The World

Refugees; Europe's heart on trial

Anyone who thinks that the arrival of refugees mainly from Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East is a temporary situation is mistaken. People will continue to flee Syria as long as the war continues. How should European countries respond? Are we providing the right humanitarian response?

Miguel Pérez Pichel-April 13, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

Nothing seems to indicate that the war in Syria is going to end soon. Even a possible pact between Al-Assad and the Syrian opposition will not mean the end of the war, as it would still be necessary to defeat DaeshThe situation will remain highly unstable even if the war ends and Daesh is eradicated. The situation will remain highly unstable even if the war ends and Daesh is eradicated. Syria and Iraq have great difficulty in regaining control over their territory. Rebuilding their administrative structures will require a long process of reconciliation and an economic rescue to bring stability to the country. As long as there is no peace in Syria and the country is not rebuilt, hundreds of thousands of refugees will continue to arrive in Europe.

Refugees

Europe has a vast frontier bordering some of the world's poorest regions, dictatorships and countries at war. At the same time, the territory of the European Union enjoys levels of welfare and freedom that are the envy of millions of people in Africa and the Middle East. Given this reality, what is surprising is that European politicians are surprised by the arrival of millions of refugees from Syria (located a few hours by plane from any European capital) and that after five years of war in the Middle East they have not foreseen a migratory process.

But to understand the magnitude of the challenge facing Europe, it is necessary to take into account a fact of Eurostat (the European Statistical Office): Syrians account for only 31 % of asylum seekers in the European Union since 2014. The rest are refugees from Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan..., or from African countries such as Eritrea, Somalia, Nigeria and many others. In total 1,500,000 asylum seekers. If we add to them all those who have entered without registering at the borders, we have more than two million people who have entered Europe fleeing war, persecution and misery in 2014 and 2015.

In 2015, more than one million migrants (mostly refugees) reached the Greek and Italian coasts by crossing the sea in precarious rubber dinghies, as indicated by Frontex (the European agency in charge of external border management). Of that million, more than 870,000 have used the eastern Mediterranean route. The majority are Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans. The distance between the Turkish coast and the Greek island of Lesbos is ten kilometers. This distance is short, but the fragile boats crowded with people (each boat carries between 40 and 60 migrants) are not always able to withstand the crossing and end up shipwrecked. We all remember the images of drowned refugees on the beaches of Turkey. 

Migrants and refugees pay large sums of money to mafias in exchange for transportation, directions on how to apply for asylum and documentation. The average cost of a passage for a family in a rubber dinghy that may sink is €10,000. The Turkish-Greek and Turkish-Bulgarian land border is another access point to the European Union.

Schengen Area

The massive influx of refugees has overwhelmed national authorities. Some countries have decided to partially suspend the Schengen agreement (adopted in 1985 and which made it possible to create a European area without borders). This suspension has left hundreds of thousands of refugees stranded in the border areas of Macedonia, Croatia, Austria and Hungary, living in the open.

The lack of coordination between European states led to chaos. At first, European governments were inclined to help the refugees. German Chancellor Angela Merkel refused to limit the number of asylum seekers on German territory. The final destination of asylum seekers is mainly Germany. In September 2015, the European Union adopted an agreement allowing the reception of 120,000 refugees spread across different countries. However, that agreement still remains unfulfilled and refugees are still living in refugee camps in Greece, or in sports centers and reception centers in Germany, Austria, Denmark and other countries.

Agreement with Turkey

The pressure of a part of public opinion, which is fearful of the arrival of refugees, and the conviction that the exodus will not stop in the short term, has led the governments of the European Union to seek an agreement with Turkey to act as a "buffer state". Angela Merkel defended the negotiation with the argument that Europe could not act unilaterally. "If we fail to reach an agreement with Turkey, Greece will not be able to bear the burden for long."he said.

The agreement reached between the European Union and Turkey in March means that, from now on, refugees will have to apply for asylum in Europe from Turkish territory. Those who arrive on European soil without having done so will be returned to Turkish territory. This measure will not affect refugees who were already in Europe before the agreement. In exchange, Turkey has obtained a commitment from the European Union that its entry into the Union will be promoted and that the process for Turkish citizens to gain access to the Schengen area without the need for a visa will be accelerated. European countries will also give Turkey 6 billion euros in aid to help it deal with refugees.

The aim is to make the option of crossing the Mediterranean by dinghy less attractive and to encourage migrants to arrive in Europe with their status already regularized. The big question is whether this agreement respects European legislation on the right to asylum. The directive 2013/32/EU states that "a Member State may extradite an applicant to a third country [...] only if the competent authorities are satisfied that an extradition decision will not result in a direct or indirect refoulement in violation of that Member State's international and Union obligations." (Article 9, paragraph 3).

Article 33(1) of the Geneva Convention establishes that "no Contracting State shall expel or return a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion"..

Reactions

Catholic social organizations in Spain (Caritas, CONFER, Social Sector of the Society of Jesus, Justice and Peace, Manos Unidas...), as well as those in other countries, have expressed "its dismay and its most absolute rejection". to the agreement between the European Union and Turkey. For these organizations, the agreement means "a serious setback for human rights".. In an official statement, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), has not rejected the agreement, but has warned that when it is implemented, it will have to be implemented by the end of the year. "respecting international and European legislation". The President of the European Council, Donald Tusk, expressed himself along the same lines: "The most important thing, and it is something we will not compromise on, is the absolute necessity to respect both our European Law and International Law. It is indispensable, otherwise Europe can no longer be Europe.". In this regard, many voices have warned that the expulsion of refugees violates the founding spirit of the European Union.

In his homily during the Palm Sunday Mass in St. Peter's Square in Rome, Pope Francis referred to the situation of refugees. "I think now of so many people, so many immigrants, so many fugitives, so many refugees, those of whom many do not want to take responsibility for their fate."said the Holy Father, after affirming that Jesus suffered "indifference, because no one wanted to take responsibility for their destiny.".

Solution

The agreement with Turkey may alleviate some of the migratory pressure on the southeast of the European Union, but it will by no means solve the problem. As the Balkan route closes, other routes may open up in the coming months.

The solution lies in putting an end to the wars in neighboring states (especially in Syria), in stopping the action of jihadist groups such as Daesh or Al Qaeda, and in developing a plan for the development of neighboring countries. The European Union, undermined by the particular interests of its member states, does not seem to have the capacity to achieve these objectives. So far, the European reaction to the challenges of migration and jihadism has been slow, uncoordinated and ineffective. The challenge now is to guarantee the human rights of asylum seekers arriving on EU territory.

The authorMiguel Pérez Pichel

Initiatives

Hospital Easter 2016. Brothers of St. John of God

Under the slogan "Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy."During Holy Week, 28 young people and 6 children from Bilbao, Seville, Jerez, Barcelona, Madrid, Zaragoza and Segovia participated in the Hospital Easter organized year after year by the Brothers of St. John of God.

Luis Marzo Calvo-April 13, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

The meeting allowed young people to experience and celebrate God's mercy through the people who suffer the most or are going through a moment of vulnerability in their lives. This edition was held at the Fundación Instituto San José in Madrid from March 23 to 27.

Eva is one of the participants of this meeting and it is the first time she participates in this proposal of prayer and service under the umbrella of St. John of God. "I signed up to participate in the Hospital Easter because I wanted to experience Holy Week in a more intense way and it caught my attention to be able to experience it in a hospital context. I had never thought about living Easter surrounded by the sick and I was curious. I think that living Easter with people who are suffering has given me the chance to rediscover the very human face of God. I have been able to contemplate these days how God was present in the small details that I have been able to perceive during the moments that I have been with some of the sick who are cared for in this center, as well as in the moments of celebration lived with them. I would like to keep many glances, small details that I have been able to contemplate during the times with the sick, and with the testimonies that I heard during Good Friday at the table of experiences where a worker of the center, a sick person who is currently in the center, a volunteer and a brother shared their testimony of mercy, and through which I could discover how faith is capable of sustaining and giving full meaning to people who are going through an illness. I took away with me a great experience of mercy, which gives me a new way of being and of living my faith, more incarnate and hospitable".

Close to those who suffer

The Hospitaller Easter is a proposal that the Brothers of St. John of God have been offering for more than 20 years to young people so that they can live and celebrate the Paschal Mystery, the center of the life of every Christian, together with other young people and from an experience of prayer, service and encounter. For us, the Brothers of St. John of God, opening our centers and communities to welcome young people who want to live these days of Holy Week is also an opportunity to live the faith with them and it deeply enriches us to be able to share and celebrate together the days of the Easter Triduum. We would like that the young people at the end of these days could take with them an experience of a Samaritan Church and close to the suffering people. In recent years we have also opened the experience of the Hospitaller Easter to families and we have seen the great richness of being able to share the faith with each one from the concrete reality they are living.

Hospital Fundacion San Jose in Madrid.

This year, the Hospitality Easter was celebrated in the San José Institute Foundation of Madrid, a social-health center of the Brothers of St. John of God whose mission is to provide comprehensive care to people with complex clinical processes in subacute and chronic phases, with a high level of dependency, on an inpatient, outpatient and home care basis. "Making young people participants in all the Mystery that is hidden behind people who are going through a process of illness helps to live life with greater depth and greater meaning. We are fortunate to be immersed daily in this Mystery that lies behind each person who is suffering a process of illness. That is why when young people come to live an experience of service we try that they can also experience it. We belong to the great family of the Brothers of St. John of God whose charism is Hospitality, so we try to welcome people in the best possible way. 

The presence of young people gives us a lot of joy and for the patients it is an enrichment. Some of the patients who are admitted to our center do not have families, so we consider this type of activity to be very important because it gives us the opportunity to be with them for a while. They really appreciate the fact that there are young people who, instead of going on vacation, come to this center to participate in the Hospital Easter".says Ana, a collaborator of the San José Institute Foundation of Madrid.

Activities

For Silvia, this was the third time she joined the St. John of God Youth group with her husband and daughter to participate in the Hospitaller Easter. "I have felt at home and have been able to experience God's mercy in the encounter with the sick. I have been able to love without conditions and without calculation. I have been able to share these days of Holy Week with my family and with the great Hospitaller family with which I feel very united. Every Easter that I have had the good fortune to participate so far has been different and has helped me to recharge my batteries and to try to reread my life from the faith. I am very happy to be able to share and celebrate my faith with such diverse and pluralistic people. From this year I would like to highlight the Holy Thursday celebration we had with the sick and especially the gesture of the washing of the feet. In this simple gesture I was able to relive the experience of Jesus and the importance of abasement and of being at the service of the people who need it most"..

The meeting began on Wednesday the 23rd with a promising starting point, an evening prayer in which the young people were invited to listen to the call to happiness launched in the Gospel. Until Sunday, with the Eucharist of the Resurrection, multiple activities took place: moments of encounter with the sick in the different units of the center, tables of living experiences, reflective dynamics, prayer vigils, etc. One of the highlights, both for the participants and for the patients of the center, was the Eucharist of the Resurrection. San José Institute FoundationThe event, which took place on Friday morning, was the Way of the Cross of Mercy. We had the opportunity to accompany Jesus on the road to Calvary, keeping in mind the many men and women who today continue to carry the cross of hunger, hatred, violence, marginalization, sickness and loneliness.

"In these days so crucial for the life of the followers of Jesus, we tried to get the young people to discover and celebrate God's merciful love in the midst of a world of sickness."adds Brother Luis, one of the organizers of the Hospitaller Easter. It has been a healing experience for all of us that encourages us to live our faith from the experience of the Risen One. May we be able to bring to life the motto that has accompanied us during these days of Easter. ("Blessed are the Merciful") wherever we are.

San Juan de Dios Youth

San Juan de Dios Youth is formed by a small group of young people and brothers of St. John of God who try to offer to other young people who so desire the opportunity to come into contact with the charism of Hospitality. At the same time, we are responsible for promoting and disseminating values and attitudes that foster awareness and commitment to the world of health and marginalization. For this, we offer during the year some spaces and times for commitment, service and reflection from the faith and Hospitality. More information about the Hospitaller Easter and about us can be found at:

www.facebook.com/groups/jovenessanjuandedios
www.jovenessanjuandedios.org

The authorLuis Marzo Calvo

Brother of St. John of God

An opportunity to repair and inform

Spotlight rekindled the debate on clerical abuse and the Church's response, stressing the importance of information and dialogue.

April 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

On February 11, the film was released in Argentina. Spotlight and the movie theaters were flooded with painful silence. Although showing the evil we failed to prevent hurts the heart, it also provides an opportunity to repair and inform. The final plate, which shows cities where complaints have been registered, includes several Argentine ones. The Profile Newspaper He recalled five cases with final convictions: Sasso, Rossi, IlarazPardo and Grassi.

A few days later, Spotlight won the Oscar for Best Picture and producer Michael Sugar questioned the Pope when thanking him for the award: "It's time to protect children and restore faith.". The situation was strange because he referred to the subject as if he was notifying the Pontiff for the first time.

How can this be explained? Perhaps because the social criticism that had its climax in 2010 had been giving way before the sequence of good measures taken by the Church and the appearance of cases referring to various spheres of society, whose most recent chapter affects the UN. This revealed the existence of a problem of all and not only of Catholics. And when problems belong to everyone, it is more difficult to recognize and confront them.

It is a fact that the reaction to violence in private spheres continues to be lukewarm. To give just one piece of information, the Observatory of Gender Violence of the Province of Buenos Aires registered 18,619 complaints of domestic violence in January of this year. A disturbing question then arises: are we being accomplices of all this hidden social violence, perhaps because we do not want to see it?

Returning to the point, the issue of clerical abuse had been shelved as a story and each new case could be interpreted in the framework of the "zero tolerance" policy that he initiated John Paul IIThe film, promoted by Benedict XVI and consolidated by Francis. But the film and its spin-offs brought the issue back into the public conversation and the responsibility of the Church was again questioned.

It thus offers the opportunity to share anew a narrative that explains the crisis, its causes and the forceful response that has placed the Church at the forefront of prevention and care for victims. It is striking that many Catholics still lack that work of synthesis - the fruit of study, reflection and exchange of opinions - which is fundamental in a world of unstable consensus, partial data and permanent claims. To contribute to social dialogue, formation is not enough: it is necessary to be informed and to communicate with quality.

The authorOmnes

Latin America

Conscientious objection recognized in Uruguay

The Uruguayan courts set a precedent by overturning the law that restricted the right of doctors to conscientious objection to abortion.

Agustin Sapriza-April 13, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

The Administrative Court of Appeals (TCA) of Uruguay has issued a historic ruling for the rule of law. It has established guidelines and concepts that guarantee the free exercise of conscientious objection by health professionals. In this way, the right to conscientious objection, implicitly established in the Uruguayan Constitution, is protected. This right is expressly included, although under very special conditions, in the text of the law that currently allows the decriminalization of abortion. In Uruguay, for years the governing party (Broad Front) is trying to pass a law decriminalizing abortion. During his previous presidency (from March 1, 2005 to March 1, 2010), the current president of Uruguay, Tabaré Vázquez (re-elected on March 1, 2015), vetoed a law that had been passed by parliament, based on the scientific reality that from conception there is an human life.

Finally, in 2012, during the presidency of José Mújica, the new law in force was approved. This law presents as an exception the possibility of not penalizing the performance of an abortion. This is clearly stated in Article 2 of the law: "Voluntary termination of pregnancy shall not be penalized and consequently Articles 325 and 325bis of the Penal Code shall not be applicable, in the event that the woman complies with the requirements set forth in the following articles and it is performed during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy." 

Therefore, it is currently possible to perform abortions without being penalized only when performed in accordance with the procedure and guarantees expressly provided by law and within the first twelve weeks of pregnancy.

In addition, the right of the physician to exercise conscientious objection was expressly included in Article 11 of the law. Therefore, there is no negative consequence for the conscientious objector physician to exercise a right that the law itself guarantees him/her.

One month after the enactment of the law, the Ministry of Public Health issued the decree regulating it. This decree contradicted in many aspects the particularities of the law. At its core, it illegitimately limited and restricted the right to conscientious objection on the part of physicians who did not wish to participate in the abortion procedure.

A group of physicians, who felt that the aforementioned decree violated the doctor-patient relationship and their fundamental rights to practice their profession while respecting their conscience, initiated a lawsuit to assert their rights.

Thus, in August 2015, the ATT put an end to a situation of manifest illegality and lack of certainty generated by the Ministry of Public Health in the past government period. The ATT ruling established guidelines and concepts that guarantee the free exercise of conscientious objection for health professionals as provided for in the Constitution and the law.

This is a historic resolution because, in addition to confirming the protection of freedom of conscience, it approves the existence of mechanisms for adjusting through the courts the excesses of the Executive Branch in the face of a law approved by Parliament.

The discordance between the Ministry of Public Health and the approved law regarding the scope of conscientious objection was evident. Therefore, the Ministry wanted to change the text of the law by regulatory means, incurring in a manifest illegality that led the TCA to repeal the law with general and absolute effects. In other words, it erased the contested articles from the legal system from its very inception, thus affecting not only the plaintiff physicians, but all physicians.

The judgment recognizes that the right to conscientious objection derives from the fundamental rights of the individual, both in relation to the right to freedom of conscience and the right to human dignity. The judges upheld the main points of the lawsuit.

However, during the whole period that it took for the Court's decision supporting the position of the objecting physicians to arrive, there was a lot of pressure from some authorities of the Ministry of Public Health. Physicians were labeled as false objectors or as not fulfilling their duties in the health system. Attempts were also made to give a restrictive view of the right to conscientious objection, opposing it to the supposed right of women to have an abortion. It has had such a wide repercussion in the media that in several of the country's departments and cities all the gynecologists practicing there are now conscientious objectors. Therefore, abortions cannot be performed in these places, unless the authorities send doctors willing to perform them.

In times when society wants to approve at all costs the supposed rights of some social groups, the legal system supports those who in conscience think otherwise and see their freedom violated, and taking the strength of true rights, they show that no one can demand that they renounce the inner light of their conscience.

Latin America

Bishop Juan Carlos Bravo: "I want priests with spiritual and human qualities who love the people".

Bishop Juan Carlos Bravo reviews his career as a priest and bishop, and talks about the challenges facing the Church in Venezuela. We met with him after the 105th Annual Plenary Assembly of the Episcopal Conference of Venezuela to talk about the Pastoral Exhortation "The Church in Venezuela". Assuming the reality of the homeland and its implications for Venezuelan society.

Marcos Pantin-April 13, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

The Pastoral Exhortation "Assume the reality of the Homeland".published following the 105th Annual Plenary Assembly of the Episcopal Conference of Venezuela from January 7 to 12, is a call for peace and forgiveness. In it, the bishops call for "to work for dialogue, reconciliation and peace. We invite all our institutions to implement, with creativity and courage, gestures and actions that make us live and taste with joy and sacrifice, the fruits of solidarity and fraternity: greater attention to the poor, to the sick, to raise with creativity initiatives for peace and to fill the gaps in the face of shortages of food and medicine, such as 'solidarity pots' or any other form of attention to the needs of the community.". After the meeting we were able to talk with Bishop Juan Carlos Bravo, Bishop of Acarigua-Araure.

Monsignor, at 48 years of age, you are one of the youngest bishops in the country.

-Look, I did not want to be a bishop. The nuncio called me and I flatly refused. He was surprised by the determination of my answer. He sent me to pray and think. He called me again and I refused again. I told him that never in my life have I ever wanted, sought or desired to be a bishop. He replied that Pope Francis is looking for bishops who neither want, nor seek, nor desire to be bishops. I insisted that I am a peasant, from the neighborhood and I am not good for that. He answered me: Pope Francis is looking for bishops who have the smell of sheep. In the end I accepted out of obedience. Behind it was the will of God.

What was your formation and first pastoral assignments like?

-I entered the seminary with the Diocesan Operators. I studied philosophy in Caracas and theology in Minneapolis (USA). I studied at the Tantur Ecumenical Institute in Jerusalem during the Gulf War. It was a unique experience that strengthened me in my choice of life and in my personal following of Jesus Christ.

I was ordained in Ciudad Guayana in 1992 and worked ten years in the Curia. I went to Mexico for four summers to study Pastoral Ministry. Tired of the organizational work I asked to go to a remote village, where nobody wanted to go. I ended up in Guasipati in the far east of the country. I stayed there for twelve years until my episcopal appointment.

He has also been the pastor of a remote village for twelve years....

-It was the most important experience of my life. There were more than 40,000 souls scattered over 8,500 square kilometers. They had not had a priest for fifty years. At the beginning I took the motorcycle and went everywhere: markets and hamlets, farming fields, getting to know the people, visiting the sick. That helped me to reach all the sectors and organize parish life.

More than organizing the ecclesial structure, the essential thing was the deep relationship with the people. I began to love them very much. I used some "different" initiatives to enter into their lives. I was an elementary school teacher in a very dangerous neighborhood where no one wanted to work. I had the time but, above all, I wanted to show that in order to transform society and people, we had to start from childhood.

I dedicated many hours to the peasants and the poor villages. I worked with them. So we were able to promote them and bring them into the sacramental life, into the life of the church. I had assumed that I would stay there forever. And the people felt that I belonged to them. So when I was asked to become a bishop, I was the first to be surprised. Some in the town considered it a betrayal. It hurts a lot. It is a very strong resignation. I came to Acarigua to exercise my ministry with the same affection, the same intensity and the same love that I put in Guasipati. The same day of the inauguration I went to lend a hand in a neighborhood that had been flooded.

Can it be said that community spirituality is the driving force of pastoral action?

-But for me the most important thing is where we want to go. The great challenge is to make the Church the home and school of ecclesial communion.

The Pope invites "to feel the brother of faith in the profound unity of the Mystical Body and, therefore, as 'one who belongs to me', to know how to share his joys and sufferings, to intuit his desires and attend to his needs, to offer him a true and deep friendship.". Without this disposition, the structures and everything we do will be meaningless and will end up empty. Therefore, our option must be personal holiness and the proclamation of the Kingdom.

If our personal relationship with God is deep, constant, and we discover God in our brothers, community action will not be empty, soulless. We are trying to promote in the whole diocese the spirituality of communion: including priests, religious, evangelizing agents and everyone.

Pope Francis encourages us in the same direction when he says that we should not proclaim ourselves but proclaim Jesus Christ. This spirituality must start from the word of God and from a personal encounter with Jesus Christ.

What about priests and seminarians?

-For me, the spiritual and human quality of the priest is fundamental. I want priests who love people. Our raison d'être is service, but sometimes we are not up to the task. We have a project to inspire in the seminarians this spirit of communion. We want them to have spiritual accompaniment, help in their discernment, to form a clear option for Jesus, for holiness, for the Gospel and to be formed inserted in the reality of parish life.

I also want priests to be prepared, to be trained, when they are inserted in a parish for at least three years. Once they organize it, and dare I say, they are able to leave the parish organized in such a way that it can function without a pastor for at least two years, then they deserve to go and study. And when they return they should come to serve the poorest. Because if what we study does not serve us to serve the poor, it does not serve us at all.

Luis, a student of Social Communication, is taking pictures. He follows the interview carefully and asks Bishop Bravo:

How can we young people, who do not have an ecclesiastical title, bring our friends closer to God and the Church?

-This is precisely the point: for me the most important thing is not to be a bishop or a priest. For me, the most important thing is that I am baptized, and that is what makes me a Christian. To the extent that we rely on our Christian condition, we can be heralds of Jesus. Sometimes we think we are "somebody" in the Church when we achieve a status.

Latin America is a mostly young continent, and we must approach them through their own media, particularly social networks.

For his part, Francis knows how to engage with young people and speaks to them in their language. "I want mess". We have to develop a youth pastoral done by the young people themselves: protagonists of their own evangelizing action. Young people have an immense faith and a great hunger for God.

What have been the moments when God has been closest to you?

-I try daily to discover where God has passed through my life today. There are two prayers that help me a lot. Charles de Foucault's: "Lord, here I am. For all that you make of me I thank you.".

And the other prayer is by John XXIII: "Lord, this is your Church, it is in your hands, I am tired, I am going to sleep.".

Sometimes I am asked if this or that issue keeps me awake at night. I don't want problems to keep me from sleeping and I say: "Lord, this is your Church, it is in your hands, I am tired...". With my words I tell you: "That's your problem and let's see what you do to fix it.". I believe that God understands this language. I am also often amazed at the impact our ordinary behavior has on people. It is when God reminds me: in the midst of your miseries you are an instrument to do great things in God.

The authorMarcos Pantin

Caracas

Vocations

Mercy and Mother Teresa

On September 4 of the Jubilee Year of Mercy, Mother Teresa of Calcutta will be canonized. Born in Albania with the name Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, her life is linked to India, where she was an example of mercy and founded the Congregation of the Missionaries of Charity.

Brian Kolodiejchuk-April 4, 2016-Reading time: 8 minutes

I would like to share some reflections (though not all that could be said) on how Mother Teresa understood and lived the mercy of the Lord in her life and work. The apostolic works of the Missionaries of Charity family are precisely the corporal and spiritual works of mercy.

Pope Francis says that the etymological meaning of the Latin word mercy is "miseris cor dareto give his heart to the poor, to those who are in need, to those who suffer. This is what Jesus did: he opened wide his heart to the misery of mankind"..

Note that mercy involves both the inner and the outer: the heart and then show the mercy of the heart in action, or as to the Mother Teresa liked to say, to show "love in live action"..

At Misericordiae Vultus (the official document establishing the Jubilee of Mercy), Pope Francis said that mercy is "the fundamental law that dwells in the heart of each person, when he looks with sincere eyes at the brother he meets on the path of life".. The Pope goes on to say that his desire is to "may the years to come be impregnated with mercy so that we can go out to meet each person, bringing the goodness and tenderness of God".. This implies that our attitude should not be one of "top down". That we do not feel superior to those we serve, but rather that we consider ourselves part of the poor, identified with them, at their level.

Pope emeritus Benedict reminds us of this in his encyclical letter Deus Caritas Est, 34: "Practical action is insufficient if in it one cannot perceive love for man, a love that is nourished in the encounter with Christ. Intimate personal participation in the needs and sufferings of the other thus becomes a giving of myself: so that the gift does not humiliate the other, I must not only give him something of myself, but also myself; I must be part of the gift as a person.".

A wonderful example of this

"Your heart." (Mother Teresa's), said the Sister Nirmalathe immediate successor of Mother Teresa, "was great as the heart of God Himself, full of love, affection, compassion and mercy. Rich and poor, young and old, strong and weak, wise and ignorant, saints and sinners of all nations, cultures and religions found a loving welcome in her heart, because in each of them, Mother Teresa saw the face of her beloved Jesus.".

Like Mother Teresa, before showing mercy to others we must recognize our own misery and our need for mercy. The last book of the Bible has these words: "For you say, 'I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing'; and you know not that you are wretched and pitiable, and poor, and blind, and naked." (Rev. 3:17). We can call this the "Calcutta of the heart", the "Calcutta of my own heart".

Sister Nirmala tells us that "Mother was convinced of her poverty and sin, but she trusted in the tender and merciful love of Jesus. [...] Mother always felt the need for God's mercy - how merciful God is to give us all these things he has given us - and so she was grateful to God.". Mother Teresa herself said: "Jesus, who loves each of us tenderly, with mercy and compassion, works miracles of forgiveness.".

Following St. Paul, we can distinguish three stages in the recognition of our weakness and interior poverty. The first step is to recognize our weakness, poverty, vulnerability and brokenness. Secondly, that we may accept our weakness. Finally, that we may even come to glory in it.

As we mature spiritually, we gradually acquire total distrust in ourselves and gain absolute trust in God. As Father Jean-Pierre de Caussade tells us, "this complete distrust of ourselves and trust in God, leads us to that 'inner humility' which is the permanent foundation of the spiritual edifice, and the main source of God's graces for the soul.".

Mother Teresa's extraordinary humility was demonstrated in her ready attitude to forgive and forget. This was a reflection of the mercy and forgiveness of the Master who "he has not come to call the righteous but sinners." (Mt 9:13).

Mother Teresa had a very profound and practical teaching on forgiveness and forgetting: "We need a lot of love to forgive and we need a lot of humility to forget, because forgiveness is not complete unless we also forget. [...] And as long as we do not forget, we have not really forgiven completely. And this is the most beautiful part of God's mercy. He not only forgives but he also forgets, and he never brings the subject up again, just like the father (in the parable) who never reproached the son. He did not even say to him: forget your sins, forget the evil you have done... And the Father himself ran away with joy. These are living and wonderful examples that we should share.".

Mother Teresa herself put this teaching into practice. One of her acquaintances had done something very wrong and was having difficulty facing his guilt and shame. So he told Mother Teresa the whole story. This person related: "Mother first asked if anyone knew about this and I told her only the priest who had heard my confession. Mother looked at me with so much love and so much tenderness in her eyes... She said, 'Jesus forgives you and Mother forgives you. Jesus loves you and Mother loves you. Jesus only wanted to show you your poverty. Now, when someone comes to you with the same thing, you will have compassion for that person'. I asked Mother Teresa not to tell anyone, and she tenderly promised not to. She never asked me: why did you do that, how could you do that? Nor did she say: Aren't you ashamed? You caused a big scandal. She didn't even say to me: don't do it again.".

As we know, in the Sacrament of Confession we encounter God's mercy directly and personally.

Mother Teresa approached the sacrament of Reconciliation faithfully and regularly, even during her frequent travels. "Even while traveling from house to house, Mother remained faithful to her weekly confession and preferred to do so with the ordinary confessor of each community where she was going to be."explains Sister Nirmala. For Mother Teresa, confession was not a habit or routine, but each time it was a new encounter with God's mercy and love. She understood very well the importance of confession.

On one occasion he said: "The devil hates God. And that hatred in action is destroying us, making us sin, making us participate in that evil, so that we too share in that hatred and (this one) separate us from God. But that's where God's wonderful mercy comes in. You just have to back up and say I'm sorry. That's the beautiful gift of confession. We go to confession as a sinner with sin and we come out of confession as a sinless sinner. That's the tremendous, tremendous mercy of God. Always forgiving. Not only forgiving, but loving..., gently, lovingly, lovingly, patiently. And this is what the devil hates in God, the tenderness and love of God for the sinner.".

Humble works

Turning now to our way of demonstrating mercy in action, Mother Teresa wanted the material and spiritual works of mercy to be carried out as "humble works".. She did not want to do "big things"but "humble works". with great love.

Someone once asked Mother Teresa a question: "When you say poverty, most people think of material poverty.". Mother Teresa responded: "This is why we speak of the unwanted, the unloved, the neglected, the forgotten, the lonely... This is a much greater poverty, because material poverty can always be satisfied with material things. If we pick up a man hungry for bread, we give him bread and we have satisfied his hunger. But if we meet a man who is terribly lonely, rejected, discarded by society..., material assistance will not help him. For to eliminate that loneliness, to eliminate that terrible pain, he needs prayer, he needs sacrifice, he needs tenderness and love. And that is very often more difficult to give than material things. That is the reason why there is hunger not only for bread, but there is also hunger for love. Nakedness is not just the lack of a piece of clothing; there is nakedness because of the loss of human dignity. And homelessness is not just not having a house to sleep in, it is being homeless, being rejected, unwanted, an outcast from society.".

The interviewer continued: "We've seen you and the Sisters doing for the children these very small things and with such tenderness; just in the way you treat them. And it was very inspiring, could you talk about that?". Mother Teresa responded: "It is not how much we do, or how big things are, but how much love we put into what we do. Because we are human beings, the action seems very small to us, but once it has been given to God, God is infinite and that small action rises, it becomes an infinite action. Because God is infinite, there is no measure for God, just as there is no time for God. God isGod can never become was. Likewise, God's love is infinite, full of tenderness, full of mercy, full of forgiveness, full of kindness, full of consideration. It is enough to meditate on the things that God thinks in advance for us, being so amazing how He, who has the whole world, heaven and earth to think about and yet is so particular about the simple, little things that can bring joy to someone. He inspires one person to give that joy to another person, to someone in need.

That is God's action in the world, God's love in action. And today God loves the world through us. Just as He sent Jesus to show the world how much He loved it. And today Christ is using us, us, you. He wants to try to show the world that He is, and that He loves the world, and that we are precious to Him. As Isaiah said, 'you are precious to Him, I have called you by name; you are mine. The water will not drown you. The fire will not burn you. I will forsake the nations for you; you are precious to me; I love you.' And that tenderness of God's love, and His compassion and mercy and forgiveness, are so beautifully expressed when He said that 'even if a mother can forget her child, I will not forget you. I have carved you in the palm of my hand'. Just think that every time that you, that we, call out to God, there we are in his palm and he looks at us, so closely, with such tenderness, with such love. This is prayer..

Mother Teresa, throughout her life, had her critics. They were individuals or groups who tried to oppose her mission or her plans for various reasons. She never considered any of them her enemy, nor was she ever offended. Her desire to be one with Jesus offers us a key to understanding her own attitude toward people who, as far as her actions were concerned, could easily qualify as potential "enemies" in the way she viewed them. In a meditation she wrote for her sisters, Mother Teresa explains: "See the compassion of Christ toward Judas. The man who received so much love, yet betrayed his own Master, the Master who kept the 'Sacred Silence' and would not betray him to his companions. Jesus could have easily spoken out in public, as some of you do, and told others the hidden intentions and deeds of Judas. But he did not. Mnd rather showHe showed mercy and charity; and instead of condemning him, he called him 'friend'. And if Judas had looked into the eyes of Jesus as Peter did, today Judas would be the fruit of God's mercy. Jesus always had compassion"..

As great as Mother Teresa's faith was, she was always aware that it was God's grace at work in her life. She considered it a grace of God to be able to accept grace and she recognized God's action in her life. She said: "I must know what God has done for me. His great love for me is what keeps me here. Not my mmerit. The answer must be the conviction: it is the mercy and grace of God"..

I end with a reflection by Eileen Egan, a very close friend of Mother Teresa since the 1960s: "Mother Teresa took Jesus at His word and accepted Him with unconditional love in those with whom He chose to identify Himself. With the hungry, with the homeless, with the suffering. She wrapped them in mercy. Mercy, after all, is just love in the guise of need, the love that goes out to meet the needs of the loved one. Could it not powerfully change life in our times for the better if millions of His followers took Jesus at His word?".

The authorBrian Kolodiejchuk

Newsroom

The logic of forgiveness

While the mercy of God is infinite, evil always has a limit: and this is precisely the mercy of God. An article on the human logic of forgiveness, and on the divine logic of the Sacrament of Penance.

Joan Costa-April 4, 2016-Reading time: 8 minutes

Pope Francis, in the bull Misericordiae Vultus n. 9, comment: "Forgiveness of offenses becomes the most evident expression of merciful love and for us Christians it is an imperative that we cannot do without. [Forgiveness is a force that revives us to a new life and gives us the courage to look to the future with hope.. Forgiveness is, therefore, an eminent expression of the works of Mercy, something like the heart of Mercy.

When I ask people what they are looking for when they approach the sacrament of confession, the answers are usually along the following lines: to start over, to take a weight off my shoulders, to regain peace of conscience, to find peace, to seek strength and consolation, to receive good advice... I would now like to give an example related to the university world, a time when young people are very much in love and male/female relationships are very intense. Well, let's imagine that there is a girl who takes very good notes; on seeing this, a boy befriends the girl in order to get those notes. However, there is someone who tries to ask for the notes in order to attract the girl's attention and make friends with her, so that she will notice him. These are two very different positions, and it seems obvious to me which one would please the girl more, at least from the point of view of female self-esteem.

When in confession we seek strength, peace of mind, advice..., then what we are looking for are "notes". But Jesus, in confession, tells us: you ask me for notes, but I give you something much more valuable: myself, to live in your heart and let you live in mine. It is God whom we should seek when we go to confession.

Confession is not a mere laundry either. This happens when we go to render an account, to have our stains removed without a true conversion of heart, because we do not understand sin as a lack of love and confession as an act of love.

Know how to love. Primerear

The dynamics of love has, among others, two dimensions: the other and the good of the other. True love needs both. Whoever seeks and desires only the other person, but does not at the same time seek the other's good, would be pure selfishness; and conversely, if he were willing to seek his good but did not desire his closeness, such dedication would become a humiliation.

A graphic way of defining love would be the mutual belonging of one in the other. That is to say: you are my life, and therefore, if I do not have you in my heart I lack something, I cannot be fully me, and I cannot be happy. On Evangelii Gaudium (n. 24) there are some words that form a sequence to understand the different demands of love: "primerear, get involved, accompany, fructify and celebrate".. They are a very accurate way to describe love.

Who should begin to forgive: the victim or the aggressor? In the practice of our behavior we often find that if the one who has offended us comes to ask for forgiveness, then we would be willing to forgive him, but self-love prevents us from starting the path of reconciliation. However, what happens is that if we are not able to take the initiative, this means that we do not care about the other person. Here it is appropriate to bring up that word that Pope Francis often mentions: "primerear"to take the initiative. If I am not willing to take the initiative, it means that what you offer me does not interest me; in short, I am not interested in you, and I have stopped loving. Whoever is not capable of taking the initiative in forgiveness, does not love. Forgiveness, on the other hand, follows the logic that "having you in my heart is valuable to me"; and the one who loves the most, the one who has the biggest heart, must begin to ask for forgiveness.

Recognition

When the other person comes to ask for forgiveness from the heart, you realize that what he or she is saying is: what you offer me-your friendship, your affection, your closeness-is valuable to me, a gift and a source of joy. In this sense, asking for forgiveness is a way of valuing the other.

Not being able to primerear to reconcile with the other manifests a humiliating indifference. Ask for sorryOn the contrary, it is one of the most beautiful ways to show the one we have offended that we need him, that we want to keep him close to us, that he is dear to us. Asking for forgiveness is the recognition of the other as valuable.

Forgiveness also includes the recognition of the offender. When the offender comes to ask for forgiveness, the offended one, in welcoming this initiative, in fact shows his true love: that you come is also a gift for me. When you were far away I also suffered; I longed to have you in my heart, thank you for coming. Welcoming forgiveness is, therefore, the most beautiful way to exalt the other. Forgiveness becomes the act by which we restore the other's dignity in our eyes. Your dignity is to live in my heart. This is what the Lord tells us whenever he forgives us. Forgiveness (being forgiven) always exalts, never humiliates either one or the other. In forgiveness, as in love, no one loses and everyone wins. Let us remember the parables of the merciful father, of the lost sheep.

Acknowledging guilt

The recognition of guilt is necessary to be forgiven. Forgiveness requires for the "purification of the memory" that the guilt is recognized and the request for forgiveness is made explicit, otherwise the situation will not be fixed. To ask for forgiveness it is not strictly necessary to verbally manifest the guilt, but it is necessary to clearly show repentance. Those who suffer from excessive self-love find it difficult to ask for forgiveness explicitly, often using non-verbal language, which is sufficient for those who know them.

In the face of the forgiveness offered, the recognition of guilt makes it possible for it to disappear immediately. For this reason, it is necessary that we never justify a fault, however small it may be, for this prevents it from being overcome, and it will remain latent. By recognizing it, forgiveness will also reach its fullness; the evil will be destroyed, and nothing will remain of it. Sin, evil, distances hearts, but once we have forgiven each other, there is nothing to distance us from each other: forgiveness is the most powerful force in history in the fight against evil.

I remember a man who was dying. He asked a priest he knew to mediate with his son because they had not spoken to each other for more than thirty years. They made the necessary arrangements and the son agreed to visit his sick father. When they entered the hospital room, the father stood up, hugged him, and they both began to cry... and there was nothing left of the evil that the two of them had caused each other over so many years. We recognize, we embrace each other and nothing remains.

He who holds a grudge in his heart has not truly forgiven. Indeed, he who does not forgive will never be truly free. God gave us the freedom to love, and the inability to forgive manifests a lack of freedom. There is no freer person than the one who is able to forgive. The human being should have a good drainage incorporated in his heart so that nothing remains of resentment, hatred, malice or bad feelings towards the other. The best way to achieve this is to look to Christ and learn to love.

Guilt and evil as an offering

The Lord, whenever we ask for forgiveness, answers us: "Your evil is a gift to me, because it serves me to show you that I love you also with all your evil; that I love you much more than you thought I did, and the evil you have committed is now, for me, the means I have to put you on record that I love you much more.".

In fact, some define mercy in light of the etymology of the words that make up the term: "You give me your misery and I offer you my heartbeat". Evil then becomes an offering, a way and a real manifestation of my love for the other.

Forgiveness, the great destroyer of evil

Human beings are made in the image of God, and He is Love. Our dignity and vocation are at stake in love. We are made to love and to be loved. We also know that through original sin the Evil One installed in the world the two most powerful destructive bombs in history: pride and selfishness; they are the denial of love, of our dignity and of our vocation. Both attitudes mean saying to the other: I don't care about you, I'm not interested in you. We go from being loved to being abused or used. These two bombs undo everything, because they have a great destructive capacity: individuals, families, peoples and nations, and the Church herself.

But at that very moment, God instituted the great neutralizer, the antivirus, against all this destructive force: forgiveness. Thanks to forgiveness, humankind has a well-founded reason for hope. All the evil of history, placed before the gaze of God who pronounces his forgiveness, is reduced to nothing, is annihilated. That is why the world always has hope. Now, before this beautiful truth of a God who forgives unconditionally, no one can despair, considering his life a failure, because every life of every person, through the mystery of the Cross of Christ, is the recipient of that "I forgive you" by which all evil is annihilated.

Evil, we can affirm, has a limit, and this is the mercy of God; while, for its part, God's mercy is infinite. God, in the words of St. Teresa, "neither tires nor gets tired"He always has the last word in history through his forgiveness.

The joy of interpersonal communion

The final point of forgiveness is the joy and happiness of knowing that I am loved by those I love. Interpersonal communion, having those we love in our hearts, feeling loved by those we love, is what makes us happy. Therefore, to have God, Love, in one's heart is the greatest gift that exists on earth and in eternity. Whoever has God, has everything. God alone is enough.

On the contrary, he who does not forgive will never be happy. Pride and selfishness make happiness on earth impossible. It is urgent to transmit a great lesson: the importance of the family and of looking at and welcoming Christ in order to teach people to love.

How many times should we forgive?

Peter must have had a huge heart when he asks if he should forgive up to seven times, a number not only large, but related to fullness. Jesus, however, reminds us that he must forgive "always," seventy times seven.

There is a double reason why we must always forgive. First, because the day I say "I no longer forgive," I am also saying that I no longer care about you, that I no longer love you, which means that I no longer recognize you as a person, whose dignity is to be loved for oneself. At the same time, when I do not forgive, we do not live according to our vocation, which is to love. Non-forgiveness implies a double injustice. Another thing is the necessary help of grace, without which we are not able to forgive.

And the second reason is that, if I say "enough, I no longer forgive you", in fact I have never really loved you, because I have only been willing to forgive you up to this limit; I have not accepted you, but what I was willing to assume from you. If I do not always forgive, I have neither truly loved you nor do I care for you from now on.

The meaning of penance

At the end of confession, we receive a penance. Does this mean that God is spiteful? What is the meaning of penance or satisfaction in forgiveness? Let us go back to an example: a child makes a mischief at school, breaking a glass door. The mother, in front of the principal, the first thing she would do would be to ask for forgiveness, even if she is not the guilty one; what happens is that she "is" in a certain way in the son and he in her. By feeling forgiven by the director, she understands that she has also forgiven the child. The same thing happens on the Cross with the Son: he personally asks for forgiveness, like the mother, because he has assumed all the sin of the world, and by God the Father offering his forgiveness, in Christ we have all been forgiven.

However, the debt for the damage is still outstanding. She assumes that she must pay and empties the billfold in the presence of her son who, moved and realizing the consequences of his action, decides to take out the few coins he has in his pocket. Should the mother accept them? Yes, for two main reasons: because if she did not do so, she would be belittling and disregarding the child's offer, and because it would be a lack of love. At the same time, by accepting, she makes him more aware of his own responsibility, and makes him more human. Those coins are penance. Analogously penance can be understood. After receiving forgiveness, what I can do for Jesus is penance. It is not the rancor of a God who passes the bill, but an act of delicate love on the part of God who values the gesture of love. In this way, God loves us by accepting our love, and he thanks us for it.

The authorJoan Costa

Faculty of Theology of Catalonia

Archive

St. Faustina Kowalska: Apostle of Divine Mercy

In the Jubilee Year of Mercy, and in preparation for WYD in Krakow, it is clear that an explicit reference, a deeper knowledge of Sister Faustina Kowalska, cannot be missing.

Ignacy Soler-April 4, 2016-Reading time: 7 minutes

In Sister Faustina Kowalska (1905-1938), the saintly apostle of the Divine MercyThe visionary - and above all the hearer - of the Merciful Christ, reveals to us the infinite treasures of God's Love. It is logical for the reader to wonder about her. Who was she? What is her biography? What does her life story tell us? Diary? Perhaps it is good to situate the figure of this saint within her mission. Faustina Kowalska, a simple woman from the great Polish countryside, belonging to the Congregation of the Sisters of the Mother of God of Mercy, was chosen to announce Divine Mercy in a renewed way.

Biography of Saint Faustina

Sister Maria Faustina was the third daughter of a poor and large peasant family from Głogowiec, a village near the city of Łódź. She was born in 1905 and her name was Helena.

It was a hot Sunday in June 1924. It was dusk in Łódź. Her sisters Gieni and Natalia invited her to a party. Helena was not very eager, but they bought her a ticket. A young man asked her to dance. She tried to evade by saying she didn't know, but at his insistence, she gave in. In the middle of the dance she froze, apologized and left the party with the excuse of a sudden headache. Later he would write in his Diary: "As the dance began, I suddenly saw Jesus on the side. He appeared as if on the Way of the Cross, in pain, without clothes, full of wounds. And as if He were a jealous young man, He asked me in pain: 'How long will I have to keep suffering for you, how long will you keep deceiving me?'".

First picture of the Divine Mercy painted from the indications of Saint Faustina.
First picture of the Divine Mercy painted from the indications of Saint Faustina.

At that moment everything in his life changed. The encounter with Christ marked him with a sign that lasted forever. It was something sudden, unexpected, and overwhelming. From that moment on "only Jesus and I are left".as he would later note in his Diary. When she left the party, she immediately went to the nearest church, St. Stanislaus of Kostka. There he asked for forgiveness, remained in silent prayer asking what he should do and listened for the second time to the voice of the Lord within him: "Go immediately to Warsaw; there you will enter a convent.". At the age of eighteen, and without her parents' permission, she arrived in Warsaw, a city totally unknown to her, and sought a convent. The superior of the Daughters of Divine Mercy was convinced of her vocation and accepted her as a postulant. Maria Faustina entered as a postulant in 1925 and during her thirteen years as a religious she lived in different convents and cities. In Krakow (Łagiewniki) she spent most of her time as a postulant and her last two years of life. In Warsaw he began his journey. In Płock, on February 22, 1931, Jesus spoke to her for the first time while she was already a nun.

In the Diary Fautina, several constants can be appreciated. In the first place, the apparitions of Jesus, which are marked in a concrete time and place that indicate the objective veracity of a personal apparition. Then it is striking that the Merciful Jesus always appears to communicate something. Another constant is the presence of the spiritual director. At the beginning it was Father Józef Andrasz SJ.

With the apparitions of Jesus came to Sr. Faustina the question of whether she should create a new congregation dedicated to imploring mercy for the world. In Łagiewniki she meditated on it, but she would not do anything without the approval of her spiritual director, who was Father Józef Andrasz. The latter advises him to remain in the order and from there to proclaim the message of Divine Mercy.

Sister Faustina took with great joy the continuous changes of house. In Vilnius she had a lot of work and many difficulties, but that was not what worried her. The most important thing that happened to her had to do with her spiritual life. Faustina finally found the priest for whom she had prayed so much: a spiritual director who also served as a support for her in putting the Lord's will into action. This confessor was Michał Sopoćko, now Blessed. When she recognized in Father Sopoćko the priest she had previously seen with the eyes of her soul, she once again heard within herself the words of Jesus: "This is my faithful servant, he will help you to fulfill my Will here on earth.". In 1934 Faustina fell ill with tuberculosis and, at the express request of her spiritual director, she began to write her Diary. In 1936 he moved again to Krakow and there he lived, suffered and died, in 1938, in a simple and holy way.

ABR16-dossier-esp3-2
Portrait of Saint Faustina Kowalska.

Divine Mercy Message

The message proclaimed by the saint brings with it new forms of worship that are born of God's express will. We can list five forms.

1) The image with the inscription "Jesus, in You I trust" is the figure of the Merciful Jesus, one of the most famous depictions of the crucified and risen Christ in the history of the Church and the world. He was in his room, in the convent of Płock, when he received the commission to paint the picture. It was February 22, 1931.

Narrates in his Diary: "In the evening, while I was in my cell, I saw the Lord Jesus dressed in a white robe. He had one hand raised in blessing, and with the other He was touching the robe on His breast. From the opening of the tunic on his chest, two large rays were coming out: one red and the other pale. After a moment, Jesus said to me: Paint an image according to the model you see, and sign: Jesus, I trust in You. I wish this image to be venerated first in your chapel and then in the whole world.".

Two years passed since the assignment in Płock and Faustina did not succeed in carrying out the mission. Having completed her perpetual vows, in 1933 she was sent to Vilnius. There, Father Michał Sopocko introduces her to the artist Kazimierowski, who, with Faustina's precise indications, paints the picture. Once finished, in spite of the artistic and religious value of the work, which is now in the sanctuary of the Divine Mercy in Vilnius, Faustina was not satisfied and wrote in her Diary: "I went to the chapel and cried a lot. I said to the Lord: Who can paint your beauty? And then I heard these words: The greatness of this image is not in the beauty of colors and canvases, but in my grace.".

A few years after Faustina's death, in 1943, on the instructions of Father Józef Andrasz, the painter Hyla made a second model. This is the miraculous image in the chapel of the convent of the Sisters of the Mother of God of Mercy in the sanctuary of Divine Mercy in Krakow-Łagiewniki, occupies a special place in the iconography and the cult of Divine Mercy. It is an image of Christ highly venerated by the faithful, and famous for the numerous graces received, and whose copies and reproductions can be found everywhere on all five continents of the world.

2) The Feast of Divine Mercy on the second Sunday of Easter. In the Diary we can read what Jesus says to Sister Faustina: "I desire that the first Sunday after Easter be the Feast of Mercy. I desire that the Feast of Mercy be a refuge and shelter for all souls and especially for poor sinners. On that day the bowels of My mercy are open. I pour out a whole sea of graces upon the souls who approach the fountain of My mercy. The soul who goes to Confession and receives Holy Communion will obtain total forgiveness of sins and sorrows. On that day, all the divine floodgates through which graces flow are opened.".

Cardinal Francis Macharski was the first to include the Feast of Mercy in the liturgical calendar for his archdiocese of Krakow (1985). This was followed by a number of Polish bishops in their dioceses. At the request of the Polish episcopate, Pope John Paul II instituted this feast in 1995 in all the dioceses of Poland. On the day of Sister Faustina's canonization, April 30, 2000, the Pope instituted this feast for the whole Church.

3) Chaplet to the Divine Mercy. A common five decade rosary is used to pray this prayer. It begins with an Our Father, a Hail Mary, and a Creed. At the beginning of each decade on the large beads of the Our Father it is said: "Eternal Father, I offer You the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Your Most Beloved Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ, for the forgiveness of our sins and those of the whole world.". In the small beads of the Ave Maria is repeated: "Through Your sorrowful Passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.". At the end of the five tens of the crown, it is repeated three times: "Holy God, Holy Mighty One, Holy Immortal One, have mercy on us and on the whole world.".

In the Diary we find these words of the Lord addressed to Faustina: "Encourage people to say the Chaplet I have given you. Whoever recites it will receive great mercy at the hour of death. Priests will recommend it to sinners as their last refuge of salvation. Even if the most hardened sinner has recited this Chaplet at least once, he will receive the grace of My infinite Mercy. I desire to grant unimaginable graces to those who trust in My Mercy. Write that when they say this Chaplet in the presence of the dying, I will place Myself between My Father and the dying. él, not as a Just Judge but as a Merciful Savior"..

4) The hour of Mercy, at three o'clock in the afternoon. About this hour of Mercy, the Lord said to Sister Faustina: "At three o'clock, pray for My mercy, especially for sinners, and if only for a very brief moment, immerse yourself in My Passion, especially in My abandonment at the moment of My agony. This is the hour of great mercy for the whole world.". It is about keeping in mind the moment of Jesus' agony on the cross, that is, to accompany him praying at three o'clock in the afternoon.

There is no specific prayer proposed for this hour, you can pray the Way of the CrossIf time does not permit due to obligations, at least, for a few moments, wherever we are, try to unite ourselves with Him as He agonizes on the Cross. The Chaplet can be one of the ways to live the Hour of Mercy, making a distinction since the Chaplet is addressed directly to God the Father, and the prayer in the Hour of Mercy to Jesus.

5) The propagation of the devotion to the Divine Mercy. "To the souls who spread devotion to My mercy, I protect them throughout their lives as a loving mother does her newborn child and at the hour of death I will not be for them Judge but merciful Savior."This promise, recorded in the Diary of St. Faustina, was made by Jesus to all those who proclaim Mercy in any way. To priests, the Lord made an additional promise: "Tell My priests that the most hardened sinners will soften under their words when they speak of My unfathomable mercy, of the compassion I have for them in My Heart. To the priests who proclaim and praise My mercy, I will give prodigious strength and anoint their words and shake the hearts to whom they speak.".

The authorIgnacy Soler

Krakow

Read more
Newsroom

Mercy, the mainstay of the Church

Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, Major Penitentiary, reflects on the words of Pope Francis in issue 14 of Misericordiae Vultus: "Mercy is the main beam that supports the life of the Church".

Cardinal Mauro Piacenza-April 3, 2016-Reading time: 10 minutes

I would like to dwell on these words with which the Holy Father has pointed out the essential link between Mercy and the life of the Church: "Mercy is the main beam that supports the life of the Church." (n. 10 of the Bull of Convocation of the Holy Year).

The main beam is an absolutely "essential" element in any building, together with other architectural elements, without which it would have no reason to exist.

First of all, it presupposes by itself the existence of a building, and invites us to consider the Church, which we confess as Catholic and Apostolic, and therefore missionary and structurally "going forth", also in its dimensions of Unity and Holiness: it appears as the "...".Domus aurea"The golden house, the spiritual building, in whose construction we are used as living stones (cf. 1Pt 2:5), and whose only foundation is Christ himself (cf. 1Cor 3:11).

We will be able to dwell attentively on the structure of the main beam to the extent that we are interested in crossing the threshold of this building and inhabiting it as our definitive House. This is the Temple destroyed by men and rebuilt on the third day (Jn 2:19), not made by human hands. It was opened to us in Baptism, through the work of the Holy Spirit. In this House, human existence attains and embraces its proper meaning in an integral way, presenting on the altar that oblatio rationabilisThe spiritual worship, which offers, in union with Christ the Lord, the living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God (cf. Romans 1:1). 12,1).

Our Lady of Mercy, by the Master of Marradi.
Our Lady of Mercy, by the Master of Marradi.

From this "Domus aurea"In this spiritual and historical edifice which is the Church, Christ himself is the Door, the Way. In him, life is continually illumined by the light of "Christ-Truth," which enters freely and illumines everything through the uninterrupted teaching of the Apostles and their successors, in communion with Peter. In its interior, the Life of Christ is communicated to the multitude of the brethren, reborn from the one source, the bosom of Holy Mother Church. They are inhabitants of the Domusbut also living stones used in the construction of the Building. This Life is communicated in an eminent way in the banquet and in the Eucharistic-sacramental sacrifice, a real pledge of the eschatological one, which unites all and raises them to the presence of the Father, by virtue of the one Cross of Christ.

It is therefore one Church, the Church that Christ, Crucified and Risen, has generated and has generated for more than two thousand years; the place of the true, new and eternal life that we have received, of the saving communion with the Son of God made Man; a saving communion that represents the only and true goal of the whole mission of the Church.

Looking at the reality of the Church in the theological-sacramental perspective, let us consider the richness of the image used by the Holy Father in a threefold perspective.

Visibility and splendor

In the first place, the main beam is presented as a structural architectural element, essential for the whole building and each of its parts. With the limits proper to any analogy, we can affirm that mercy is, and has always been, well "visible" as a main beam throughout the history of the Church.

Abandoning the metaphor, there has never been a time when the Church has not proclaimed with conviction the Gospel of mercy, since the day of Pentecost, when St. Peter, leaving the cenacle, responded to the crowd that with pierced hearts asked what they should do: "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus, the Messiah, for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to those who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God shall call to himself." (Acts 2:38-39).

Now this proclamation of divine mercy, unlike the master beams of this world, decorated to please the observer, has no need of ornaments, because it has in itself all its splendor. As the Apostle affirms: "I myself, brethren, when I came to you to proclaim to you the mystery of God, I did it not with sublime eloquence or wisdom, for I never boasted among you that I knew anything but Jesus Christ, this crucified One." (1Cor 2,1-2).

If it is true that the Church has had to face several times over the centuries the perennial temptation of man to save himself autonomously, she has always responded, defended and reaffirmed before everyone the absolute gratuitousness of Mercy, which certainly requires sincere repentance, but remains infinitely greater than any human ugliness.

Thus, the Church, to the Donatism of the fourth century, which wanted the exclusion of the lapsi of communion, he responded with the readmission of repentant brothers and with the fundamental doctrinal truth of the ex opere operato. To the Pelagianism of the 5th century, it responded with the Augustinian deepening of the doctrine of Grace. To the Cathar-Albigensian heresy of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, it responded, in the preaching of the mendicant orders, with the goodness and unity of creation, integrally assumed and saved by Christ.

Francis receives the sacrament of Confession, March 13, 2015.
Francis receives the sacrament of Confession, March 13, 2015.

To the Lutheranism of the 16th century, he responded by reaffirming the real efficacy of justification by grace, the truth of the Sacraments - especially those of the Eucharist and Reconciliation and, by obvious consequence, that of Holy Orders - and the goodness and sufficiency of attrition to obtain the forgiveness of sins. In addition, by extraordinary heavenly blessing, the Domus Aurea The most beautiful fruits of that time could be seen in the lay saints, religious, mystics, pastors and missionaries of that time: just think, for example, of St. Philip Neri, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Charles Borromeo, St. Francis de Sales, St. Camillus de Lelis, St. Teresa of Jesus... and the list could become a dictionary!

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Church responded to Jansenist legalism and rigorism with the moral doctrine of the preventive, simultaneous and successive action of grace, which has its most precious fruits in St. Alphonsus Liguori and in the holy shepherds of the twentieth century. To the modernism of the last century, which claimed to elevate itself to be the only real interpreter of man, it responded with the texts of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which reaffirmed Christ-God as the only real fullness of every man and the Church as a divine and human reality at the same time, in its irreducible sacramental, liturgical and missionary dimensions.

To the dictatorship of philosophical and religious relativism of contemporary times, the Church responds by reaffirming the universal salvific uniqueness of Christ and His cosmic Truth, in which history, the whole of creation, the nature and dignity of man and, finally, his irreducible freedom before the offer of salvation are inscribed.

It would be short-sighted, therefore, to try to anchor the proclamation of God's love and mercy in the most recent epoch of the Church (perhaps in the last fifty years), contrasting it perhaps with ghostly long centuries of "clerical terror" in which too much was said about the Judgment of God and the punishments of hell. Certainly, we must always avoid any dangerous unilateralism; moreover, in order to correct any exaggerations, we cannot resort to other exaggerations. I believe that a real attention also in preaching to the divine prerogatives of Omnipotence and Judgment can only help the proclamation of Mercy. It is much more interesting, in fact, the free choice of love and mercy that God makes in His Omnipotence, than the idea of a God "obliged" to be merciful, without always choosing it, in the face of every man, every circumstance, every concrete sin.

Budget and structure

Once we have identified the main beam of Mercy as a clearly visible architectural element in the building of the Church, we can analyze its presuppositions and its function. Let us speak first of the presuppositions, because every main beam is not, at the architectural level, "of thrust" but "of support". It is a horizontal element, which supports an upper part, but unloads its weight on two vertical arms also distributing the weight of the upper structures. What are the two presuppositions, the two "supporting columns" of the architrave of mercy? What are the supports without which it could not be supported? Many may be astonished, but we must first of all affirm that, theologically speaking, "mercy" is not an "original" attribute of God.

Let me explain. With St. John the Apostle, we must confess first of all that "Deus Caritas est - God is Love. We can and must affirm that God, by sending His Son made Man in Jesus of Nazareth, Lord and Christ, dead and risen, has made us know that He is, in Himself, Love: Love of the Three Persons. Such intra-Trinitarian Love, however, cannot be configured in Himself as mercy, because it knows no "ontological hierarchy" among the Three Divine Persons, who are equal in the one and same Nature. The idea that the Father should "have mercy" on the Logos or the Holy Spirit would not be at all acceptable!

When, then, can we begin to affirm, with the Psalm, that "his mercy endures forever".(Ps 135). When God creates.

When God creates the spiritual and the material cosmos and, above all, when He creates man, He participates at the same time in one and the other. God, who is a communion of Persons, in Himself in relation with Another distinct from Himself, can also create, conceive something that is "totally other" from Himself. Creating the intelligent and free human person, He loves outside of Himself. He loves the free man, and calls man to love. This Love of God, addressed to us and recognized by us, is, on a level that we could call creatural, "mercy". Love absolutely gratuitous because it is divinely free, which rests on what is "wretched" because it is infinitely far from divine perfection.

Mercy, therefore, has as its double presupposition the divine freedom that creates and the very existence of created man. By the will of God, it is irrevocable, so much so that not even in eternal damnation, which man inflicts on himself by his sin and final impenitence, does God deprive condemned souls of the merciful gift of being and existence. The Most Holy Trinity, Blessed and Perfect in Itself, has willed to bind human existence to Itself forever, and we, then, will truly be able to sing with the angels: "The Holy Trinity, Blessed and Perfect in Itself, has willed to bind human existence to Itself forever."eternal is his mercy"!

The image I have adopted presents, on this point, all its limits, because the uncreated and eternal freedom of God and the created and temporal freedom of man cannot be conceived in an equal way, and are not ontologically coessential. Divine freedom is subsistent in the absolute sense and is not in need of anything; man's freedom, on the other hand, is created and depends essentially on divine freedom, and is indispensable for the mystery of mercy only because God wants it by creating it.

But there is a further level of mercy, which not only brings man into existence, but also enters into relationship with created man. Man, in fact, even though he is made by God and for God, decides to sin, that is, to direct his freedom against the Creator, thus staining himself with an infinitely grave guilt, from which he will not be able to recover with his poor strength.

It is here then that, by divine Will, the new and great initiative of Eternal Love is developed within the space of creation: "In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; the virgin's name was Mary." (Lk 1:26-27). After having formed the people of Israel, after having revealed the Law to them and thus having shown them their sin, God turns to Mary to save us.

From the encounter between uncreated divine freedom and the created and immaculate freedom of Mary Most Holy, who welcomes the angel's Annunciation, a new and definitive mercy arises: the Incarnation of the Word. The Son of the Eternal Father takes our flesh in her and thus binds himself in a new and indissoluble way to human nature and, in the mystery of his Incarnation, Death and Resurrection, becomes forever "the" mercy. In Christ the divine intimacy is definitively opened to us: he sacrifices himself on the Cross for our sin, offers us salvation and makes us personally sharers in his own life.

The Church, the universal sacrament of salvation and minister of mercy, is built on the divine mercy of the divine-human Heart of Christ, inasmuch as it is a continuation, in space and time, of the living presence and saving work of Christ.

Then, within the life of the Church, through the apostolic ministry, which participates in the one, eternal and supreme Priesthood of Christ, the main beam of mercy, in a certain sense, is "prolonged" as, by the grace of vocation, a man's created freedom responds to the gift of Christ's call and offers himself to his service, in the fascinating adventure of the ministerial Priesthood. The whole Church is then as it were "woven" of this mercy, and on it she develops her whole life. The Petrine ministry itself is born of the mercy of Christ, who, after the triple profession of love that followed the triple betrayal, entrusts his own flock to Peter: "Yours." -St. John Paul II has repeated to us. "it is a ministry of mercy born out of an act of mercy of Christ". (Ut Unum Sint, n. 93).

Irreplaceable and essential function

It remains for us to delineate the function of the architrave. Sustained by the mystery of divine freedom and the response of human freedom that welcomes salvation, mercy in turn sustains the whole life of the Church; one could say that it is "at the beginning" of the Church's life, in a double sense.

First of all, the life of the Church develops by an ever new act of the mercy of Christ who, through the ecclesial ministry, consecrates the baptized and communicates his very life to them. Secondly, such a principle does not consist in a "chronological beginning" that can later be left behind, but in an "ontological principle": the life of the Church is sustained and guided by the grace of Christ, welcomed in listening to Apostolic teaching and prayer, nourished and perfected by the Most Holy Eucharist, restored and strengthened by sacramental reconciliation.

Considering precisely Reconciliation, we see how mercy can "happen" sacramentally only in the encounter between two co-involved freedoms: the divine and the human. Divine freedom is given, definitive, irrevocable, and every time a minister is willing to offer it, it becomes sacramentally accessible. Human freedom, on the other hand, is expressed in repentance, in the pain of the sin committed together with the resolution not to commit it again in the future, and in the accusation that opens the heart of the sinner to the saving truth of Christ. In the time of this pilgrimage, human freedom always preserves the power tremendum to accept the mystery of divine mercy and allow oneself to be inwardly renewed by it, or to reject it, thus showing how the very Omnipotence of God loves above all else precisely our freedom, to the point of pouring into it all the riches of His Heart as soon as it makes a gesture of opening up; and He respects the human choice that tragically decides not to let itself be loved or, what is the same thing, does not decide at all. God never does violence to anyone!

The mercy that works in sacramental Confession will only liberate and spread the grace of the sacrament of Baptism, the first source and perennial principle of the mercy that builds up the Church.

I believe that only this integral realism in relation to divine mercy will be able to awaken and sustain the long-awaited new evangelization, announcing without fear or complexes the truth of Christ the Savior. Today it is more necessary than ever to "provoke" the freedom of man, who will finally find himself before the most unprecedented and great fact of history: God made man, dead and risen, who lives in our midst.

In this work of evangelization, may the Immaculate Virgin Mary, perfect work and most pure reflection of divine mercy, sustain us! ante praevisa merita! May she teach us the total and ever new availability to the will of Christ; thus the truth that Mary Most Holy contemplates in the blessed eternity will always appear more and more in the eyes of our hearts: God, in creation and redemption, is mercy, is all mercy, is only mercy! n

The authorCardinal Mauro Piacenza

Major Penitentiary

Cinema

Cinema: Risen (a fictionalized account of the Resurrection)

The plot fundamentally serves the clear purpose of the screenplay, which is none other than to tell the story of Christ's resurrection. But the script has the "apologetic" virtuality of telling that fundamental Christian truth from the eyes of a non-believer.

Diego Pacheco-March 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

Risen (Risen)
Leadership: Kevin Reynolds
Script: Kevin Reynolds
USA, 2016

This film, which the actors starring Joseph Fiennes and Maria Botto presented in mid-February at the Vatican Film Library, will be released in Spain on March 23, in the middle of Holy Week. It is certainly a very opportune moment, because the film, written and directed by the American Kevin Reynolds (Waterworld y Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves), narrates in a novelized form the events following the death and resurrection of Christ; specifically, the enormous difficulties that, logically, the centurion Clavius, played by Fiennes, faces to fulfill the impossible assignment he has received from his superiors: to find out where the missing body of Jesus is and to recover it.

The plot fundamentally serves the clear purpose of the screenplay, which is none other than to tell the story of Christ's resurrection. But the script has the "apologetic" virtuality of telling that fundamental Christian truth from the eyes of a non-believer, Clavius, who progressively verifies how the non-appearance of Christ's body, despite his intense search, has no more reasonable explanation than the unanimous testimony of the witnesses of the resurrection.

Clavius undertakes his task convinced that he will succeed, but then his doubts increase, to the point of completely rethinking not only the order he has received, but also his deepest convictions. Although as a military man he feels inclined to obey the command of his superiors, without questioning it, later, on the occasion of his inquiries, the film will show the personal transformation experienced by the main character, when he has no choice but to face the evidence of the resurrection, and consequently the person of Christ and his doctrine of salvation. Clavius will be challenged to a profound change of convictions. The culminating moment of this personal transformation occurs in the film when the Roman officer who has put Jesus to death meets the resurrected Jesus himself four days after his death.

The character of Mary Magdalene, played by Argentine actress Maria Botto, is also interesting for the certainty of the testimony she offers about the resurrection of Jesus and the sense of peace she conveys.

The film, which was partly shot in Almería, uses practically no special effects, except for a few moments.

The authorDiego Pacheco

TribuneGuillermo Hurtado Perez

The Pope's message in Mexico

In Mexico, Francis has left a message: it is possible to change, to work together to achieve a better reality; a message that is not only valid for Mexico. And a lasting image remains: the Pope praying in silence in front of the Virgin of Guadalupe.

March 7, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Pope Francis was in Mexico for only five days. But if we were to examine everything he said during his visit, we would be astounded by the diversity and richness of his message. Of all Francis' trips, Mexico's was undoubtedly the most emphatic: a sort of compendium of the themes he has dealt with during his pontificate. The Pope had the opportunity to speak on each of the issues that have been at the center of his agenda: exclusion, ecology, migration, family. But on this occasion he added others to the list and offered an interconnected vision of all of them in the light of the Gospel.

Those who expected a political benefit from his trip were disappointed. With great skill, the Pope managed to slip away from those who wanted to take advantage of his visit to take water to their mill; I am referring to certain individuals and groups within the federal government, local governments, political parties, opposition groups, the media and large corporations. The most important aspect of his pastoral visit was not in the political order but in the moral and, above all, spiritual order.

The Pope said nothing we didn't already know about Mexico's problems: its ills are plain to see. Mexico is a nation burdened by poverty, corruption and violence. As a result, many Mexicans -fortunately, not all, it would be unfair to generalize- have fallen into lethargy, indifference and fatalism. But perhaps the worst of our vices is cynicism. In the crowded auditoriums where Francis offered this serious diagnosis, people who should feel alluded, sang and applauded, as if the Pope was talking about another country, another planet.

In the face of this discouraging scenario, Francis offered the enduring message of Jesus Christ: put God at the center of your life, love your neighbor, learn to forgive, do not negotiate with evil. Mexico is a largely Catholic country. One would expect these rules of life to be known by all or almost all. However, the sad truth is that Mexico is far from Jesus Christ. Who are those responsible? One could point to bad elements within the government, the oligarchy, the intellectual elites and even the ecclesiastical hierarchy. But I don't think there is much point in looking for culprits. Somehow, all Mexicans share, to a greater or lesser extent, the responsibility for our miseries. Instead of lamenting our misfortunes, we should look to the future. This is what Pope Francis invited us to do: to leave conformism behind, to believe in the possibility of change, to work together to build a better reality. There are Mexicans who are already committed to this project. Let us hope that the Pope's message motivates others to walk along this path of hope.

It would not be easy to choose the most important moment of Pope Francis' trip. The Masses in San Cristobal de las Casas -dedicated to the indigenous peoples- and in Ciudad Juarez -dedicated to migration- were very emotional and of a powerful social content. The two cities are geographical extremes of Mexico that also symbolize the extreme nature of the nation's reality. Even before his arrival, Francis stressed the importance of his pilgrimage to the Basilica of Guadalupe. Perhaps the most enduring image of his stay is that of the Pope praying in silence before the Virgin. Mexico is a fortunate people because of the permanent presence of the Virgin Mary of Guadalupe. In the hardest moments of our history, she has offered comfort to those most in need. She has also been a unifying agent of nationality. Mexico cannot be understood without the Guadalupana. But then a disturbing question arises: why, if we Mexicans are so Guadalupanas, have we distanced ourselves from Jesus Christ? Have we been bad children of the Virgin? Have we abused her mercy? It is difficult not to suppose that there is some truth in these conjectures. However, it would also be unfair not to recognize the difficult historical conditions in which Mexicans have had to struggle against all kinds of adversities. As Francis said, Mexico is a long-suffering country.

Mexico is the second most Catholic country in the world. Beyond the particular incidents of Pope Francis' trip to that nation, a complete evaluation of his visit will have to take into account the integral context of his pontificate. In the meantime, let us not lose sight of the fact that what Pope Francis said in Mexico is not only valid for Mexico: it is a universal message that should be heard by all humanity. Mexico gave the Pope the unique opportunity to formulate a speech that should serve as a guide for a world like ours, sunk in uncertainty and despair.

The authorGuillermo Hurtado Perez

Philosopher, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Twentieth Century Theology

After the Council. The two fronts of criticism of the Church.

In the mid-twentieth century, the Church was accompanied by two persistent critics. The first was the old liberal critique, which came from the Enlightenment. The second was the Marxist critique, originating fifty years earlier.

Juan Luis Lorda-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 8 minutes

Until the time of the Council, the two lines of criticism had remained external to the Church, but when the Church wanted to open itself more to the world in order to evangelize it, they became internalized in a certain way and had an important effect on some post-conciliar drifts.

The Western Front

Liberal criticism was already a well-established criticism, incessantly repeated and centered on the clichés set by French anti-clericalism, from Voltaire. They saw and wanted to see in the Church a remnant of the Ancien Régime, a "reactionary" institution, backward and obscurantist, anti-modern and anti-democratic, defender of superstition, oppressor of consciences and opposed to the progress of science and liberties. And they repeated it incessantly, generating the characteristic anticlerical hatred of the radical left, which Marxism also picked up later. This anticlericalism had had very harsh expressions, open persecutions, closure of Catholic institutions and massive expropriations, throughout the 19th century and was renewed in the first third of the century, with the secularist laws in France (1905), Mexico (1924) and the Spanish Republic (1931). To this was added the religious persecution opened after the Russian revolution (1917).

After the Second World War, the general climate improved, but in the most advanced countries of Europe - Switzerland, Germany, the Netherlands - criticism persisted from the most secularist intellectual sectors, from radical and materialistic scientific circles to liberal circles of a more or less Masonic character. They constantly repeated the same topics already consecrated: the Galileo case, the wars of religion, the intolerance of the Inquisition and the ecclesiastical censorship (the Index), until they stamped in the consciences an image that still lasts.

All this provoked an uncomfortable sensation of confrontation between modern culture and the Christian faith. And it put the Church in a certain way on the defensive: on the political defensive, where it could seem that the lost privileges of the Ancien Régime were being yearned for and vindicated, and on the intellectual defensive, where it could seem that the growth of science and knowledge necessarily generated the retreat of the Christian faith: Christianity could only remain among the ignorant. It was the classic accusation of obscurantism.

It was known that criticism was, in many cases, unfair. But it generated discomfort and discomfort. And for the more culturally sensitive Christians it made them see more clearly their own inadequacies, and look at them with impatience and, at times, incomprehension: the intellectual poverty of many ecclesiastical studies, the scarce scientific formation of the clergy, the rancid flavor of some inherited customs that had little to do with the Gospel: benefices and canonries, ecclesiastical pomp, baroque, grotesque manifestations of popular piety, privileges of the civil powers or of the old nobility, etcetera.

The Church has done an immense cultural work everywhere and has always counted on privileged minds, and for this reason the scornful criticism of those who considered themselves representatives of progress was all the more painful. With the desire for conciliar renewal, there was a growing sensitivity to one's own defects in order to achieve a more effective evangelization and also to achieve a new cultural and intellectual dignity, to be acceptable to the Western intellectual elites and to make a place for oneself in modern culture. This affected in a particular way the most intellectual episcopates: Holland, Germany and Switzerland; and, to a lesser extent, Belgium and France, which would take the lead in the Second Vatican Council. It was legitimate, but it needed discernment.

The Eastern Front

There is another front, which we can call the Eastern front, because it reminds us geographically of the situation of Russia in the East of Europe. In reality it was not a geographical front, but a mental front, and the problems were not directly with the immense Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; it was, in reality, internal, in each country. It is the presence of communism. Berdiaev, a Russian thinker who fled to Paris after the Russian revolution, rightly saw communism as a kind of Christian heresy, a transformation of hope: an attempt to make paradise on earth, to reach the perfect society by purely human means.

Communism is the most important of the revolutionary socialist movements, although it should not be forgotten that fascism and Nazism were also socialist and revolutionary. It had spread at the end of the 19th century as a consequence of the massification and mistreatment of the working population after the industrial revolution. The growth of a poor sector, of workers uprooted from their places of origin and their culture, and grouped in the belts of the big industrial cities, had been the breeding ground for all the socialist utopias since the middle of the 19th century. Marxism was one of them.

The Marxist charm

He succeeded in gaining a foothold because he had behind him a general theory, simple but apparently compact, about history and the structure of society. It attracted many intellectuals and ignited a revolutionary mysticism. First, it reached radicalized sectors; then, also intellectuals who wanted to place themselves in the vanguard of the future; and, finally, it was a great temptation for Christian movements, which felt challenged by this current that was going to change history. So it seemed.

Marxism is, in its origin, a philosophy; or rather, an ideology. An attempt to understand historical and social reality, resorting - it must be said - to rather elementary explanations about the formation of society and to a kind of utopian vocation for a better world. The principles of Marxist economics, purely simple, could not account for reality, and proved incapable of constructing it when they were put into practice, but its social ideals caught on in the revolutionary movements and managed to move an idealistic sector, which succeeded in triumphing in some countries, above all in Russia. There, with all the economic and political weight of an enormous society, it became communism and spread throughout the world, by political and propagandistic means.

Bleeding paradoxes

The truth is that with the benefit of hindsight one can judge the tragic ridiculousness of almost everything: of doctrine, expectations, etcetera. And the achievements are striking for their mixture of megalomania and gray inhumanity, apart from an inexhaustible history of outrages. But two things cannot be denied. The first, that he had an enormous political success. The second, that he had the mystical aura of taking the side of the most disadvantaged. He was the voice that spoke on behalf of the poor. Or, at least, so it seemed and so they wanted it to seem.

What was so shocking was that, at the same time, the movement was tightly directed by the police and propaganda apparatus of such unmythical characters as Stalin, with a dictatorial and totalitarian regime unparalleled in history, and with arbitrary rule, purges and atrocities beyond compare. Incredible paradoxes. Reality, as is often repeated, surpasses fiction.

Ecclesial impact

The fact is that the Church was, on the one hand, challenged to see some sectors of the proletarian population who, having been uprooted from their places of origin, had lost their faith and were being badly reached. On the other hand, it felt a kind of temptation, which grew throughout the twentieth century until the crisis of the system. The more socially sensitive Christians felt admiration for the Marxist commitment ("they really give their lives for the poor"). It must be said that this was also due to a constant propaganda that distorted the situation and concealed its sinister aspects, fiercely persecuting and denigrating any dissident or critic.

The fact is that the Marxist wing criticized the Church as an ally of the rich and an accomplice of the bourgeois system it wanted to overturn. And, at the same time, it tempted those with a greater social conscience. This produced an enormous and growing impact on the life of the Church throughout the 20th century. Especially in the most committed sectors: the Christian lay organizations and some religious orders.

In the sixties, it became an epidemic that affected the Christian bases of the entire civilized world. And it would have a long epigone in some aspects of liberation theology, until it was resolved with the fall of communism (1989) and the discernment that made the Congregation for the Doctrine of the FaithThe Council was chaired at the time by Joseph Ratzinger.

Discomfort and ambiguity of the world

In short, it was an uncomfortable situation on both fronts, although it only made sensitive minds uncomfortable. And it had this double dimension: a feeling of a purely defensive attitude, and a feeling of the shortcomings of evangelization. There was certainly a question of intellectual and Christian honesty, if one wanted to evangelize the modern world. It was not possible to evangelize without listening, making amends for one's own mistakes and recognizing the good and the just in others.

But it is not possible to use the word "world" without confronting the deep echoes that this word awakens in Christian language. For, on the one hand, the "world" is God's creation, where human beings work honestly; but it also represents, in the language of St. John, everything in man that is opposed to God. The two things are not really separable, because there is no such thing as the purely natural: by its origin everything comes from God and is ordered to God, and after sin, there is nothing naturally good and innocent unless God saves it from sin. God alone saves: neither critical intelligence nor utopia saves.

Need for discernment

It is true that there were many things to fix in the Church, and external criticism made us see what, at times, we did not want to see. But it was necessary to discern. The (enlightened-Masonic) world was rightly irritated by clericalism, laziness and ecclesiastical pomposity, but it was also irritated by the love of God and the Ten Commandments.

For its part, the Marxist world accused the Church of caring little for the poor. And it was right, because everything is little, although no human institution has been as concerned about the poor as the Church in all its history. And it was also necessary to discern, because Marxist mysticism had a touch of idealistic romanticism, but it was encouraged by blatant propaganda and directed by an immense machinery of power, which only sought to impose a world dictatorship, with the good intention of making everything better.

They wanted to create an ideal world, a paradise, where, as in the Soviet Union, the Church would have no place. Moreover, they were willing to go beyond anything, because, for them, the end justified the means. History would show, once again, that the harsh reality could not be changed by any utopia, although perhaps no other utopia in history made such violent pressure to change it. In the meantime, many Christians changed their hope. They preferred the hope conveyed by Marxist propaganda, which promised heaven on earth, to the hope conveyed by the Church, which only promised heaven in heaven, although it also called for commitment to earth.

The memory of Benedict XVI

In his first and famous address to the Curia in December 2005, Benedict XVI considered "Those who hoped that with this fundamental 'yes' to the modern age all tensions would disappear and the 'openness to the world' thus achieved would transform everything into pure harmony, had underestimated the inner tensions and also the contradictions of the modern age itself; they had underestimated the dangerous fragility of human nature, which in every period of history and in every historical situation is a threat to man's path. [The Council could not have intended to abolish this contradiction of the Gospel with regard to the dangers and errors of man. On the other hand, there can be no doubt that it wished to eliminate erroneous or superfluous contradictions, in order to present to today's world the requirement of the Gospel in all its grandeur and purity. [Now this dialogue must be carried out with great openness of mind, but also with the clarity of discernment of mind that the world rightly expects of us at this very moment. Thus today we can turn our gaze with gratitude to the Second Vatican Council: if we read it and accept it guided by a correct hermeneutic, it can be and become more and more a great force for the ever necessary renewal of the Church".


To continue reading

mar16-teol1

Marxism. Theory and practice of a revolution
Fernando Ocáriz.
220 pages.
Ed. Palabra, 1975

mar16-teol2

Marxism and Christianity
Alasdair McIntyre.
144 pages.
New Beginning, 2007

mar16-teol3

Marxism and Christianity
José Miguel Ibáñez Langlois.
Ed. Palabra, 1974

Read more
ColumnistsAndrea Tornielli

Mother's eyes

Twenty million people come every year to pray before the Virgin of Guadalupe. Francis also wanted to visit the Queen of America and stop to talk to her as a son does with his mother.

March 7, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

The recent Pope Francis' trip to Mexico focuses the world's attention on the Guadalupe event. The most evocative image of the trip was, by the way, the long silent prayer of the Pope in front of the most venerated Marian image in the world, which was mysteriously formed in the poor tilma of the Indian Juan Diego.

Look at Mary, Virgin of Guadalupeand let himself be looked at by her: this is what the Pope did. He bent over his people, whom this mixed-race image holds in his lap: this is what he invited the bishops of the country to do, caring for everyone, but especially for those who suffer in body and spirit, for the victims of poverty and violence.

Francis himself had said it before his departure: the trip to Mexico was for him, in the first place, the possibility of praying in front of the Virgin of Guadalupe, the Virgin whom twenty million people visit every year, to go to her lap, the home, the "little house" of all Mexicans (and Latin Americans). With her, Francis, the first Pope of this continent, wanted to stop to look at her and let himself be looked at, to talk like a son with his mother. The image of the Pontiff seated in the dressing room, the small room in which it is possible to contemplate from close up the image that was mysteriously formed in the tilma of the Juan Diego Indianis the icon of the journey. Faith is a matter of looks, of seeing and touching. It is Mary's gaze on a Pope who recognizes the infallible "sense of smell" of the holy people of God and who draws from this gaze the strength of tenderness towards the wounds of this people. Sores that must be touched in order to be able to touch the "flesh of Christ".

At the end of the trip, during the press conference on the plane, the Pope invited us to study the Guadalupe event. He told us that the faith and vitality of the Mexican people can be explained only because it is based on this event. The Virgin of Guadalupe thus becomes an interpretative key, a hermeneutic for understanding the roots of the faith of the people, which cannot be understood without the Mother's lap.

In the homily of the Mass celebrated at the shrine of Guadalupe on Sunday, February 14, Francis explained: Mary "tells us that she has the 'honor' of being our mother. This gives us the certainty that the tears of those who suffer are not sterile. They are a silent prayer that goes up to heaven and that in Mary always finds a place in her mantle. In her and with her, God becomes our brother and companion on our journey, carrying our crosses with us so as not to be crushed by our sorrows".

The authorAndrea Tornielli

Read more
The Vatican

"It is Christ who welcomes, who listens. It is Christ who forgives".

The Missionaries of Mercy have been sent, priests from all over the world who, during the Holy Year, have received from the Pope the mandate to forgive all sins.

Giovanni Tridente-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

There are 1,07 of them, and they come from every continent, including the distant Churches of Burma, East Timor, Zimbabwe, China and Vietnam. We are talking about the "Missionaries of Mercy", priests who on Ash Wednesday, in a crowded celebration in the Vatican Basilica, received from Pope Francis the mandate and authority, throughout the Jubilee Year, to also forgive sins that are usually reserved to the Apostolic See.

An absolute novelty of this Jubilee, foreseen in the Bull of Convocation, is the following Misericordiae vultuswhere the Holy Father describes them as "sign of the Church's maternal solicitude for the People of God, so that they may enter deeply into the richness of this mystery so fundamental to the faith"..

These Missionaries are entrusted with the task of being "artisans before all of us of a meeting full of humanity, source of liberation, rich in responsibility, to overcome the obstacles and to take up again the new life of Baptism.".

Their small number - 0.25 % of the total number of priests in the world - was designed precisely to keep the number of priests in the world at a minimum. "the value of this peculiar sign that expresses the extraordinary meaning of the event".Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelization, which is in charge of organizing the Jubilee, explained.

Among the sins that can be absolved are, as we said, those normally reserved to the Apostolic See. The Code of Canon Law indicates five: the profanation of consecrated species, physical violence against the Holy Father, the absolution of an accomplice in a sin against the sixth commandment, the direct violation of the secret of confession, episcopal ordination without pontifical mandate. However, it is clear from the "mandate" of the Missionaries - and this was also emphasized by Msgr. Fisichella - that they do not have the faculty to absolve from this last sin, in which they have incurred for example in the Fraternity of St. Pius X (the so-called "Lefebvrians", to whom, moreover, the Pope has given the possibility of validly confessing to the faithful), but above all in the Church in China and the bishops who in these years have been elected without pontifical mandate or who have voluntarily participated in illicit episcopal ordinations. These petitions will always be addressed directly to the Pope, after recognition and repentance for the sin committed.

To this must be added another sin (which carries a penalty of excommunication reserved to the bishop) that Pope Francis has granted the possibility of absolving to all priests, also only during the Jubilee Year, which is that of abortion, for the purpose of "as many as have sought it and in repentance of heart ask to be forgiven.". In this case, the priests are invited to know how to conjugate "words of genuine welcome with a reflection that helps to understand the sin committed, and to indicate a path of authentic conversion"..

In the meeting he had in the Aula Paolo VI with a representation of about 700 Missionaries of Mercy the day before entrusting them with the mandate, Pope Francis wanted to emphasize the "responsibility entrusted to you"to be witnesses, not only of the proximity, but also of the "way of loving". of God. And he has indicated three peculiarities: "expressing the motherhood of the Church"which "always generates new children in the faith".It nourishes them and through God's forgiveness regenerates them to a new life; "to know how to see the desire for forgiveness present in the heart of the penitent."; "cover the sinner with the blanket of mercy, that he may no longer be ashamed and that he may regain the joy of his filial dignity and may know where he stands".

"Upon entering the confessional."added the Pope, "let us always remember that it is Christ who welcomes, it is Christ who listens, it is Christ who forgives, it is Christ who gives peace.". Therefore,  "let us give great space to this desire for God and His forgiveness; let us make it emerge as a true expression of the grace of the Spirit that moves to conversion of heart.". In short, Francisco explained, it is not "How can we bring the lost sheep into the fold with the gavel of judgment, but with holiness of life, which is the principle of renewal and reform in the Church" (1)..

At the Holy Mass on Ash Wednesday, giving the missionary mandate, the Pope once again encouraged them to "help to open the doors of the heart, to overcome shame, not to flee from the light. May your hands bless and lift up the brothers and sisters with paternity; through you may the gaze and hands of the Father rest on the children and heal their wounds.".

Finally, he pointed out as an example the "ministers of God's forgiveness" St. Leopold Mandić and St. Pio of Pietrelcina, whose mortal remains were exposed in St. Peter's Basilica for the veneration of the faithful precisely on those days: "When you feel the weight of the sins that confess to you, and the limitation of your person and your words, trust in the power of mercy that goes out to meet everyone as love and knows no boundaries.".

Read more
The Vatican

St. Pio and St. Leopold, 'ministers of Mercy'.

The urns containing the mortal remains of St. Pio of Pietrelcina and St. Leopold Mandić have been transferred to Rome on the occasion of the Jubilee; half a million faithful have paid homage to them. Meanwhile, there are developments in the reform of the Roman Curia and the Synod.

Giovanni Tridente-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

About half a million people filled Rome to overflowing for a week, for what has been defined as the first great Jubilee event, namely, the transfer from their respective lands of the mortal remains of St. Pio of Pietrelcina and St. Leopold Mandić, the two Capuchin friars who spent practically their entire priestly life in the confessional and for this reason have been chosen by Pope Francis as examples of the "ministers of Mercy" in this Jubilee year.

The faithful, mostly devotees of these two saints, came from all over the world and venerated them first in the Basilica of San Lorenzo Outside the Walls, where they stayed for two days, and then in the Basilica of San Salvatore in Lauro, both churches included in the Jubilee itinerary. The prayer was constant and lasted throughout the day, a sign of "a spirituality so participatory and spontaneous that it has impressed the whole city".said Msgr. Rino Fisichella.

Also very impressive was the massive procession of the urns with the relics of the two "saints of Mercy". to St. Peter's Basilica, where they remained for several more days for the veneration of the faithful, before returning to their respective places of origin.

Padre Pio Prayer Groups

Taking advantage of this Roman Jubilee period, a large representation of members of the so-called "Padre Pio Prayer Groups". -a lay spiritual movement linked to the Saint and spread throughout the world- were received in audience in St. Peter's Square by Pope Francis. They were also joined by the employees of the Suffering Relief HouseThe hospital was founded by the friar himself and inaugurated in 1956. These two works, born in parallel, were dear to the friar's heart. "in favor of the sick, their families, the elderly, the needy in general."as "place of prayer and science where the human race is gathered together in Christ Crucified as one flock with one shepherd".Padre Pio said on the day of its inauguration.

Present at the audience were the faithful of the Archdiocese of Manfredonia-Vieste-San Giovanni Rotondo, in whose territory in southern Italy are located the monastery that welcomed the friar of Pietrelcina, the hospital and the hospital of the friar of Pietrelcina. Suffering Relief House and the sanctuary erected after his death and which preserves his relics, the destination of constant and numerous pilgrimages.

On this occasion, Francis outlined a profile of Padre Pio as "servant of mercy"who has practiced "sometimes to the point of exhaustion, 'the apostolate of listening'".. Through the ministry of the Confession, the Capuchin friar has become "a living caress from the Father, who heals the wounds of sin and refreshes the heart with peace.".

For being "always united to the source: he clung continually to Jesus Crucified."has been able to transform itself into a "great river of mercy, which has watered many a desolate heart.".

The same prayer groups founded by St. Pio have become "oasis of life in many parts of the world".: "prayer, in fact, is an authentic missionwho brings the fire of love to all mankind"..

He then addressed the employees of the Suffering Relief Housewhich is now in its sixtieth year, has invited them, in addition to "treat the disease", a "caring for the sick".

With the Capuchin Friars Minor

In the same days, Pope Francis celebrated at the altar of the Cathedra of St. Peter's Basilica a Holy Mass with the Capuchin Friars Minor from all over the world, gathered on the occasion of the translation of the relics of their intercessors.

In his homily, the Pontiff focused his words on the importance of the Sacrament of Confession, of forgiveness and of the ability to grant it, which is born of a deep life of prayer, where each one discovers that he too is in need of forgiveness. "When someone forgets the need he has for forgiveness, he slowly forgets God, forgets to ask for forgiveness and does not know how to forgive."Francisco explained. On the other hand, "the person who comes [to the confessional], comes to seek comfort, forgiveness and peace in his soul.". Therefore, it is very important to "that he finds a father who embraces him, who says: 'God loves you very much' and who makes him feel it!"The same is true of St. Pius and St. Leopold, who in the many hours they spent sitting in the confessional have done the following "the office of Jesus, who forgives by giving his life"..

Reform of the Roman Curia

Also in February, the thirteenth meeting of the Council of Cardinals took place in the presence of the Holy Father, and among the topics discussed were, as usual, the aspects inherent to the reorganization of the dicasteries of the Roman Curia, as well as information on the progress of the structures created by the new structures. ex novo Francis, from the guardianship of minors to reforms in the economic field and in the canonical process on the validity of marriage.

In particular, the final proposals for the creation of two new dicasteries, the one on "Laity, Family and Life" and the one on "Justice, Peace and Migration," were approved and placed in the hands of the Holy Father for his decision. There followed a further exchange of views on the Secretariat of State and on the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. U.S. Cardinal Sean Patrick O'Malley reported on the activity of the Commission for the Protection of Minors, over which he presides, while the juridical-disciplinary questions concerning the competencies of the dicasteries of the Curia were referred for further study. Cardinal Georg Pell was also heard, who reported on the status and performance of reforms in the economic field. Finally, the Cardinals of the Council were given the documentation on the so-called "vademecum" prepared by the Tribunal of the Roman Rota for the implementation of the reform of the canonical process on the validity of marriage.

Synodality and decentralization

The Council had begun with the study of some themes of the speech delivered by the Pontiff last October 17, during the commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the Synod of Bishops, when he spoke about the "synodality" and the "need to proceed with a healthy decentralization".. All these indications constitute an important reference for the reform of the Curia, and in these same days they were also the central focus of a study seminar organized by the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops.

The symposium was attended by numerous professors of ecclesiology and canon law from universities and ecclesiastical faculties from all over the world, who agreed on the wish for a "greater listening and involvement" of the People of God in the Synod, as reported in a communiqué. Such involvement must take place both in the preparatory phase, foreseeing "stably" a consultation of the faithful, as was the case with the questionnaire sent to the parishes on the occasion of the Extraordinary Synod of 2014, as well as offering more space for the intervention of the auditors during the assembly, even without granting them the right to vote. The faithful would also be involved in the successive phase of the "performance"where they should take care of "to translate the decisions taken at the central level into the various socio-cultural situations"..

These indications could converge in "a review of the regulations on the Synod of Bishops" and the tasks of the Council of the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops"., "in which the permanent character of the synodal body can be projected in a certain way".as is the case with the Catholic Churches of the East. "for an evolution of the Synod from 'event' to 'process'.".

 

Read more
Experiences

Benedict XV: the Pope of peace in the face of the Great War

A century ago, Europe was in the midst of World War I. How did the Holy See react to the outbreak of this conflict? Did Benedict XV, elected pope a month after the outbreak of hostilities, fail in his attempt to achieve peace, or should he be considered the real moral victor of the conflict?

Pablo Zaldívar Miquelarena-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 12 minutes

We are commemorating, in this period of time from 2014 to 2018, the centenary of World War I, called at the time the Great War or European War, a name that later seemed inappropriate as nations from other continents, such as the United States and many Asian and Latin American countries, entered the conflict. That tragic conflict was unleashed -almost unexpectedly- by the coincidence of a series of factors of various kinds, which were triggered in the context of that historical moment. But what was the geopolitical and strategic structure of Europe?

Balance system

In 1914, the security of Europe rested on a fragile network of defensive alliances, drawn up by the German Chancellor. Otto von Bismarck. It was the so-called "armed peace", the result of the hegemony of the German Empire, which emerged after the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870. On the geopolitical map of the continent, two antagonistic blocs were emerging: the Triple Entente, formed by France, England and Russia; and the Triple Alliance, or the Triple Alliance, or Triplet, which linked the Central Empires, Germany and Austria-Hungary, and Italy. This system of balances was only a guarantee of a precarious peace, since it required continuous rearmament in order to be prepared for a war that was considered possible at any moment.

However, this sense of pre-war mistrust, nurtured by nationalist sectors and by the general staffs of the great powers, did not manage to tarnish the yearning for peace and the enjoyment of material progress that characterized those years of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, known as the "war of the nineteenth century". "belle époque". People lived in the "unconsciousness" of reality, for Europe was undergoing a socio-political transformation with industrialization, the workers' movement and nationalism. Proof of this majority mood is the comment made a few months before the outbreak of the conflict by the French ambassador in Berlin, Jules Cambon: "The majority of the French and Germans wish to live in peace, but in both countries there is a minority who dream only of battles, conquests and revenge. Therein lies the danger, beside which we must live as beside a powder keg, which may explode at the slightest imprudence.".

And the spark went off on June 28, 1914, in Sarajevo, capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina, where the heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated together with his wife by a Slav terrorist. The government in Vienna blamed Serbia - a Slavic and Orthodox nation - for having planned this attack to hurt the Germanic and Catholic Habsburg Empire, and declared war on July 28.

Although it was initially thought that the hostilities would be of a limited nature, the fact is that the existing system of alliances was put into operation: Berlin had to support Vienna, while Russia, protector of Orthodoxy and Slavism, went to war against the Central Empires. In Western Europe, Germany's declaration of war on France was not long in coming. On the other hand, the invasion of Belgium by the German army, violating the neutrality of that country, provoked the immediate response of London. Thus, before the end of the month of August, the powers of the Triple Entente (France, England and Russia) had gone to war against Germany and Austria-Hungary, later joined by the Ottoman Empire, secular adversary of the Russians. Only Italy, despite being a member of the TripletThe company remained neutral for the time being, which did not go down well in Vienna and Berlin.

Benedict XV.

Pius X ... and Benedict XV

How did the Holy See react to this upheaval? St. Pius X had followed with concern and pain the chain of events that led to the outbreak of the conflict. "I bless peace, not war."he exclaimed when the Emperor of Austria begged him to bless his armies. It filled him with bitterness to see Catholic nations facing each other to the death. His health had been declining in step with these events. Overwhelmed by the tragic consequences he foresaw, he died on August 21.

On September 3, Cardinal Giacomo della Chiesa, Archbishop of Bologna, was elected his successor and took the name Benedict XV. The new Pope was a Genoese who had learned diplomacy from Cardinal Rampolla, the great Secretary of State of Leo XIII. Giacomo della Chiesa, solidly formed in the civil and ecclesiastical university classrooms, had accompanied Rampolla when the latter was nuncio in Madrid, between 1885 and 1887. During his stay in Madrid, he had the opportunity to work in the arbitration that Spain and Germany requested from Leo XIII to settle the dispute over the ownership of the Caroline Islands. Later, he held important positions in the Roman Curia before being appointed archbishop of Bologna. He was a seasoned diplomat and a good connoisseur of European politics.

Impartiality

Newly elected, Benedict XV urgently appealed for an immediate cessation of hostilities and expressed his rejection of the "freak show" of a fratricidal war, which caused a part of Europe to be in the grip of a "watered by Christian blood". And already from that moment, he established the position of the Holy See: impartiality.

In other words, the Holy See does not stand on the sidelines of the war tragedy as a neutral power, but considers itself morally involved because of the universal paternity of the Pope. But involved in a proper sense, in the measure, says the Pontiff, "in that...we have received from Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd, the duty to embrace with fatherly love all the sheep and lambs of his flock." The cruelty of the struggle fueled nationalist passion: the French and Belgians were disappointed not to hear from the Pope an explicit condemnation of Germany for the invasion of Belgium or the bombing of the cathedral of Rheims. In fact, the Pope had publicly condemned "all violations of the law wherever committed".He was in close contact with Cardinal Mercier, Primate of Belgium, but this did not seem sufficient to those who wanted the Holy See to take sides. For its part, the imperial cabinet in Vienna was hurt at not having the Pope's explicit backing in the face of what it considered a Slavic conspiracy, protected by Russia and encouraged by France and England, to put an end to the Catholic empire of Austria-Hungary.

In his first encyclical, published in November 1914 under the title of Ad BeatissimiThe Pope analyzed the tragic European situation from the supernatural plane of the theology of history. His interpretation with eschatological overtones -he saw war as a divine punishment-, or his allusions to the "refined cruelty" of modern weaponry could not sound well in the ears of a nationalism exacerbated by a hatred that had been pent up for decades. Neither did their complaint at the sight of the Christian countries at loggerheads: "Who would say that those who thus fight each other have the same origin? Who would recognize them as brothers, children of the same Father, who is in heaven?". Nor does he hesitate to define as the main cause of this war the denial of the Christian meaning of life: forgetfulness of charity, contempt for authority, and the injustice of social struggles, delegitimized when violence is resorted to. And at the root of all this, the Pope stresses, is the greed for temporal goods generated by materialism. The Pope, it has been written, "saw in war the monstrous effect of the moral crisis of modern Europe." 

Convinced that the most urgent objective was to stop the armed struggle, the Pontiff appealed to the responsibility of governments: "Let them hear us, we pray, those in whose hands are the destinies of the peoples. Other means exist, and other procedures for vindicating one's rights... Let them come to them, arms laid down for the time being.".

Intense humanitarian effort

As Christmas 1914 approached, the prospect of a long conflict was gaining momentum. The Pope then proposed a brief and definite lull in the fighting during the Christmas holidays. The idea, welcomed in principle by London, Berlin and Vienna, was rejected by Paris and St. Petersburg on various pretexts. Benedict XV expressed his sorrow at the Consistory of Cardinals, regretting that it had failed. "the hope we had conceived of comforting so many mothers and wives by the certainty that, for a few hours consecrated to the memory of the Divine Nativity, their loved ones would not fall under the enemy's lead.".

The diplomatic efforts of the Holy See ran parallel to an efficient and extensive humanitarian work. A team coordinated with the Red Cross operated in Rome and Switzerland under the orders of Monsignor Tedeschini, with the enormous task of providing information on the whereabouts of prisoners of war. By the end of the war, 600,000 requests for information and 40,000 requests for the repatriation of sick prisoners had been processed, and 50,000 letters of correspondence between prisoners and their families had been transmitted. The Pope also secured the release of prisoners who had been rendered unfit to fight, and transmitted to Emperor Wilhelm II numerous petitions for the commutation of death sentences against civilians handed down by German courts in occupied Belgium.

Likewise, the Holy See obtained, with the collaboration of the Swiss government, that 26,000 prisoners of war and 3,000 civilian detainees were allowed to convalesce in Swiss hospitals and sanatoriums. Benedict XV took special care to alleviate the suffering of children and to assist the civilian population of countries at war. Food aid operations organized by the Holy See took place without distinction of race, religion or side: Lithuania, Montenegro, Poland, Russian refugees, Syria and Lebanon received, among other nations and communities, papal protection.

The Pontiff was particularly concerned with the fate of the Armenians, whose persecution and extermination under Ottoman power induced him to intercede with the Sultan of Turkey. When the war was over, the Pope defended the national aspirations of the Armenians, and wrote to President Wilson to that effect. Benedict XV's efforts were recently recalled by Pope Francis, on the occasion of the centenary of what the current Pontiff has called the "centenary of the war". "first genocide of the 20th century". The gratitude of the peoples of the East is manifested in the bronze statue of Benedict XV that stands in front of the Catholic Cathedral of Istanbul. The monument was paid for by the religious communities of the Middle East (Muslims, Jews, Orthodox and Protestants).

Incomprehension

The Pope's diplomatic and humanitarian work was recognized without discussion on the international scene. German Chancellor von Bülow declared as much: "Benedict XV worked for peace with wisdom and firmness.".

However, Italy's entry into the war on the side of the Western Allies in May 1915 removed the hope that the war would be shortened. The situation of the Holy See was particularly delicate: the Pope lacked territorial sovereignty since the capture of Rome in 1870 and the loss of the Papal States. In spite of the ample guarantees received, at any moment he could be held hostage by a revolutionary Italian government. Faced with Italy's belligerence, Benedict XV adopted a policy of the utmost care to prevent the hierarchy and Italian Catholics from being carried away by nationalistic passions, thus compromising the impartiality of the Holy See. He did not hesitate to remind even some pastors of the Church that, above national interests, the interests of the Church and of humanity were paramount: "Lyricism, even patriotic lyricism, should not be seconded."and urged them to observe "a worthy reserve or a reserved membership"..

This prudent attitude was not understood either, because some sectors branded the Pontiff as defeatist, despite the fact that the Vatican cooperated with the Italian government to alleviate the terrible consequences of the fighting on the Italian-Austrian Isonzo front. The Pope, on the other hand, did not support conduct that failed to comply with the civic duties of national defense. Thus, he obliged seminarians to respect their military duties and did not allow the anticipation of priestly ordinations before the canonical age (25 years) to avoid conscription.

Impulses to peace

In July 1915, on the occasion of the first anniversary of the outbreak of war, Benedict XV addresses a solemn appeal to the belligerent peoples and their governments. The language and tone reflect his vision of a bloodied Europe: "In the most holy Name of God, by the precious Blood of Jesus... we conjure you, whom Divine Providence has placed in the government of the belligerent nations, to put an end to this horrible carnage which disgraces Europe.". And he bravely points out another aspect of war, the wealth of the contenders, which allows them to continue the fight with increasingly sophisticated weaponry: "But at what price! Let the thousands of young existences that are extinguished every day on the battlefields answer...". As a remedy to the futility of hatred and violence, Benedict XV proposes negotiating peace. "on reasonable terms" and states that "the equilibrium of the world, the tranquility... of nations rest on mutual benevolence and on respect for each other's rights and dignity...".

The exhortation was received with incomprehension by both sides, since neither wished to negotiate, knowing that this would imply giving in on demands and renouncing the crushing of the adversary. Benedict XV, in spite of everything, remained firm in working for peace. "no winners and no losers". The personal support he received from the new Austrian Emperor, Blessed Charles I, and his wife, Empress Zita of Bourbon-Parma, was of little use, since Germany had resolved to go all the way. Berlin's offers to examine a possible negotiation were of little credibility in the eyes of the Allies, since no concrete measures were specified, and the first condition "sine qua non" for London and Paris was the evacuation of Belgium.

At the beginning of 1917, the United States made the decision to enter the war with the Allies. This, together with the Russian revolution and the new submarine warfare launched by the German General Staff, made the Pope see that peace was still farther away. Nevertheless, some symptoms of "war fatigue" were perceptible and Benedict XV decided to take advantage of them. And for this purpose, aware that there was no time to lose, he entrusted Monsignor Eugenio Pacelli (the future Pius XII), nuncio in the kingdom of Bavaria, with the task of approaching Emperor Wilhelm and the government of Berlin.

A concrete proposal

Pacelli acted swiftly and persuasively, and secured the initial acquiescence of the German Chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg, to essential points that included the limitation of armaments, the independence of Belgium and the settlement of disputes in international tribunals. Pacelli urged the Holy See to step forward with concrete proposals on which to negotiate. He also insisted on the need to prevent the military leadership in Berlin from convincing the emperor that the only solution was to carry the armed struggle to the end, still confident of victory.

The Pope was of the same opinion as Pacelli, and on August 1 he sent to the leaders of the belligerent nations a Note that included concrete points, such as disarmament, arbitration, freedom of navigation of the seas, restitution of occupied territories, which were basic to negotiate a just and lasting peace, as well as to stop definitively the "useless slaughter" Europe was suffering. Benedict XV advocates a new international order founded on moral principles. As Pollard states, "it was the first time in the course of the war that any person or power had formulated a practical and detailed outline for negotiating peace.".

A door slammed on the peaceful settlement

The reactions of the Allies were not very encouraging: from the rejection of France and Italy, to the British lukewarmness. However, the last word came from the American President, Wilson, who slammed the door definitively on the papal attempts to negotiate a peaceful settlement, without winners or losers, that would allow the cessation of the fighting and the restoration of the status quo The above as a preliminary step to an agreed solution to the differences.

Clearly, the Allies wanted no way out other than the defeat of Germany and the Habsburg Empire. On the part of Berlin and Vienna, the respective responses expressed sympathy for the initiative, but no commitment. In the end, the firm position of the German military high command prevailed, still confident of a victory over an exhausted western front. The Prussian generals did not want to realize that the intervention of the United States had tipped the balance inexorably. The Pope then saw clearly that his efforts had failed. It was then that he would confess that he had gone through one of the most bitter moments of his life. In any case, the Papal Note of 1917 influenced the negotiators of the Peace of Paris in 1919. There are obvious similarities between Benedict XV's proposals and the famous 14 Points that Wilson presented in Paris to inspire the construction of the new international order.

Failure?

Did the Papacy fail in its attempt to seek peace for Europe? It is true that Benedict was "the unheeded prophet", and that his appeals to the conscience of the powerful to stop what he called "a useless slaughter" were not only disregarded, but many described them as defeatist and impossible to obey. But despite the "seeds of discord" contained in the Peace Treaty (and which brought about World War II), which the Pope had warned the victors of 1919, the new international order was the fruit of a new vision of coexistence among peoples.

Indeed, it was recognized, for the first time, "the primacy of law over force".The new concept of modern diplomacy, according to the teaching of Benedict XV, whose voice was the only one to denounce from the beginning the evil of war and whose tireless work of charity did not distinguish between frontiers, creeds and nationalities. Blessed Paul VI alluded to this new concept of modern diplomacy when he defined it as "the art of creating and maintaining international order, that is, peace.".

And to this change of perspective the Papacy, once again in history, had cooperated with wisdom and courage. With well-founded reason, Benedict XV has been called "the only moral victor of the war.".


Other protagonists

mar16-exper-saint-piox-church-catholic-prophecies-catholics

St. Pius X, daddy
Pope St. Pius X followed with concern and sorrow the events that led to the outbreak of the conflict. "I bless peace, not war."he exclaimed when the Emperor of Austria begged him to bless his armies. It filled him with bitterness to see Catholic nations facing each other to the death. Overwhelmed by the tragic consequences he foresaw, he died on August 21.

mar16-exper-26976488_121138552260

Federico Tedeschini, cardinal
A team coordinated with the Red Cross operated in Rome and Switzerland under the orders of the then Monsignor Federico Tedeschini. By the end of the war, 600,000 requests for information and 40,000 requests for the repatriation of prisoners had been processed, those unfit for combat had been released and 29,000 were allowed to convalesce in Swiss hospitals.

mar16-exper-wilson-older

Thomas Woodrow WilsonPresident of the United States
Benedict XV influenced the negotiators of the 1919 Peace of Paris. There are obvious similarities between Benedict XV's proposals and the famous 14 Points that U.S. President Wilson presented in Paris to inspire the construction of the new international order.

The authorPablo Zaldívar Miquelarena

Diplomat, former Spanish ambassador to Ethiopia and Slovenia, and author of the recent monograph "Benedict XV. A pontificate marked by the Great War."

Read more
The World

WYD 2016 in Krakow: in the footsteps of St. John Paul II in Poland

World Youth Day begins in Krakow on July 26. Thousands of young people from all over the world will share a few days of prayer and celebration of the Christian faith with Pope Francis. We review some of the places that pilgrims will be able to visit during those days.

Ignacy Soler-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 12 minutes

It is good for the young pilgrim who wishes to participate in the World Youth Day (WYD) to be held in Krakow in July has a basic idea of what WYD is: a joint experience of prayer, personal encounter with Christ, an explosion of celebration and joy in the communication of the Christian faith in union with the successor of Peter whose mission is to confirm us in our faith. Pilgrims will find in WYD the opportunity to get to know the country and deepen their faith.

The baptism of Poland

WYD is not a fireworks display, but seeks to deepen the responsibility of baptism. For this reason, it is not by chance that it is framed in the celebration of the 1050th anniversary of the baptism of Poland in the person of its first king, Mieszko I, in the year 966.

WYD begins on Monday, July 26, with a solemn Mass celebrated by Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz in the Błonia (countryside) of Krakow, a large esplanade in the center of the city where St. John Paul II celebrated Holy Mass on almost every apostolic journey to his homeland. It is also there that the first greeting to Pope Francis and the Stations of the Cross will take place on the evening of Friday the 29th. The young people will move from the Błonia to the town of Brzeg, on the outskirts of Krakow, very close to Wieliczka. There, on Saturday afternoon and evening, there will be a candlelight vigil with the Pope, and on Sunday the closing Mass of WYD.

Typical sweets on a street in the Jewish quarter of Kazimierz in Krakow.
Typical sweets on a street in the Jewish quarter of Kazimierz in Krakow.

More than one hundred thousand pilgrims registered for WYD have expressed their desire to visit the Jasna Góra shrine in Częstochowa, 150 kilometers from Krakow. Undoubtedly the Czarna Madonna (Black Madonna) in Częstochowa, with its iconic image of the Lady with merciful eyes, was the place most visited by Karol Wojtyła. There lies the heart and center of Polish spirituality. It is an almost obligatory place for the Marian pilgrim of WYD. In addition to Częstochowa, there are other places of interest in connection with the Polish Pope.

The Sanctuary of the Divine Mercy

Łagiewniki is a district of Krakow located in the south of the city. It is a must for all WYD participants because the Shrine of Divine Mercy, where St. Faustina Kowalska lived and died, is located there. In the Year of Mercy it seems especially appropriate to visit this place. The diary of Faustina Kowalska was a text especially dear to Karol Wojtyła. Following a precise indication written in that diary, John Paul II established Mercy Sunday.

During World War II, the young Karol Wojtyła worked in the chemical factory. SolvayHe lived in the district of Borek Fałęcki, very close to Łagiewniki. As a priest and bishop he was many times in Łagiewniki. As pope, St. John Paul II twice visited the shrine of Divine Mercy. The first time was on June 7, 1997, during his sixth trip to Poland. He said then that he came to this shrine moved by an imperious need in his heart: "From this place came the proclamation of God's mercy that Jesus Christ himself wanted to give to our generation through Blessed Faustina. It is a clear and intelligible message for everyone. Every person can come here, look at the picture of the merciful Christ, at his Heart that radiates graces, and listen to what Faustina heard: 'Do not be afraid of anything, I am always with you' (Diary, 613).".

mar16-act3
Interior of the sanctuary of the Divine Mercy in Łagiewniki.

During his last pilgrimage to Poland, in August 2002, he consecrated the new Temple of Mercy, erected as a minor basilica. The dimensions of the new building make it possible to welcome thousands of pilgrims. The old church, or chapel, although of reduced capacity, remains the center of the Sanctuary: there is the original picture of the Merciful Jesus, painted according to the indications of St. Faustina, and her relics. From this place, Pope John Paul II consecrated the world to the Divine Mercy on August 19, 2002.

The Shrine of St. John Paul II

From the Sanctuary of the Divine Mercy it is a ten-minute walk to the Sanctuary of John Paul II, inside the John Paul II Center "Do not be afraid".. It is a complex of parks and buildings whose purpose is the study of the life and works of the Polish Pope, along with the dissemination of his devotion. All the buildings constructed are an example that Polish religious architecture can be beautiful.

The sanctuary church has a crypt in whose altar there is a reliquary with the blood of the saint and a number of chapels of great interest. For example, in the priestly chapel we have a replica of the chapel of St. Leonard, where Karol Wojtyła celebrated his first solemn Mass, and there is also the original slab that covered the tomb of John Paul II in the Vatican grottoes before he was proclaimed blessed and his relics were deposited in St. Peter's Basilica.

The shrine of Divine Mercy in Częstochowa, the shrine of the Mogiła Cross, the Auschwiz concentration camp and other places associated with St. Faustina Kowalska and St. John Paul II will play a special role in the development of WYD.

The main church is decorated with large mosaics, full of light and color, of undeniable artistic and symbolic value. They are the work of Father Marko Ivan Rupnik SJ, an author who has done other important works, such as the decoration of the crypt of San Giovanni Rotondo. In one of the chapels, that of Our Lady of Fatima, we can see the cassock worn by John Paul II on the day he suffered an attack, May 13, 1981, when he presided over the Wednesday general audience in St. Peter's Square. Blood stains impregnate the white fabric in many areas.

Kalwaria Zebrzydowska

Kalwaria Zebrzydowska is a Marian shrine founded in the early 17th century by the nobleman Mikolaj Zebrzydowski, modeled after the Church of the Crucifixion in Jerusalem. Its founder wanted to recall the mystery of the passion and death of Christ together with the sorrowful mysteries of Mary, so the different chapels are as if intertwined linking the passion of Christ to that of his Mother. It is governed by the Bernardine Fathers, and the whole complex belongs to the UNESCO World Heritage.

Anyone who has seen the movie "From a faraway country" (directed in 1981 by Polish Krzysztof Zanussi), which chronicles the life of Karol Wojtyła from 1926 until his appointment as Pope, you will remember how it begins. Karol Wojtyła as a child takes part in the Stations of the Cross during Holy Week in Kalwaria Zebrzydowska, 15 kilometers from Wadowice. When it was over, he goes with his father to eat at the pilgrim's inn, where they see the young actor who was staging the Lord who is drinking a beer. That stuck in his mind. So did his father's words at the death of his mother. He pointed to the Virgin Kalwariska and said: "from now on she will be your Mother"..

On August 18, 2002, John Paul II bid farewell to Mary in this Shrine with a moving silent prayer. It was the only apostolic journey during which he was not in Częstochowa. After more than an hour of active silence, he spoke: "How often I have experienced that the Mother of the Son of God turns her merciful eyes to the concerns of the afflicted man and obtains for him the grace to solve difficult problems, and he, poor in strength, is amazed by the strength and wisdom of divine Providence! When I visited this shrine in 1979, I asked you to pray for me as long as I live and after my death. Today I thank you and all the pilgrims of Kalwaria for these prayers, for the spiritual support I continually receive. And I continue to ask you: do not stop praying - I repeat it once again - as long as I live and after my death. And I, as always, will repay your benevolence by commending you all to the merciful Christ and his Mother.".

Wadowice. Church and house

Wadowice is the birthplace of the Polish Pope. It is also an obligatory place to visit to follow in his footsteps. To know a person is to go to his roots, to know the environment where he was born and where he lived his childhood. On June 16, 1999, he had a meeting with a group of faithful in the church square, and there he opened his heart, referring to his memories, without reading any written text, to the thread of his great memory.

A group of faithful celebrate the canonization of John Paul II outside the parish church in Wadowice.
A group of faithful celebrate the canonization of John Paul II outside the parish church in Wadowice.

The very neat parish church of the Presentation of St. Mary is renovated, but it has the air of Wojtyła's younger years. In it we can see the baptismal font where little Karol was baptized, as well as the baptismal certificate. You can also visit a chapel dedicated to John Paul II and the renovated museum in the house where the Wojtyła family lived. From the kitchen window of the House-Museum you can see a sundial on the wall of the church that Lolek saw every day as he left his house, and which bears an expression in Polish: "Czas ucieka wieczność czeka" (time passes, eternity awaits).

Sanctuary of the Cross Mogiła

At the edge of Nowa Huta is the town of Mogiła, with the Cistercian monastery of the Holy Cross, erected in the 13th century. The crucified Christ of Mogiła has enjoyed great popular devotion for centuries. Karol Wojtyła went there many times, attracted by his great love for the Cross. It was at this shrine that he delivered his last homily as ordinary of Krakow on September 17, 1978 on the occasion of the Solemnity of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross. He said: "In a particular way I come to this place to commend to Our Lord and to his holy Mother the new Pope, elected a few weeks ago, the successor of Peter, Pope John Paul I."

Already as Pope he returned to this shrine of the Cross on June 9, 1979, and on that occasion he used for the first time the expression "new evangelization": "Our fathers in the past raised the cross in different places in Poland as a sign that the Gospel had arrived there, that evangelization was beginning, that it continued uninterruptedly. With this idea the first cross was also erected in Mogiła [...]. Now, on the threshold of the new millennium, we have received a new sign: for new times and new circumstances the Gospel is coming again. A new evangelization has begun, a second one, which is the same as the first.".

The WYD cross that the young people carry in their hands from one country to another is the sign of the transmission of the Christian faith. The cross, which is circling the globe, gives meaning to the history of the days.

Auschwitz

This Nazi concentration and extermination camp seems to me also a must-see place. I have met many Poles who have never been to this place, nor do they plan to. I understand that. But in my opinion we should all get to know it, as we have no such dramatic and horrifying vestige of the madness and horror of the wars of the 20th century as Auschwitz.

In Auschwitz, the German name for the Polish city of Oświęcim (neither word is easy for Spanish speakers to pronounce), there were three concentration camps. The first two have been preserved. "Auschwitz 1" is a museum where you visit the barracks built in well-made, Austrian-made brick of the late 19th century (it should be remembered that that part of Poland, Galitzia, belonged at that time to the Austro-Hungarian Empire). The second camp is Auschwitz-Birkenau. Built during the war, it is located four kilometers away from the first one. It is necessary to go to both camps. Saint John Paul II (June 7, 1979) and Benedict XVI (May 28, 2006) visited both camps. Both Popes also passed through the door with the inscription: Arbeit macht freiwhich sounds like a blasphemous mockery of the dignity of man and labor.

Access to the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Access to the Auschwitz concentration camp.

The two Popes - one Polish and the other German - evaluated their visit to Auschwitz with almost the same words: "I couldn't not come to this place.". These words express the obligation to do justice to the memory of the victims of the Nazi extermination. The two Popes prayed in the cell where St. Maximilian Kolbe died a martyr. On numerous occasions I have gone from Krakow to Auschwitz-Birkenau to walk at dusk along the large esplanades of the camp, crossed by rails, and to pray with the texts of the homily that John Paul II delivered in that very place: "'This is the victory that overcomes the world: our faith' (1 Jn 5:4). In this place of terrible devastation, which meant death for four million men from different nations, Father Maximilian, by offering himself willingly to death, in the bunker of hunger, for a brother, achieved a spiritual victory similar to that of Christ himself. This brother still lives today in this Polish land. But was Father Maximilian Kolbe the only one? Certainly, he achieved a victory that had immediate repercussions on his fellow prisoners and has repercussions even today in the Church and in the world. But surely many other victories were won. I think, for example, of the death, in the crematorium oven of the concentration camp, of the Carmelite Sister Benedicta of the Cross (known in the world as Edith Stein), an illustrious student of Husserl who has become an honor of contemporary German philosophy and who descended from a Hebrew family living in Wroclaw"..

And Pope Benedict XVI, on the same stage as his predecessor but 27 years later, cried out dramatically: "In a place like this one is speechless. Deep down one can only keep a silence of stupor, a silence that is an interior cry addressed to God: Why, Lord, did you keep silent? Why did you tolerate all this?". Right after Benedict XVI pronounced those words, a rainbow full of color was drawn in the sky. We could all see it. It was like a divine response, visible, clear, silent....

Krakow

For some pilgrims, the omnipresence of John Paul II in many areas of religious and social life in Poland can be a bit tiresome. This great presence is something natural, yes, but it is also true that good things should be given in small doses, because repeated in a routine way is tiring and annoying. That is why we must remember that in Krakow, as in the whole country, there is a great variety of places and spaces worth visiting that are not closely related to the Polish Pope. There are many other saints connected with this city that must be mentioned, starting with the martyred bishop St. Stanislaus and ending with St. Faustina and her message of Mercy: the queens Kinga and Jadwiga Andegaweńska, the friars Albert Chmielowski, Simon of Lipnicy or Raphael Kalinowski; the professors of the Jagiellonian University John Kanty and Bishop Joseph Sebastian Pelchar; and the servant Aniela Salawa. However, because of what John Paul II has meant for Poland and for the recent history of the Church, the places linked to his biography are the ones that stand out the most.

In Krakow it is worth admiring its old town, especially the market square, Wawel Hill with the cathedral and castle, and the Jewish quarter of Kazimierz. There are many sites that are connected with the life of Karol Wojtyła: the house at 10 Tyniecka Street, where he lived during his first year of university and the war, and where his father died; the parish church of St. Florian, where he began his youthful pastoral methods and which bore fruit in his book "Love and responsibility."or Calle de los Canónigos, where he lived in two of his houses -now museums- from 1953 to 1964. Let's highlight four places worth visiting:

1) The Bishop's Palace. It is located at Franciszkańska Street 3, as opposite is the Franciscan convent. Karol Wotyła entered this palace as a seminarian during the war. In its chapel he was ordained a priest - he alone - by Cardinal Sapieha. Already as titular bishop of Krakow (between 1964 and 1978) every day from 9.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. he worked in that sacred place looking at the Tabernacle. He spoke many times from the central window of that palace during the evening serenades for young people organized during his apostolic trips to Krakow.

2) Wawel Cathedral. This cathedral is a summary of the history of Poland. There, in its central altar, the relics of St. Stanislaus can be found. Kings were also crowned there. In its crypts are buried the great men of the religious, political and cultural life of Poland. In the oldest chapel, the Romanesque crypt of St. Leonard, Karol Wojtyła celebrated his first - his first three - solemn Masses on November 2, 1946. On the occasion of his golden jubilee of priesthood he wanted to celebrate Holy Mass again in that chapel. His thanksgiving lasted two hours. It was June 9, 1997.

Exterior of the Wawel Cathedral (Krakow), of great importance for Poland.
Exterior of the Wawel Cathedral (Krakow), of great importance for Poland.

3) The church of Santa Maria. This church, located in the market square, offers the best artistic and religious work of all Polish heritage: the altarpiece of the Assumption of St. Mary. It is the work of the sculptor Wit Stwosz who in 1477 moved with his family from Nuremberg to Krakow. In this city he worked and realized this masterpiece. The costs alone (the entire budget of the city for one year) give an idea of the grandeur of the project. The altarpiece is articulated around a Marian trilogy that helps to pray. In the first scene we see Mary sleeping around the apostles. Next, Mary, body and soul, is elevated to heaven. Finally, the Virgin is crowned by the Trinity. During his first years as a priest, John Paul II used to hear confessions in this church. The confessional can still be seen today. Dr. Wanda Półtawska recalls in her book of memoirs. "Diary of a friendship" the occasion when he went to this church of St. Mary for confession. During confession, the young priest Wojtyła said to him: "Come to Holy Mass in the morning, and come every day!". Those words were for her like a "thunderclap": "I didn't ask him to be the spiritual director of my soul, I didn't tell him anything like that. It all came naturally when at the end he told me what no priest had ever told me before: Come to Holy Mass in the morning, and come every day! More than once I have thought that to tell the truth every confessor should give such simple advice.".

4) Jagiellonian University. It is the oldest university in Poland. Founded in 1360 by King Casimir III the Great, it was renovated and promoted by King Jagiellon and his wife Saint Jadwiga (Hedwig). Karol was a student at the University and received a doctorate in theology. honoris causa in 1983.

The authorIgnacy Soler

Krakow

The World

Francis and Kirill, in Havana, a historic meeting and a historic declaration

The meeting between Pope Francis and the Patriarch of Moscow Kirill has opened a new path in the relations between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches. Mgr. Romà Casanova, Bishop of Vic, analyzes the meeting.

Romà Casanova-March 7, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

The Second Vatican Council in the decree on ecumenism, Unitatis redintegratiohe says: "This sacred Council hopes that, the wall which separates the Western and Eastern Church having been overthrown, there will at last be made one dwelling, seated on the cornerstone, Christ Jesus, who will make the two into one sun to thing." (n. 18). And among the conditions for this to be possible, the same council affirms its desire that the following be done "all efforts, especially with prayer and fraternal dialogue about doctrine and the most urgent needs of the pastoral function in our days". (ibid.). Even before Vatican II, but later with new strength, the Catholic Church has launched itself into the task of achieving the unity so desired and requested by the Lord in the priestly prayer of Jn 17.

In this ecumenical journey towards the full unity of the one and only Church of Christ, there are truly significant milestones, such as the meeting of Pope Paul VI with the Patriarch Athenagoras in 1964, the meetings of St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis with the Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople, as well as with other Orthodox Patriarchs. Not forgetting, either, so many meetings at different levels that contribute to opening paths of greater knowledge and friendship, which are the prelude to the full unity of the Eastern and Western Churches.

The relationship at the highest level between the representatives of the Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church was an unfinished business. It is not that there was no interest on the part of the Bishop of Rome, since the attempts of John Paul II and Benedict XVI for one reason or another never came to fruition. A breakthrough was seen when Patriarch Kirill sent Archbishop Hilarion of Volokolamsk to visit Pope Benedict XVI in September 2009.

The very fact of being together Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill in Havana The announcement on February 12 is already very good news. The gestures speak for themselves. The fraternal embrace, the sitting down together to talk, the exchange of meaningful gifts; all this is in itself a proclamation of Christ. Centuries have passed since the break between East and West, and half a century has passed since the first meetings of the Pope with hierarchs of the Orthodox Churches. The meeting in Havana has all the category of a historic event that will certainly open new channels of dialogue and mutual encounters between sister Churches.

No one is unaware of the role of the Russian Orthodox Church among the Orthodox Churches, since it is the most numerous in the world. Likewise, this milestone comes against the backdrop of another great historic event scheduled for later this year: the Pan-Orthodox Synod. But the joint declaration is also full of riches for ecumenical dialogue. Given the brevity of this text, we will only underline a few points, without claiming to be exhaustive.

The Declaration is placed in the perspective that understands ecumenism as a gift of God. Hence, God is thanked for this new step taken in Havana (n. 1 of the Declaration) and the request for this gift is a constant throughout the document. Given the fragility of the human condition, this gift requires a task on the part of men.

Likewise, from the beginning of the Declaration (3), it is made explicit that ecumenism and full unity are an imperative derived from the mission of the Church before the world. The common Tradition inherited from the first millennium (4) is eminently expressed in the celebration of the Eucharist itself. However, this also shows the lack of unity in the conception and explanation of the faith, fruit of human weakness, as expressed in the deprivation of Eucharistic communication between the two Churches (5).

The meeting between Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill is intended to be a link towards full unity (6) at a crucial moment of epochal change in history in which we are immersed: "Christian conscience and pastoral responsibility do not allow us to remain indifferent to challenges that require a joint response." (7).

The Gordian knot of ecumenism is the martyrial witness of Christians from different churches in regions of the world where Christians are persecuted (8). The extermination of families, villages and cities of brothers and sisters in Syria, Iraq and the Middle East, present since apostolic times, calls for immediate measures on the part of the international community and humanitarian aid (9, 10), as well as the prayer of both churches for Christ to grant peace, the fruit of justice and fraternal coexistence (11).

The joint declaration concludes the look at the Middle East by affirming that, in a mysterious way, these martyred brothers are united in the confession of the same faith in Jesus Christ, "are the key to Christian unity." (12). Interreligious dialogue calls for education to respect the beliefs of other religious traditions and repudiates any attempt to justify criminal acts in the name of God (13).

Unity is understood in a pastoral perspective. Thus, the declaration indicates with great determination new missionary challenges that must be addressed in a common way. These are broad fields of evangelization and pastoral action that must be confronted: the vacuum left by atheistic regimes that portend a revival of the Christian faith in Russia and Eastern Europe (14); secularism that undermines the fundamental human right of religious freedom (15); the challenge of European integration, whose Christian roots have forged its millennia-long history (16); poverty and inequality, which calls for social justice, respect for national traditions and effective solidarity (17 and 18); the situation of the family (19) and marriage (20); the right to life, with special attention to the manipulation of human life (21).

Young people have a prominent place in this enormous task; they are asked to adopt a new way of life that departs from the dominant way of thinking (22), being disciples and apostles, capable of taking up the cross when necessary (23).

The document, therefore, suggests a vast evangelizing horizon that calls for a common response from both Churches, an ecumenism of action and common witness.

With this objective in mind, the declaration courageously addresses points that have been a source of tension and that impede the preaching of the Gospel to the contemporary world (24): proselytism is excluded and the fact that we are brothers and sisters is proposed as a cornerstone; a commitment is made to seek new forms of coexistence between Greek Catholics and Orthodox, encouraging reconciliation between the two (25); the need for the cessation of hostilities in Ukraine is made explicit, to give way to social harmony; an appeal is made to the moral and social witness of Christians before a world in which the moral foundations of human existence are being undermined (26).

The Declaration, therefore, fulfills the objectives of the Second Vatican Council, cited at the beginning of these words. It entrusts us with the task of asking for the gift of unity and the task of deepening the reality of fraternity in order to reconcile ourselves and love legitimate diversity.

The authorRomà Casanova

Bishop of Vic

The World

Pan-Orthodox Council: overcoming disagreements to return to a common direction

The Orthodox Churches are about to meet in a council (the first in over a thousand years) that aims to become an instrument of unity among them. It will take place from June 16-27, 2016 on the island of Crete.

Bryan P. Bradley-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

It took five decades of intense negotiations on the issues to be addressed and the decision-making format before the agreement to convene the meeting was reached. Sacred and Great CouncilThe leaders of all the autocephalous (recognized as autonomous) Orthodox Churches finally agreed to convene the meeting in Switzerland in the last days of January.

In the event that the meeting is held - there are still disagreements that could change the plans or cause not all those summoned to attend - the Pan-Orthodox Council will be a great historical event, perhaps not so much for its eventual contents, but for the mere fact of having been held. The official convenor of the meeting is the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinoplewho has been a tireless promoter of the council. The aim is that the Orthodox Churches should once again function not as a mere confederation of independent Churches, but as a single ecclesial body, able to speak with one voice. This would facilitate both their Christian witness in the world and the possibilities of ecumenical dialogue, also with the Catholic Church.  "The advent of the Sacred and Great Council will serve as a testimony to the unity of the Orthodox Church."Bartholomew said during the meeting of Orthodox Primates in Geneva (Switzerland) in January. "It is not a single event, but must be understood as an overall process that unfolds.".

Among the 14 autocephalous Churches summoned to the Council are the historic Patriarchates of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem; the Modern Patriarchates of Moscow, Belgrade, Romania, Bulgaria and Georgia; and the Archiepiscopal Churches of Cyprus, Greece, Albania, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The delegations of these Churches may include representatives of other Orthodox Churches dependent on them, as well as non-Orthodox observers, who may attend only the opening and closing sessions.

The days close to the feast of Pentecost have been chosen for its celebration, which, according to the Eastern calendar, this year will be Sunday, June 19. The meeting will take place in Crete. The venue will be the Orthodox Academy, located 24 kilometers from the coastal city of Chania. It was originally planned to be held in the church of St. Irene in Istanbul, but due to the high diplomatic tensions between Turkey and Russia, the Moscow Patriarchate requested a change of venue.

Agenda

The meeting of the Primates in Geneva (which took place at the Orthodox Center in Chambésy), in addition to setting the dates and location, officially approved the topics to be discussed and the rules of procedure for the 12-day council.

The representatives of the Orthodox Churches have been trying since the 1960s to elaborate a series of basic documents on ten topics that should be worked out at the council. On some of them, mostly related to the internal hierarchy of the Orthodox Church, there is still no agreement.

Of these ten topics, the Primates approved six to be discussed at the Council: the mission of the Orthodox Church in the contemporary world, the Orthodox Diaspora, autonomy and the manner of its proclamation, the sacrament of marriage and the difficulties it encounters, the meaning of fasting and its observance today, and the relations of the Orthodox Churches with the rest of the Christian world. On the other hand, they did not agree to address the issue of establishing a common calendar for Easter.

"Some issues have been removed from the agenda, not because they have been solved, but because it was not possible to reach a solution."Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of the Moscow Patriarchate's Department for External Relations, told a press conference. Metropolitan Hilarion stressed that the council should show unity and not air conflicts. He also expressed his satisfaction that the Primates, at the insistence of the Russian Primate, agreed to require unanimous agreement in the council for the approval of any decision.

Risks

The requirement of unanimity, which assumes that each Church has the power of veto, may complicate the conduct of the council. However, in the opinion of the Moscow Patriarchate, the council would lose its pan-Orthodox authority if not all the Churches convened did not participate in the decisions. "If any of the Churches, for whatever reason, were unable or unwilling to participate, then it would no longer be a pan-Orthodox council. At most it would be an inter-Orthodox synod."said Hilarion.

One of the main conflicts within the Orthodoxy is the rivalry between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. The former is the largest of the Orthodox Churches with more than one hundred million faithful. The latter, on the other hand, although it currently has far fewer faithful, enjoys a primacy of honor over the entire Orthodox world. Moreover, while the Patriarchate of Constantinople has always promoted the idea of the council, the Moscow Patriarchate has generally tried to complicate its organization or to play down its importance.

There are also other relevant differences. The Patriarchate of Antioch, for example, is at odds with the Patriarchate of Jerusalem over the appointment of a metropolitan in Qatar. As a result, it has threatened not to participate in the June council if such a disagreement is not resolved first.

Hopes

Bartholomew has repeatedly said that further delay of the council would compromise the image of the Orthodox Church in the world and among its own faithful. At the same time, he suggests that coming together in a council is the best way to move forward in unity. "The only way to avoid the temptations of confessional isolation is through dialogue."said the Ecumenical Patriarch in January. In an address to the bishops of his jurisdiction several months before the Geneva meeting, he explained his thinking in more detail: "To those who say, with good will, that the council needs more preparation and that it should include in its agenda more The answer is that the convocation of the council itself is even more important, as a beginning for other councils, which in turn will resolve the pressing issues of the day.n more burning issues".

One issue that everyone seems to agree on is that the expected Sacred and Great Council of the Orthodox should not be called "ecumenical". For some, like the Patriarch of Constantinople, because the Churches of the West, which did participate in the ancient councils prior to the "great schism" of 1054, will not participate; for others, like the Patriarchate of Moscow, because only after it is held, if in fact there is universal acceptance of its teachings, could a council be recognized as ecumenical.

In any case, as the Orthodox theologian John Chryssavgis, archdeacon and advisor to Patriarch Bartholomew, recently wrote in the American magazine First Things: "Certainly something is stirring within the Orthodox Church. And the rumor will become louder and clearer in the weeks and months to come.". Despite the uncertainties, Chryssavgis himself looks forward to possible historical outcomes, with the help of the Holy Spirit, both for the life of the Orthodox themselves and for their relations with other Christians. Indeed, he sees in the current tensions between groups and individuals within the Orthodox world echoes of the struggles that occurred in the councils of the first millennium. "History is seldom made by people of weak character, and ecclesiastical history is no exception."he assures.

The authorBryan P. Bradley

Vilnius

Read more
Cinema

Nathan Douglas: Evangelizing through film

Nathan Douglas is a 26-year-old Canadian screenwriter and film director who, despite his youth, has managed to compete in one of the most prestigious film festivals.

Fernando Mignone-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Created in 1979, the Clermont-Ferrand International Festival (France) is the most important short film festival in the world. Nathan Douglas managed to get his short film (about seven minutes long) to be one of the 70 films selected to participate among more than 8,000 films from different countries. For him it is a dream come true. His film, entitled "Son in the Barbershop" (Hijo en la peluquería), is about a young man who overhears a telephone conversation between a divorced father and his son in the barbershop where he is having his hair cut. This young filmmaker showed his short film for the first time in March 2015, at the congress. Univ of Rome. He then went on to several North American festivals before arriving at the Clermont-Ferrand festival. It was a unique experience, although he was a bit shocked by the commercial side of the event.

Nathan Douglas was born in the Canadian province of Ontario and lives in British Columbia. He studied Film at the Simon Fraser Universitywhere I met him. He works in his alma mater making educational documentaries. He also produces short films on his own. After all, some of us in Vancouver pride ourselves on living in the Hollywood North because of the amount of filming that takes place here. Nathan was baptized in a Protestant community shortly after his birth. After ten years of seeking God he joined the Catholic Church at the Easter Vigil in 2013. There were four factors that greatly influenced his conversion: "My work, which made me more sensitive to art and beauty as ways to experience God's love; Eucharistic adoration; a Catholic friend who lovingly and persistently challenged me; and a week I spent in a Benedictine monastery (near Vancouver) that opened my heart to the beauty of the liturgy."

"What is the main purpose of cinema?", I ask him. According to Nathan, it is the same as that of all true art: "To reflect the beauty of Christ in a way that can be understood through the senses. There are things that words cannot say. I think film can lead you to an experience of love. Film can overcome our resistance by reminding us how much we are worth as children of God."

Nathan explains that the influential film critic and film theorist (as well as Catholic) André Bazin (who lived from 1918 to 1958), wrote that cinema, more than any other art, is inextricably linked to love. For André Bazin "the camera is like an omniscient universal eye that gives us an idea of how God sees. It prepares us to accept the undeserved understanding of God himself. A truly Catholic cinema should embrace the viewer with the mysterious love of God and man, not hammer him with messages.".

He affirms that cinema is a gift from God, a rare fruit of modernity, and that Catholics should dialogue with avant-garde cinema. "Often, avant-garde art disrupts notions of beauty and order. But these works often represent a quest. In modern life there is constant abstraction and movement, and many of these films struggle with this challenge. Cinema is not just for entertainment; that is a trap of consumerist society. The films you see out there don't usually change people's lives; they are produced for the masses. Many avant-garde artists understand this, even if they also oppose institutions like the Church. We can work side by side with them in their work against injustice.".

Nathan sees in the beauty of art and in the witness of the saints the two pillars of conversion: "I believe that holiness and art are the two greatest evangelizing voices the Church possesses. And film brings these two voices together when it shows us lives that seek truth and love.".

The authorFernando Mignone

Montreal

Read more
Spain

First National Mercy Congress, October 22-23, 2010

The Spanish Episcopal Conference, which has just celebrated its 50th anniversary, is preparing the First National Divine Mercy Congress.

Enrique Carlier-March 6, 2016-Reading time: < 1 minute

The Spanish bishops have commissioned Bishop Ginés García BeltránBishop of Guadix-Baza, to coordinate the many groups, ecclesial realities and the movement that has arisen in our country around the spirituality and message of Divine Mercy. For this reason -and also because the Church is living in this Jubilee Year dedicated to Mercy-, the preparation of the First National Divine Mercy Congress is already well advanced. "We trust in your mercy."will be held in Madrid on October 22 and 23. The organizers estimate about two thousand participants.

The first objective of the congress is to show the message of the Divine Mercy in all its depth, beyond the devotional. A second objective will be to make visible, for the first time in Spain, the spirituality movement - at present very fragmented - that draws from the message of Divine Mercy. Abroad, this "charism" has been institutionalized and is spread mainly through the Congregation of the Sisters of the Mother of God of Mercy and the "Faustinum" Association, with headquarters in the Sanctuary of the Divine Mercy in Krakow-Lagiewniki.

The First International Divine Mercy Congress, the brainchild of John Paul II, was held in Rome in 2008. Two more have been held since then. The next one, in Manila, will be held in 2017. In other countries, such as Ireland, national congresses have been organized for 14 years.

Although at first there were some reservations about the message of Divine Mercy, it was later endorsed by John Paul II through the beatification and canonization of Faustina Kowalska and the institution of the feast of the Divine Mercy.

The authorEnrique Carlier

Read more
Spain

Manos Unidas starts a three-year period against hunger

February 14 marked the start of Manos Unidas' LVII campaign for 2016, in its fight to end the scourge suffered by 800 million people.

Enrique Carlier-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

This year, Manos Unidas has begun a three-year struggle against hunger, which will culminate in 2018, just as this Catholic Church NGO specialized in promoting development is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary. During these three years, it will focus its efforts on combating the main causes of hunger: the misuse of food and energy resources; an international economic system that prioritizes profit; and lifestyles that increase vulnerability and exclusion.

Soledad Suárez, president of Manos UnidasIn the presentation of the campaign, he pointed out that "it is unacceptable that hunger can be allowed in the 21st century, in a world of abundance such as ours", and that "it is contrary to logic, ethics and morality that one in nine people on earth go hungry, while every year 1/3 of the food produced is lost and wasted". He alluded to the data provided by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) according to which 795 million people go hungry in the world, and to a figure recently published by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment: every year 1,300 million kilos of food are thrown away.

This year, Victoria Braquehais, a Spanish nun of the Purity of Mary who runs an institute in the village of Kancence, in the southwest of the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Dr. Carlos Arriola, who works at the Jocotán children's nutritional recovery center in Guatemala, put their faces and names to the Manos Unidas campaign.

At its crossroads against hunger, Manos Unidas believes that the North-South scheme, in which the rich countries show the poor the way forward, is no longer valid. Moreover, as Pope Francis suggests in the encyclical Laudato si', it is necessary to link development with the environment and sustainability.

In that direction, between late 2015 and early 2016, Manos Unidas has supported various emergencies in Ethiopia and Zimbabwe, where the lack of rainfall suggests a great humanitarian tragedy; in contrast to the El Niño phenomenon that has forced to respond to emergency calls for floods in Paraguay, Congo and India.

In the area of refugee aid, Manos Unidas has supported projects in Jordan to help Syrian and Iraqi refugees and refugees fleeing the conflict in South Sudan. And it has contributed to improving the living conditions of displaced persons in Thailand, Colombia, Central African Republic and Congo.

All this work would not be possible, logically, without the support of the nearly 79,000 members and collaborators of Manos Unidas, as well as contributions from public and private institutions. Manos Unidas' income in 2015 increased by 4.7 % and reached 45.1 million euros. An increase due to private donations, which grew by 5.4 % compared to 2014.

With this income, it has been possible to approve nearly 600 development projects directly benefiting 2.8 million people. In 2016, for the implementation of food security projects alone, Manos Unidas will allocate 11 million euros; 10 % more than in 2014 and 2015....

The authorEnrique Carlier

Spain

Application, without further ado, of the gender identity protocol.

After Luken, the boy from Guipuzcoa who asked to be recognized as a girl, now a teenager has appeared in Seville who, following the Andalusian protocol on gender identity, will be called Ana.

Rafael Ruiz Morales-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

The bell violently breaks the stillness of the corridors of a public high school in Seville announcing the time for recess. Within seconds, they are assaulted by hundreds of young people who, relieved, are looking for a break. Among the teachers, however, a climate of uncertainty reigns. They have been urgently summoned -with less than twenty-four hours notice- to an extraordinary assembly.

In a matter of minutes, almost all of them have filled the large space of the teachers' lounge, presided over by the serious face of the center's director. A general murmur echoes in the room, and the looks suggest more doubts than certainties. The head of the institute, paused, takes the floor: a boy, no older than fourteen, expressed to the management the day before, his desire to be known as Ana. With the help of an association - which, curiously, is present in the promotion and management of all these cases - and without prior announcement, he went to the institute, demanding compliance with the "...".Action Protocol on Gender Identity in the Andalusian Educational System.The "Launching of a new program for the 2014-2015 academic year Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía (Department of Education of the Regional Government of Andalusia).

None of those gathered knew what they were talking to him about. "But do we have to call him Ana right after the break?", asked one of the attendees. "This is the way it has to be", the director replied with little confidence. "At least, there will be some medical or psychological report, or some judicial opinion to back up your position, won't there?", questioned another. "Nothing, and according to the Protocol, it is also not mandatory for there to be".

Perplexity reigned in the atmosphere and the director added: "In fact, in a short period of time, a member of the CEP will be sent by the Department to Centro del Profesorado, dependent on the Consejería de Educación [Teacher Center, dependent on the Consejería de Educación]. to provide the corresponding courses on the prevention of gender violence to the teaching staff, students, and even to the parents of the school's students.". The meeting ended with more questions than there were at the beginning.

This is one of the cases that have occurred lately in the national territory. In February, the case of Luken, a resident of Guipuzcoa, who, at only four years of age, was recognized by a judge in Tolosa as a girl, came to light. She may not know how to tie her shoelaces with sufficient dexterity, and she certainly does not read a page of her primer. But the door has been opened for him to pass over his own sex.

Neither the boy who now wants to be Ana has been offered a time for reflection, nor the little Luken to wait until he has the use of reason. Until they are eighteen, they will not be able to vote, drive, sign a substantial contract or open a bank account. But in the complex world of self-acceptance, emotions and affections, they have been left alone.

Precisely when the wind of confusion is at its strongest; just when the night of doubt has grown darkest; just when they most needed a clear light and a safe haven, they have been abandoned to their fate. All the proposal they have received has been: "Don't fight; surrender. That I am at your side to see you surrender your weapons."

Not long ago, the priest and journalist Santiago Martin alluded to the sufferings of Christ as he hung on the Cross. He was referring to those who rebuked him in his agony. They did not do so with insulting words; they simply repeated what the devil had intended some time before: "Save yourself by coming down from the cross!"they said. "Reject God's plan! work according to your will! surrender!". But on Calvary Jesus found in his Mother the gaze that sustained him: "....Let the Father's Will be done in you, My Son!".

Even in the hour of the storm, these children, like so many others, do not need associations or protocols that instrumentalize their pain to achieve their ideological ends. We must encourage them to remain firm in hope. And in this way, they will understand that "the acceptance of one's own body as a gift from God is necessary to welcome and accept the whole world as a gift from the Father and as a common home". (Encyclical Laudato si').

 

The authorRafael Ruiz Morales

Faith without complexes

The lack of respect shown by some for Christian convictions, feelings and symbols is painful and unjust. But it is also an opportunity to witness the faith with peace, love and without complexes.

March 6, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

With the latest political-social events I have found some people on Twitter defending that religion should be reduced to the private sphere. Cases of disrespect such as the puppeteers in Madrid, the "madrenuestra" in Barcelona and the Rita Maestre trialThe fact that Spain is a "secular state" is not fulfilled in practice, and some people justify such disrespect based on the idea that Spain is a "secular state".

To begin with, let us clarify that the Spanish State is neither secular nor secularist, but non-denominational. And it is not the same thing. Article 16.3 of the Constitution establishes that "no denomination shall have a state character, the public authorities shall take into account the religious beliefs of Spanish society and shall maintain the consequent relations of cooperation with the Catholic Church and other denominations". 

On the other hand, article 16 of the Constitution ".guarantees the ideological, religious and worship freedom of individuals and communities...". In turn, Organic Law 7/1980 develops this point and speaks of facilitating religious assistance in public places, as well as the right to receive religious services in public places. religious formation in educational centers supported by the state.

In Spain, therefore, freedom of religious expression is not only a fundamental right in the private sphere, but also in the public sphere. But, in addition, Jesus himself asked us: "Go and preach the good news to all nations.". Therefore, one can and should express one's faith publicly. In the Middle East, where Christians risk their lives for Christ, they have no fears or complexes. Perhaps we should learn from them. The situation of religious intolerance that we are living in Spain seems to me an opportunity to make our fundamental religious rights be respected, although not in any way, but from peace and coherence with the Gospel. It is time to live and express our faith without complexes.

The authorOmnes

Spain

Will a redistribution of the clergy be necessary in the future? Some proposals

The Solemnity of St. Joseph and the celebration of Seminary Day are a propitious occasion to analyze how priestly vocations are evolving in Spain and to see what is, in short, the situation and the future of our clergy.

Santiago Bohigues Fernández-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 4 minutes

The Church in Spain has, according to the latest published statistics, 18,813 priests, for a total of 23,071 parishes. And the average age of Spanish priests is 65 years, which has been a cause of concern for the bishops and for the whole Church, since the new promotions of priests (there are 1,357 seminarians) do not guarantee today the generational relay. If urgent measures are not taken, in ten years there will be dioceses that will not be able to meet the needs of their faithful. That is why the Episcopal Conference is working on a document that includes criteria and proposals on a future and eventual redistribution of the clergy. The secretary of the Clergy Commission of the Spanish Episcopal Conference (CEE), Santiago Bohigues Fernández, discusses these criteria and proposals in these pages.

The shortage of clergy, which is more noticeable in rural areas (very depopulated) than in urban areas, is causing us to face emergencies whose consequences cannot be ignored. New ways of evangelization are being considered, but the reality is that in some places the preservation of the faith itself will be endangered. The Christian community needs the presence of priests, because it is in liturgical action that the center of the community of the faithful is constituted. And as the Vatican Council IIThe priestly ministry shares in the same universal breadth of the mission entrusted by Christ to the apostles.

Faced with the lack of priests, there are different positions: to surrender and resign oneself passively to what is coming, to go for the immediate without further ado, to be filled with fear of the future... or to change one's mind and heart to face the signs of the times with a broad outlook.

The shortage of clergy should worry us but not distress us; the Lord will never leave us abandoned and always attends to those who turn to him. For the bishops, obliged to have solicitude for the whole Church, the promotion of vocations is urgent. For example, it will be opportune to set up a vocation group in the parishes and various initiatives: vocation Thursdays, prayer groups for vocations, vocation petitions in the prayers of every Sunday, a prayer chain for vocations, activities and prayer meetings in the seminary open to students of Catholic schools, monthly vigils, vocation weeks, supporting the World Day of Prayer for Vocations and the Day of the Good Shepherd. Also incorporating vocation catechesis into ordinary catechesis, working with altar servers and through the Diocesan Center for Vocation Ministry....

The bishops have to lead this evangelizing impulse hand in hand with the priests, their first collaborators. They should not look to past times that will never return, but face the present times with the right inner disposition.

And in order to be right in an eventual distribution of the clergy, it is necessary to take into account many factors. The Congregation for the Clergy has already indicated that it is not only a question of numbers; it is necessary to know the historical evolution and the specific conditions of the more developed particular Churches, which require a greater number of ministers.

Criteria to consider

Among the guiding criteria, we can point out, at a general level:

  • It is very important to know the reality of each diocese and of each place to be evangelized, in order to make a planning or programming that goes beyond temporal or personal circumstances.
  • It is not possible to send priests only to preserve what is there, without addressing the causes of the shortage of priestly vocations that prevent the local Church from developing.
    It is advisable to prepare the priest who is willing to help in another diocese in need.
  • The holiness of the priest is given in the ministerial exercise itself, and the way of life of the Catholic priest must be attractive. It will be so if what is external is an authentic expression of what is lived interiorly. We all have to make a sincere review today, following the paradigm of Zacchaeus. A personal conversion is necessary to arrive at a pastoral conversion. But how many priests make annual spiritual exercises? We need ministers in love with their priesthood, not functionaries.
  • We need a pastoral ministry of growth, not of conservation. Sometimes we "burn" priests. There are new situations that we should not face with old schemes, but with new forms and methods: to create, for example, priestly and fraternal teams that facilitate the community experience and overcome the prevailing individualism. And perhaps the time of home service is over, looking for what is easy.
  • Is current seminary formation adequate? Because priests may be being prepared for a world that no longer exists. Should the bar be lowered to allow more young people to enter the seminary, or in times of scarcity should it be raised a little higher?
  • Perhaps it would be opportune to look for some priests of substance from different dioceses to give retreats and take care of the ongoing formation of the clergy (priests of mercy).
  • The permanent diaconate is not a solution to the lack of priests, but it is a help.
  • There is also a need for close collaboration between the diocesan clergy and the consecrated life.
  • The laity are also important, although they must be given the formation and spiritual accompaniment they need so that they can be bearers of God's love in a missionary and "going out" Church.

Formulas

At the individual level, several formulas could be used:

  • Foreign priests with ordinary pastoral care. The requests would be made from bishop to bishop, who would send some of his priests for a determined period of time and under previously established conditions.
  • Priests with scholarships and limited pastoral commitment. They come to a diocese with the mission of studying for a degree or doctorate in ecclesiastical sciences. They would have the obligation to celebrate daily Mass and dedicate two hours to the parish to which they would be assigned.
  • Seminarians from other dioceses sent by their bishop. They are formed in the host seminary under established conditions. This option is having many problems in different seminaries.
  • Priests from Spanish dioceses offering to go to other dioceses in need. These priests would help to strengthen vocation ministry in the different dioceses with an established plan for a specific time.
  • Pastoral units with a priest and a group of religious and lay people who would attend to a territory where there are several parishes. In some dioceses they also incorporate a permanent deacon.
  • Restructuring of the diocese and elimination of unnecessary parishes. In towns where there are several parishes, they are being grouped into one with several worship centers. Very small parishes are also being incorporated into larger parishes.

New mentality

Faced with the eventual shortage of clergy, it is therefore necessary to change our mentality: to put aside the activism of functionaries, individualism or the lack of priestly spirit, which incapacitate us for the new challenges, and to be authentic mediators between God and his People.

 

The authorSantiago Bohigues Fernández

Secretary of the Episcopal Commission for the Clergy.

Read more

Entering the heart of the Holy Year of Mercy

The Pope at the Jubilee Audience began in this way: "We enter day after day into the heart of the Holy Year of Mercy."

March 6, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

The month of January was drawing to a close when the Pope began his Saturday Jubilee Audience with this observation: "We enter day by day into the heart of the Holy Year of Mercy.". The day before, addressing the participants in the plenary session of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he once again recalled the purpose of this Year: "I hope that in this Jubilee all members of the Church will renew their faith in Jesus Christ who is the face of the Father's mercy, the way that unites God and man.".

In the last month, we have witnessed the closing of the Year of Consecrated Lifeat the beginning of the liturgical season of Lent and to the apostolic journey of the Holy Father to Mexico. The Pope's speeches revolved around these events, with the common thread being the repeated invitation to experience divine mercy in order to be witnesses of it in the world.

During the Jubilee of Consecrated Life, Francis proposed to strengthen three pillars on which the life of men and women consecrated to the service of the Lord in the Church rests: prophecy, proximity and hope. Consecrated persons are called to be people of encounter, custodians of wonder, who live the joy of gratitude. The Year of Consecrated Life has been like the river that "now converges in the sea of mercy, in this immense mystery of love that we are experiencing with the Extraordinary Jubilee.". He spoke similar words at the Jubilee of the Curia, where he invited the Pope's closest collaborators to become a model for all, so that "in our workplaces... let no one feel neglected or mistreated, but let each one experience, first of all, the loving care of the Good Shepherd.".

In the Bull of convocation of the Holy Year of MercyPope Francis asked that this year's Lent be lived with greater intensity, "as a strong moment to celebrate and experience God's mercy".. He then proposed three concrete tasks: to meditate again on Scripture passages where the merciful face of the Father shines forth, to take greater care of the sacrament of Reconciliation with confessors who are a sign of the primacy of mercy, and to welcome those who are in need of mercy. missionaries of mercy as an expression of the Church's maternal solicitude for the people of God.

The meditation of the Word of God under the perspective of divine mercy is being developed in the Wednesday General Audiences, in the meditations of the Angelus and in preaching to the rhythm of the liturgy. There we are presented with milestones of salvation history that contain teachings for the present time, such as the figure of Moses, who became a mediator of mercy, or the relationship between justice and mercy, or the biblical meaning of the "jubilee", which to be true must touch the pocketbook. In the Saturday Jubilee Audiences, the Pope continues to deepen the richness of divine mercy. Taking up the teachings of St. John Paul II, Francis has shown us the relationship between mercy and mission: "Living mercy makes us missionaries of mercy, and being missionaries allows us to grow more and more in God's mercy.". There is no lack of continuous references to confessors and missionaries of mercy, who must exercise their ministry by making visible the motherhood of the Church, seeking in the heart of the penitent the desire for forgiveness and helping him to overcome shame in the recognition of his guilt.

As a missionary of mercy, he met with the Patriarch of Moscow in Havana and traveled to Mexico, where the Successor of Peter experienced an important meeting with the Patriarch of Moscow. "transfiguration experience"with a spiritual barycenter in the sanctuary of the Virgin of Guadalupe, mother of mercy.


In brief

Jubilees
The Jubilee of Consecrated Life was celebrated on February 1, and the Jubilee of those working in the Curia was celebrated on February 22.

Special hearings
In addition to the Wednesday audience, one Saturday a month there is a special audience for the Jubilee: so far it has been on January 30 and February 20.

Lent
The Missionaries of Mercy were "sent" on Ash Wednesday. On the same day the Pope was with the Capuchin Friars.

Travel to Mexico
Francis was in Mexico on an intense pastoral trip covered elsewhere in this issue.

The authorRamiro Pellitero

Degree in Medicine and Surgery from the University of Santiago de Compostela. Professor of Ecclesiology and Pastoral Theology in the Department of Systematic Theology at the University of Navarra.

Read more

Francis in Mexico, before the Virgin of Guadalupe

The Pope's visit to Mexico was historic, highlighting his meeting with the Virgin of Guadalupe. In addition, in Cuba, Francis and the Patriarch of Moscow achieved an important step in the Catholic-Orthodox dialogue.

March 6, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

The affection and spontaneity of the Mexican people have made of the Pope's visit and it is understandable that Francis described it on his return as an unforgettable experience. "transfiguration experience". Those who have followed the trip closely will not be able to easily say which act has been more significant or moving. Six "peripheries", six places and six themes were chosen as the goal of the stages, as our envoy Gonzalo Meza explains in his article: in Mexico City, dialogue with the authorities; in Ecatepec, poverty and marginalization; in San Cristobal de las Casas and Tuxtla Gutierrez, indigenous peoples and families; in Morelia, drug trafficking and young people; and in Ciudad Juarez, violence, migration, drug trafficking, young people and women. But the Pope has pointed out that his main purpose was to "to remain in silence before the image of the Mother". in Guadalupe.

He was indeed able to pray alone in front of the figure printed on the tilma of St. Juan Diego, perhaps for less time than he would have wished. In this issue, both journalist Andrea Tornielli and renowned Mexican philosopher Guillermo Hurtado agree in indicating that moment as the key to the trip, and not only as a fulfillment of the Pope's wish, but also from their own perspective of analysis. The latter believes that the Pope has brought strength to a disillusioned society in need of hope, both in Mexico and elsewhere. On the papal trip, the reader will also find the chronicle of our correspondents.

On the way to Mexico, a dream came true in Cuba: the fraternal embrace between Francis, Pope and Bishop of Rome, and Cyril, Patriarch of Moscow and of all Russia, with a long private conversation and the signing of a document. The meeting, as much desired by Francis as by his predecessors John Paul II and Benedict XVI, opens a new perspective in the relations between Catholics and Orthodox, broken a thousand years ago. Obviously it is not a definitive step in the recomposition of unity, but it is, quite simply, a historic event, a very special gift. The joint declaration, whose affirmations are carefully balanced and independent of detailed evaluations, "is full of riches for ecumenical dialogue".Romà Casanova, member of the Episcopal Commission for Interconfessional Relations in the Spanish Episcopal Conference, in the collaboration published in these pages.

Meanwhile, the grace of the Jubilee Year of Mercy continues to bear fruit everywhere, with a multitude of initiatives and proposals. The figure of St. Joseph is also on the horizon, since the Church's annual petition for priestly vocations and for families is concentrated on his Solemnity. If the forecasts regarding the date of publication of the apostolic exhortation expected after the Synod on the Family are fulfilled, this year the Church will be entrusting him as intercessor and supporter of her service to families.

The authorOmnes

Read more
Debate

Entering the paschal mystery

As we go through Lent we prepare for the Easter Triduum which "is the apex of the whole liturgical year.

Juan José Silvestre-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

As we go through Lent, we are preparing for the Easter Triduum which, as Pope Francis reminded us, "is the apex of the whole liturgical year and also the apex of our Christian life. For this reason, "the center and essence of the Gospel proclamation is always the same: the God who manifested his immense love in Christ who died and rose from the dead" (Evangelii Gaudium, n. 11). However, the content of the Paschal Mystery, the mystery of the Passion, death and resurrection of Jesus, and its relationship with our liturgical celebrations is often far removed from the Christian of today. Why is this so?

The core of the problem was pointed out by the then Cardinal Ratzinger in his book A New Song for the Lord. There he recalled that the situation of faith and theology in Europe today is characterized, above all, by an ecclesial demoralization. The antithesis "Jesus yes, Church no" seems typical of the thinking of a generation. Behind this widespread opposition between Jesus and the Church lies a Christological problem. The true antithesis is expressed in the formula: "Jesus yes, Christ no", or "Jesus yes, Son of God no". We are therefore faced with an essential Christological question.

For many people Jesus appears as one of the decisive men who existed in humanity. They approach Jesus, so to speak, from the outside. Great scholars recognize his spiritual and moral stature and his influence on human history, comparing him to Buddha and Confucius, Socratesand other wise and "great" characters of history. But they fail to recognize him in his uniqueness. In reality, as Benedict XVI forcefully affirmed, "if people forget God, it is also because the person of Jesus is often reduced to a wise man and his divinity is weakened, if not denied. This way of thinking prevents us from grasping the radical novelty of Christianity, for if Jesus is not the only Son of the Father, then neither has God come to visit the history of man, we have only human ideas of God. On the contrary, the incarnation is part of the very heart of the Gospel!".

Forgetfulness of God

We can then ask ourselves: to what is this forgetfulness of God due? Logically, there are various causes: the reduction of the world to the empirically demonstrable, the reduction of human life to the existential, and so on. We will now focus on one that seems fundamental to us: the loss of the image of God, of the living and true God, which has been advancing unceasingly since the Enlightenment.

Deism has practically imposed itself on the general consciousness. It is no longer possible to conceive of a God who cares for individuals and who acts in the world. God may have originated the initial outburst of the universe, if there was one, but in an enlightened world there is nothing left for him to do. It is not accepted that God comes so alive within my life. God may be a spiritual idea, an uplifting complement to my life, but he is something rather undefined in the subjective sphere. It seems almost ridiculous to imagine that our good or bad actions are of interest to him; so small are we before the greatness of the universe. It seems mythological to attribute some actions in the world to it. There may be unclarified phenomena, but other causes must be sought. Superstition seems more founded than faith; the gods - that is to say the unexplained powers in the course of our life, and with which it is necessary to put an end - are more credible than God.

Why the Cross?

Now, if God has nothing to do with us, he also prescribes the idea of sin. Thus, that a human act can offend God is already unimaginable for many. There is no room left for redemption in the classical sense of Catholic doctrine, because it hardly occurs to anyone to seek the cause of the evils of the world and of one's own existence in sin.

In this regard, the words of the Pope Emeritus are illuminating: "If we ask ourselves: Why the cross? the answer, in radical terms, is this: because there is evil, indeed, sin, which, according to Scripture, is the deepest cause of all evil. But this statement is not something that can be taken for granted, and many reject the very word 'sin', for it presupposes a religious vision of the world and of man. And it is true: if God is removed from the horizon of the world, one cannot speak of sin. Just as when the sun is hidden the shadows disappear - the shadow only appears when there is sun - in the same way the eclipse of God necessarily entails the eclipse of sin. Therefore, the sense of sin - which is not the same as the 'sense of guilt', as psychology understands it - is reached by rediscovering the sense of God. This is expressed in the Psalm Miserere, attributed to King David on the occasion of his double sin of adultery and murder: 'Against you,' says David, addressing God, 'I have sinned against you alone' (Ps 51:6)".

In a way of thinking in which the concept of sin and redemption finds no place, there can be no room either for a Son of God who comes into the world to redeem us from sin and who dies on the cross for this cause. This explains the radical change in the idea of worship and liturgy, which after a long gestation is taking hold: its primary subject is not God or Christ, but the "we" of the celebrants. Nor can it have worship as its primary meaning, for which there is no reason in a deistic scheme. Nor is it possible to think of atonement, sacrifice, forgiveness of sins. What is important is that the celebrants of the community recognize and confirm each other and come out of the isolation in which modern existence plunges the individual. It is a matter of expressing the experiences of liberation, joy, reconciliation, denouncing the negative and encouraging action. For this reason, the community has to make its own liturgy and not receive it from unintelligible traditions; it represents and celebrates itself". (Joseph Ratzinger).

Liturgy: rediscovering the Paschal Mystery

A careful reading of this diagnosis can be a good stimulus for a fruitful examination of conscience about liturgical celebrations, about our liturgical feeling. At the same time, it is probably now a little better understood why, on many occasions, the Paschal Mystery and its celebration-actualization do not constitute the center either of the liturgical celebration or of the life of the community and of each Christian.

The answer to this deistic approach is to rediscover the Paschal Mystery. It is understandable, in all its force, that St. John Paul II affirmed in the Apostolic Letter Vicesimus Quintus Annus: "Since the death of Christ on the Cross and his Resurrection constitute the center of the Church's daily life and the pledge of her eternal Easter, the Liturgy has as its primary function to lead us constantly along the paschal path inaugurated by Christ, in which we accept to die in order to enter into life". Sunday after Sunday, the community, called together by the Lord, grows, or at least tries to do so, in the awareness of this reality that fills us with wonder.

And when we are about to begin the holiest days of the year that lead us to celebrate the Lord's resurrection, let us not travel the road too quickly. "Let us not forget something very simple, which perhaps sometimes escapes us: we cannot participate in our Lord's Resurrection if we do not unite ourselves to his Passion and death" (St. Josemaría). Let us therefore follow the advice of Pope Francis: "In these days of the Holy Triduum, let us not limit ourselves to commemorating our Lord's Passion, but let us enter into the mystery, let us make our own his sentiments, his attitudes, as the Apostle Paul invites us to do: 'Have among yourselves the sentiments proper to Christ Jesus' (Phil 2:5). Then our Easter will be a 'happy Easter'".

Initiatives

Dining room and social shelter in Vallecas

The area of Puente de Vallecas, in Madrid, still retains much of the atmosphere of a few decades ago. It is true that the social changes are already perceptible; for example, the Madrid ring road M-30 practically borders the wall of the parish of San Ramón Nonato.

Juan Portela-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 4 minutes

The parish church, located in the Puente de Vallecas district of Madrid, is just over a hundred years old. Of simple construction and modest size, it responds to the character of a parish of the suburbs - in this, yes, there have been changes since its construction, because of how much the city has expanded - and located in an underprivileged urban area: a characteristic that, however, has not disappeared. Unemployment is frequent and the immigrant population is high. The parish is attended by people of 27 different nationalities, although the majority come from Latin America.

Meal delivery

We visit the parish late in the morning, and at that moment a group of women are animating the small rectangular square in front of the church with their conversation. They are gathering in front of the church, on the other side of the square, in front of a simple building that belongs to a religious institution that makes it available to the parish for its social activities. It is clear that these women are also immigrants, and of modest condition. When we ask them, they explain that they are waiting to receive the food rations that the volunteers give them every day and with which they help their families to get by. "Together with the poor and the families" says the home page of the parish's website, as if defining it, and we find that there is nothing more real or less "demagogic" than that statement. "I am from Peru", "I am from Bolivia"..., the women tell us, and add that they have three, four children, and that their husband is unemployed, or that he does some odd jobs, or that... "I don't have a husband".

Those who help and those who are helped

Inside the main room of the building, located on the first floor, volunteers are cooking and already beginning to serve the food to several dozen people, including some entire families. Although the facility has the simplicity of a soup kitchen, the atmosphere is cheerful and dignified, and no one minds chatting with visitors. On the upper floors of the same building, the parish has also set up a shelter where it offers shelter to homeless people, while trying to help them solve the most serious problems and arranging a job or some more lasting solution.

Some of these details are explained to us, for example, by a man named Angel, who is excited about the prospect of a job. He used to live on the street until he was taken in at the parish shelter, and now he is also a proud volunteer at the soup kitchen. Sister Maria Sara, a Peruvian (consecrated virgin), the main support of the parish in this activity, is the "manager" and organizer; but there is also the help of other very committed people.
We see that a group of boys in school uniforms and of (obviously) different social backgrounds are helping to serve meals: they come in shifts several days a week to lend a hand, and in return they learn and mature. The parish priest tells us that "everyone here is a volunteer, because we try to make each person feel responsible for this social work, so that they don't just come to receive, but feel it as their own". This is a commitment that determines all the activities: that there is no difference between those who need help and those who come to help, so that no one feels humiliated. In this way, each person who comes for help feels at ease and feels at home.

From the material to the spiritual

The parish has grouped these initiatives under the concept of "Obra Social Álvaro del Portillo", placing them under the intercession of Blessed Álvaro, the first successor to St. Josemaría in Opus Dei, who in 1934 came to this place to participate as a catechist in the activities of the parish. In the church, a high relief graphically explains this link, which has been translated into an effort for the social and Christian promotion of the neighborhood.
As surprising - or should we say "not so surprising"? - as the activity in the soup kitchen and the social shelter is the fact that the impetus for these initiatives comes from the Blessed Sacrament. The Lord is exposed on the altar of the church every morning, and three days a week throughout the day. He is not alone; there are groups of people from the neighborhood visiting or praying for a longer time. Also on a high floor of the hostel we have seen a small chapel, with the Lord in the tabernacle; frankly speaking, in this context the presence of the Eucharist is moving.

Various groups and projects

Perhaps this is the reason why in this parish there is nothing resembling a lack of activity, resignation or concern for the future, in spite of the difficulties of the inhabitants of the neighborhood. There are groups of Marys of the Tabernacles, of Charismatic Renewal, of Catholic Action. Alpha Courses are offered for groups of people far from the faith; there are "sentinels" who take care of the activity "Light in the night", inviting passers-by to a time of prayer, with appropriate music and atmosphere; the "Nazareth" Family Orientation Center with activities for couples and children; Caritas activities; retreats, spiritual exercises and, of course, catechesis and sufficient availability to hear confessions and receive the other sacraments.

José Manuel Horcajo, the parish priest, explains that "up to thirty projects are underway that try to cover all the good of each person, from their material needs, through family difficulties and reaching the spiritual. When a person comes to us asking for food, we start by giving him a plate in the dining room, but we will follow up with him personally to help him in his work, family and spiritual situation. We want to make that poor person a happy person, a saint".

That is why, when one visits the San Ramon Nonato website, after the presentation of the parish and the expression of the pastor's availability, the first thing one finds is a request for help and volunteers: young people for evangelization; someone to take care of the website; a van to transport clothes and food; someone interested in helping handicapped children. This is certainly a great sign. According to the pastor: "The more volunteers the better, so we can reach more, improve the service and expand other projects that are still waiting".

Read more
ColumnistsCesar Mauricio Velasquez

Historic hugs and controversies

Pope Francis surprised by changing the course of the plane that, before taking him to Mexico, took him back to Cuba.

March 6, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

Once again, Pope Francis surprised by changing the course of the plane that, before taking him to Mexico, took him once again -in less than six months- to Cuba. This time to fulfill a historic appointment with the Patriarch of the Russian Church.

The warm Cuban atmosphere opened doors that had been closed for a thousand years. The embrace of Francisco and Kiril demonstrated that unity is possible. This was reflected in the joint declaration they signed. In 30 points, the religious leaders called for an end to the war in Ukraine and stressed the importance of the roots of Christianity and its teachings in world peace, the defense of human life and coexistence.

But the worldwide expectation of the meeting deflated the interest of some in Europe who, upon learning of the declaration, were left with anecdotes: they expected a political text against Russia, the European Union, the United States or all three. Important media did not dare to report, for example, paragraph 21, which warns of the millions of abortions and other attacks on human life such as euthanasia. Neither did they mention number 8 on religious freedom, nor number 19 on the family, or number 20 on marriage. Later, in Mexico and on the plane back to Rome, Francis took the opportunity to insist on these issues.

Francis called for alternatives to the immigration crisis on the southern border of the United States. Without making direct reference to the pre-candidate Donald Trump, the Pope expressed that "a person who thinks only of building walls, wherever he is, and not building bridges, is not a Christian".. A statement that aroused controversy in the middle of a presidential campaign. Francis recalled the political nature of the human being, well defined by Aristotle, but which did not convince those involved, perhaps the same ones who did not know the conclusions of the Havana meeting.

The authorCesar Mauricio Velasquez

Former Ambassador of Colombia to the Holy See.

Latin America

Francis in Mexico. Messenger of hope

The Pope knew that before his visit Mexicans were expecting a message of hope. And that is what he brought and what he received.

Gonzalo Meza-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

"Messenger of hope". That was the name of the Boeing 737-800 of Aeromexico which transported the Pontiff into Mexico and back to Rome. It was one of the most intense visits of his pontificate. In six days, from February 12 to 17, more than ten million people saw the Pope in some of the more than 50 activities he carried out in the 320 kilometers he traveled by land.

The trip to Mexico can only be understood in the light of the existential peripheries of which he has spoken so much. All the topics he addressed have a special sensitivity to Mexico's religious, social and political agenda. In Ecatepec, he denounced wealth, vanity and pride. In San Cristobal de las Casas, he asked forgiveness to the indigenous people for the theft of their lands and the millenary contempt. In Morelia, he urged people not to resign themselves to the atmosphere of violence. In Ciudad Juarez he prayed for the dead and the victims of violence. The Pope addressed all these issues directly and in his own style, with words proper to his vocabulary: "primerear", "escuchotherapy" y "affection therapy". The trip had as its barycenter his visit to the Basilica of Guadalupe: "To remain in silence before the image of the Mother was what I proposed to myself first and foremost. I contemplated, and I let myself be looked at by the One who bears imprinted in her eyes the gazes of all her children, and gathers the pain of violence, kidnappings, murders, abuses to the detriment of so many poor people, of so many women"..

In the cathedral of Mexico the Pope met with the country's bishops and addressed a strong message to them: in the Church there is no need for princes, but witnesses of the Lord: "Do not waste time and energy on secondary things, on vain career projects, on empty plans for hegemony, or on infertile interest clubs.". Francis urged to always preserve unity and when there are differences, "to say things to each other's faces."as men of God.

On February 14, Francisco went to Ecatepec to denounce the wealth of some at the expense of the bread of others. In 2010, Ecatepec was the municipality with the highest number of people living in poverty.

In Chiapas, the Pope asked forgiveness from the indigenous communities for the millenary indifference they have suffered. Chiapas, located in southern Mexico, is a state bordering Guatemala. In 1994, the guerrilla uprising of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation, led by "Subcomandante Marcos", who demanded the recognition of the rights of the indigenous people, made the world aware of Chiapas. In the Mass of February 15, 2016 in San Cristobal, Francis revalued and emphasized the dignity of indigenous peoples. Not only with words, but with deeds. The ceremony was conducted in Tzeltal, Tzotzil, Chol and Spanish. At the end of the ceremony, Francis issued the decree for the use of indigenous languages in the Mass. He also delivered the first Bible translated into Tzeltal and Tzotzil.

In Morelia, Francis warned against the temptation of resignation in the face of the atmosphere of violence. It should be recalled that on January 4, 2015, the Pope named the Archbishop of Morelia, Monsignor Alberto Suarez Inda, as cardinal. This district had never before received the cardinal dignity. The Pope wanted to express in this way his closeness and affection for one of the cities that has suffered the most from the violence of drug trafficking. An evil that has devoured especially the youngest. For this reason, the Bishop of Rome urged the people of Morelos not to let themselves be defeated by resignation in the face of violence, corruption and drug trafficking. Later, before thousands of young people gathered in the José María Morelos y Pavón stadium, the Pope warned: "It is a lie that the only way to live, to be able to be young, is to leave your life in the hands of drug traffickers or of all those who are doing nothing but sowing destruction and death... It is Jesus Christ who refutes all attempts to make them useless, or mere mercenaries of other people's ambitions"..

In Ciudad Juarez the Pope made one of the most significant gestures of the visit: praying before a giant cross and presiding at a "cross-border" Mass a few meters from the border with the United States. It was a Mass for and with migrants and victims of violence. There the pontiff exclaimed: "No more deaths, no more violence".

The Pope was able to feel that Mexico has been oppressed by violence, but that, in spite of everything, it keeps the flame of hope alive. For this reason, all of his meetings in the country were "full of light: the light of faith that transfigures faces and clears the way".. This trip to Mexico was a surprise and a transfiguration experience for the Pope.

The authorGonzalo Meza

Ciudad Juarez

Latin America

In the footsteps of the shepherd. Pope Francis visits Mexico

It is difficult to narrate in a few lines the pastoral visit of Pope Francis to Mexico from February 12 to 17.

Ada Irma Cruz Davalillo, Gonzalo Meza-March 6, 2016-Reading time: 6 minutes

It is difficult to narrate in a few lines the pastoral visit of Pope Francis to Mexico, which took place between February 12 and 17. The large number of anecdotes and experiences before, during and after the trip would require more space to summarize them. The messages of the "pilgrim of Mercy", as many call the Pope, have deeply touched those present. But what had the greatest impact, even on Francis, was listening to the testimonies of some of the faithful about the reality of life in Mexico. It is a reality that the Pope knows very well: "I don't want to cover any of that up."He said before leaving on his trip, referring to the ills suffered by the country.

This visit was the first of the Pope Francis to Mexico. For six days the Pontiff held various public meetings throughout the country and met with different sectors of Mexican society.

Mexico City

Pope Francis arrived at the presidential hangar of Mexico City's international airport on Friday, February 12, 2016 at 7:30 pm. He had previously made a stopover in Cuba, where he held a historic meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Kirill. In Mexico City, on the tarmac, he was met by President Enrique Peña Nieto and his wife Angélica Rivera de Peña, as well as the Apostolic Nuncio to Mexico, Archbishop Cristoph Pierre, and the host Archbishop, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera.

Some five thousand people welcomed the first Latin American Pope. The overflowing joy of the young people, waving yellow handkerchiefs and enthusiastically chanting songs and slogans, was contagious: "Francisco, my friend, you are welcome! Francisco, you are already Mexican!...".

Four children in regional costumes approached Pope Francis to present him with a chest containing soil from Mexico. The Pope thanked them for the gesture and blessed it. Afterwards, the Amalia Hernandez ballet and the mariachi of the Secretariat of the Navy offered a great show with the traditional "Son de la negra" y "Jarabe tapatío".. Afterwards, the procession left in the direction of the apostolic nunciature. Thousands of people were waiting for him on the way, carrying lights that illuminated the way. Upon arriving at the nunciature, a large group of people shouted for the Pope to come out and greet them. The Pope responded by going out into the street to address a message and pray with them.

Francis prays before a large cross on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Francis prays before a large cross on the U.S.-Mexico border.

On Saturday, February 13, President Peña Nieto received Francis with a welcoming ceremony at the National Palace. In a part of his speech, the Holy Father affirmed that "Experience shows us that whenever we seek the path of privilege or benefits for a few to the detriment of the good of all, sooner or later life in society becomes fertile ground for corruption, drug trafficking, exclusion of different cultures, violence, and even human trafficking"..

Then, after leaving the presidential compound, he received the keys to Mexico City from the head of government, Miguel Ángel Mancera, at the doors of the metropolitan cathedral. He then met with the bishops of the country. Before 165 titular bishops and 15 auxiliary bishops, he made a speech in the context of the insecurity and violence that plagues Mexicans. He also called on Mexican prelates not to be corrupted by wealth.

Francis did not want to leave Mexico City without visiting the Basilica of Guadalupe; in fact, he affirmed that this was the main moment of his trip. There he celebrated a Mass attended by fifty thousand people. Some attendees had to follow the liturgy from outside the church. In his homily, the Pope made reference to the victims of kidnappings and the abandonment of young and old people. "God approached and draws near to the suffering but resilient hearts of so many mothers, fathers, grandparents who have seen their children depart, lost or even criminally taken away from them."he said.

State of Mexico

During the mass celebrated on Sunday, February 14, in a 45 hectare property known as El Caracol, in the municipality of Ecatepec (State of Mexico), Pope Francis called on Mexicans to resist the temptations of wealth and corruption. Ecatepec is a locality affected by violence and crime.

The pontiff said that he knows that it is not easy to avoid the seduction of the "money, fame and power". that the devil puts in front of them. However, he warned them that they can only face him with the strength that God gives. "Let's get it into our heads: you can't dialogue with the devil. There can be no dialogue, because he will always win".said the Pope. "Only the strength of God's word can defeat it."he said. He also spoke of the three temptations that seek to degrade, destroy and take away the joy and freshness of the Gospel; temptations that lock us in a circle of destruction and sin: wealth, vanity and pride.

Chiapas

On Monday 15, on his fourth day in the country, Francis arrived in San Cristobal de las Casas (Chiapas). After the official reception at the airport (in which the Zoque community gave him the baton, a necklace and a crown), the Pope moved to the town. In this city, the bishop of Rome officiated a Mass in the Municipal Sports Center in which indigenous communities participated. During his homily he affirmed that "Many times, systematically and structurally, their peoples have been misunderstood and excluded from society. Some have considered their values, cultures and traditions inferior. Others, dizzy with power and money, have dispossessed them of their lands or have carried out actions that have polluted them. How sad! How good it would do us all to make an examination of conscience and learn to say: excuse me, excuse me, brothers and sisters! Today's world, dispossessed by the throwaway culture, needs you"..

Later, in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, the capital of Chiapas, Pope Francis presided over a large meeting with families and asked Mexicans to give him their blessing. "echen ganas". to the family to keep it together, because it is the most important nucleus of society.

On Tuesday the 16th he presided a Mass with priests, religious and seminarians in Morelia (Michoacán), and on Wednesday the 17th he went to Ciudad Juárez.

Ciudad Juarez

In Ciudad Juarez (Chihuahua), Pope Francis wanted to experience firsthand the drama of migration and violence. Juarez is a city in northern Mexico - adjacent to El Paso (Texas) - and sadly famous for the femicides that, between 1993 and 2012, cost the lives of 700 women. In addition to this scourge, Juarez has been plagued by a spiral of violence caused by drug trafficking and disputes between the various drug cartels. A third scourge plaguing Juarez is the death of hundreds of people attempting to reach the United States without documents.

Here, in addition to visiting a prison and meeting with the world of work, the Pope celebrated Mass with migrants and victims of violence. The altar was built just eighty meters from the border fence. More than 200,000 people attended the ceremony. Among them were various groups and relatives of victims of violence, not only from Juarez but from all over Mexico.

Francisco offers a vaccine to a child.
Francisco offers a vaccine to a child.

Bishops and priests from Mexico and the United States also participated in the Mass. It was a "cross-border" ceremony since, in addition to the binational presence of clergy, 50,000 Catholics gathered on the other side of the border to follow the ceremony in the stadium of the University of El Paso, a few meters from the altar. Thus, in Juarez and El Paso a single family was formed, united by faith, separated -like thousands of families- by a metal fence.

Before the Mass, Pope Francis went to pray in front of a giant cross erected thirty meters from the metal netting. There, the Pontiff left a bouquet of flowers and prayed for the migrants who have died in their attempt to reach the United States.

Already in his homily the Pope referred to undocumented migration as a humanitarian crisis, a human tragedy. Migrants "They are brothers and sisters who are driven out by poverty and violence, by drug trafficking and organized crime. Faced with so many legal loopholes, a net is cast that always traps and destroys the poorest. Not only do they suffer from poverty, but they also have to suffer all these forms of violence.. At this the pontiff exclaimed: "No more death and exploitation! There is always time to change, there is always a way out and there is always a chance, there is always time to implore the Father's mercy.".

At the end of the Mass, the Pope went to the Ciudad Juarez airport to conclude his visit with the official farewell ceremony. The ceremony was attended by civil and religious authorities and more than 5,000 people who bid farewell to Pope Francis to the sound of mariachi music.

The authorAda Irma Cruz Davalillo, Gonzalo Meza

Mexico City and Ciudad Juarez

Read more
The World

The knives and the end of the Oslo Accords: where are the actors heading?

The Oslo Accords have failed to curb the tension between Arabs and Jews in Israel and Palestine, aggravated by the "knife crisis".

Miguel Pérez Pichel-February 27, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Tension between the Arab and Jewish communities in both Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories is constant. It periodically experiences peaks of violence in the form of intifadas, acts of terrorism or open warfare with Palestinian armed groups.The so-called "knife crisis" has been shocking Jews and Arabs for months in both Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories. Palestine and Israel. The knife attacks, not always spontaneous, by Arab Muslim citizens against policemen or Jewish citizens and the subsequent revenge by Israeli radicals raise fears of a new wave of violence.

The knife crisis began in late September in Jerusalem neighborhoods near the Esplanade of Mosques, where the Al Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest site for Muslims after Mecca and Medina, is located. The attacks spread to Palestinian cities where there are nearby Israeli settlements. The causes are various: the feeling that any negotiation with Israel is doomed to failure, the feeling of humiliation of many young Palestinians who have no opportunities at all, the precarious economic situation in the occupied territories of Israel, the lack of a better future for the Palestinians, and the lack of a better future for the Palestinians. West Bank or clashes with Israeli settlers.

All these factors have paved the way for violence, but, as is often the case in such cases, it was a single spark that ignited the fuse. The trigger was the rumor that Israel was preparing to modify the status quo of the esplanade of the mosques to allow Jewish prayer on the site where the Temple of Jerusalem once stood. The rumor provoked a strong protest within the

Is there progress in the talks on the agreement between the Holy See and Israel?

-The agreement with Israel, which is still in the process of being finalized, is the third to be signed between the Holy See and Israel. For the most part it concerns matters of a fiscal and economic nature. At this stage it is not possible to say when the agreement will be completed. There are some outstanding issues on which a course of action will have to be mutually agreed. The Holy See's hope is that this will happen soon.

Is there any news regarding the ownership of the Cenacle?

-The Holy Places are administered under a series of provisions and traditional rules known as Status quo. It is important that all interested parties commit themselves to respecting the provisions so that everyone can have quiet and peaceful access to the Holy Places. As for the Cenacle, there are no new developments and no future changes are expected in the short term.

Could you explain the situation of Christian schools in Israel?

-For a long time, the State of Israel has recognized and even partially funded Catholic schools. More recently, government funding was gradually reduced to levels that could not guarantee the operation of the schools, and the reduction has severely affected all Catholic schools in the country. After lengthy discussions and negotiations it was possible to reach a compromise that allowed the schools to carry out their normal academic activities. In the meantime, negotiations continue with the aim of finding a definitive solution to the dispute. Catholic schools in Israel are appreciated for their high academic standards and for the important role they play in the education of the younger generations of the different communities.

Can the Holy See help end the wave of violence between Palestinians and Israelis?

-The only "weapon" the Church has against violence and all kinds of social and religious conflicts is education. It is a long-term process, but educating people's minds and hearts is the only effective way to build a peaceful society based on the values of tolerance and mutual respect.

The authorMiguel Pérez Pichel

Read more

A challenge: immigration

Of all the issues that Francis will address in Mexico, immigration will undoubtedly be the one that will arouse the most interest in the United States.

February 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

One of the hottest issues in U.S. politics is immigration, mainly from Mexico and, in general, from the United States. Latin America. It is the most vibrant issue in the rhetoric we are witnessing in the debates between the presidential candidates, and it is causing a stark divide among both Democrats and Republicans. Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez, himself of Mexican origin, said that the immigration debate is really a debate about immigration. "renewal of the soul of America" and called it "our generation's test of human rights", even though not all Catholics agree with him.

It is in the midst of this storm that Pope Francis visits Mexico (February 12-18). Throughout his trip to the border city of Ciudad Juarez, the Pope is expected to address the immigration issue even more directly than when he did so in the United States in September. While his Mexican audience will listen carefully to his words, they could have a major political impact in the United States. This is primarily because the primary race for the 2106 U.S. presidential election will take place in February.

Juárez is adjacent to the U.S. city of El Paso, and in a recent interview with the Our Sunday Visitor El Paso Bishop Mark Seitz has said that, in reality, the two cities are one, except for the border that divides them. In Juarez, the larger of the two, violence has frightened many of its residents. Bishop Seitz has said that bishops along the U.S.-Mexico border have common ties. "The church is not separated by national boundaries." he said. "We are all brothers and sisters." a message he hopes the Pope will also communicate.

With the second largest Catholic population in the world, Mexico is a logical destination for the Pope. In the plan for the 2015 papal trip to the United States, it was suggested that the Pope could enter the United States through Mexico, or celebrate Mass at the border, but it was deemed logistically unfeasible. Now, that Mass at the border will be celebrated on February 17 at 4:00 p.m. in Juarez, and that is where the Pope could speak about immigration. With several Republican candidates identified as Catholic, the political implications of the Holy Father's words will reach far beyond the border.

The authorGreg Erlandson

Journalist, author and editor. Director of Catholic News Service (CNS)

Read more
Latin America

Mexico and papal visit. Elections, narco and guerrilla

Pope Francis will visit Mexico from February 12 to 18. What are the challenges of this trip to a country affected by violence, drug trafficking and poverty?

Ada Irma Cruz Davalillo-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Exactly one year ago, in January 2015, on board the plane that was taking him back to Rome after a visit to the Philippines, Pope Francis did not have on his agenda to travel to Mexico; in any case, as he explained, if he did, it would be on a trip that included the capital of that country, as this would allow him to attend the Basilica of Guadalupe.

To some extent, the statements he himself later made in March 2015 made it understandable to think that he would definitely not be able to move to Mexico, given that "I have the feeling that my pontificate will be brief... Four or five years, I don't know, or two or three. Well, two have already passed". Finally, in December 2015, Francis himself announced and detailed his visit to Mexico, which allowed Mexican columnist Raymundo Riva Palacio to assure that. "the Pope 'self-invited' himself to Mexico".

In fact, it is claimed that it is "a trip that took the Mexican government by surprise", since it was not part of the diplomatic agenda between the Holy See and the government of Enrique Peña Nieto, the Mexican president who has been most obsequious towards the Church and the papacy.

To support the assertion of the papal "self-invitation", they resort to political discrepancies, but also to the direct intervention of Mexican Jesuit priests who expressly met privately with the Pope during his stay in Cuba, to insist on the convenience of planning a visit to Mexico.

Hence, for the country's political analysts, the express inclusion of the town of San Cristobal las Casas in Francis' tour of Mexico has not gone unnoticed, as well as the intense efforts to have him visit the tomb of Bishop Samuel Ruiz and pay him a kind of homage.

The figure of the bishop was shrouded in controversy after the first day of January 1994, when a guerrilla group trained in Chiapas declared war on the Mexican government and began a series of armed attacks. He was directly linked to the promoters of these violent acts.

It is also true that in the diocese, both during the time of Bishop Ruiz and later, pastoral experiments have been carried out that at the time were officially suspended by the Holy See for their doctrinal inaccuracies.

San Cristobal de las Casas is located in the State of Chiapas, one of the poorest in Mexico. And, like the other cities that Pope Francis has listed in his agenda, it presents the face of the lack of development and widespread poverty, especially in communities where the lack of agro-industries has not allowed the inhabitants to reach higher levels of wellbeing.

Pope Francis will indeed visit San Cristobal de las Casas, Mexico City, Morelia and Ciudad Juarez. Morelia, with a higher degree of industrialization, has been affected by the violence unleashed by drug gangs or cartels that grew under the protection of corruption and the connivance of politicians and businessmen in the area. It is a locality with high religious fervor, despite the onslaught of the revolutionary governments that harassed the Church for decades.

As for Ciudad Juarez, it is an attractive locality because of the large number of assembly plants that employ men and women who come from all over the country in search of a higher income. Violence has been highlighted there both by drug trafficking, as well as by the deaths of women, many of whom were single mothers who had gone to work in the "maquiladoras" installed there by foreign consortiums interested in supplying U.S. firms with regularity and precision.

As for the Federal District, one of the most populated cities in the world, it maintains evident and profound contrasts. In spite of all the problems and difficulties, all of them, like most of Mexico, and unlike in Europe, register a significant religiosity that explains to a great extent the hope under which people live even in the most underprivileged areas.

The panorama in Mexico is not different from that of John Paul II or Benedict XVl, but what is striking is that for the first time a Pope arrives in an election year.

In fact, all political actors in the country had agreed in all papal visits to keep them out of the elections, with the clear purpose of not trying to take advantage of them by any of the parties or candidates, for their own benefit. Now, however, the opposite will happen. What will happen? We will have to wait.

The authorAda Irma Cruz Davalillo

Mexico City

Read more
Latin America

Our Lady of Suyapa: a growing devotion

Near Tegucigalpa, in Honduras, is one of the main Marian shrines in Latin America: that of Our Lady of Suyapa. Recently recognized as a minor basilica, it has become a focus of conversion and mercy.

Eddy Palacios-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

The worship that the Honduran people pay to their Patroness, the Virgin Mary, the Virgin Mary Our Lady of SuyapaThe image of Suyapa, with the passage of time, has experienced an increase in extension and depth. Since the discovery of the miraculous image in 1747, until the recent elevation of the sanctuary of Suyapa to the rank of minor basilica, the Honduran Catholic has been feeling increasingly closer to his Morenita.

The words of St. John Paul II on March 8, 1983, the day he crowned this image on the occasion of his pastoral trip to Honduras, express this devotion well: "The same name, Mary, modulated with different invocations, invoked with the same prayers, pronounced with identical love [...]. Here, the name of the Virgin of Suyapa has the flavor of mercy on the part of Mary and of recognition of her favors on the part of the people". 

Its origins

According to the most widespread tradition, the emergence of this Marian devotion dates back to the day when a young farmer, Alejandro Colindres, accompanied by an eight-year-old boy named Jorge Martínez, went to the village of Suyapa, in the northwest of Tegucigalpaafter a hard day's work harvesting corn. They were surprised by the night and found a good place to sleep in the Piliguín ravine. In the darkness of the night, Alejandro felt that an object, apparently a stone, prevented him from settling his back, so he picked it up and threw it away. When he lay down again he again felt the presence of the same object, but this time, intrigued, he decided to put it in his backpack. With the light of dawn he discovered that it was an image of the Virgin Mary, and decided to take it to the altar of his family, where it was venerated until, twenty years later, after the first miracle credited to the intercession of the Virgin under this invocation, funds were raised to build a chapel that was completed in 1777.

The small cedar wood sculpture is barely six and a half centimeters tall. Of dark complexion, his face is graceful, oval, with round cheeks; fine and straight nose, and small mouth; in the eyes you can guess something of the indigenous race. Her straight hair falls, parted in two, on both sides of her forehead, down to her shoulders. Her tiny hands, without intertwining, are gently clasped on her chest, in an attitude of prayer. The clothing painted on the effigy itself is a pink tunic that barely shows through the chest, as it is covered with a dark mantle adorned with golden stars. Sometimes it is covered with other vestments. She wears a crown on her head, framed by a gleam of gilded silver in the shape of a number eight, topped with twelve stars.

In 1943, the apostolic administrator of the Archdiocese of Tegucigalpa, Monsignor Emilio Morales Roque, decided to build a new temple for the Virgin of Suyapa. The Zúñiga-Inestroza family donated the land for the project. It was the third archbishop of Tegucigalpa, Monsignor José de la Cruz Turcios y Barahona, who began the construction of the sanctuary in 1954 when a Marian year was celebrated in the Church for the centenary of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception.

It is worth recognizing that Archbishop Turcios y Barahona was a visionary since he wanted the dimensions of the temple to be adequate to contain a large number of pilgrims, something very ambitious for those years. The work was continued by the fourth archbishop of Tegucigalpa, Monsignor Héctor Enrique Santos, and concluded by Cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga, current archbishop of Tegucigalpa, who officiated the solemn dedication of the church on December 8, 2004.

The design of the nave is a Latin cross, it is 93 meters long, 23 meters high and the width of the central nave is 31.50 meters. Its design is of Latin cross. Its beautiful stained glass windows depict scenes from the life of Christ and the Virgin. The capacity of the nave is 4,360 people seated and 2,000 people standing.

The place where it was erected is an area where people of scarce resources live, which enhances the closeness of the Blessed Virgin to her most needy children. Everything was done with the help of the faithful and the impulse of the last three archbishops so that it could be, as the current one wishes, a house of God's consolation for the Honduran people, who suffer so much from the consequences of violence.

Greater harmony with the Pope

In 1954 the Episcopal Conference of Honduras declared the temple of Suyapa as a National Shrine. Taking into account the trajectory of this place as a pilgrimage destination and focus of irradiation of the faith, relying on the work of the previous pastor, Hermes Sorto, and the current pastor, Carlo Magno Núñez, a request was made in 2013 to Pope Francis that it be recognized as a Minor Basilica. On September 9, 2015, Cardinal Rodríguez Maradiaga had the immense joy of announcing to the Honduran people that, on August 28, the corresponding decree had been signed. On October 28, a solemn Eucharist was celebrated to give thanks to God for this papal recognition, which places this church in the group of temples that throughout the world show the pontifical signs and represent a testimony of union with the Roman Pontiff.

Signs of vitality

There is a massive influx of pilgrims to visit the Virgin of Suyapa on February 3, her feast day. The festivities begin the night before with a majestic dawn that lasts until dawn. Although Suyapa is the center of devotion, the Queen of Honduras is celebrated not only in her Sanctuary but in all corners of the country, where reproductions of the image abound.

The Virgin is also acclaimed abroad in celebrations organized by Hondurans living in the United States and Spain on the occasion of the feast of Our Lady of Suyapa. There is a reproduction of the Virgin of Suyapa in the sanctuary of Torreciudad, where she is venerated with various acts on the Sunday closest to February 3, and since 2013 there is also one, made in bronze, in the Vatican Gardens.

Several hymns sing with fervor to this invocation of the Mother of God. It is worth mentioning that the name Suyapa is frequent among Honduran women.

For the better care of the faithful, Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga deemed it convenient to erect two parishes and detach them from the parish of Our Lady of Suyapa. The pastoral activity carried out is intense in terms of divine worship, the celebration of the sacraments and the formation of the faithful in the biblical, theological, liturgical and moral areas, in such a way that popular piety and evangelization go hand in hand. The hermitage where the image was venerated for more than two hundred years continues to be used as part of the basilica complex, and Sunday Eucharists are celebrated there.

Assistance to the needy

The Suyapa Foundation provides assistance for the maintenance and decoration of the premises, and Cáritas Suyapa focuses on assisting the most needy.

Thirteen new side altars have recently been added to the interior of the church, corresponding to various devotions of the Honduran people, such as St. Michael the Archangel and St. Jude Thaddeus. In the chapel of the Blessed Sacrament there are now two paintings of popular devotion; the first is a canvas of Mary under the invocation so dear to Pope Francis, Our Lady Untied. In the other painting is an image of the basilica with the Virgin of Suyapa, guarded by Latin American saints, among them Monsignor Oscar Arnulfo Romero.

Finally, there are ample confessionals where the sacrament of penance is generously offered. In all certainty, during the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy many of the faithful will find the peace of Reconciliation, and the truth of the sentiments expressed by the holy Polish Pope will become more evident: "The name of Our Lady of Suyapa has a taste of mercy".

 

The authorEddy Palacios

San Pedro Sula

Read more
Debate

The new heavens and the new earth

Paul O'Callaghan-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 4 minutes

As Christians, we speak a lot about the Resurrection of Christ. We consider it as a tangible, material and undeniable sign of God's love that saves mankind. We also speak of the resurrection of the dead, or resurrection of the flesh, at the end of time. We consider it as the quintessence of Christian hope, and we see in it an affirmation of the value of matter.

But we must ask ourselves further: where will the resurrected men be? What kind of material environment will they have? They are not angels, they are not pure spirits: they will have to step somewhere, they will have to relate to other people, they will have to relate to a "world".

"Term" or purpose?

In the 7th century, Julián de Toledo wrote: "The world, already renewed for the better, will be adapted according to men, who in their turn will also be renewed in the flesh for the better" (Prognosticon 2, 46). St. Thomas said that in the future life "the whole bodily creation will be modified in an appropriate way to be in harmony with the state of those who inhabit it" (IV C. Gent., 97). And the French writer Charles Péguy said it with great conviction: "In my heaven there will be things".

But, in reality, what is striking in the New Testament are the statements about the future destruction of the world. "Then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever shall be" (Mt 24:21). Graphically, the Gospels describe a wide range of signs that indicate the approaching end: the collapse of human society, the triumph of idolatry and irreligion, the spread of war, great cosmic calamities.

However, it is not a question of a definitive destruction, of the world gradually or suddenly coming to an end, as the philosophers Michel Foucault and Jacques Monod thought. For the Christian faith, it must be said that the world has an end, in the sense of a finality, but not an end in the sense of the moment when it will cease to exist.

For this reason, Scripture speaks in various ways of "the new heavens and the new earth": already in the Old Testament (Is 65:17), but especially in the New Testament. Particularly important are two quotations, one from St. Paul and the other from St. Peter. Similar texts are found in the book of Revelation (21:1-4).

Renewing redemption

To the Romans, Paul writes: "The anxious expectation of the creation longs for the manifestation of the sons of God. For the creation is subjected to vanity, not by its own will, but by him who subjected it, in the hope that the creation itself also will be set free from the bondage of corruption to share in the glorious freedom of the children of God" (Rom 8:19-21). Just as sin introduced death and destruction into the world, Paul tells us, the redemption that Christ won and by which he made us children of God will renew the world forever, filling it with divine glory.
And in the Second Letter of St. Peter (3:10-13) we read: "The day of the Lord will come like a thief.

Then the heavens will be shaken apart, the elements will be dissolved with a roar, and the earth with all that is in it" (v. 10, cf. v. 12). For this reason he exhorts believers to be watchful: "If all these things are thus to be destroyed, how much more ought you to conduct yourselves in a holy and godly manner, as you wait for and hasten the coming of the day of God!" (vv. 11-12).
Nevertheless, the text continues, "we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness" (v. 13). And again the faithful are exhorted: "Therefore, my dearly beloved, as you wait for these events, take care that he finds you in peace, spotless and blameless" (v. 14).

What remains?

Peter's message is spiritual and ethical, certainly, but it is based on the divine promise of a cosmic renewal. There will be destruction and renewal, there will be discontinuity and continuity between this world and "the new heavens and the new earth". But we can ask ourselves: of all that men do and build here on earth, what will remain forever? Is it merely the continuity of the virtues that men have lived and will retain forever in heaven, in particular charity? Or will there also be found in the beyond something of the great works that men have shaped together with others: works of science, art, architecture, legislation, literature, etc.? The Second Vatican Council's constitution Gaudium et Spes explains it this way: "We are warned that it is of no use for man to gain the whole world if he loses himself. Nevertheless, the expectation of a new earth should not dampen, but rather alleviate, the concern to perfect this earth, where the body of the new human family grows, which can in some way anticipate a glimpse of the new century. Therefore, although temporal progress and the growth of the kingdom of Christ must be carefully distinguished, nevertheless, the former, insofar as it can contribute to the better ordering of human society, is of great interest to the kingdom of God" (n. 39).

Yet the new heavens and the new earth will be God's work. What we find in them is not of our own making. Even so, it seems logical that something of what we have made with God and for God will accompany us in some way forever. But only God knows how.

The authorPaul O'Callaghan

Ordinary Professor of Theology at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome.

Read more

Dialogue: a necessity, an opportunity

February 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

Dialoguing with others is a human need, a condition of people's being. It humanizes and enriches them, and allows them to develop common actions. In this sense, it is necessary for coexistence in society, since there is no other way to articulate common projects and to add the contributions of all. If there are wounds or misgivings, it may be difficult, but it will open the way to reconciliation. As seems obvious, it presupposes the recognition of a dignity common to all, over and above differences of any kind, and the fidelity of each one to his or her own personal convictions. This enriches everyone, rather than preventing them from listening or collaborating.

There are times when attitudes of dialogue and respect are found to be desirable and beneficial. This is the case in some current situations, in disparate spheres. In the religious sphere, we have just celebrated the annual week of prayer for Christian unity, with signs of understanding and affection that, without concealing differences, show a real rapprochement of believers in Christ, all in the perspective of the fifth anniversary of the Lutheran reform next year. In the relationship between the various religions, the warm welcome given to the Holy Father in the synagogue of Rome, amidst the encouraging context created by the documents published almost simultaneously in December by the Holy See's Commission for Relations with Judaism and by a large number of rabbis, including a novel approach to mutual consideration, should be highlighted. In relations with Muslims as well, the benefits of dialogue and the need to foster reconciliation are clear. The same principle should accompany the necessary effort to integrate migrants and refugees in Europe.

Turning our gaze to another context, the current political situation in Spain also calls, according to a unanimous interpretation, for a new disposition to dialogue. The Compendium of Social Doctrine reminds us that the promotion of dialogue must inspire the political action of lay Christians (n. 565). It is necessary that ways be found to promote it at the various levels where problems arise, many of them serious and in apparent deadlock: political, labor, economic, territorial, ideological... But society also needs that dialogue not be reduced to a tactical element, to a short-term recourse to find formulas that only resolve short-term difficulties. It must be translated into a new willingness to serve common projects of coexistence. It could be an opportunity to strengthen democracy and renew the political culture.

The authorOmnes

The voice of peace and the warmth of mercy

The Pope calls for peace, mercy and unity, highlighting the welcoming of migrants, interreligious dialogue and the value of work.

February 13, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

With the new year comes the balance of what has been experienced and the opening to what is yet to come. The Christmas offers the framework that allows us to read the passage of time with the inextinguishable light brought by the Savior. The teachings of Francis in the last month deal with this framework, shedding light on the past and projecting hope for the future. With them, the Pope wishes to make the voice of peace resound and to enkindle the warmth of mercy.

In keeping with the liturgical framework, the meditations of the Angelus and the Homilies of the great Christmas celebrations have left us orientations on the peace that the Father wishes to sow in the world, not only so that we may cultivate it, but also so that we may conquer it.

The shepherds and the Magi teach us that we must raise our eyes to heaven, that is, keep our hearts and minds open to God's horizon, in order to conduct ourselves with hope in this world. The Word of God proclaiming the coming of the fullness of time with the incarnation of the Son of God seems to contradict what we perceive around us. "How can this be a time of fullness, if before our eyes many men, women and children continue to flee from war, hunger and persecution, ready to risk their lives for the sake of their fundamental rights? A river of misery, fed by sin, seems to contradict the fullness of time brought about by Christ. However, this flooding river can do nothing against the ocean of mercy that inundates our world".. We plunge into this ocean by the hand of the Virgin Mary, Mother of Mercy: "Let us allow ourselves to be accompanied by her to rediscover the beauty of the encounter with her Son Jesus.".

A balance of the last year is found in the speech addressed to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See. There the Pope has affirmed that "mercy has been the 'common thread' that has guided my apostolic journeys during the past year".The President of the United States has called attention to the serious migratory emergency that we are experiencing today. "The migratory phenomenon poses an important cultural challenge that cannot be left unanswered.". Looking to the future, the main challenge that awaits us is to overcome indifference in order to build peace together. Francis spoke once again of the plight of the unemployed when he addressed the Christian Movement of Workers. He reminded them that work is a vocation to which we can respond well if we take care of education, sharing and witness.

When visiting for the first time the Rome SynagogueThe Pope recalled the visit of his predecessors, evoking the contribution of the conciliar document Nostra Aetate and welcomed the important advances in theological and practical reflection carried out by Catholics and Jews. Today's world presents us with challenges, such as that of an integral ecology, which we should face together. To the Delegation of the Lutheran community of Finland, Francis asked to continue advancing in the dialogue in favor of a greater unity, in spite of the differences that still exist, recognizing that we are united by our commitment to give witness to Jesus Christ.

The Pope speaks of a future marked by mercy in the new series of catecheses of the Wednesday Audiences, as well as in the Jubilee meetings with migrants, rectors of sanctuaries and Vatican security personnel. He also referred to the future when he addressed parents presenting their children to be baptized, reminding them that the best inheritance they can leave them is the faith. The future, finally, we are called to build during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, asking that "let us all disciples of Christ find a way to collaborate together to bring the Father's mercy to every corner of the earth.".

 

The authorRamiro Pellitero

Degree in Medicine and Surgery from the University of Santiago de Compostela. Professor of Ecclesiology and Pastoral Theology in the Department of Systematic Theology at the University of Navarra.

Spain

The number of pilgrims to Santiago increased by 10% in 2015.

Despite the fact that 2015 was not a Compostela Jubilee Year, the Camino de Santiago experienced an increase in pilgrims of more than ten percent.

Diego Pacheco-February 13, 2016-Reading time: < 1 minute

A total of 262,515 people made a pilgrimage last year to Santiago de Compostela, which is 24,532 more people than in 2014 (a 10.31 % increase), the Xunta de Galicia has recently confirmed based on data provided by the Pilgrim's Office.

According to this office, which depends on the archdiocese of Compostela - and which issues the famous "compostelana" that certifies those who have traveled at least one hundred kilometers on foot or two hundred by bicycle or on horseback along the Camino - more than half of the pilgrims who made the Road to Santiago in 2015 were foreigners, specifically 53.38 %, a total of 140,138 pilgrims. Those of Spanish nationality were a total of 122,377, the remaining 46.62 %.

The Spanish are followed by Italians, Germans, Americans, Portuguese, French, British, Irish, Canadians, Koreans and Brazilians.

The total number of pilgrims came from a total of 178 countries, 39 more than in 2014, demonstrating the pull of the Camino to attract visitors from all over the world. The so-called French Way attracted the largest number of pilgrims: more than 379,000 travelers.

In view of these figures and this significant increase in pilgrims, it seems clear, as civil and ecclesiastical sources have also stressed, that the Camino de Santiago is still booming.

The authorDiego Pacheco

Spain

Constitutional Court upholds the agreement for differentiated education

A recent ruling of the Constitutional Court recalls that choosing a gender-differentiated education cannot imply disadvantages when subscribing to concerts.

Enrique Carlier-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

The Constitutional Court (TC) has rejected by means of several rulings the appeal filed, at the request of the Andalusian government, by the High Court of Justice of Andalusia (TSJA) against the General State Budget for 2013, which included an allocation of public funds for the ten centers of differentiated education in that Autonomous Community.

The ruling of the High Court has not yet resolved the merits of the issue -nor has it even entered into it-, which would be to pronounce once and for all on whether it is unconstitutional or not to establish concerts with schools that adopt the differentiated educational model of not mixing children of both sexes in their classrooms. The TC has simply ruled that, according to the legislation in force -what is stated in the Organic Law for the Improvement of the Quality of Education (LOMCE) in its article 84.3- "In no case shall the choice of gender-differentiated education imply for families, students and corresponding centers a less favorable treatment, nor a disadvantage when signing agreements with the educational administrations".

The LOMCE is being, therefore, an ally of those ten schools in the face of the manifest intention of the Junta de Adalucía -somewhat obsessive and exaggerated for only ten schools, I would say- not to concert any center of differentiated education. Because, although in 2012 the SC had allowed the Andalusian government not to renew the concert to the twelve centers of that educational model that existed then in the region, the approval of the LOMCE -and specifically of the provision 84.3 of the so-called Wert Law- substantially modified the legal situation. The Spanish government, taking into account that precept, fixed in the General State Budget the items corresponding to those schools of differentiated education, included in the economic module of distribution of public funds for the support of subsidized educational centers.

The Junta de Andalucía then reacted by urging the TSJA to present a question of unconstitutionality before the TC, whose pronouncement is the one we now know.

The ruling does not assess whether it is constitutional or not; it simply states that at the time the TSJA presented the issue, the LOMCE was already in force, which prohibits discrimination against centers of this type of education.

In light of this ruling, the TSJA must resolve the appeals of unions, parents and centers against the 2013 order of the Board that denied the concert to the ten centers. While the appeal was being resolved, the TSJA has granted in these years several precautionary measures to these schools so that they could maintain the concert. The Junta de Andalucía, however, appealed these precautionary measures before the Supreme Court, which again ruled in favor of the differentiated centers with a decision in which it considers that the funding of this pedagogical model is not contrary to the principles of UNESCO and is protected by the LOMCE.

The schools are Ángela Guerrero, Ribamar, Altair, Albaydar, Nuestra Señora de Lourdes, Elcható and Molino Azul (all seven in Seville); and Zalima, Torrealba and Yucatal (in Córdoba).

The authorEnrique Carlier

Read more
ColumnistsÁlvaro Sánchez León

Anonymous segregators

The recent ruling of the Constitutional Court endorsing the economic agreement for differentiated education centers in Andalusia denies that they are socially harmful.

February 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

-Welcome to Segregators Anonymous! Juan, tell us your story. Strip your traumas on this hanger.

-Thank you very much. Hello, my name is Juan and I have studied in a school of differentiated education. I'm sorry.

We are seven siblings and we all inherited clothes and ate frozen pasties. Coca-Cola was the symbol of the holidays. Today's stale bread was tomorrow's breadcrumbs. And on our birthdays there were balloons, popcorn and chips. We were never happy meal people.

Three sisters. Three brothers. Orders. Dishwashers. Brooms. Imagination. A modest house, but very much a house. Sweated with the illusion of two fronts.

Seven public schools would have loosened the tie. But my parents decided to complicate their lives because they felt like it. I went to an all-boys school. All in uniform. With ties. My sisters went to an all-girls school. All in uniform. In plaid skirts. They went to the school next door, the one we winked at when we went cross-country.

No memory of that school is of a couch, of a pill, of group therapy. Really. I would say more, and you will forgive my boldness. I remember those great years very fondly. I did not feel that I was being turned into an undercover wife-beater, or a Martian, or a compulsive segregator, or an unresolved sexual tension, or a hammer of heretics, or a generator of phobias, or a provocation.

Never ever in my life, I promise by the regime, did I feel like a child trained to be antisocial, sexist, classist, radical Catholic, intolerant, rapist, blindly pepero, mental gumshoe... You are laughing your heads off. I understand that. But here, in confidence, without Rottenmeier ladies who watch over my single thought with webcam, I feel free... At school I learned things, and at home I learned them all. In both places I learned to respect people. It was in the environment.

My trauma, let's say, is more like a controlled anger. The Junta de Andalucía is determined to turn me into an alleged or future abuser of women, men, or vice versa. A danger. Guilty. And other Boards that are not from Andalusia, because it is a new policy to turn into social segregators those who believe that other educational models are better. And they pay them.

I'm offended by this iniquity. Because it is a design lie as big as the San Telmo Palace.

Bile segregators: you can stop pointing the laser pointer at me. Come on. Thank you.

The authorÁlvaro Sánchez León

Journalist

Read more
Cinema

The Bridge of Spies

The film 'Bridge of Spies' is a visually majestic film, where photography and shots are very well thought out and executed, in the best Spielberg style. It is also a great treatise on character development.

Jairo Velasquez-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 2 minutes

The movie

AddressSteven Spielberg
ScriptMatt Charman, Ethan Coen
Country: U.S.A.
Year: 2015
Distribution: Tom Hanks (James Donovan) Mark Rylance (Rudolf Abel), Amy Ryan (Mary Donovan), Alan Alda (Thomas Watters)

Steven Spielberg continues to be a master in the art of filmmaking. And his passion for historical cinema offers us a new great film. Bridge of Spies is not dizzying, as Saving Private Ryan o Munichnor excessively political, such as Friendship o Lincoln. It is a human story, where the ambition for justice and doing the right thing is the guide on which the narrative is built.

The change of setting from New York to Berlin is really great. From one moment to the next, the film goes from being a thriller from American lawyers to a disturbing spy adventure, where the character of James Donovan, an insurance lawyer brilliantly played by Tom Hanks, is at the center of the action and becomes, unintentionally, the hero of the story.

It is a visually majestic film, where the photography and shots are very well thought out and executed, in the best Spielberg style. It is also a great treatise on character development. It is also interesting to note the way in which the director manages to interweave the stories of the subjects and families involved in the plot.

Bridge of Spies focuses on the true story, although logically somewhat versioned, of the Cold War exchange between a Soviet spy captured in the United States and a U.S. military pilot shot down in Russian territory.

The director begins the narrative long before the exchange is posed. He does so during the legal proceedings of the alleged Soviet Union spy in a New York court of law. It is here that the moral qualities of Hanks' character are established and where the first human consequences of what this lawyer felt that in justice he should do are raised.

Once the story changes continent and reaches Europe, the narrative becomes exciting. The scenery becomes another protagonist, while the action accelerates and manages to keep the viewer in suspense, because it is not certain until the last moment that things are going to turn out well.

With this tape Spielberg recounts historical moments. It fully addresses the arguments present in the first part of the Cold War. The nuclear tension, the work of the spies and the political positions clearly established in each of the blocks.

Bridge of Spies is a film, in short, in which director and actor are at their artistic best and which ends up being one of the best stories of the year.

The authorJairo Velasquez

Read more
Spain

A decalogue for the promotion of the birth rate

Faced with Spain's bleak demographic outlook, the authorities can no longer remain impassive: they must promote the birth rate.

Roberto Esteban Duque-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Professor Contreras Peláez, Professor of Philosophy of Law at the University of Seville, maintains that only in the years 1918 and 1939, due to issues of "Spanish flu" and the casualties of our civil war, Spain lost population. Something that happened again in 2012 and 2013, a period in which it decreased by 2.6 million inhabitants, no longer due to conjunctural issues as then, but as something structural and permanent. And Alejandro Macarrón, on the birth rate, adds that a fertility of 1.26 children per woman in 2013 puts us at 40 % below the "replacement rate", (2.1). Moreover, Spanish women do not have their first child until they are 31.8 years old and the average age of Spaniards is now quite high: 41.8 years.

The decline in population levels will continue over the next decade. This is even clear from the United Nations "World Population Prospects 2015", which warns of the negative effects of such a demographic transformation on economic growth. There is a strong feedback between the economic crisis and the demographic crisis: the worse the economy, the less stimulus for childbearing; and the more eclipsed childbearing is, the worse the economy will be.

But it is also necessary to note the correlation between family stability and birth rate. Conversely, there is a correlation between family crisis and demographic winter. Marriage is the ideal ecosystem for the procreation and education of children. In the United States, the Chinese-American researchers J. Zhang and X. Song showed that married couples have a fertility rate four times higher than unmarried couples. The commitment and stability characteristic of marriage influence their reproductive behavior, almost absent in the amorous volatility of a common-law couple, which makes investment in "durable goods" such as children much more implausible. A society with few stable marriages will be a society with few children.

It is common to hear that the low birth rate and the increase in extra-marital births, the devaluation of marriage and the high divorce rates are merely social trends that the State can only confirm. However, the law is not neutral. The legislator cannot remain impassive, nor contribute to the progressive degradation of the family, but must encourage marriage and avoid, as far as possible, breakups, especially because in Spain it seems as if having children is considered a private whim. The economic measures to stimulate the birth rate will pass, in the first place, by rewarding -through fiscal, salary or pension advantages- fertility, for its contribution to the future of Spain.

It is not enough to believe that an intensification of immigration flows is the solution to the drama of the inverted demographic pyramid.

On the other hand, we must urgently call for individual responsibility: we cannot expect the State to solve our basic needs.

I suggest a decalogue to strengthen marriage and the family, in order to lay the foundations for a correct promotion of the birth rate in Spain:

1. A new regulation of abortion, similar to the Polish law, whose implementation in 1993 brought about a decrease in abortions from more than 100,000 in the early 1980s to less than 1,000 in the mid-1990s. The Constitutional Court has ratified in a recent ruling that the conceived child is a member of the family. The world is strange to God if we are not receptive to the gift and transmission of life.

2. Repeal of the "express-divorce" law in order to create a consensus of both spouses and provide sufficient time for reflection on the assessment of the negative impact of divorce on children.

3. Creation of a public network of Family Orientation Centers, whose fundamental motivation will be to promote the family instead of dissolving it.

4. Offering a subject of preparation for family life in secondary education, capable of raising awareness of the social importance of the family and the birth rate, as well as counteracting the harmful effects of a widespread gender ideology.

5. Creation of a Ministry of the Family that would make visible in an institutional way the state's commitment to the empowerment of the family. Ministries of this type exist in many European countries.

6. Implementation of corrective coefficients in the calculation of the contributory pension according to the principle "the more children, the more pension", a principle of justice insofar as parents provide society with future contributors.

7. Payment by the State, for a period of time to be determined, of the Social Security contribution for each child for women who stop working after becoming mothers.

8. Tax deduction of the cost of family caregivers, day care and other expenses associated with children, as well as the assumption by companies of flexible schedules according to the needs of workers with children.

9. Increase of personal income tax deductions for minor children and reduction of the Transfer Tax for families with minor children and of the Real Estate Tax for families with children.

10. Elaboration of a comprehensive plan to support the reconciliation of work and family life, as well as a comprehensive maternity assistance plan that includes financial and welfare assistance for pregnant women in distress.

The authorRoberto Esteban Duque

Spain

Demographics in Spain: a real and serious problem requiring urgent action

Alarm about the decline of the population in Spain has been raised in the media after the publication of the latest data from the National Institute of Statistics (INE). We spoke to Canadian demographer Alban D'Entremont about this problem.

Rafael Hernández Urigüen-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 6 minutes

For the first time since 1999, more deaths than births have been registered in Spain. According to the INEIn the first quarter of 2015, there were 206,656 births and 225,924 deaths, resulting in a negative balance of 19,268 fewer people.

In the Basque Country the demographic crisis is even more serious, since the figures speak of only 8.8 children per 1,000 inhabitants, as opposed to the 9.1 of the national average and the 10 of the European Union. In the Basque Country there has been a notable increase in the number of people over 65 years of age (currently 458,396), while those under 20 years of age only total 202,082. Furthermore, according to the INE, Basques between 30 and 40 years of age, who now number 372,000, will barely reach 207,000 in 2023.

However, this worrying demographic anemia has hardly been the object of attention in the state or Basque political debate, with only lukewarm or non-existent proposals in favor of the family and the birth rate in electoral programs. Although it is worth mentioning the appeals made in the last few years in favor of the family and the birth rate. arartekos (Basque Ombudsmen) in parliament. The first to warn about the seriousness of the problem was the socialist Íñigo Lamarca, who already raised in 2008 the need to adapt family support policies taking into account those already implemented in the rest of Europe, for example in Finland and other countries. The Basque Country invests a third less in family policies than the EU as a whole. The current ararteko, Manu Lezertua (proposed by the PNV), completed Lamarca's proposals in mid-December, stressing the need to promote policies that favor an effective family reconciliation and calling for economic investment in favor of families to grow up to 2 % of the Gross Domestic Product.

The writer Pedro Ugarte, for his part, has recently denounced the fear of the political parties to propose family policies that favor the birth rate, since they are conditioned by environmentalist, radical feminist and animalist pressure groups. Thus, the parties, according to Ugarte, "do not feel any concern about this demographic disaster". They do not feel concerned by the problem. Ugarte also alludes to pragmatism and the sustainability of the welfare state, which should at least make politicians react.

The Basque Government's plan to promote the birth rate will be developed starting this year, said the Minister of Employment, Ángel Toña. Throughout these first months, effective formulas will be studied. The previous 2011-2014 plan invested 233.4 million euros in birth and adoption aids, and in favoring family conciliation. But despite this effort, Basque women do not have their first child until they are 32.4 years old on average, later than in the nineties (at 30 years old) and than in 1975 (at 28.6). The delay in childbearing has been a constant both in years of economic boom and crisis.

For Ángel Toña, the key to opening a new demographic cycle is reconciliation policies, in addition to increasing economic aid. And above all, a change of mentality and culture is required to overcome the anti-natalist constants imposed by ideologies.

Undoubtedly, both in the Basque Country and in Spain, public authorities will have to consider new and decisive policies in favor of the birth rate. On these issues we have consulted the opinion of the expert Canadian demographer Alban D'Entremont.

What is the evolution of the main demographic indicators in the Basque Country?

-All demographic indicators - birth rate, fertility, mortality, growth, nuptiality, age and sex distribution - reflect a highly atypical and alarming situation.

The data in the Basque Country are on a par with those of other Spanish autonomous communities, with the aggravating factor that here, without exception, the indices reveal an even more critical situation. According to the INE, the Basque Country is losing population - some 2,800 people in the last quarter of last year - and the birth rates (8.9 per thousand) are not only lower than those of Spain as a whole (9.2 per thousand), but also lower than the mortality rates in the Basque Country (9.3 per thousand). Mortality is increasing due to the aging of the Basque population (almost 20 % are over 65 years of age). This gives a negative vegetative or natural growth, to which is added the population going abroad.

Basque women have an average of 1.4 children, below the Spanish average and far from the 2.1 children needed to renew generations. And nuptiality is also at very low levels (3.4 per thousand) and increasingly delayed: at 34 years of age in 2015.

What are the causes of demographic decline?

-Apart from the strictly demographic processes, there are other underlying causes, of a social, cultural and religious nature, which explain this situation. These are perhaps the most important causes of the collapse of the birth rate in Spain and surrounding countries. They are rooted in ethical and psychological issues: the serious deterioration of these values has generated the appearance and generalization of counter-values related to human procreation, which leads to social approval and legal sanction for alternative structures to traditional family structures, and the generation of an anti-natalist mentality.

This, together with new trends towards genetic manipulation, euthanasia and the expansion of abortion, paints a very worrying picture of personal and collective disintegration.

Was this demographic turnaround foreseeable and were policymakers warned?

-Although demography is a social science, which analyzes the behavior of free individuals, it is based on statistical analysis. And population projections, the further back in time they point to a certain trend, the more likely it is that this bias will continue in the future in the short and medium term. Forty years ago, Spain was already experiencing a fertility collapse: for the last generation there have not been two children per woman. There were also clear signs of an aging population, a decrease in population and an increase in mortality. The only factor that could not be taken into account was immigration, the effects of which were felt ten years ago, but have not been lasting.

The process itself has not been a surprise. The surprise has been the speed and dimension of the demographic, mentality and behavioral changes. But the political authorities were more than amply warned about this profound demographic crisis, but for reasons of political expediency they are not acting with conviction and determination: the left, because of their own ideology and adherence to supposedly progressive ideas in favor of divorce, abortion, euthanasia and the rest; and the right, because of a certain complex. In both cases, this is a serious irresponsibility.

Why do some consider natalist policies to be right-wing?

-This perception exists in Spain, but not in our neighboring countries. The famous "third child policy", which has given good results in France, was promoted by a socialist government: that of Mitterrand. And the Nordic countries promote very ambitious pro-natalist and maternity protection policies without any complexes. These are also social democratic governments. It is clear that promoting the birth rate and the family is not something right-wing or left-wing. But in Spain it is usually considered right-wing because they also defend life and marriage, and they tend to come from sectors that often identify with Catholic beliefs.

And why have conservative political parties not developed policies to increase the birth rate? Is the high number of abortions a relevant factor in the decline of the birth rate?

For the aforementioned reason of being branded as "right-wing" or close to the Church. And this, in the perception of these parties, would translate into a loss of votes. We are faced with the old dilemma of choosing between short-term and long-term good. Although my opinion is that a party that defends the family and the good of children, and explains it adequately, will win votes. The party that has been in power these years has had the pretension - on issues such as abortion, for example - of "appeasing" public opinion so as not to scare some and please others. The result has been that it has not pleased many and, on the other hand, has frightened quite a few.

As for the number of abortions in Spain (94,796 in 2014), it has not been the decisive factor in the decline in the birth rate, although it does have its relevance, since any loss of birth rate comes on top of the current large fertility deficit.

What specific measures should be taken and how should they be presented to the public?

Coherent, generous and effective long-term policies must be implemented. And I am not just referring to the specific area of reproduction or family formation, but to comprehensive and forceful policies in areas such as employment, housing, health and education, which would allow young people to marry and have children without having to make the enormous sacrifices of today.

Today this is tremendously difficult, since the aid earmarked for such purposes is extremely meager and insufficient for all intents and purposes - among the lowest in the European Union - and no political party has taken this issue seriously, with disastrous consequences such as the possible bankruptcy of the Social Security system.

I would recommend the Spanish government to place the demographic crisis at the same level as the economic crisis, to carry out a public awareness program and to allocate substantially more money to promoting the birth rate and the family than is currently the case. Until now, policies have focused mainly on the top of the pyramid (the elderly and pensioners); this has been a mistake: we must look at the bottom (children and young people), which is where the solution will come from.

The authorRafael Hernández Urigüen

Vocations

Myriam Yeshua: "We all decided to stay".

Sister Myriam Yeshua was born in San Juan (Argentina) in 1983 and is a religious of the Servants of the Lord and the Virgin of Matará, the female branch of the Institute of the Incarnate Word. For four years she has lived in Syria serving Christian university students in the midst of the hardships of war.

Miguel Pérez Pichel-February 13, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

It is a simple house in the Carabanchel neighborhood of Madrid. Sister Myriam Yeshua welcomes me and, after crossing a small garden, invites me inside her congregation's house, where she has been living for almost a year. I sit in an armchair in the living room. She sits across from me, waiting for the interview to begin. I take out my tape recorder and ask her permission to record the conversation. "It's just so I don't miss anything when transcribing it.". She smiles and gives me her permission. Myriam Yeshua (the name she adopted when she took her vows) has lived for four years and a half in Syria. There he has witnessed the suffering of the Syrian people in Aleppo, one of the cities hardest hit by the war.

"I have nine siblings and the four youngest of us are religious."she says when I ask her about her vocation. Myriam Yeshua wanted to enter the "aspirancy" when she was 11 years old. At that time she had two religious sisters. "My father thought I was too young and told me to finish high school first and, if I was really called by God, to enter the convent afterwards. But I just reached that difficult age of adolescence, I began to meet people, to make friends..., and the idea went away.". When he finished high school he began to study history. "Then my sister, the one who is just older than me, told me that she was also going to the convent. It was a tremendous shock for me.". She explains that from that moment on she began to rethink what she had felt as a child. Of course, it was a difficult decision, "but I was still encouraged to give that yes to God.".

After her novitiate and years of formation, she was assigned to Egypt. She lived for two years in Alexandria where she studied Arabic. Then "the Latin rite bishop of Aleppo asked us to go to Syria to found".. Thus, in 2008, at the age of 24, she moved to Aleppo together with two other Egyptian sisters. There they began their apostolate. The three sisters took charge of the cathedral and a residence for university students. "some of whom were my age". The girls were all Christians (mostly Orthodox), since the bishop's idea was to start doing charity first at "home".  "The apostolate with them was very beautiful. We went on excursions, we invited them to Sunday Mass and, although they were Orthodox, many of them came; every night whoever wanted to pray the rosary with us, we talked with them... We had to help them in those first difficult years far from their families"..

In 2011 the war started. Yeshua never thought that something like this could happen in Syria. "Syria was a very peaceful country. Muslims had a lot of respect for Christians. There was a respect that I often don't find in Europe."he says. When the violence began to become generalized, the superiors of the order asked them if they wanted to remain in place: "We all decided to stay.".

In the midst of these difficulties, the sisters tried to continue their apostolate. "Before the war began, it was normal for two people to go to Mass every day, sometimes more. Five at the most. But when the fighting began, it was incredible how the number of faithful who went to daily Mass, to pray the rosary, to adore the Blessed Sacrament, began to grow....". Sister Yeshua tells us that the people suffered a lot, "but I also saw an impressive trust in God."

Yeshua regrets the precariousness of the situation in Aleppo: practically inaccessible food, electricity supply cuts, difficulties in obtaining gas.... "Now that it is winter and there is no heating because there is no gas, people make fires inside their houses with whatever they can find. In the squares there are no more trees because people have cut them down to make fires for heating or cooking. Even the benches in the parks have only the iron structures left, because people have also torn up the wooden planks to use them as firewood.".

But what strikes Yeshua most is how, despite the difficulties, young people struggle to finish their degrees or attend Mass, "Sometimes in very difficult situations, because the bombings and shootings are continuous. Many times they put their lives in danger. They are not afraid. Quite the contrary. Because they know that they are in a permanent risk, and that at any moment they could die, they are constantly prepared: they go to mass every day, they go to confession frequently, they pray the rosary...".

The authorMiguel Pérez Pichel

The World

Muslims and Christians. When you risk your life to save your brother's life.

Just over a month ago, a group of Kenyan Muslims saved the lives of their Christian compatriots. The example serves to reflect on the relationship between Muslims and Christians.

Martyn Drakard-February 9, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Monday, December 21, 2015 was a hot day. The bus was on its way to Mandera, in the north of KenyaThe driver had to pick up passengers from another vehicle that had broken down on the same route. At one point, the driver had to slow down the vehicle considerably due to the poor condition of the road (actually a dirt road). The route had suffered a great deal of damage due to the torrential rains that had fallen in the region shortly before.

Mixed

At that moment the driver saw three armed men stopping him standing in the middle of the road. He thought they were some army soldiers, but soon realized his mistake. The men opened fire on them and wounded him in the leg. He immediately stopped the bus.

Realizing that these individuals were most likely members of the Al-Shabaab (a terrorist group originating from Somalia linked to Islamic State, which has been carrying out terrorist attacks in Kenya for years), the driver and his companion alerted the passengers, among whom were numerous Christians. In an attack on December 28, 2014 in a similar place they had killed 28 people, all Christians, who were not able to recite from memory texts from the Koran as the terrorists asked them to do to save their lives. Now they feared the worst.

Immediately the passengers began to mingle on the bus to disguise each other's religious status. The Muslim women gave some of their veils or other garments to the Christian women so that they would not be easily recognized.

The terrorists, faced with the difficulty of distinguishing between the followers of one religion and another, ordered those who were Christians to get off the bus. But none of the passengers got off. Christians and Muslims were together, mixed, side by side. The terrorists began to get nervous because it is usual for these buses to carry a police escort. In this case, the police car had broken down and so had been delayed. In any case, it was clear that the police patrol escorting the vehicle would not take long to arrive. Indeed, shortly after the assault, the sound of an approaching engine was heard in the distance. The terrorists then decided to leave, but not before murdering a poor man who, in fear, had tried to flee alone.

An act of patriotism

The next day Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta praised the patriotism of our Muslim brothers who risked their own lives to protect the lives of other Kenyans. Sheikh Khalifa, the chief imam of Kenya, said this courageous act showed the true teachings of Islam: we all have an obligation to care for our fellow man.

This reminds us of what Pope Francis said on November 26 at an interfaith meeting in Nairobi: "I am thinking here of the importance of our common conviction that the God whom we seek to serve is a God of peace. His holy name must never be used to justify hatred and violence. I know that the memory of the barbaric attacks on Westgate Mall, Garissa University College and Mandera is still vivid in your minds. Too often, young people are radicalized in the name of religion to sow discord and fear, and to tear at the fabric of our societies. It is very important that we are recognized as prophets of peace, peacemakers who invite others to live in peace, harmony and mutual respect. May the Almighty touch the hearts of those who commit this violence and grant His peace to our families and our communities.".

In this particular case our Muslim brothers and sisters have given us a beautiful lesson. May we keep it in mind as we welcome refugees or other displaced persons or those in need in this year of mercy.

The authorMartyn Drakard

Read more

It's not just for priests

Theology affects all men equally. It is not something that should be of interest only to priests, but also obliges the laity. The study of theology should lead us to give ourselves to our neighbor, to listen to those who are alone.

February 9, 2016-Reading time: < 1 minute

On January 7, in Santa Marta, Pope Francis said that "I can feel many things inside, even good things, good ideas. But if these good ideas, these feelings, do not lead me to God who has become flesh, do not lead me to my neighbor, to my brother, they do not belong to God"..

The only criterion for knowing theology, for studying theology, is the criterion of the Encarnacion. If I study it, I must not only get to the final exam, but to my neighbor. I start from a lesson, from a book, but if it is theology, I must learn to listen to those who are alone, to ask my neighbor what he needs. I must learn that the only book to read is the face of a poor person, the skin of a man who needs to be clothed, a mouth to feed. Not a distant man to be supported with money, but one to whom I am close and must support with my flesh.

Theology is not just a matter for priests: it is a matter for God and, therefore, for man.

An example of these days is the experience of Proactiva Open Arms. They are lifeguards from the Costa Brava -and not only from there- who started walking on the beach and have come, with death in their hearts, to save fugitives. They knew how to be lifeguards, and they have done it: lifeguards for fugitives in rough waters. The first lifeguards to arrive were four.

The first "weapons", neoprene and vests. Now there are many, people of all kinds. They have boats with outboard motors. And the money is what they have collected. They have until March. They have no economic plan, but the hands that have collected 115,000 people from the water are not afraid of not knowing how to collect money.

The authorMauro Leonardi

Priest and writer.

Read more
The World

Immaculate Conception column makes its way back into Prague's Old Square

The capital of the Czech Republic will replace the monument to the Immaculate Conception on the Old Square, where it stood since 1650 until its collapse by uncontrolled persons in 1918.

Omnes-February 9, 2016-Reading time: 4 minutes

A misunderstood secularism has led many countries of Christian tradition in Western Europe to remove religious symbols from schools, streets and even the name of their festivals, as is the case of the monument to the Immaculate Conception in Prague, where it stood since 1650 until its collapse by uncontrolled in 1918; While in Eastern Europe, out of their communist dictatorships twenty-five years ago, these symbols return to public spaces.

The eastern lung of Europe, as referred to as the St. John Paul II to the countries that fell under Moscow's Soviet orbit, now turns its gaze to the elements of the common Judeo-Christian culture.

In the Czech Republic, the restitution of property seized from the Catholic Church and other religious denominations during the communist regime (1948-1989) has also entered its final stretch.

The latest restitution law, passed in 2012, thus resolves the desired economic independence of dioceses and religious entities so that they can run their affairs without interference, unlike what had been happening until now, with a financing system inherited from the totalitarian past.

This does not detract from the fact that the State continues today to devote many resources to the conservation of heritage, which is largely of a religious nature and provides the public coffers with substantial income from tourism.

But there are also curious situations, such as citizen initiatives that lack institutional support from the Church or the State, and are sustained only on the basis of popular zeal, trying to return to their original place religious monuments that were displaced or destroyed by sectarian hatred.

The idea is that, with the return of these monuments to the site for which they were conceived, public spaces will recover their original flavor, meeting architectural, aesthetic, historical and cultural criteria.

Column of the Immaculate Conception

Among these initiatives is the return of the Immaculate Conception column to the Prague Old Town SquareIt had been there since 1650, shortly after the signing of the Treaty of Westphalia, which put an end to the Thirty Years' War.

According to Jan Royt, art historian and rector of Charles University in Prague, the column was a symbol of this European peace, and the part of the city on the right bank of the river wanted to show its gratitude to the Virgin for having emerged unscathed from the war.

The image, made by J.J. Bendl, was at the time the first baroque sculpture in sandstone, and "paved the way for a great development of sculptural art."explains Jan Bradna, academic sculptor and restorer.

The statue was demolished on November 3, 1918, a few days after the proclamation of the Czechoslovak Republic. Since then there have been four attempts to replace it, and the last one, championed by the Society for the Renewal of the Marian Column created in 1990, is on the verge of achieving its goal. Although after the Velvet Revolution, which opened the door to democracy in Czechoslovakia, this seemed impossible, it has become a reality.

The countdown for the return of that statue to the memorable square, which is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, has only just begun. And it is doing so without any state contribution, since the Society for the Renewal of the Marian Column has raised sufficient donations.

Prague is specific

With the return of freedoms in the Central European country, Immaculate Conception columns have already returned to their place in major cities such as Ostrava and Česke Budejovice, and in smaller ones such as Kykhov, Turnov, Sokolov and Chodov.

Prague is a specific case, since the toppling of the column by an uncontrolled group in 1918 came to be considered a symbol of Czechoslovak emancipation from the Habsburg monarchy, which was closely associated with the Catholic Church.

For this reason, the Roman Church was not well regarded by the architects of the new state, led by the politician and philosopher T.G. Masaryk, who encouraged the creation of a Protestant-oriented Czechoslovak national church.

Almost a century has passed since the dramatic incident and, after many vicissitudes, everything seems to indicate that an exact replica of the statue will return to give balance to the square.

At one end an architectural ensemble was erected in 1915 in honor of the reformer Jan Hus (1369-1415), very devoted - by the way - to the Virgin, and there is a consensus among experts that the original counterpoint at the other end is missing.

"I prefer to express restraint, to avoid a counterattack, but 'D' day is just around the corner. There is no political factor that can prevent it and it is now an administrative matter that concerns the Construction Office."Jan Wolf, city councilor responsible for Culture, Heritage Preservation and Tourism, told PALABRA.

Wolf expressed this opinion after the results of the last archaeological survey, carried out in December, which concluded that the site is suitable to support the weight of the sculptural ensemble.

This clears the last hurdle raised by the Historic Heritage Office, and the file now goes to the Construction Office of the City Council of District 1 of the city.

If his words come true, the shadow of the column will coincide at noon - with a delay of five minutes - with the Prague meridian: this was, since the days of its installation in 1650, the system for measuring time in Prague.

Reasons

In addition to architectural and aesthetic reasons, there are other more profound reasons that can serve as a reminder of the identity of the people.

"The Immaculate Conception column is a moral reference from which Europe was born."said Wolf, for whom the monument refers to the Judeo-Christian roots of a civilization.

The column has a Jewish woman, Mary, at the center of the scene, surrounded by a cohort of angels reflecting scenes from the Apocalypse, the last book of the Bible in which God reveals Himself to man and which constitutes one of the deposits of the Christian faith, together with the Apostolic Tradition.

For Wolf, in the days of its construction the column reflected also "the unity of Europe"for Prague was "an international crossroads" with people coming from many corners to rebuild a country devastated after the Thirty Years' War.

From a more current perspective, the Prague councilor stressed that the column serves as a counterpoint to the Muslim world, in a current context of violence and terrorism led by the Islamic State. "Something we can be proud of."concludes the Christian Democrat politician, referring to the maternal and welcoming model represented by the Virgin Mary.

He added that it can serve as "a resistance against atheism and something to help convert to the good, on which Europe was based.".

This has not always been understood by the opponents of the project, who consider it, in Wolf's words, to be "a confirmation of Catholic supremacy, as another show of mere pride.".

This stumbling block seems to have been overcome recently following an agreement between the Archbishop of Prague, Dominik Duka, and Hussite and Evangelical representatives, within the framework of the 6th centenary of the death of the reformer Jan Hus.

Read more
Articles

Advances in robotics: a new version of the Tower of Babel?

Robotic systems integrated into the human nervous system, extreme enhancements of the body or computers capable of making autonomous decisions... are today's humans not succumbing to the temptation of a new Babel? Are these technological advances inhuman, or are they part of the divine mandate to dominate the earth? A new science, technoethics, is now answering these questions.

José María Galván-February 9, 2016-Reading time: 10 minutes

If until now technology had been kept in a certain way as something external to man, nowadays it is no longer so; we have it inside us. Nano and biotechnologies, robotic systems are integrated into the nervous system by neural interface, have been introduced into the most intimate mechanisms of the person and are profoundly changing our way of living in the world and of being with others and with ourselves.

Even if the machine remains external to the human being, its current development is capable of determining human life more profoundly than ever before: just think of the presence of machines that are similar to us, whether in terms of their appearance (humanoid robotics), their ability to make decisions autonomously, or the socio-economic changes that will be brought about, for example, by the massive introduction of 3D printing (in three dimensions). And the key question is: is all this something negative, anti-human, or can we live the age of technology in the key of hope?

In this global environment that is increasingly conditioned by machines, it seems logical that many new questions are being raised that are not easy to answer, and that we are beginning to speak of "technoethics" as a way to reach an answer in the key of hope. In fact, various bodies in the world of technology, culture and politics are increasingly pushing for a rediscovery of the ethical dimension of technology.

Bionic leg prototype implanted at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.

A new science is born

The term "technoethics" was born a long time ago, in December 1974, during the "International Symposium on Ethics in an Age of Pervasive Technology", which took place in the prestigious Israel Institute of Technology (Technion) of Haifa. At that meeting Mario Bunge, an Argentinean philosopher who taught at the McGill University of Montreal (Canada), first used the term in an address entitled "Toward a Technoethics".which was subsequently published in "The Monist" in 1977.

The word was born, therefore, just four years after the word "bioethics"The new project was not as successful; it practically disappeared from the cultural map until it re-emerged at the beginning of the 21st century.

Perhaps the author himself was to blame for this. In that conference, Bunge made statements that at that time represented great advances, such as declaring that the engineer or technologist has the obligation to face the ethical questions that his actions entail, without pretending to transfer them to managers or politicians. At that time, the engineer was seen as a kind of "specialized worker", capable of doing what the company or the politician asked him to do, but without being the one to decide what to do or what not to do, or whether it was a good thing to do.

But the formula that Bunge found to give this ethical value to the technical act spoiled everything. As a thinker imbued with modernity, with materialistic tendencies and a good connoisseur of the emerging technology, he probably thought that from an ethical point of view one could trust much more the machine, guided by science and computer algorithms, than the human person (for a modern person, from a functional point of view, the person is disappointing). That is why Bunge concluded his intervention by stressing that an upright and efficient conduct requires a revision, an overhaul of ethics, because it has to depend on technique and not on an unreliable human freedom.

Bunge's position is reminiscent of that of the pre-Hippocratic Asclepiadian physicians: their science depended only on the sacred books; what was written in them was what they followed; the ethical consequences of their acts did not fall on the physicians, but on the gods, who alone were responsible for the life or death of the patient. In the technoethics of modernity, the ancient gods have been replaced by science, which guides all consciences. The only problem is that today the guide of all sciences is, in turn, the economy; therefore, if something is good for the economy, it is good morally, and vice versa. Obviously, we are dealing here with an economy centered on the production of wealth, not on the person, as the semantic origin of the word actually suggests and Francis recalled in the Laudato si.

At the service of the individual

Hippocrates breaks with tradition asclepiadea and makes medicine a true science: he destroys the sacred books and begins to study the symptoms and to experiment the efficacy of drugs. Since Hippocrates, to cure or to kill depends on the science and the technical capacity of the physician who, therefore, is ethically involved in the first person: that is why the physician swears that he will use his science only for the good of humanity. Hippocrates' science and technique are at the service of the person.

I believe that to have hope in the current technological civilization is to rediscover the true meaning of science and its orientation towards the global good of the person, and not only of its functions. In this sense, technoethics must be conceived in the opposite key to that of Bunge: technoethics must be an area of interdisciplinary dialogue between technologists and ethicists, leading to a body of knowledge and an ethical system of reference that allows the achievements of technology to become a central element in achieving the teleological perfection of the human being. This presupposes not only affirming the positive anthropological character of technology, but also placing the end of the person in something that goes beyond technology itself.

Babel versus Pentecost

The most classic example of the immanent finalism of technology is the biblical Tower of Babel. In that episode, men think that to reach heaven is to build a very high tower, without realizing that their attempt would lead them to be laying bricks one on top of the other for eternity: a sort of Sisyphus myth in a masonry version. Babel is the symbol of the technique of modernity: it is no coincidence that in the film MetropolisFritz Lang's "New Babel" (1927), the city of technical happiness revolves around a tower called "New Babel".

The man of Babel loses his symbolic capacity: self-reduced to an immanent purpose, he is able to communicate very well, but he loses human language, he is incapable of dialogue. His punishment, the confusion of languages, is not arbitrary: it is what is due to him for what he has done. Only when the Spirit of the Logos is given to him again (Pentecost) will he be capable of a true dialogue with all men, over and above the diversity of tongues. The opposite parallelism between Babel and Pentecost is the key to the hope of contemporary technology.

Modern man, who is the man of Neo-Babel, or the happy Sisyphus of Camus, or the indefatigable ant of Leonardo Polo..., cannot attain happiness. Modernity has died, giving way to postmodernity, among other things because it is already a common certainty - and not only the prediction of the great prophets of the crisis of modernity: Dostojevsky, Nietzsche, Musil... - that techno-scientific development will never succeed in answering the great mysteries of the human being: pain, guilt, death... A full human existence will never be achieved by adding more time. Let us remember that, for St. Thomas, hell is not true eternity, but only more time, indefinite time, a tick-tock that never ends (cf. Summa TheologiaeI q. 10, a. 4 ad 2um).

Technique won the battle

That is why the end of modernity has coincided with an enormous distrust of technology, which is seen as an enemy. A great cultural war has been fought against it: philosophers such as Heidegger and Husserl, the hippythe New AgeMuch of the art (unbelievable!: "art" is Greek for "art", "art" for "art", "art" for "art".tekné"; technique in Latin is said "ars") and literature have fought against technique..., and have lost.

Curiously, technology has won the cultural battle. As was said at the beginning, it now occupies a central place not only in society, but within the person himself. And it has won not only because it has imposed itself with its achievements, but for another more radical reason: the reduction of human reason to experimental scientific rationality has limited access to reality to knowledge of its laws of physical, chemical, biological and psychic behavior....

In the end, the fundamental model is given by physics, which is the modern "measure of all things", as was the Vitruvian man in the Florentine Renaissance: then everything was understood from anthropology, and in modernity everything is understood from physics (how not to think of the a priori Kantians of pure reason?).

The problem is that all this tends towards a paradigm of domination: to know the laws of reality in order to be able to subdue it. Modernity has thus originated an ecological crisis: the destruction of so many resources, the increase in the number of people living in the world, and the gap between rich and poor countries...

Basically, the problem is that modernity, as Scheffczcyk said, has replaced God with science and religion with technology. In the modern paradigm, technique ends up being the instrument of science, inverting a relationship that had always been the opposite. And postmodern man has rebelled against this. Who knows more about a rose: a botanist or a poet? That is why technology has won the battle, and even those who continue to attack technology do so by employing an infinity of technological artifices, and spread their ideas through the most sophisticated achievement of the technique of communication: the Internet.

Identification with the machine

What to do in the face of this paradox: is the technique that has won the cultural battle the subdued and violent technique of modernity, or is it the man-centered technique of classical culture and the Italian Renaissance?

The answer to this question cannot be given by the technique itself, because it alone does not determine itself to any end, it is always progress towards new achievements. The ordering to the end is given by the person. In a certain sense, the modern person has preferred to renounce the end (which is like renouncing freedom), in order to identify himself with the machine and thus participate in its many functional advantages. Faced with the crisis of modernity, those who do not want to renounce this way of seeing things have no other way out than to flee forward, further reducing the person to the machine: this is the path of the transhumanists or posthumanists, who are not postmodern but "tardomodern" (this is the terminology used by Pierpaolo Donati, very aptly). For them, the key to the human being lies in the recovery of the radical Cartesian dichotomy between res cogitans (mind, intelligence) and res extensa (bodies, matter), so that the res cogitans can subsist in any res extensaboth biological and artificial.

Posthumanists view the human body as something that, if necessary or convenient, can be dispensed with or subjected to extreme and arbitrary modifications. This position is not very different from that found in many aspects of late-modern culture, which sees the body as a mere instrument that we can modify to improve its performance: prostheses and modifications that make it more sexually attractive, or more suitable for achieving certain professional or sporting performances, or that could make the human body a branded body, a "branded" body.branded body" (Campbell). It is curious that in the same year that Pistorius got permission to compete in the "normal" Olympics, one of the best known international bioethics journals published an article stating that there are no moral reasons to prevent voluntary mutilations or extreme body modifications (Scharmme in Bioethics2008); if a robotic prosthetic leg can lead me to sporting glory better than my natural one, why not replace it? Then, only amputees would participate in the finals of the 2022 Olympics.

Main technoethical principles

One might think that progress that allows such things is not worthwhile. On the other hand, we should affirm that we cannot renounce this technological progress, which is a true conquest of the human spirit.

It is clear, however, that something has to change. The proposal of the new technoethics is that we must change the modern paradigm that affirms the primacy of science over technology and disassociates it from freedom for a new model in which technology once again becomes a spiritual activity, an eminent product of the spirit in its relationship with matter. Basically, it is a matter of rediscovering the anthropological value of the body that we are.

The key to the true meaning of technology lies in discovering its role in the relational being of the person, already described by Aristotle as the teleological element of human happiness ("no one would want to live without friends"). This is highlighted in our postmodern days by the need to overcome the paradigm of dominion with a new relational paradigm. The person, who realizes himself in the interpersonal relationship by sharing the intentional ends of intellect and will, knows that the substantial unity of soul and body cannot carry out this task without accepting its material dimension. Interacting with matter (human labor) in order to insert it fully into the interpersonal dialogue is the ultimate reason for technique.

It is necessary to replace the objectifying and dominating technoscience, which subordinates technology to a secondary role, with a new concept of science open to the authentic truth of man and conscious of not being able to reach that truth, but capable of putting itself at his service through technology. Therefore, it can be said, as the first theorem of technoethics, that technology has as its own object the increase of the relational capacity of the person. From this we can deduce the second theorem: experimental science is humanized or spiritualized when it becomes technique, because it reaches the person. And if these two theorems are fulfilled, it is possible to postulate a third: the authentic development of technology leads to the exaltation of the person, so that the technological artifice, the machine, which when it is born usually has a bulky presence, ends up being integrated and taken for granted. The more perfect a machine is, the more the human person is hidden behind it, behind its task and its true purpose.

A man walks parallel to a prototype autonomous electric vehicle in Buenos Aires.

Naturally artificial

The crisis of modern culture has led us to establish a kind of axiom whereby what is natural is good, and what is artificial is bad. The truth is exactly the opposite. There is no opposition in human nature between natural and artificial: we are "naturally artificial". Who dares to say that a myopic person is less natural with glasses than without them? A proper view of technique should lead one to see the artificial element as the product of the free interaction of the person with material reality and, therefore, as something that creates dialogue. On the one hand there would be the artifices (machines) that are mere utensils, or evolved mechanisms of assistance to human life (robotic prostheses, neuroprostheses...), and, on the other hand, the artifices that increase the symbolic capacity of the person (communication and information technologies).

These general principles that I have enunciated, but not sufficiently developed due to the logical lack of space, can serve as a guide to judge from an ethical point of view when a new technology serves the person or not. The most evolved robotic systems can already be connected to the nervous system of living beings, creating a synergy between machine and person that can lead not only to repair lost functions, but also to increase others to unthinkable limits. The same can be said of neuroprostheses.

Humanoid robotics can enable symbolic manifestations that art until recently could not dream of. New technologies serve freedom. This means that they can also go against humanity: a robotic system can condition the physical action of a person against his will, a neuroprosthesis can enslave a personal being. Hence the importance of returning to the ethical key of technical creation, which will always make it possible to discover the person behind the machine. When we contemplate the Sistine Chapel, the matter of the fresco puts us in dialogue with Michelangelo; when we come into contact with a humanoid, we will be in dialogue with the engineer who created it.

The authorJosé María Galván

Professor of Moral Theology at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross and an expert in technoethics.

Read more