Father S.O.S

Vitamins and minerals (and II)

There is a widespread perception that it is advisable to take vitamin and mineral supplements in any case. Is this true? In particular, what are the dietary functions of minerals and where are they found?

Pilar Riobó-April 11, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

The minerals are, like vitamins, micronutrients that participate as coenzymes in the metabolism of nutrients, have structural functions (such as calcium and phosphorus, constituents of the skeleton), participate in the transport of oxygen to the tissues (such as iron, essential for the formation of red blood cells), or intervene as constituents of muscle proteins (as in the case of iron) or thyroid hormones (iodine). Calcium is also involved in nerve signal transmission functions in the brain and muscle. Other minerals, such as sodium (a constituent of common salt), control water balance and blood pressure levels.

Potassium is the main ion found in cells. Together with sodium and chlorine, it is involved in the hydration of the organism and in neuromuscular transmission. Because of their physiological importance, they are all subject to fine regulation in the body, mainly through the action of the kidney, so there are usually no major variations in their level in the body, unless there is an underlying pathology.

In the body, 65 % of iron is found as part of hemoglobin. This protein, contained in red blood cells, is responsible for transporting oxygen from the lung to the tissues. The rest of the iron is part of myoglobin, a protein found in muscle, which gives up oxygen when needed, and is also stored in the liver or spleen. From these stores, iron is mobilized to form more hemoglobin when needed.

Iron deficiency prevents hemoglobin from being synthesized. This is what is called iron deficiency anemia. Iron deficiency is very frequent especially in adolescents and women of childbearing age, and in pregnant women, who have higher requirements. In the elderly, the most frequent reason for iron deficiency anemia is chronic losses, especially at the gastrointestinal level, even if they are small, and the cause should always be sought.

Some micronutrients (vitamins A and E, selenium, and zinc) have antioxidant capacity, thus preventing the formation of free radicals (which have been linked to aging, tumor genesis, cataract formation, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction). 

Calcium and phosphorus play an essential role in bone formation. Due to the Western and hyperproteic diet we eat, there are not usually deficiencies of phosphorus, although it is frequent that the calcium intake does not cover the requirements. Specifically, these are high in children and adolescents, a time when bone is being formed and the so-called "peak bone mass" is reached. From this moment on, when the bone is stronger, bone will be lost very slowly. The loss of bone mass is accelerated at the time of menopause, when the female sex hormones are absent, so that the requirements are also high around those years. It has been shown that high calcium intake at this time of life attenuates the loss; if it is accelerated, or if the peak bone mass reached in adolescence is not adequate, osteopenia appears more easily and then osteoporosis ("porous bone", which breaks easily with small traumas), with its dreaded consequences (hip fractures, vertebral fractures, radius fractures...).

So, is it necessary to take pharmacological vitamin and mineral supplements? If you eat a plentiful and varied diet and do not suffer from diseases, it is generally not necessary: vitamins are contained in food. There are specific cases, such as those mentioned above (iron deficiency anemia, sun deficiency, calcium intake during menopause, vitamin B12 in the elderly, malabsorption problems...) in which vitamin supplements may be of interest, always after consulting your doctor.  

The main minerals and their dietary sources are shown below:

  • Iron: meat, blood sausage, eggs, legumes;
  • Calcium: dairy products, fish scrapings;
  • Phosphorus: meat, fish, dairy products, eggs;
  • Magnesium: vegetables, legumes, nuts, meat, chocolate, seafood;
  • Sodium: common salt;
  • Potassium: fruits, vegetables;
  • Iodine: iodized salt, fish;
  • Selenium: seafood, kidneys, liver and meat;
  • Zinc: oysters, meat, liver, eggs, milk.
The authorPilar Riobó

Medical specialist in Endocrinology and Nutrition.

Initiatives

A youth ministry for the 21st century

Each generation makes the message of Jesus Christ present in its own time, its own language and its own culture. Youth ministry is not oblivious to these changes, and must present the beauty of Christianity in an appropriate way. An experience such as Life Teen can give clues about ways of catechesis:  participatory and in a contemporary language, without cutting doctrine and with a deep sacramental practice.

Pablo Alfonso Fernández-April 11, 2017-Reading time: 4 minutes

The next Synod of Bishops, scheduled for 2018, will focus on young people and vocational discernment. It already has a Preparatory Document that was made public at the beginning of this year. This text helps to focus youth ministry today in an appropriate way, and as on other occasions, it includes a questionnaire at the end whose answers will serve as a basis for drawing up the Working Document for the Synod. The tone is optimistic and hopeful, and its reading encourages the Church to perceive the voice of the Lord through young people who, even today, know how to distinguish the signs of our times. As stated in the introduction to this Document, by listening to the aspirations of young people, it is possible to glimpse the world of tomorrow and the paths the Church is called to follow.

There are many pastoral workers who work with young people, and sometimes their dedication does not bear the expected fruits. This situation leads to a certain discouragement, and one can have the impression that Christ's message is somewhat outdated, that it does not connect with the interests and aspirations of today's young people. The temptation then arises to cut back on the demands of the Gospel, or to show a somewhat more diffuse figure of Christianity, one that does not require a vital commitment so often perceived as costly. We know that this is not the solution. In fact, Christianity a la carteBy losing its authenticity, it also blurs the appeal of an ideal, of something worth fighting for. And today's young people, like those of other eras, are those who seek to improve the world. They value the authentic. They are not satisfied with substitutes. They are capable of compromise if the message of Christ is shown with all the strength and attractiveness it has.

A youth group that works

There are many initiatives aimed at further integrating young people into Christian life projects. One of them is the method of Life TeenThe program, which began in 1985 in a parish in Arizona, in the United States, is now present in close to 2,000 parishes in more than 30 countries. It was started by Randy Raus, with the aim of bringing young people closer to Christ after living a process of personal conversion. 

This father of a family is now the president and one of the founders of the evangelizing project of Life Teenwhich he presents with professionalism and enthusiasm all over the world. When he began to feel this apostolic restlessness, he had the opportunity to meet Mother Teresa and asked her: "Mother Teresa, what should I do? Life Teen? -Take them to the Eucharist. - Is that all," he asked, "but there must be something else. Mother Teresa replied: "Don't worry about the numbers, help only one person at a time and start with the one who is closest to you on one occasion.

The parishes in which the method of catechesis is implemented in Life Teen The groups are made up of young people who share their faith in a lighthearted and joyful way, while at the same time living a profound proposal of encounter with Christ in the Eucharist and weekly formation in the doctrine of the Catholic Church. The pillars of their formation are therefore found in the Mass, in dynamic catechetical sessions and in the community in which they live with other young people.

Life Night: new experience for teenagers

In the catechesis of Life Teen the protagonism is given to the young people themselves. Rather than the transmission of a doctrine, the sessions are organized with the aim of sharing spaces and learning through encounter. There are two types of sessions, depending on the age of the participants: the youngest join the group and the oldest join the group. Edgeand from the age of 15 or 16, they are grouped in the so-called Life Teen

Its dynamics includes four successive moments that are named in English as follows Gather, Proclaim, Break, y Send. In the first moment (the meeting), the participants are received in a festive context, such as a snack or a game, which allows them to get to know each other and establish a first approach. Then the catechesis is given, explaining some doctrinal aspect or current issues that directly affect young people. Afterwards, the topic explained is shared in small groups, where everyone's participation is encouraged. Finally, they meet again, this time for a moment of prayer.

Parishes that use this method receive specific materials for catechetical sessions three times a year. These are resources designed to reach the culture of young people, who are accustomed to receiving many appeals through the audiovisual media. In addition, liturgical guides are included with suggestions for preaching and music for Eucharistic adoration meetings. This is an important element in the meetings, especially the music of praise, which through a vibrant rhythm and catchy melodies urges to feel the presence of God and moves the heart to a personal dialogue with God.

Think big

The last European meeting of Life Teen was held in Barcelona in March. There were about 200 attendees who shared experiences and sought ways to make evangelization among youth more effective and profound. Jordi Massegú, the person responsible for this method in Spain, explains that it is important to accompany adolescents where they are, and specifically in the social networks they use and in which they are present, such as Instagram y Snapchat

At the same time, it suggests that youth pastoral agents know how to show their activities in a more attractive way, taking care, for example, of the professionalism in their organization and diffusion, with the creation of posters with a more visual and direct design. There are specific tools for the elaboration of these materials, such as Worswag o Canva. Of course, the use of networks or the external appearance of the materials does not replace face-to-face contact with the friendship and sincere accompaniment that young people appreciate and contribute to generate with their enthusiasm and initiative.

In a 2014 audience to the Commission for Latin America, Pope Francis was thinking of young people by highlighting three aspects of Jesus' encounter with the rich young man: welcome, dialogue and invitation. This passage can help us as an icon of accompaniment for young people, and as the Pope explains, help them to understand that "Christ is not a character in a novel, but a living person who wants to share their unrenounceable desire for life, commitment and self-giving. If we are content to give them mere human consolation, we disappoint them. It is important to offer them the best we have: Jesus Christ, his Gospel, and with it a new horizon, which will make them face life with coherence, honesty and a clear vision"..

The authorPablo Alfonso Fernández

Read more
Focus

Accompanying young people. They need to be treated seriously

Fulgencio Espa Feced-April 11, 2017-Reading time: 10 minutes

To suppose that spiritual accompaniment has its roots not on earth, but in heaven, and that it produces its fruits in history, is to play with an advantage. Basically, any reality that deals with the supernatural is susceptible to being interpreted in this way. In fact, the image of the inverted tree that takes root in heaven and bears fruit on the altars was fecundly detailed during the patristic era in reference to the Eucharist. The sap runs down the trunk of the cross and is poured out in the Eucharistic gifts, made the body and blood of Christ. 

The letters are marked, therefore, by the stamp of the supernatural. I speak of spiritual accompaniment from a perspective of grace, of supernatural gift. We are going to describe the essential features of an encounter between brothers or, if you prefer, between a son and his father. Spiritual paternity and Christian fraternity are at the origin of this spiritual practice. In the accompaniment there are no clients, as in the coachingThere are no patients, as in psychiatry; there are simply brothers and sisters. In the spiritual colloquy there is no therapy, as in the legitimate and profitable world of psychology; there is openness of heart, fraternal dialogue, filial conversation. 

When you want to carry out any study of any kind, the first question of any essayist or researcher is about the sources. Where will you find knowledge? What bibliography should be consulted? What articles have been published recently?

I write about spiritual accompaniment for young people, and I confess that the fundamental source for these letters has been the young people themselves. In other words, to describe this tree of grace that is spiritual accompaniment, I begin - why not? - by detailing its marvelous fruits in young hearts. In these years of pastoral life, I have seen many of them grow in the heat of spiritual dialogue. In this reflection it is necessary to take off our shoes, because we are treading on sacred ground (cf. Ex 3:5): the task of grace in souls is so delicate that it deserves our primary attention.

Fruit

An unproductive plant is not defined by its fruits. If one takes the trouble to look up the evangelical term "tares" in the dictionary of the Royal Academy of the Spanish Language, one will not find the word "fruit" in it. It is said to be a toxic plant, difficult to remove without also uprooting the good seed, which alone can damage entire harvests.

On the contrary, if one searches for "wheat", the reference to its beautiful "row of grain and fruit" is almost immediate. The fruit says a lot about the plant, to the point of being able to qualify its existence as beneficial or harmful.

Now, what is the fruit produced by spiritual accompaniment in young souls? Above all, love. I know it sounds generic to the skeptical ear, and since it is in my spirit to make him a believer, we will go down to detail what love means in this context.

It begins, even if it is not sought (perhaps because it is not sought), with a right love for oneself. Many girls and boys have learned to respect themselves through spiritual accompaniment. When dialogue is extremely delicate, it leads to that respect that begins with oneself. The boys begin to think that they are capable of something. Too many times they have heard words of reprobation, unwise - and perhaps false - judgments about the goodness of past times, reproachful sentences about their fickle will. Finally, someone believes in them, and I am not referring to the spiritual companion, but to God himself. Little by little, one arrives at the impressive conviction that something is waiting for me from him who existed before the mountains were born or the orb of the earth was begotten, and from everlasting to everlasting is God (cf. Ps 89:2).

Love is always about sharing something. Amans amato bonum velitsaid the classics. In other words, to love is to share the good. To discover to the young soul that it has something to share with God is to open it to the exciting world of prayer. The heart becomes great in the dialogue of prayer, because youth - as long as it is young - does not notice the difficulties when it perceives the greatness of love, the beauty of a loving ideal. All this is revealed when one perseveres in prayer, and spiritual accompaniment is synonymous with words of encouragement in this regard. 

In the spiritual colloquy we learn to pray, we grow in our relationship with God, and we try to put ourselves "face to face" with God (cf. Ex 33:11). Like Abraham, we want to listen to his voice (cf. Gen 12:1). At first we may not be aware that this listening may also imply leaving our land. It does not matter. God does not ask for anything that he does not give first. The periodic dialogue with the companion is fundamentally oriented to fulfill His will; God's will. The main and first topic of the spiritual conversation is prayer, prayer, complaint and thanksgiving to God: the intimate dialogue with Him.

The light of grace received in prayer brings out the divisions of the soul. What does this mean? As the preparatory document for the 2018 Synod of Bishops on young people details, "the human heart, because of its weakness and sin, normally presents itself divided because of the attraction of different, or even opposing, claims". The young person becomes aware of this opposition, and distinguishes, once again, the fruits of those branches that sink their roots in heaven, from those that are born by and for the worldly. Spiritual accompaniment awakens in the young person a yearning for the best, and opens his heart and his intelligence to a life of prominence. 

The young person who authentically allows himself to be accompanied spiritually escapes from conformism, and no longer acts alone if he "pays" or "does not pay". In his heart nestles something more than sensuality and comfort, which has nothing to do with a heavy ideology, but rather with a burning love. 

The young man who prays sincerely, and delves unceasingly into it, makes his soul shine with the most beautiful sparkles. He does not allow himself to be deceived. He discovers the hidden pearl, and is capable of selling everything he has in order to acquire it (cf. Mt 13:45-46). He is much more than a young man with values; he is a young man with a supernatural life. He has found the hidden treasure of God's love and observes a different world: he does not see strangers, but brothers and sisters; he does not experience difficulties, but trials in love; he does not know complaint, but the challenge of self-giving.

In life's journey, the document cited above affirms, it is important to decide, "because we cannot remain indefinitely in indeterminacy. But it is necessary to equip oneself with the instruments to recognize the Lord's call to the joy of love and to choose to respond to it". The most supernatural fruit that spiritual accompaniment can produce in youth is the discernment of one's own vocation, because it implies the serene conviction of an extraordinary love of God who, in his infinitude and omnipotence, has made reparation for my poverty. 

"Listen, daughter, look, incline your ear; the king is fascinated by your beauty; prostrate yourself before him that he is your Lord". (Ps 44:11). This, and no other, is the context of every vocation: a dialogue of love in which one has something to give. This is the beautiful thing: that God wants to beg something from the young soul. And this is the exciting thing: that this boy, this girl, can give it to him. Can a fruit of such extraordinary beauty be rooted in a place other than heaven itself?

Branches and stem

These marvelous fruits "fit" into a very concrete personality: a humanity that wants to grow. Youth is a time of ideals, and whoever thinks that this has ended with the last century is, in fact, not treating or not knowing how to treat young people. To lose hope that youth can be the age of dreams is to lose hope in the whole of humanity. 

"Youth is not made for pleasure." the poet Paul Claudel rightly affirmed, "but for heroism". Today, as always, young people need someone that reminds him of his greatness. Those fruits that are the noble hearts of young people hang from branches that need to be pruned, from a stem deserving of the most exquisite attention. In short, young people need to be seriously dealt withand not as morally deficient or, worse, psychologically incapable. Youth should be synonymous with greater generosity, not with a stunted life.

Men are needed who understand what really interests young people and can move them to the finest love. They say it - they ask it! - themselves. Spiritual guides must be persuaded of the heroism of youth. 

"We were able to respond."said an elderly priest to the group of priests crowded around him, "because someone got their hopes up for us". Boys and girls need that someone And they often learn this not so much as a result of long lectures, but as a consequence of a true passion for them in a thousand ways: their ideals, their tastes, their songs, their values, their concerns. Quererles

Because someone got their hopes up for us. Those who accompany spiritually should engrave these words in their hearts if they sincerely wish to help young people. To be excited about youth, to be excited that a young person is called by God to an unreserved dedication, to be excited that all of them can reach the highest heights of God's love. Having a passion for youth makes young people nobly passionate. They soon notice who has the desire to live, the commitment to be joyful and the confidence in youth. When the priest or the spiritual director has enthusiasm for the young people, he succeeds in communicating their aspirations naturally, without pretenses or strange things. They finally find an adult who understands them and speaks to their heart, who does not want to take out nothing about them but only wants them to find true happiness: their own (and higher) way. There is no suspicion, on the contrary: they know that they can talk to him about their most intimate things, because it will never seem too much to him. That man, that woman, continually teaches by word and deed that to be of God is a gift, and that he who has been chosen by God is privileged. 

We were able to respond because someone got their hopes up for us. Returning to the agricultural simile, the plant of youth must be cared for at the cost of the greatest efforts, although the greatest of all is to love them sincerely and wholeheartedly. With his love and his word, the spiritual companion will free the young person from the many plagues to which he is exposed: human respects, fierce criticism, prochasticity, sensuality and lack of roots. 

Fear of God

In spiritual accompaniment, the mastery of a bonsai keeper is necessary. Extreme delicacy in dealing with the Christian soul. The course of the spiritual conversation will deal with various questions: prayer, faith in God, doubts and worries, the sacrifices of the day and the circumstances of everyday life. Each person has his or her own way of engaging in this conversation, although in all cases the most sincere and truthful encounter with God should be sought. It is the task of the spiritual accompanier to listen and to place the young person before God so that he/she does not do what he/she most desires, but what leads to the greater love of God. It is the task of the teacher to open horizons of righteousness and love that are the driving force behind the most difficult decisions; to move souls to communion with God in order to bring heaven to earth. 

To this extreme delicacy corresponds the most total sincerity. A sincere person is one who says everything he knows, and this represents at least three aspects of utmost interest. In the first place, it means that nothing is hidden out of shame or fear of looking bad. It never looks bad in spiritual direction if the truth is told. For this, the companion must never show disappointment, because such an attitude would not be evangelical in any case. Did the Father of the prodigal son ever show a shadow of disappointment?

Secondly, to be sincere means to deepen and grow day by day in one's own knowledge. Say all what one knows does not mean knowing it all. In order to let oneself be accompanied, it is opportune to have a deep spirit of examination that helps to a progressive self-knowledge.

Finally, to be sincere means to be docile to the indications. If one always says everything and never listens to advice, it will be difficult to find in accompaniment an effective instrument for one's spiritual life.

Root

The root is in heaven; or rather in heaven that became earth: Jesus Christ. He is the first exemplar and absolute paradigm of all spiritual accompaniment, which is expressed in the totality of his humanity: the loving gaze (the vocation of the first disciples, cf. Jn 1:35-51); the authoritative word (the teaching in the synagogue of Capernaum, cf. Lk 4:32); the ability to become a neighbor (the parable of the Good Samaritan, cf. Lk 10:25-37); the choice to walk alongside (the disciples of Emmaus, cf. Lk 24:13-35); the witness of authenticity, without fear of going against the most widespread prejudices (the washing of the feet at the Last Supper, cf. Jn 13:1-20). 

Through the humanity of Jesus, grace came to the first disciples, to the inhabitants of Nazareth, to those who listened to his teaching, to the disciples of Emmaus and to the Apostles. Through spiritual accompaniment, torrents of grace continue to flow to young people, bringing them out of the dullest anonymity, and bringing them to the highest heights of God's love: as to Peter and James, as to John and Andrew, as to Mary Magdalene.

The goal in this case is the origin. Spiritual accompaniment, which is rooted in God's grace, has God himself as its goal. Many people seek to be well. So do young people. It is reasonable; no one likes to feel bad. Spiritual accompaniment undoubtedly contributes to inner peace, but its goal is more transcendent. Ultimately, spiritual accompaniment wants to lead the young person to holiness, and for that reason is for every Christian soul. In the last Council we were reminded of this universal call to holiness, and linked to it we could legitimately underline that there is also a universal call to spiritual accompaniment.

It is true that spiritual accompaniment is not the only means to holiness. The means of sanctification are infinite, as infinite is the love of God for every creature. But, as a young soul emphasized, spiritual accompaniment is a fine rain, a delicate suggestion, a gentle indication that strongly moves hearts and makes souls fruitful. In fact, spiritual accompaniment is not the only means of sanctification, but it is one of the most privileged.

A youth community where there is recourse to spiritual accompaniment that is rightly lived speaks clearly of a whole and of a well-oriented individual. The periodic conversation with the spiritual man or woman puts each soul and the whole community in the right direction. 

What we have seen with our eyes (1 Jn 1:1)

"The Jews were able to behold miracles." said St. John Chrysostom in one of his catecheses; "you shall see them also, and greater still, more dazzling than when the Jews came out of Egypt." 

The miracle is a beautiful harvest; that is what our eyes saw and our hands felt. A divine harvest, which speaks of dedicated young people, totally modern and fully Christian. The same fruit (the path to holiness) expressed in very different ways: souls consecrated to the religious life, young people dedicated to the priesthood, boys and girls who embrace apostolic celibacy and dozens and dozens of young people who form families according to the love of God. Indeed, miracles more dazzling than when the Jews came out of Egypt: the triumph of the love of the New Covenant (grace) in the young soul.

"More than ever we need men and women who, from their experience of accompaniment, know the processes where prudence, the ability to understand, the art of waiting, and docility to the Spirit prevail" (p. 6).Pope Francis stated in his Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, "to take care of the sheep entrusted to our care from the wolves that try to break up the flock". (n. 171). 

Protect the flock, take care of the plant.... and make it grow. "In the commitment to accompany the new generations the Church".The preparatory document for the 2018 Synod sentences, "welcomes his call to collaborate in the joy of young people, rather than trying to take over their faith (cf. 2 Cor 1:24). Such service is ultimately rooted in prayer and in asking for the gift of the Spirit who guides and enlightens each and every one of us.

The authorFulgencio Espa Feced

Parish Priest of Santa María de Nazaret (Vallecas, Madrid)

Read more
ColumnistsAndrea Tornielli

Missionaries who allow themselves to be evangelized

Christians know that they must be missionaries, but also that their most important mission is not to give to others something that we possess and that we should give, but to seek in others, and particularly in those in need, what they need.

April 11, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

Why has Pope Francis already repeated several times those words of his predecessor Benedict on evangelization, when he explained that the Church grows by attraction and not by proselytism? Is it not in the nature and mission of the Church to "conquer" proselytes? In reality, Benedict's words taken up by his successor Francis speak to us of a method, which is the method that God always had: not that of coercing freedom. Not that of great historical events, not that of extraordinary interventions, but that of communication in the whisper of the breeze, in the brilliance of beauty, in the attractiveness of a life that bears witness to itself.

We can discover this conviction in the history of the Church and in how the Christian faith was communicated. In the perspective of Francis, it is convenient to understand some consequences, and above all this: the believer knows that he has to be a missionary, but that his main mission is not to bring something to someone, but to be a protagonist and to be able to give something to others who need it. For example, speaking on the subject of the geographical and existential peripheries, the mission is not primarily to bring to the poor or the desperate our proclamation, as if it were something that we ourselves possess, and that because we are Christians we give so that those who receive it can be converted.

The perspective is different and asks us for a continuous conversion. It is that of the missionary who goes to the peripheries to look for something he needs. He goes to seek the face of God in the poor and needy, to be evangelized by touching in them the flesh of Jesus Christ. The Pope explained it very well on January 6. Christians are not those who talk a lot, lament, study marketing strategies to win people for their ecclesial "enterprise". They are like beggars who seek every day to meet God in the encounter with those in need. And as Cardinal Parolin recently said, speaking of the Christian roots of Europe: "Christians are not expected to say what to do, but to show by their lives the way to go.".

The authorAndrea Tornielli

Read more

The Pope and the homeless

In the first weeks of the year, ice has fallen on Rome, worsening the living conditions of the homeless. This is why Pope Francis authorized Bishop Krajewski to leave the dormitories open 24 hours a day. Surprisingly, however, some homeless people preferred not to leave the corner of the streets where they "hostnot because they consider it their "...", but because they consider it their "...".house"It is the best place to beg during the day.

March 22, 2017-Reading time: < 1 minute

And the Pope went to meet them, in the street, near the favorite places of the homeless, with the cars of the Almshouse: if you don't come, I will go. Because the protagonist of my good is the one who is in need. In Rome it is said: "tie the donkey where the master wants". And if the master is a homeless man who does not want a roof over his head but only a way to protect himself from the cold, the Pope lends him a car. It is helping by serving, that is, helping by loving.

When we make the resolution to be better we do not have to think first of the object to give, but to whom we want to do good. If I want to give a roof to a homeless person, it may happen that the homeless person does not want it. Then I don't explain to him why he is wrong, but I take the car out of the garage and lend it to him for the night. If we lived this way in service to the other, we would have real authority, we would be real".regios"We would truly live the ordinary priestly ministry of baptism: to serve.

We should not strive to improve ourselves, but to love the other: this is - paradoxically, Viktor Frankl would say - the only authentic way to improve ourselves. If my attention is directed to the ultimate recipient of my action, in the end the true beneficiary of the purpose is me, my soul, my heart, my life. To enter into the order of ideas of helping now, in the small, concrete, to the other, with what I have, is also the only way of not transforming good intentions into windy fritters. A good resolution is fulfilled quickly. A good purpose is made with what we have, with what we are.

The authorMauro Leonardi

Priest and writer.

Read more

Hospitals in Syria

March 22, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

The war in Syria has not only led to mass exodus and starvation. In Aleppo there are 2.2 million people without health care. More people die today in Syria for lack of care than on the battlefield. The initiative Open hospitals aims to ensure free inpatient and outpatient care.

- Maria Laura Conte

It does not seem to be enough that the war in Syria has been defined several times, in all international environments, as ".the greatest humanitarian crisis of our era". It is not enough, because indifference and habituation push us to turn our heads away, and even to lower them often to see only our navel.

Nevertheless, 13.5 million displaced persons, 6 million of whom are children, cannot fail to stir something in anyone who thinks a little of the world as their home.

A large part of these Syrians, almost 9 million, live in food insecure conditions. And after six years of war, the Syrian healthcare system has collapsed. The UN speaks of 11.5 million people who have no access to health care. And 40 % are children. In Aleppo alone there are more than 2.2 million people without access to medical care. It is estimated that 58 % of public hospitals and 49 % of health centers are closed or only partially functioning, and that more than 658 people working in these structures have died since the beginning of the crisis.

According to some estimates, only 45 % of the health personnel working in Syria before the onset of the crisis are still active in the country. Life expectancy has dropped by 15 years for men and 10 years for women.

"More people die today in Syria for lack of care than on the battlefield". These words of the nuncio in Syria, Cardinal Mario Zenari, have prompted the creation of a new project, "Open Hospitals, to help people find care and relief from wounds of the body and also of the soul. They are the Italian Hospital and St. Louis Hospital in Damascus, the Al Rajaa Hospital and St. Louis Hospital in Aleppo. It has been studied by the AVSI Foundation, together with Cor Unum and with the health collaboration of the Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation.

AVSI's project aims to boost the activities to the 90% of its possibilities and to ensure free inpatient and outpatient care for the most needy patients. Supporting these hospitals (including through avsi.org), to support the work of those in Syria who are on the side of the population, is a simple way of not looking the other way and understanding that Syria is here.

 

The authorMaria Laura Conte

Degree in Classical Literature and PhD in Sociology of Communication. Communications Director of the AVSI Foundation, based in Milan, dedicated to development cooperation and humanitarian aid worldwide. She has received several awards for her journalistic activity.

ColumnistsAndrea Tornielli

Colombia and the diplomacy of gestures

The Holy See confirmed on March 10 that Pope Francis will travel to Colombia from September 6 to 11 of this year. Andrea Tornielli explains the background.

March 22, 2017-Reading time: < 1 minute

Pope Francis makes his own "diplomacy" with gestures that are perhaps surprising and entirely his own. No diplomat would ever have thought of inviting his main political opponent on the same day, when the official audience with a Head of State was already scheduled.

This is what happened on December 16, 2016, when the Pope received on the same morning Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos and Alvaro Uribe, the head of the opposition that won the popular referendum rejecting the agreement between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrillas.

Francis had said that, in case of victory of the agreement that puts an end to more than half a century of civil war, he was willing to travel to Colombia and to be present on the date of peace. The surprising result of the referendum of October 2, which by a low percentage said "no" to the agreement, had had the result of postponing (some say canceling) the trip.

But the dialogue begun between Santos and Uribe was the occasion for the president to ask the Pope not to cancel the visit. That is why Francis, with an unprecedented and surprising decision of "pastoral diplomacy", summoned Uribe to the Vatican on the same day as Santos and, after two separate audiences, the three -the Pope, the president and his opponent- met for dialogue.

In this difficult, but new climate on the long-suffering road to reconciliation and forgiveness, the trip to Colombia has once again become possible. And it seems that work is now beginning in this direction. It is early for official announcements, but the Latin American country has resumed its presence among the probable trips in 2017.

The authorAndrea Tornielli

Read more
Culture

Maria Franco. Valuing what really matters

Omnes-March 10, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

November of this year marks the tenth anniversary of the foundation's first congress. What really matterscreated and chaired by María Franco. She explains what led her to create the foundation, and how it promotes projects to encourage universal values in society in various fields.

- Jaime Sánchez Moreno

The founder and president of What really mattersMaría Franco studied International Secretarial Studies, but recognizes that she had the intention of studying Journalism, and that she has always had a vocation for journalism. In fact, her first work experience was at ABC, in the External Relations department. "I didn't study for my degree because I really lived the world of journalism very closely."he explains. It was also in this newspaper that he discovered his second vocation: organizing events to help others.

Maria is the mother of three daughters. In her professional career, she worked for a company dedicated to organizing events to help foundations and NGOs. One day a friend of hers told her about the case of a friend, Nicholas Fortsmann, an American multimillionaire who also had cancer, a disease that took his life. This man wrote a book for his children, entitled What Really MattersThe book was written to help him and them appreciate "what really matters" (the title of the book) in order to truly enjoy life. Maria received the book thanks to her friend. For Maria, the book was a vital lesson: "It touched my heart, because when life hits you, you think the same thing and reflect on what really matters. [...] It's through stories that help people discover what really matters.".

With the help of another friend, Pilar Cánovas, the institutional director of What really mattersThe first congress of this foundation was held in honor of Fortsmann to transmit values to young university and pre-university students, this being the first edition of a free event. The event was held at the Palacio de Congresos del Paseo de la Castellana in Madrid, which was filled with more than 2,000 attendees. The event had a strong media echo, and eight Spanish cities were interested in spreading the word about the project. The foundation is now in six other countries: Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, Austria, Ecuador and Peru.

The NGO's congresses aim to get people to reflect on values that make them see what really matters in given situations. In addition to targeting young people through congresses, the foundation carries out initiatives for children, such as KliquersThe second one, carried out in schools, and the third one, where volunteers read stories. For adults, talks on real stories that stimulate them for their family and work life. As a novelty, the team has incorporated another initiative, My story really mattersfocused on senior citizens. "The volunteer and the person (usually elderly) to be cared for sign an agreement committing to work side by side for six months. We call the volunteer the narrator and the elderly person the protagonist. In weekly visits, the narrator tries to unravel the life of the protagonist, talking to him. The goal is that, after those six months, a book of his life will be published, of which the narrator will give ten copies to the protagonist. It is a great legacy for his children. For the protagonist it is a 'shot' of joy, and for the young man, to know the story of a person who, although from another generation, is the same as him and has lived the same".

At the headquarters of What really matters all of its members are women, and they are at the "helm" of the foundation. María comments that this aspect is a coincidence, because the team that directs it is the one that it is because of commitment and passion, and that the women who are part of it work in a climate of mutual collaboration. "We are seven people in love with the cause and we all work very hard together. This is a team foundation and, above all, a family foundation, because every time speakers join, they become part of the foundation. We just celebrated our 10th anniversary gala. It was very nice..

On February 17, a film was released in theaters, directed by Paco Arango, which in Spanish bears the name of the foundation. This director has participated in NGO congresses to talk about his testimony. In 2005, he created the Aladina Foundationwhich has teamed up with What really matters for the proceeds of the film destined to SeriousFun Children's Networka network of camps for sick children founded by actor Paul Newman.

Culture

The Annunciation in Art up to the Middle Ages

The Annunciation of the Lord (Lk 1:26-38) is, in the Christian tradition, the moment of the Incarnation. In the history of salvation, the Annunciation to Mary constitutes the moment of the Incarnation. "fullness of time" (Gal 4:4). By her assent to the divine message, the Virgin Mary becomes the Mother of Jesus. This biblical scene has been frequently depicted in art.

Omnes-March 10, 2017-Reading time: 4 minutes

Nine months before the feast of the Nativity of the Lord, the Church celebrates the feast of the Annunciation to Mary. Artists of all times have represented it. Its main iconographic source is the Gospel account of St. Luke (1:26-38). The most ancient representations are in the catacombs of Rome; for example, in the painting on the vault of a cubiculum from the catacombs of Priscilla, from the 3rd century. Since the 5th century, we also find this motif in the interior of churches.

In the Roman basilica of St. Mary Major (432-440), the Annunciation is the first scene on the left in the triumphal arch. Mary is depicted as a Queen. Attired in a golden imperial dress, she is seated on a throne. At her sides she is solemnly attended by three angels in white robes. Her hair is adorned with precious pearls, and her feet are resting on a suppedaneum. These ceremonial-courtesan details are explained by the decision of the Council of Ephesus (431) to define her as the Mother of God (Theotokos).  

Dialogue between Mary and Gabriel

The scene of the birth of Christ does not appear in the triumphal arch of the basilica. It must therefore be assumed that the Annunciation here includes the Incarnation. Above the clouds of heaven, the fourth angel announces the conception to Mary. In addition, a white dove can be seen as a symbol of the Holy Spirit.

Mary prepares a purple cloth for the veil of the temple, which is depicted on the left in synthetic form. The motif of weaving the purple veil can be traced back to legendary additions to the Protoevangelium of St. James (PsJac 11, 1-3), from the second century. A later source is the Gospel of pseudo-Matthew (PsMt 9), from the IX century. In popular piety and iconography the motif was very widespread, also up to the late Middle Ages, because the Legenda aurea (ca. 1264) by Jacobus de Voragine, which was widely read, received these two apocryphal texts.

Especially in Byzantine art the motif of the purple fabric was widespread. In the ivory relief of the Annunciation on the chair of Archbishop Maximian (between 546 and 556 in Ravenna, Archbishop's Museum) Mary appears seated on a high-backed throne. Her left hand grasps a purple spindle. Her right hand points to the Archangel Gabriel, who announces the good news to her. Like angelosGabriel usually carries a messenger's staff. In Ravenna, a staff of command distinguishes him as "Prince of the heavenly militia" (Archistrategos). Mary's head is covered with the virgin veil (Maphorion).  

In the Middle Ages, artists depicted the dialogue between Mary and Gabriel in most cases with both figures standing, emphasizing hand gestures and gazes. Also in the illumination of books and manuscripts, the compositions preferred standing figures. The Gospels of Otto III (ca. 1000, Aachen, Cathedral Treasury Chamber) shows the Annunciation in a solemn and monumental style (fol. 125r). The hand of God the Father, on high, in a round image, indicates the supernatural action during the Incarnation of the Son. The aforementioned type, with the standing figures, continued in the sculpture of the portals of Gothic cathedrals, as in Chartres, Reims, Amiens, Strasbourg, Bamberg, Freiburg and Cologne.

The Holy Spirit, the efficient principle of the Incarnation, used to be represented in a symbolic way as a dove along a ray of light, as in the painting by Carlo Crivelli (1486, London, National Gallery) or just above Mary's face, as in 1480-1489 in Hans Memling's painting (New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art).

Narrative realism

In the 15th century a type of Annunciation emerged in which the Infant Jesus appears fully formed. The Antependium of the high altar of the cathedral of Teramo (1433-1448, Nicola da Guardiagrele) presents Jesus as a bambino in the hands of the angel, who offers him to Mary. On the other hand, in the relief of the tympanum of the chapel of the Virgin of Würzburg (1430-1440), Jesus descends upside down through the lightning. With the appearance of a hose, this ray of light goes from the mouth of God the Father to Mary's ear, where the Holy Spirit blows the good news into her ear (conceptio per aurem). In the central table of the Mérode Triptych (1425-1435), by Robert Campin (New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art), the Child Jesus appears with a small cross on his shoulders.

What significance can this small figure of Christ arriving "flying" to Mary have? At first glance there seems to be a conflict here with dogmatic tradition. In the Creed, the Church prays even today: "...by the power of the Holy Spirit he became incarnate of Mary, the Virgin." (et incarnatus est de Spiritu Sancto ex Maria Virgine). A review of Byzantine and medieval Western iconography shows that the mentioned pictures are not to be considered "heretical" at all. With the help of the example of "Mary's falling asleep" (koimesis, dormitio) it is clear that the human soul was represented in the artistic tradition of the time as a small figure. In the representations of the Annunciation, the "Child" thus symbolizes the soul created by God, while the body of Jesus comes only from Mary.

The place of the Annunciation was represented since the 15th century as a concrete space. In Italy, in 1452-1466 Piero della Francesca placed the scene in a palace (Arezzo, San Francesco) and Fra Angelico in 1430-1432 in a portico (Madrid, Prado). Both also emphasize the majesty and humility of Mary. The early Flemish preferred the interior of a church, as Jan van Eyck in 1434-1436 (Washington, National Gallery of Art) or the contemporary bourgeois interior, such as Rogier van der Weyden around 1455 in the Triptych of the altar of St. Columba, Cologne (Munich, Alte Pinakothek). The narrative realism of these paintings sought to attract the attention of observers.

Father S.O.S

Vitamins and minerals (I)

Vitamins are micronutrients that play a regulatory role: for example, vitamin C plays an antioxidant role, vitamin D strengthens bones, etc. A varied diet is usually sufficient to ensure their supply.

Pilar Riobó-March 10, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

Micronutrients are essential substances for the body, but are required only in very small amounts. They include vitamins and minerals, both of which essentially have a regulatory function, as they help in the metabolization of other nutrients (e.g., they are necessary for glucose to be burned and produce energy). 

At this point we will refer to vitamins, leaving minerals for a later article.

The vitamins are classified into fat-soluble (vitamins A, D, E, K) and water-soluble, which are the rest: vitamins B1 or thiamine, B2 or riboflavin, B3 or niacin, B5 or pantothenic acid, B6 or pyridoxine, B12 or cyanocobalamin, folic acid and vitamin C.

Vitamin C is related to cellular oxidation-reduction processes, in which it plays an antioxidant role. 

Vitamin A has both an antioxidant and an epithelial and mucosal maintenance function. 

B vitamins act mainly as regulators of intermediary carbohydrate and protein metabolism. 

Vitamin B12 is related to the synthesis of red blood cells and brain function. It is found in foods of animal origin, and therefore deficiency may occur in strict vegetarians. There is also a certain risk of vitamin B12 deficiency in the elderly and in people who continuously (for years) take certain drugs such as metformin (for diabetes) and omeprazole (for the stomach); the clinical picture is one of megaloblastic anemia (so called because the red blood cells are larger than normal) and impaired brain function (dementia), and even paralysis of the limbs.

Vitamin D is formed in the skin by the action of the sun's ultraviolet rays. It is involved in phospho-calcium metabolism: it promotes calcium absorption and helps form and maintain strong bones. 

It also has other functions. For example, it is important for muscles to function properly and thus helps reduce falls in the elderly; and some studies suggest that it may help prevent diabetes mellitus, hypertension and many cancers. 

It is also involved in immune function, and is capable of destroying the tuberculosis bacillus. Perhaps this is the reason why tuberculosis patients, before the antibiotic era, were exposed to the sun. Nevertheless, about 35 % of young adults and up to 60 % of older adults are deficient in this vitamin. Lack of exposure to sunlight in the winter months (even though we are in a country as sunny as ours!), the use of creams with a very high protection factor and diets low in vitamin D contribute to this. 

Finally, vitamin E is an important antioxidant, and vitamin K is involved in coagulation processes.

The food sources of the main vitamins are shown below:

  • Vitamin A: found in butter, egg yolk, whole milk and fruits;
  • Vitamin D: ingested with fish oils, salmon, herring, eggs, fortified milk and cod liver oil; it can also be formed in the skin by the action of ultraviolet rays;
  • Vitamin E: provided by vegetable oils, nuts and vegetables;
  • Vitamin K: contained in vegetables, cereals, meat and milk;
  • Vitamin C: provided by fruits (mainly citrus fruits) and vegetables;
  • B group vitamins: found in legumes, eggs, cereals, brewer's yeast;
  • Folic acid: vegetables, meat, eggs;
  • Vitamin B12: meat, eggs, fish, milk.
The authorPilar Riobó

Medical specialist in Endocrinology and Nutrition.

Spain

V Centenary. The true legend of the Caballero de Gracia.

Enrique Carlier-March 10, 2017-Reading time: 5 minutes

The Caballero de Gracia was an important figure of the Spanish Golden Age and of Madrid. Throughout his long life (102 years, of which more than 30 as a priest) he carried out a magnificent diplomatic, cultural and pastoral work in Madrid. His saintly life, however, has been overshadowed by an unfounded and fanciful legend.

This legend is based on two works written by Antonio Capmany y Montpalau in 1863, two and a half centuries after the death of the Knight. It is there that the legend is forged, which presents the Knight of Grace as a kind of "Don Juan Tenorio" who, after falling in love with several ladies, has a divine illumination - just as he is trying to seduce another woman - which prompts him to change his life. Capmany does not indicate where he gets this story from, nor does he cite any documentary source. Moreover, he seems to be unaware of the biography of Alonso Remón, a contemporary of the Knight.

The thing does not stop there. Some years later, Luis Mariano de Larra, son of Mariano José de Larra and composer of librettos for zarzuelas and dramas, will offer the same distorted version of Capmany in his work The Knight of Graceperformed in 1871. Also the zarzuela La Gran Vía, premiered in 1886, will project a pejorative image of the Caballero, by personifying the Madrid street of the Caballero through a cocky, womanizing and conceited character.

Angel Fernández de los Ríos, author of Guide to Madrid. Manual of the madrileño and the stranger. (1876), will also draw a grotesque image of the Knight, similar to that of Capmany. He is also the inventor of the reference to Jacobo Gratij as a "dissolute twin of Don Juan Tenorio"..

Carlos Cambroneo and Hilario Peñasco, authors of the book The streets of Madrid, will collect in 1889 the same phantasmagoric stories about this character. Finally, Pedro de Répide (+1948) will emphasize what Capmany spread in another book also titled The streets of Madrid.

In the face of this imaginary legend, the recently published biography The Knight of Grace. Life and legendby José María Sanabria and José Ramón Pérez Aranguena (Editorial Palabra), helps to disprove the fraudulent legend of Jacobo Gratij, which unfortunately has ended up slipping into three voices of Wikipedia. The authors of the biography rightly point out that "there is no data, testimony or document that accredits the slightest detail of what Capmany imagined".then voiced by the other authors mentioned above. "To call him an ambitious real estate speculator, and a libertine, a tenor, a Casanova, a seducer, or a terror of fathers and husbands, is a world away." of what the Knight of Grace really was. Rigorous historical research of his figure has not detected any libidinous slip in his career, something that has been documented in numerous characters of his time: emperors, popes, kings, cardinals, dukes, bishops... No documentary source speaks of the Caballero de Gracia as if he were a Miguel de Mañara, not even a man in love as was his friend Felix Lope de Vega. Nor is there any record that the Caballero had to "repent" of any misdeed or of leading a licentious lifestyle, as the aforementioned authors point out. And from the only trial to which he was subjected for money, his innocence was proven.

Historical testimonies coincide in this line. For example, Jerónimo de la Quintana (1570-1664), a contemporary of Caballero, points out in History of the antiquity, nobility and greatness of Madrid that "the man of noble birth Jacobo de Gratiis, founder of the Vble. Congregation of Unworthy Slaves of the Blessed Sacrament, was an eminent man in virtue and science and died at 102 years of age in the odor of sanctity". And Mesonero Romanos (1803-1882) also states that "The street of the Knight of Grace bears the title of the Knight of the Order of Christ Jacome or Jacobo de Gratiis, virtuous priest, born in Modena, who came to Spain with the Nuncio of His Holiness.".

Semblanza

Jacobo Gratij -the Caballero de Gracia after his surname was castellanized- was born in Modena (Italy) on February 24, 1517 and died in Madrid on May 13, 1619.

His biography is juicy and varied in events and initiatives. In Bologna, the best university of his time, he met John Baptist Castagna, who would become Pope Urban VII. From then on he would be his friend and confidant.

In 1550 he began to work for the Holy See. In 1551 he intervened in the peace treaty that put an end to the war between France, Venice and the Holy See on one side and Spain on the other. In 1563 he participated as a collaborator of Castagna in the third session of the Council of Trent, where the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist was discussed, which, perhaps, influenced the initiative of the Knight to found the Congregation of the Blessed Sacrament.

Nunciature in Spain

From 1566 to 1572 he worked in the Nunciature of Spain with Cardinal Hugo Boncompagni, future Pope Gregory XIII; Felice Peretti, future Pope Sixtus V; and John Baptist Castagna, nuncio and, as mentioned above, future Urban VII. In those 7 years Jacobo was part of the papal delegation that intervened in transcendental contacts with the court of Philip II for the formation of the Holy League that went to the battle of Lepanto, for the war of the 80 years in Flanders, the wars of religion in France and for the resolution of the inquisitorial process against the cardinal of Toledo Bartolomé Carranza.

Jacobo felt at ease in Madrid. His good relationship with Princess Juana, sister of Philip II and mother of King Sebastian of Portugal, made her obtain from her son the highest Portuguese honorary distinction for Jacobo: to be a Knight of the Order of the Habit of Christ. Hence the name of Knight with which he has gone down in history.

Definitive return to Spain

After a period in Venice and then in Bologna, Jacopo returned to Spain at the end of 1575 with a delicate secret mission. For this purpose he was appointed protonotary apostolic. In 1583 he was accused of having taken advantage of his position in the nunciature and of having appropriated thirty thousand escudos. He was placed under house arrest and put on trial, but the accusations were soon proven false and he was absolved of all guilt. He forgave his accusers and offered to God the moral suffering he had endured. Gregory XIII, upon learning of this, praised the prudence and patience of his diplomat. Philip II congratulated him and also compensated him economically.

After carrying out another mission in Cologne, Jacopo returned to serve in the nunciature in Madrid until 1592. After the death of Pope Sixtus V, Giovanni Battista Castagna, his mentor, was elevated to the papal throne on September 15, 1590, but died on the 27th of the same month. The Knight could benefit little from the papal election of his friend.

Priestly ordination and foundations

Jacobo was ordained a priest in 1587 or 1588, at the age of 70. Before his ordination, he founded in 1571 the convent of Carmen calzado, in what is now the church of Carmen in Madrid. In 1581, while serving as nuncio, he founded the Hospital for Italians. From that same period is the Hospital for convalescents, promoted in collaboration with Blessed Bernardino de Obregón. Also that year he founded the Nuestra Señora de Loreto school for orphan girls.

In 1594 he founded in his own house the Convent of the Minor Clerics Regular of San Francisco Caracciolo. He then created the Congregation of the Slaves of the Blessed Sacrament, which was approved in 1609 by Cardinal Bernardo de Rojas y Sandoval of Toledo. Its purpose was and continues to be the diffusion of devotion to the Eucharist. About two thousand people belonged to it during the founder's lifetime.

The Caballero de Gracia was also a great promoter of culture, particularly in the musical and literary fields. The Blessed Obregón, Saint Simón de Rojas, Lope de Vega, Alonso Remón, Tirso de Molina and the young poet Gabriel Bocángel participated in his literary gatherings. Cervantes joined the Congregation of Esclavos del Olivar at the same time as the Caballero, and they must have attended the same meetings. The gathering was also attended by Andrés de Spínola and the Benedictine historian Prudencio de Sandoval, as well as Captain Calderón, Juan del Espada and Alonso Cedillo.

He had a more intense relationship with Lope de Vega, as he belonged to the Congregation of the Slaves of the Blessed Sacrament. At Christmas 1615, Lope had Riquelme's theater company, the best of the time, perform the sacramental auto sacramental Caballero de Gracia.

Death and fame of sanctity

The Knight died in the early morning of May 13, 1619 with a reputation for holiness. In the following 12 days, although in his will he had arranged for his funeral to be simple, many religious communities and numerous faithful celebrated funerals for his soul with the best preachers and great solemnity. His remains, after several transfers, are venerated in the Oratory of the Caballero de Gracia, on Madrid's Gran Vía.

The authorEnrique Carlier

Read more
ColumnistsÁlvaro Sánchez León

Children of relativism

"From that dust comes this mud", goes the well-known saying. Yes, relativism is the origin of today's false social dialogue and posturing, pathological affectionism, exhibitionism of intimacy and post-truth.

March 10, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

The search for the meaning of life progresses in the biography of each person. At the same time, outside, on the road, relativism grows mercilessly fat. Truth does not exist. The good is subjective. Beauty is discretionary. And that's it. A bomb in the foundation. A cigar. And thousands of dissatisfactions crystallized in inner tension, hollow dialectics, depressions, giggles, loneliness, lies, evil, ugliness.

Relativism is a fig leaf to the thirst for happiness that is shipwrecked by man's weakness to conquer truths like fists. It is an adolescently mature doubt that avoids any compromise to justify the emptiness.

Relativism is a disease of reason afflicted with affectionism that prevents the will from choosing the right -and difficult- path of conscience.

Relativism is a monster that comes to me in anger, postponing the romanticism of life to an existential pessimism full of unanswered questions by its own will and by the insistence of others.

From absolutist relativism is born the motto of societies united only by the virtuality of networks: I do whatever I want, I think whatever I want, I send you wherever I want. Get lost. I don't care about you. 

Relativism was a weapon against dogma and has become a mine against principles. And now the suffocatingly correct thing to do is to choose between being a relativist, or being medieval, fundamentalist, apostolic and Roman... 

The post-truth that fills our mouths is the daughter of relativism. Now she is older, she is playful and blasé, and she has lowered her skirt to show us her flesh. And that flesh expresses its essence: lies.

The false social dialogue is another legitimate son, a lover of posturing, unbridled and loquacious, who talks without listening. Only shameless relativism is capable of selling iron confrontation as tolerant dialogue. 

Simple authenticity is a child of blood. Pava. Dumb. That's me. Don't change. Up with myself. Down with the world.

The exhibitionism of intimacy. Another one. The casquivana daughter who portrays the unbearable lightness of being only bodies.

The family book of relativism is an encyclopedia of contemporary problems that will lose the battle. Hope augurs well. Others prefer to think that this family Monster is the mambo queen. OK. It's never too late to run away from Neverland.

The authorÁlvaro Sánchez León

Journalist

The World

Bishop Jorge Carlos Patrón Wong: "Priestly formation, above all, is the formation of the heart of a disciple of Jesus".

The Congregation for the Clergy has published the new Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Sacerdotaliswhich serves as the basis for the formation of the priests of the world. Patrón Wong, responsible for seminaries in that Congregation, and archbishop emeritus of Papantla, explains. "The most important thing is that the priest is always in formation and that this formation is integral," he says.

Alfonso Riobó-March 10, 2017-Reading time: 8 minutes

Interview with the Secretary for Seminaries, Congregation for Clergy

The Holy See has just updated the guidelines for the formation of priests. Bishop Patrón Wong explains the new document. 

How do you assess the numerical evolution of priestly vocations?

-The priesthood has never been a question of numbers. What really matters is the holiness of priests. A priest who gives himself faithfully in the priestly ministry helps so many people, his heart is full of names; he helps even without realizing it, because his priestly life alone is a great good for many. 

On the other hand, pastoral needs are not solved by priests alone. For that there is the apostolate of the laity and of religious men and women. However, the number is necessary, because vocations mature in community and for this a sufficient number of seminarians is required to form an environment and create a formative climate. 

What is the current profile of candidates for the priesthood?

-Today's society needs evangelizers who perceive the good things in so many people and tune in to them, because we proclaim the Kingdom of God which is the Kingdom of God. "is already among you" (Lk 17:21). Priests are needed who speak a comprehensible language, who "touch" with mercy the reality of all people, who put themselves at the service where they are needed and without ambiguity, who are free before any other interest, who live a profound detachment from material things, who offer an example of human and Christian maturity, who know how to love everyone, especially those who are not loved. These traits, which are those of the priestly life and ministry of always, are current, because today's world needs priests.

When addressing priests, the Pope is also demanding. What does he ask of them? 

-It is logical that the Holy Father is concerned about priests and has towards them gestures of closeness and at the same time of demand. But I have noticed that he shares his own experience of priestly ministry. 

And as proof is a button, I would like to let him speak on a point that has a lot to do with lifelong learning: "But above all I would like to speak about one thing: the encounter among priests, among you. Priestly friendship: this is a treasure, a treasure to be cultivated among you. Priestly friendship. Not everyone can be a close friend. But how beautiful is a priestly friendship. When priests, like two brothers, three brothers, four brothers know each other, talk about their problems, their joys, their expectations, so many things... Priestly friendship. Look for this, it is important. Be friends. I believe that this helps a lot to live the priestly life, to live the spiritual life, the apostolic life, the community life and also the intellectual life: priestly friendship. If I meet a priest who says to me: 'I have never had a friend', I would think that this priest has not had one of the most beautiful joys of priestly life, priestly friendship. This is what I wish for you. I wish you to be friends with those whom the Lord places before you for friendship. I desire this in life. Priestly friendship is a strength of perseverance, of apostolic joy, of courage, and also of a sense of humor. It is beautiful, very beautiful". (Meeting with priests and seminarians, May 12, 2014).

What exactly is the Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Sacerdotalis?

-The Ratio Fundamentalis is a document that establishes the general guidelines for the formation of priests. It includes a whole process, which begins with vocational accompaniment, intensifies during the seminary years and continues throughout the priestly life. The most important thing is that the priest is always in formation and that this formation is integral. 

These are only general guidelines, which each nation and each Seminary must then adapt to its own reality, always in dialogue with the culture and considering the characteristics of the Church in each place. Fundamental regulations. The publication of the Ratio Fundamentalis is just the starting point of a process of renewal of priestly formation that will continue in every Episcopal Conference and in every Seminary, always with the help of the Congregation for the Clergy.

What is in the new Ratio, and what distinguishes it from the previous one?

-The new Ratio establishes the "map" for the formation of priests from an interdisciplinary perspective. The text is broader than the previous one because it has incorporated the content of many documents that the Church has been publishing on priestly formation during the last forty years, and is in full continuity with it. 

At the same time, the formative proposal is renewed by incorporating the positive and encouraging experiences that in the last decades have been carried out in many Seminaries, offering an adequate pedagogical mediation to facilitate its practical application. If we want to point out some insistencies, they would be four: formation is of the interior man, it is always integral, it is done in a gradual way and demands careful accompaniment and discernment.

Therefore, the formation of priests is not only intended to train them intellectually or in practical skills....

-God consecrates the whole person through priestly ordination, so that he becomes a sign in the midst of God's people. This fact demands that the whole person be formed in its many facets. 

First of all, it is the formation of the heart of a disciple of Jesus who configures himself to Christ the Servant, Shepherd, Spouse and Head in the concrete form of pastoral charity. Moved by this love for the people of God, the seminary candidate and then the seminarian and the priest remain attentive to various aspects of his life that help them to render a better evangelizing service: the human aspect, the spiritual aspect, the intellectual aspect and the pastoral aspect. Each of these dimensions has its place in formation. We refer to the integration of all of them when we use the expression "integral formation".

Is personal accompaniment before and after ordination important?

-The journey of faith is personal, but it is not done alone. We all need the help of brothers and sisters who listen to us, who sometimes correct us and help us discern the will of God. Personal accompaniment has different characteristics in vocation ministry, in initial formation and in ongoing formation, but it is always necessary. 

The regularity and depth of accompaniment determine to a great extent the quality of formation. It is a service provided by formators, spiritual directors and confessors. Professionals such as doctors and psychologists also help, but what is really important is that the candidate for the priesthood learns to rely on the help of others in his maturation process in complete freedom and guided by love for the truth. The accompaniment is also group, it helps the relationships between seminarians or priests to constitute a formative climate.

Can anyone who feels called by God to be a priest be a priest? How does one distinguish a true vocation?

-In several paragraphs of the Ratio Fundamentalis insists on the importance of vocational discernment, which should be done during each of the stages of the Seminary and then always in the priestly life. There is an era in which the object of discernment is what vocation, that is, what God is calling me to. There is another time when the emphasis is on the how, that is, how the Lord wants me to exercise the priestly ministry. 

It is always important to discern the formative attitudes, so that the person is really involved in his growth process. It is normal that, sooner or later, some seminarians leave the Seminary. What is really important is that they have grown as men and as Christians and find a way of life in which they can fulfill the will of God. Accompanying those who have left is one of the most delicate tasks that formators usually do. It is normal for a young man who has left the Seminary to be grateful for all the good he has received and to have made determinations towards a greater maturity in his life of faith. Thus, his stay in the Seminary has not been a lost time, but a true gift from God.

What help does the priest need in his formation, in his spiritual life, in his apostolic activity?

-Priests have many means at their disposal for their ongoing formation. The first means is each one of them, who is called to live his vocation faithfully and to be primarily responsible for his formation. Then there is the priestly fraternity, because priests are co-responsible for the formation of their brothers. How helpful is a healthy climate of positive relationships marked by Christian and priestly values! Examination of conscience and sacramental confession are wonderful means within everyone's reach. In every diocese there are priests with a certain experience who help their own confreres through spiritual direction. 

Great help is offered by the community. We could say that the community is entrusted to the care of the priest and the priest is, in turn, entrusted to the care of the community. It is great to have lay people, religious men and women who pray for the priests, help them in various aspects of their life and ministry and even correct them fraternally when necessary. In every diocese there is a commission for the care of priests that undertakes many actions on their behalf. The bishop has a delicate mission in this regard, which requires him to be close to all priests and to have a great capacity for discernment.

In the document we read that chastity "is not a tribute to be paid to the Lord", but a gift from God. Could you explain this?

-This is a quote from a document on priestly celibacy. Just before that comes the central idea: it is about "a path to the fullness of love". (RFIS, 110). In married life the capacity to love is concentrated in one person who is chosen forever, but in the option for celibacy the capacity to love is broadened and opened to many recipients, especially to those who are not loved. So being celibate does not imply loving less, but loving more. One renounces an exclusive love in order to live an inclusive love capable of embracing everyone. This deep affective experience is expressed in the words of consecration that the priest repeats every day: this is my body that gives itself for everyone

To live this fullness of love can only be a gift of God, because it is he who mercifully looks upon everyone. We call this disposition to love everyone with a love that comes from God "pastoral charity" and it is the soul and the driving force of the life and activity of priests.

The priest serves a specific group of people, but he must have a missionary spirit How do the two things combine?

-The priest is not only the chaplain of a small group of people. It is true that he is entrusted with a portion of the people of God, but his mission goes beyond the walls of the temple and the group of faithful Catholics, because it is a universal mission. 

Jacques Hamel, murdered in France on July 26, 2016. He was certainly entrusted with a parish, but he had established a current of sympathy with the whole society, where most of the people were non-Catholics or non-Christians. His death was mourned by all of them, to the extent that they have recently erected a monument in his honor. Like Fr. Hamel, there are many, many priests who do good to all, participate creatively in social networks and are full citizens in the global village. The profound reason is that in the Church and in every believer and especially in priests there are two balancing forces: communion and mission.

Will these indications be adapted to the widely varying conditions at each site?

-This is the task of the Episcopal Conferences which, with the help of the formators of the Seminaries of each country, will elaborate during the next few years their Ratio national. That is, the norms for priestly formation for that territory. Many aspects will be concretized and nuanced there. On the other hand, the Ratio Fundamentalis aims to offer security to all in what in the experience of the Church and from a general vision is considered to be opportune for formation. 

In the elaboration of the national norms, the Congregation for the Clergy will collaborate with each Episcopal Conference, so that each Seminary and each seminarian can be helped in the personal and communitarian vocational response. To this end, the Congregation for the Clergy is organizing a Congress to be held in October 2017, which will be attended by the Bishops and formators who will then elaborate the Ratio national.

Anything else you would like to add?

-The audience of Palabra are believers and not only priests. I would like to emphasize that all Christians are on a journey of ongoing formation, that all must discern their vocation and put it into practice according to God's will, and for this they require adequate accompaniment. With this I wish to underline that what is said about the formation of priests is in some way valid for everyone and invites the whole Christian community to set out on a path of ongoing formation.

Read more
Resources

The era of post-truth, post-veracity and charlatanry

Objective facts are not in fashion. What matters is "post-truth", i.e., emotions or personal feelings in the perception of the audience. The immediate consequence is distrustful post-truth, and sometimes charlatanism.

Omnes-March 8, 2017-Reading time: 8 minutes

Martín Montoya Camacho

The year that ended a few weeks ago has been labeled by many journalists and political analysts as the year of the post-truth. This term is the translation of post-truth chosen in November as the word of the year 2016 by Oxford Dictionaries. Its meaning refers to something that denotes circumstances in which objective facts are less influential, in the formation of public opinion, than the appeal to personal emotions and beliefs. Under these terms, whoever wishes to influence public opinion should concentrate his efforts on the elaboration of easy-to-accept speeches, insisting on what can satisfy the feelings and beliefs of his audience, rather than on the actual facts.

The introduction of this word in the Oxford dictionary is due to its wide public use during the democratic processes that gave rise to the Brexitand the presidential elections in the United States. Its inclusion in the aforementioned dictionary provoked thousands of articles in various languages in the media, especially on the Internet, causing a new increase in its statistics. Soon after, the German Language Society stated that postfaktisch would be chosen as the word of the year 2016. And in Spanish, the Fundéu BBVA nominated the word post-truth for a similar award.

In recent months, the identification of the post-truth with lies. It has been concluded, in many media, that the post-truth is not new, lies have always existed and, therefore, we are faced with a neologism resulting from caprice. So, should we take this word seriously? It seems to me that this assessment may be hasty, and that the normalization of the term "lie" is not a new one. post-truth deserves a finer analysis, if only for the simple fact of its great influence. The proper study of this question undoubtedly overflows these lines, so I can only limit myself to making a few observations.

How did this era come about?

The word post-truth was first used in the U.S. press in 1992, in an article by Steve Tesich for the magazine The Nation. Tesich, writing about the Watergate scandals and the Iraq War, pointed out that by that time we had already accepted that we were living in an era of the post-truthThe book, in which lies are told without discrimination and the facts are concealed. However, it was in the book The Post-Truth Era (2004) by Ralph Keyes that the term found some conceptual development.

Keyes pointed out at the time that we live in the age of the post-truth because its credo has settled among us: creative manipulation can take us beyond the realm of mere accuracy into a realm of truth narrative. Embellished information is presented as true in spirit, and truer than truth itself. Keyes' definition offers a certain key to understanding the events of the past few months. We will return to it shortly. But first we must ask ourselves how did this era of the post-truth?

To understand how it is possible that we find ourselves in such an era, we must take into account some factors of the media through which it has been propagated. To begin with, the era of the post-truth refers to the proliferation of fake news on the Internet, insulting comments bordering on defamation that are posted daily on communication platforms on lineand to the discrediting of institutions through comments -often anonymous- in those same media.

The director of The GuardianKatharine Viner, in her article "How technology disrupted the truth", indicated that behind all this is the intentional misrepresentation of the facts by some digital media that advocate a certain social and political stance. But, along with the above, there are also the efforts of this type of media to attract visitors to their platforms, with no other intention than to maintain a business that sells what the public wants to find. Viner explains that this is made possible by the algorithms that feed the news feeds of search engines such as Facebook's, or Google's, which are designed to offer the public what it wants. For the director of The Guardian This means that the version of the world we encounter every day when we log into our personal profiles, or search on Google, has been invisibly filtered to reinforce our own beliefs.

Information consumption on the rise

It is, therefore, an effort to mold the media, and the contents, to the taste of the users. Following Keyes' definition, we can say that we are shown a truth embellished and configured to our liking, something we accept as truer than the truth of the facts themselves.

A few years ago we were surprised to find, on any website, ads for the purchase of products that we had seen on Amazon, just a few hours before. Today this is commonplace.

It seems that nowadays, the strategy applied to the sale of products on the Internet is also used in the case of the news we want to consume. This should not surprise us.

The report of the Pew Research Center revealed a few months ago that half of Americans between the ages of eighteen and thirty consume news through Internet platforms, and that this trend is growing. Therefore, the information consumption market will continue to grow, and the strategy of giving the customer what he wants is a way to achieve customer loyalty. It is true that the purchase of news in this type of media is not abundant, but this is where the maximum possibility of influencing the future consumer public is offered.

This means that, on the part of electronic platforms, we will be less and less likely to find information that challenges us, that broadens our worldview, or to find facts that refute false information that people around us have shared.

Even for a social network as flexible as Twitter this can be the case, due to the constant posting of tweets that are most liked by the people you follow.

However, it would be absurd to impute all the blame for falling into the era of the post-truth to the media and their strategies for transmitting information. It is clear that this must be attributed to people who lie, distorting the truth of the facts.

But it also seems important to examine, albeit briefly, an attitude that can occur in users or consumers, and which is of direct concern to us.

Post-veracity and distrust

Ralph Keyes stated, in The Post-Truth Erathat the immediate consequence of the post-truth is the post-veracity. That is, a distrust of public speeches, but not of their content, which may be true, and even scientifically proven. The distrust generated by the post-truth Does this idea reflect something real about our society and the way we conduct ourselves in it? It seems that the post-veracity can only arise in times like the one we are currently living in, when there is an attitude of discredit towards public speeches because we expect, after all that has been revealed in the past months, that such information does not convey the whole truth. We might think that we should avoid drama, since we are still consuming news, and news still conveys many truths. However, large sectors of society believe that the truth has lost value, that it has been knocked down and lies on the ground mortally wounded.

The issue of post-truth

To think that truth can be killed may perplex us, but this has been happening in the case of its value in society. For this reason, the question of post-truth is not superfluous. For Keyes the radical problem is that we can live governed by it, and actively participate in its dynamics without realizing it. This would happen through an attitude derived from the justification of our own lies, and by accustoming ourselves to live in an environment in which truth is discriminated against according to personal interests.

This can occur when we do not reflect on the sources of the news we consume or, in a broader view of the circumstances, when we look away from those points of view that displease us.

Sometimes, we run away from all this without stopping to think about how things can be seen from another perspective, simply because we do not want to be deceived, as if everything that does not coincide with our ideas could be labeled as misleading propaganda.

Jason Stanley, in his book "How Propaganda Works" (2015), explains that certain types of authoritarian propaganda can destroy the principles of trust in society, thus undermining democracy. But it is also true that not every use of language that alters reality is a lie. There is always some truth.

But, in order to approach it, it is important to have critical capacity and the attitude of approaching it not with distrust, but with a free spirit that is reinforced by the careful study of reality. Even though the era of the post-truth has arrived in our time with a certain force, the last word is left to the users or consumers, free people who can decide to reestablish the value of truth. This means avoiding lies, one's own and those of others, avoiding getting used to living in circumstances where falsehood is commonplace. To put aside any way, no matter how subtle it may be, of being untruthful.

Superficial charlatanism

In an interview he gave to the Belgian Catholic weekly magazine TertioPope Francis made reference to several of these issues. He especially condemned the evil that can be caused by the media that fall into defamation by publishing false news. In his direct way of speaking, the Holy Father explained that media disinformation is a terrible evil, even if what is said is true, since the general public tends to indiscriminate consumption of this disinformation. In this way, he explained, much harm can be done, and he likened this tendency to consume falsehoods and half-truths to coprophagy.

The Pope's words are not anecdotal and have a deeper significance than can be seen at first glance. This is best appreciated if we compare coprophagia with the term used in English to designate one of the most subtle modes of misrepresentation of the truth, the bullshit. This term has been recently translated into Spanish as charlatanism in the work of the American philosopher Harry Frankfurt. In his book On quackery (2013), that this is less intentional than we may think. When we lie, we concentrate to do it, but the charlatanism requires no effort because it is inadvertently spontaneous: the presentation of facts is simply neglected. The charlatan keeps the distinction between true and false clear but, as he is unconcerned about the value of truth, he can use a fact to defend one position and its opposite.

The charlatan has no intention of misrepresenting reality, but lacks intentions with respect to it. His intention is centered exclusively on himself, on the superficiality of his projects or, like certain media or users, on his own propaganda. Lies have always monopolized our attention. This is understandable. The act of lying presents a malice that repels us. To tell a lie, one must have the intention to tell it. It is not a simple carelessness, it has to be worked on. For the liar the truth has a value in function of his own ends, hence his interest in manipulating it. But the charlatan does not take care of it, and with that attitude he can do a lot of damage, as it happens in this age of the post-truth.

Frankfurt indicates that the charlatanism is contagious. Some of this may have spread to us as consumers of information when we don't pay attention to the news we can spread through social networks.

In view of this, we are not exempt from liability for participating, in any way, in defamatory acts, even when we believe that what we do is not significant, or we believe that what is transmitted is true.

When this happens, it is because we have stopped considering that language is not only a vehicle for facts, figures, strategies, demonstrations and refutations, but also a carrier of values.

It is important to keep in mind that the knowledge of true and false, although very important, does not sufficiently define what is needed to do justice to others, and to act with true charity.

The figure of the charlatan, whether embodied in a media outlet that transmits news, or in a user who consumes and redistributes it, is the ultimate contributor to the post-veracityThe information that we provide: it fosters mistrust and tension in society. Therefore, the important thing is to recognize the relevance of the things to which the information we handle refers. Not everything can be the same for us. Reflecting on whether we respect the truth, avoiding manipulating it as we please, will allow us to begin to give it back its real value.

Resources

Mercy and new sensibility. About the revolution of tenderness

At a time in history when feelings often seem to have more weight than reason, when it is perhaps difficult to reason and to make people reason, the Holy Father's call for a "revolution of tenderness" may seem surprising. One would say rather that what is needed is a bit of good sense, willpower and capacity for sacrifice. Things that do not seem to be in tune with tenderness.

José Ángel Lombo-March 8, 2017-Reading time: 10 minutes

In any case, rationality does not seem to be the only resource of human beings, at least if we consider it as calculation or reflection, both on the theoretical and practical levels. Capacities such as intuition, empathy, a sense of opportunity, good taste or a sense of humor do not seem to be identified with rationality in the aforementioned sense.

Therefore, it seems to us that the call to a "revolution of tenderness" is not an invitation to sentimentality or irrationality, but to build our own humanity from the "love of God poured into our hearts" (Rom 5:5).

Undoubtedly, this way of understanding and proposing charity is not a novelty in the Pope's preaching. Already as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, he referred abundantly to tenderness in his preaching. The references are innumerable and share some notes in common, without being identical. In speaking of tenderness, Cardinal Bergoglio alluded above all to God's love for us, which is especially evident at Christmas, "God made tenderness". In the same vein, he referred to a "God who always forgives" as a synthesis of tenderness and fidelity. Along with this, he also pointed to "tenderness as a human attitude" in response to God's tenderness.

The revolution of tenderness

However, although tenderness already had an important prominence in his previous preaching, perhaps the most novel note of his pontifical magisterium is the programmatic proposal of tenderness as a "revolution". The following words of the Evangelii gaudium are eloquent: "The Son of God, in his incarnation, invited us to the revolution of tenderness" (EG 88). In the simplicity of this phrase is contained the key to understanding the "revolution" that Pope Francis proposes to us. It is not, of course, an isolated or anecdotal indication, but an idea that will appear in several moments and contexts of the same Evangelii Gaudium, as well as in other interventions.

In this proposal, two complementary perspectives are intertwined. On the one hand, it highlights the relationship between the tenderness of God's love and the tenderness of the human heart beyond all circumstances, since the former is, in every age, the model and cause of the latter. But, in addition, there is a particular invitation addressed to man today, a stimulus and a pressing proposal in our particular situation. For this reason, the formula - so to speak - used by the Holy Father highlights the intertwining of the divine and the human, of the eternal and the temporal. The center of these two lines is undoubtedly Jesus Christ, God incarnate, "the face of the Father's mercy" (Misericordiae vultus, 1), "the same today, yesterday and forever" (Heb. 13:8).

The articulation of these two approaches is perhaps best understood if we recognize their convergence in the virtue and sentiment of the mercy. There are, in fact, two levels or spheres connected to each other: the free gift of God to humanity and the communion of affection between human beings, "compassion" (The name of God is mercy, VIII). In turn, both aspects belong essentially to charity (mercy is its fruit or "interior effect": cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1829; St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II-II, q. 28, prologue), and concretely challenge the sensibility of today's man, especially in need of deep and stable bonds "in these times of frenetic and superficial relationships" (Amoris laetitia, 28; cfr. Evangelii gaudium, 91).

The tenderness of God

In this regard, there is a phrase from the Book of Sirach that the Roman Pontiff quotes on several occasions (Evangelii gaudium, 4 y Amoris laetitia, 149) and which evidently belongs to his personal prayer: "Son, treat yourself well [...] Do not deprive yourself of a happy day" (Sir 14:11,14). In these words, the Pope discovers the tenderness of God the Father, who approaches his creatures with a language accessible to the human heart, "like a child being comforted by his mother" (cf. Is 6:13). He is the "God of all consolation" (II Cor 1:3) and his tenderness warms the hearts of his creatures (Homily 7.VII.2013). "Mercy also has the face of consolation" (Misericordia et misera, 13).

Eminent expression of divine tenderness is the forgiveness of sins (Homily 20.XI.2013), "the most visible sign of the Father's love, which Jesus wanted to reveal throughout his life" (Misericordia et misera, 2). This manifestation of divine tenderness is paradigmatically embodied in the encounter between Mercy and misery, between Jesus and sinners (the adulteress, the sinner who anoints his feet): Misericordia et misera, 1-2).

Thus, the tangible love of the Father is perfectly communicated to us in Jesus Christ, God and man, whose manifestations of affection fill the pages of the Gospel. Pope Francis points out that the Lord's mercy is not just a sentiment (Angelus 9.VI.2013), but is expressed in a concrete "sensitivity" to human needs (Misericordiae vultus, 7). In continuity with the tenderness of the Savior, the Church as Mother transmits God's love to humanity, so that "everything in her pastoral action should be clothed with the tenderness with which she addresses the faithful" (Misericordiae vultus, 10).

Human tenderness

An essential element of this vision is the connection of God's tenderness with human tenderness. If God's tenderness "reaches down and teaches me how to walk" (Homily 12.VI.2015), human tenderness is a filial correspondence to this gift, the appropriate response to His merciful love. The first modality of this response is acceptance, the "not being afraid of His tenderness" (cfr. Ibidem); but it is also expressed as a gift to others. Therefore, insofar as it is guided by divine love, human tenderness "is not the virtue of the weak, but rather the opposite: it denotes strength of spirit and capacity for attention, compassion, true openness to others, love" (Homily 19.III.2013).

God's love purifies human love and makes it similar to His to make us "merciful like the Father" (Homily 13.III.2015; cf. Lk. 6:36), capable of "giving comfort to every man and woman of our time" (ibidem). Thus, human tenderness becomes "respectful" (Amoris laetitia, 283) and "is freed from the desire for selfish possession" (ibidem, 127). In this regard, Pope Francis makes abundant reference to the catechesis of St. John Paul II on human love (ibidem, 150 et seq.).

Charity made flesh

Tenderness is thus a dimension of charity: the concrete and unfailing expression of God's mercy and the human response to this gift with an integral love, in body and spirit. For this reason, the Holy Father affirms that Christians of our time are called to make "God's mercy, his tenderness towards every creature, visible to the men and women of today" (Discourse 14.X.2013).

This visibility signifies the real, tangible and all-embracing character of charity, and finds its full manifestation in Jesus Christ, "Mercy made flesh" (General Audience 9.XII.2015). As a disciple of Christ, the Christian is called to incarnate God's love in his life and in the lives of those around him, for they are for him "the flesh of Christ" (Words 18.V.2013). The Pope often refers to this idea of the "flesh of the brother" to underline the real and close nature of charity. It is precisely through the flesh of our brothers and sisters, the poor and the needy, that we come "into contact with the flesh of the Lord" (Homily 30.VII.2016).

From the theme of the "flesh of the brother", we can understand some indications that the Roman Pontiff formulates in words that are profoundly close to us. Thus, he speaks of "the tenderness of the embrace" (Amoris laetitia, 27-30), emotions and physical enjoyment in marital relationships (ibidem, 150-152), of the expressions of conjugal charity in the "hymn to charity" (ibidem, 89-141), affective wounds (ibidem, 239-240), of the civility of language in the family (General Audience 13.V.2015), etc.

The "new sensibility

To what extent is this invitation of the Holy Father appropriate for contemporary man? It is worth asking, in fact, if this proposal reaches the sensibility of the present historical moment. In this sense, it is an open secret that we live in an increasingly complex and variable society, a globalized and - in a certain sense - uprooted society. The Pope points to this context on countless occasions.

From this situation, what some thinkers have called "new sensibility" has been generated (see A. Llano, The new sensibility, Espasa Calpe, Madrid 1988). It is obviously a markedly relative category -like everything that is "new" or "modern"- but it reflects, in its very provisional nature, a concrete positioning in an ever-changing world (what Zygmunt Bauman calls "liquid society").

I think that the Roman Pontiff's invitation to a "revolution of tenderness" is in tune with this way of looking at reality. To show this, it is necessary to characterize the "new sensibility" in its essential outlines. The philosopher Alejandro Llano has pointed out five inspiring principles of this mentality: the principle of gradualism, the principle of pluralism, the principle of complementarity, the principle of integrality and the principle of solidarity. Let us briefly describe each of them.

  1. The principle of gradualism implies recognizing that reality is not exhausted in the alternative of "black or white", but is full of nuances and is always in a process of change. It is therefore necessary to recognize that cultural and scientific achievements, etc., are always framed in a historical context - they are not intelligible separated from their history; hence the importance of cultivating traditions, working in groups and networks, and valuing the so-called "soft skills", particularly the ability to communicate.
  2. The principle of pluralism is in continuity with the previous one, since the understanding of an ever-changing reality requires a flexibilization and modulation of knowledge: the convergence of different points of view, but, above all, of diverse or analogical forms of rationality (Daniel Goleman speaks of "emotional intelligence" and Howard Gardner of "multiple intelligences"). This elasticity is opposed to a single, homogeneous point of view, in favor of the inclusion of different visions and aptitudes.
  3. The principle of complementarity is a further consequence of the preceding ones. If reality is changeable and requires a breadth of perspectives, one discovers that among things there are not only differences, but also complementarity. That is to say, there are harmonious relations and not simple irreducibility between singular events. This implies that one should not confuse the different with the opposite, but seek the "com-possibility of differences". This has important consequences in various fields: for example, in economics (transforming limits into opportunities), in politics (transforming dialectics into dialogue), etc.
  4. The principle of integrality expresses that the human being is a unity in his spiritual-corporeal structure and in his activity. Therefore, this proposal leads to overcome fragmentation in the various spheres of life. Concretely, in the face of the compartmentalization of knowledge and excessive specialization, the antidote of interdisciplinarity is proposed. In general, this principle proposes an "integral humanism" as opposed to any one-dimensional reduction of human life (as would be, for example, to consider man as a mere producer or consumer).
  5. The principle of solidarity is a certain application of the previous one to the exchange of goods between individuals, so that they are approached as interpersonal relationships and not as gears of production and consumption. Some desirable consequences of this approach are the humanization of the market and of the economy in general, various forms of development cooperation, the consolidation of peaceful coexistence and the formation of an ecological conscience.

Tenderness and contemporary man

As we have noted, the Holy Father understands tenderness as charity "made flesh," mercy made visible. To my mind, however, his vision does not end there, but adds an element of novelty or, if one prefers, of "contemporaneity". This means that his proposal for a "revolution of tenderness" is a message particularly suited to today's man and finds in it a profound resonance.

This contemporaneity is evident in many elements of Pope Francis' magisterium. First of all, he insists on "starting from our misery" and remembering "where we come from, what we are, our nothingness". From this, he concludes: "it is important not to think of ourselves as self-sufficient" (The name of God is mercy, VI). Indeed, "we do not live, either individually or as national, cultural or religious groups, as autonomous and self-sufficient entities, but we depend on one another, we are entrusted to one another's care" (Address 21.IX.2014).

From this arises the need to accompany each person, in his or her journey of response to God, "without the need to impose oneself, to force oneself on the other", because "the truth has its own power of irradiation" (Address, 21.IX.2014). For this reason, he will affirm that, "despite our different creeds and convictions, we are all called to seek the truth, to work for justice and reconciliation, and to respect, protect and help one another as members of a single human family" (Address 27.XI.2015).

In continuity with this approach, the Holy Father maintains that "the diversity of points of view must enrich Catholicity, without harming unity" (Discourse 5.XII.2014). Indeed, the communion of the members of the Church depends on the unity of faith, and this is not opposed to freedom of thought, but "precisely in love it is possible to have a common vision" (Lumen fidei, 47). For this reason, dialogue between different positions must have at least three characteristics: it must be based on an identity, it must be open to reciprocal understanding and it must be oriented to the common good. On these bases, the very diversity of perspectives - not only good, but necessary - is considered by him as an enrichment (Speech 11.VII.2015).

But dialogue is not just a method; it becomes a culture and constitutes the very basis of "living together within peoples and among peoples", "the only way to peace". It is what the Holy Father calls the "culture of encounter" (Angelus 1.IX.2013). This culture is not based on uniformity, but on the harmony of differences, which is the work of the Paraclete (Audience with all Cardinals 15.III.2013). founding

On the other hand, if unity is lost sight of, the difference of perspectives can lead to a sectoralization of knowledge. Indeed, although "the fragmentation of knowledge has its function when it comes to achieving concrete applications", in reality "it often leads to losing the sense of totality" (Laudato si', 110). The Pope thus advocates a "Christian humanism", a "humanism that springs from the Gospel", which "summons the various fields of knowledge, including economics, to a more integral and integrating vision" (ibidem, 141). This approach is particularly applicable to education and work, areas in which it is necessary "not only to teach some technique or learn notions, but to make ourselves and the reality around us more human" (Speech, 16.I.2016).

Integral human development" is opposed to "a wasteful and consumerist overdevelopment, which contrasts in an unacceptable way with persistent situations of dehumanizing misery" (Laudato si', 109; quoted from Caritas in veritate, 22). The consequence of this situation is that "great masses of the population are excluded and marginalized" and, at the same time, "the human being in himself is considered a consumer good, to be used and then thrown away. In this way, we arrive at what the Holy Father called the "throwaway culture".

On the contrary, to make God's tenderness reach all people means to achieve integral development for everyone, especially "the most distant, the forgotten, those in need of understanding, consolation and help" (Homily 27.III.2013). It is a matter of reaching the "peripheries of the world and of existence" (Homily 24.III.2013), that is, those people who find themselves in "persistent situations of dehumanizing misery".

The proposal of a "revolution of tenderness" thus becomes "contemporary" and touches the sensitivity of today's man. It becomes sensitive, but overcomes the narrowness of sentimentalism and opens itself to the totality of the person and to all persons.

This revolution implies a paradigm shift. It does not entail a denial of general norms of conduct, in accordance with the human good; but it does reject the identification of this good with universal formulations. Hence, the encouragement to understand the good as the good of the concrete person, who is always in situations that "demand attentive discernment and accompaniment with great respect" (Amoris laetitia, 243). For this reason, making room for tenderness in one's own life and in human relationships does not mean denying justice or the demands of the Gospel, but welcoming "the invitation to go through the via caritatis" (Amoris laetitia, 306), which is precisely the fullness of justice and what disposes us to receive God's mercy.

The authorJosé Ángel Lombo

Associate Professor of Ethics. Pontifical University of the Holy Cross.

Family

Christianity and emotionality: from medieval tears to Amoris Laetitia

"For what not stop to talk about feelings and sexuality in marriage?"asks Pope Francis in the exhortation Amoris Laetitia (n. 142). The question has troubled anthropologists and historians ever since Roland Barthes denounced the postponement of feelings in history: "Who will The history of tears? In what societies, in what times has there been weeping?"

Álvaro Fernández de Córdova Miralles-March 8, 2017-Reading time: 6 minutes

Recent research has revealed the influence of Christianity on Western emotionality. Its history, forgotten and labyrinthine, must be rescued.

Few phrases have had greater repercussions than St. Paul's exhortation to the Philippians "Have on you the same feelings that Jesus had". (Fl 2, 5) Is there a historical analysis of this unique proposal?

Seventy years ago, Lucien Febvre referred to the history of sentiments as a "that great mute"and decades later Roland Barthes wondered: "Who will do In what societies, in what times have people cried? Since when did men (and not women) stop crying? Why has "sensibility" at a certain point become 'sentimentality'?

Following the cultural turn experienced by historiography in recent decades, a new frontier has opened up for researchers, which has been called the emotional turn (emotional turn). Although its contours are still blurred, the history of pain, laughter, fear or passion, would allow us to know the roots of our sensibility, and to notice the imprint of Christianity on the landscape of human feelings. In this sense, the medieval period has proved to be a privileged place to study the passage from the psychic structures of the ancient world to the forms of modern sensibility. To do so, it has been necessary to replace the categories of "infantilism" or "sentimental disorder" attributed to medieval man (M. Bloch and J. Huizinga) with a more rational reading of the emotional code that shaped Western values (D. Boquet and P. Nagy).

From the apatheia Greek to the evangelical novelties (1st-5th century)

The history of medieval sentiments begins with the "Christianization of the affections" in the pagan societies of Late Antiquity. The clash could not have been more drastic between the Stoic ideal of the apatheia (liberation from all passion conceived in negative terms) and the new God that Christians defined with a sentiment: Love. A love that the Father manifested to men by giving his own Son, Jesus Christ, who did not hide his tears, nor his tenderness, nor his passion for his fellow men. Aware of this, Christian intellectuals promoted the affective dimension of man, created in the image and likeness of God, considering that to suppress the affections was to "castrate man" (castrare hominem), as Lactantius states in an expressive metaphor.

It was St. Augustine - the father of medieval affectivity - who best integrated the Christian novelty and classical thought with his theory of the "government" of the emotions: feelings had to submit to the rational soul in order to purify the disorder introduced by original sin, and to distinguish the desires that lead to virtue from those that lead to vice. Its consequence in the institution of marriage was the incorporation of carnal desire - condemned by the Ebionites - into marital love (Clement of Alexandria), and the defense of the bond against the disintegrating tendencies that trivialized it (adultery, divorce or remarriage).

It was not a moral austerity more or less admired by the pagans. It was the path to "purity of heart" that led virgins and celibates to the highest heights of Christian leadership because of the self-mastery and reorientation of the will that it entailed.

Eros destroyer and unitive Eros (5th-7th c.)

The new psychological equilibrium took shape thanks to the first rules that promoted ascetic exercise and the practice of charity in those "living fraternal utopias" that were the first monasteries. Clerics and monks strove to map the process of conversion of the emotions, and to reconstruct the structure of the human personality by acting on the body: the body was not an enemy to be defeated, but a vehicle for uniting the creature with the Creator (P. Brown).

The ideal of virginity, founded on union with God, was not so far from the ideal of Christian marriage based on fidelity and refractory to the divorced and polyandrous practices widespread among the Germanic societies of the West. This is revealed by the alliance between the Irish monasteries and the Merovingian aristocracy, who engraved on their tombstones the terms carissimus (-a) o dulcissimus (-a) referring to a husband, a wife or a child; a sign of the Christian impregnation of those "emotional communities" that tried to escape from anger and the right to revenge (faide) (B. H. Rosenwein).

The common mentality did not evolve so rapidly. Ecclesiastical prohibitions against abduction, incest, or what today we would call "domestic violence", were not taken up until the 10th century.

In no text, neither secular nor clerical, is the word "clerical" used. love in a positive sense. Its semantic content was burdened by the possessive and destructive passion that led to the crimes described by Gregory of Tours.

Little was known at the time about the strange expression charitas coniugalisused by Pope Innocent I (411-417) to describe the tenderness and friendship that characterized conjugal grace. The dichotomy of the two "loves" is reflected in the notes of that eleventh-century scholar: "love, my wish that trata from hoard it all; charity, tender unit" (M. Roche). This idea reappears in Amoris laetitia: "The love matrimonial carries to procure that all emo lifetiva to become an asset to the family and to the is at the service of life in common". (n. 146).

Carolingian tears (s. VIII-IX)

Relying on Christian anthropological optimism, the Carolingian reformers claimed the equality of the sexes with an almost revolutionary insistence, considering conjugality the only good that Adam and Eve preserved from their passage through Paradise (P. Toubert).

In this context a new lay religiosity emerged, which invited to a less "ritual" and more intimate relationship with God, linking with the best Augustinian prayer.

Sorrow or compunction for sins committed began to be valued, leading to such pompous gestures as the public penance of Louis the Pious for the murder of his nephew Bernard (822). Then appeared the masses "of petition of tears" (Pro petitione lacrimarum): tears of God's love that move the sinner's heart and purify his past sins.

This sentiment, requested as grace, is at the basis of the don from tearsconsidered a sign of the imitation of Christ who wept three times in the Scriptures: after the death of Lazarus, before Jerusalem and in the Garden of Olives. Merit or gift, virtue or grace, habitus ("disposition regular" According to St. Thomas Aquinas) or charism, pious men go in search of tears which, from the eleventh century, become a criterion of holiness (Fr. Nagy).

– Supernatural revolution from love (s. XII)

The most audacious psychological findings occurred in two seemingly antithetical spheres. While the canonists defended the free exchange of consent for the validity of marriage, in the Provençal courts the invention of the fin d'amors ("courtly love") - so often adulterous - which exploited feelings of joy, freedom or anguish, as opposed to marriages imposed by lineage. Clerics and second-class aristocrats then discovered the love of choice (de dilection) where the other is loved in his or her otherness for what he or she is, and not for what he or she brings to the spouse or the clan. A free and exclusive love that facilitated the surrender of bodies and souls, as expressed by Andrea Capellanus and experienced by those Occitan troubadours who passed from human to divine love by professing in a monastery (J. Leclercq).

The new discoveries took a long time to permeate the institution of marriage, which was bent to the political and economic interests of the lineage. Between the eleventh and fourteenth centuries, the extended family (kinship of different generations) was progressively replaced by the conjugal cell (spouses with their children), due in large part to the triumph of Christian marriage, now elevated to a sacrament. The more daring canonists developed the concept of "marital affection" (affectio marithalis) that contemplated the fidelity and reciprocal obligations of the conjugal union, beyond the social function that had been assigned to it.

The road to sainthood was slower. It was promoted in the 13th century with the canonization of four married laymen (St. Homobono of Cremona, St. Elizabeth of Hungary, St. Hedwig of Silesia and St. Louis of France), who took up the lay holiness of ancient Christianity, although the spousal ideal was not reflected in the processes preserved as a specific path of perfection (A. Vauchez).

From mystical emotion to the debates of modernity (14th-20th century)

The socio-economic crisis of the 14th century modified the sentimental cartography of Western Europe. Religious devotion began to identify itself with the emotion it embodied. It was the mystical conquest of emotion. Laywomen such as Marie d'Oignies († 1213), Angela da Foligno († 1309) or Clare of Rimini († 1324-29) developed a demonstrative and sensory religiosity, charged with a rapturous mysticism. They sought to see, imagine and embody the sufferings of Christ, for his Passion acquired the central place in devotions. Never before had tears become so plastic, nor were they represented with the strength of a Giotto or a Van der Weyden.

Medieval emotions left a deep furrow in the face of modern man. Protestantism radicalized the most pessimistic Augustinian notes, and Calvinism repressed their expressions with a strict morality centered on work and wealth (M. Weber). At this anthropological crossroads, feelings oscillated between rationalist contempt and romantic exaltation, while education was torn between Rousseauian naturalism and the rigorism that introduced the slogan "children do not cry" in children's stories.

It was not for long. Amorous romanticism swept away the bourgeois puritanism of the institution of marriage, so that by 1880 the imposed unions - so opposed by medieval theologians - became a relic of the past. Sentiment became the guarantor of a conjugal union progressively fractured by the divorce mentality and an affectivity contaminated by the hedonism that triumphed in May '68. The emotional confusion of adolescents, sexual vagrancy or the increase in abortions are the consequence of that idealistic and hedonistic system. naif  which has given way to another realistic and sordid call to rethink the meaning of its conquests.

– Supernatural Amoris laetitia is an invitation to do so by listening to the voice of those feelings that Christianity rescued from classical atony, oriented to family union and projected to the heights of mystical emotion. Paradoxically, the greatness of its history is mirrored on the surface of its shadows: the tears of water and salt discovered by the same Carolingians who underpinned the conjugal union. Pope Francis wanted to rescue them, perhaps conscious of those words that Tolkien put in Gandalf's mouth: "No os diré: do not weep; for not all tears are bitter.".

The authorÁlvaro Fernández de Córdova Miralles

Read more
Experiences

For Many - For All: Elements for a Catechesis

The Spanish translation of the third edition of the Roman Missal includes among its main novelties a change in the Eucharistic liturgy. The expression "for all men" which appears in the consecration of the wine, will be replaced as of the first Sunday of Lent 2017 by the expression "by many".

Antonio Ducay-March 7, 2017-Reading time: 11 minutes

To understand this change it is useful to consider the recent history of the subject. Since ancient times, the Latin expression used in the Roman liturgy has been "pro multis"and so it continued to appear in the Missal promulgated by Paul VI after the reform of Vatican II. But in the translation of the Latin texts into the vernacular languages, the expression pro multis of the consecration was translated, in some cases, with a change of nuance: "for all men" (for all, per tutti, für alle...), with the desire to express the universal value of Christ's redemptive sacrifice. This translation is the one that has now been revised and changed.

More accurate translation

Over the years, it has become apparent that the option of translating "for all men" was not in keeping with the Holy See's desire to produce translations with greater literalness with respect to the original texts. For this reason, among others, the Congregation for Divine Worship consulted the presidents of the episcopal conferences in July 2005 regarding the translation of the "pro multis" in the formula of consecration of the Blood of Christ in the different languages. The fruit of this consultation was the circular letter of Cardinal Arinze, then Prefect of the said Congregation, which briefly and in an orderly fashion set out the "arguments in favor of a more accurate version of the traditional formula. pro multis" (October 17, 2006: n. 3). In it, particular emphasis was placed on the fact that the formula used in the institution's narration is "by many" and in which "the Roman rite, in Latin, has always said. pro multis". The Circular Letter urged the Bishops' Conferences of those countries where the formula "by all" was in use at that time to introduce a precise translation, in the vernacular, of the formula "pro multis". He also wanted the faithful to be prepared for this change with adequate catechesis.

In this context, in March 2012, the president of the German Bishops' Conference informed Benedict XVI that some sectors of the German linguistic sphere wished to maintain translation "by all"despite the agreement in the Bishops' Conference to translate "by many"as had been indicated by the Holy See. Faced with this situation, the Pope, in order to prevent a division in the local church, drafted a letter in which he explained why the new translation was desirable (Benedict XVI, Letter to the President of the German Bishops' Conference on the translation of "pro multis", 14-IV-2012, Liturgical pastoral. Documentation. Information 328-329, 2012, 81-86). He also urged the German bishops to definitively implement the indications of the Circular Letter of 2006.

Also in this context, and as a result of a long work of revision and updating, the Spanish Episcopal Conference has recently presented the new official Spanish edition of the Roman Missal. It is, therefore, the Spanish version of the editio typica tertia emendata from Missale Romanumpublished in 2008, in which the translation of the words of the consecration is modified: the expression "the words of the consecration" is replaced by "the words of the consecration". "for all men" which until now has been used, is replaced by the more literal translation of the Latin text "by many".

Last Supper

The Gospels have told us what Jesus did at the Last Supper, when "He took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them. [to the disciples] Saying, "This is my body which is given for you.""and then, after dinner, with the chalice in his hands: "This cup is the New Covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you." (Lk 22:19,20). In recounting this scene, the Gospel accounts also allude to how to interpret it. Mentioning the "covenant in blood," Jesus evokes what, many centuries earlier, Moses had done to confirm the covenant with God. He had read the words of the Law to the people and sprinkled them with the blood of the bullocks offered in sacrifice, while saying: "This is the blood of the covenant which the LORD has made with you, according to all these words." (Ex 24:8). Thus Israel had become the chosen people, God's property among all the nations.

Over the years, however, Israel had not followed the law of God correctly and, in practice, with their deeds, they had denied the Covenant. Nevertheless, God, who is persevering in his love and in his choices, had not yielded to the disaffection of his own. He abandoned them into the hands of their enemies, who deported them and deprived them of their traditions, purified them with suffering, but did not reject them. Moreover, precisely in those difficult times for Israel, God instilled in some of his servants his desire to establish a new and definitive alliance. "Behold, the days are coming," says the LORD, "when I will make a covenant with the house of Israel (and with the house of Judah), a new covenant."Thus preached the prophet Jeremiah around 600 BC. Thus the idea was formed that this new and definitive alliance would take place, by God's will, when the time of the Messiah King would come.

Jesus' words in the Upper Room fit into this context. He has before him his disciples, whom he has chosen as the pillars of the new people of God, and he declares before them that the sacrifice of his life, which was to be fulfilled the next day in Jerusalem, was to be the foundation of that new and everlasting covenant. But, unlike the old, this new covenant was not intended for a particular race or nation, for it was to have a universal character. By giving his body to eat and his blood to drink, Jesus invited the disciples to enter into this definitive covenant, which was not limited to them alone, but extended in space and time until it intentionally embraced all humanity. This is what Jesus said when, after his resurrection, he said goodbye to his disciples with these words: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." (Mt 28:19-20).

Transmission of Jesus' words

In transmitting the words of Jesus at the Last Supper, the evangelists take into account this entire interpretative horizon. Jesus addresses his disciples and gives his life for them, but also for the multitude, that is, for all those who are called to this new people of God, and who are, in short, all men. Christ, as St. John affirms, has given his body and his blood for "the life of the world" (Jn 6:51). In this sense, the recipients of Christ's sacrifice can be considered from different points of view; it is therefore natural that the accounts of the Last Supper and, in particular, the essential words of Jesus on that occasion, have been transmitted with minor differences that do not affect the main content. Specifically, Jesus speaks of "the Covenant in my blood" spilled by "you" in St. Luke's Gospel (St. Paul also refers to the body given up by "you"), while for the other two synoptic gospels, Jesus refers to the "blood of the Covenant" spilled by "many".

Specialists in the field of biblical exegesis note, in general, that such a "many", coming from Aramaic, it cannot have a partitive sense: it is not to be understood as opposed to "all" ("many" in the sense of "not all"), but rather as opposed to "one". In this sense it is an open and indeterminate term meaning "a great number", "the crowd", the "multitude"; and which, in itself, need not exclude anyone. In any case, understood in its context, the two forms of expression (by you / by many) are just and complementary, because the first considers those present, those who are at that moment with Jesus and who represent in germ the new People of God, and the second looks at all those who will benefit through the times from the sacrifice of Jesus, that new People in its universal development.

In the Eucharistic celebration

When the Roman rite of the Eucharistic celebration incorporates this fundamental moment of the life of the Son of God on earth - the gift of His Body and Blood - it is the gift of His Body and Blood.- does not wish to lose anything of what the Gospels convey. He considers that this is a unique and decisive event in the history of salvation. So, simply, instead of choosing between the two narrative traditions (Matthew/Mark and Luke/Paul), he keeps them both and brings them together to the extent that they can be integrated into a single formula. This is why the original Latin text, when consecrating the chalice, puts the words in the mouth of the celebrant: "hic est enim calix Sanguinis mei novi et aeterni testamenti, qui pro vobis et pro multis effundetur in remissionem..."This formula of the Roman canon is also present, at the explicit wish of Paul VI, in all the new Eucharistic Prayers that came about as a result of the liturgical reform of Vatican II.

It is natural that the formulas for the consecration of the bread and wine should have been adapted to the Gospel accounts, precisely in those crucial moments in which the celebrant acts in persona Christi. For this reason it is understood that there is unity between the words of Jesus that are read in the stories and those that are pronounced in the celebration. Concretely the Roman canon, in force in the Urbe since ancient times, expresses the addressees of the blood shed by Jesus with the locution "pro vobis et pro multis".. And something similar can be said of the main Latin Bibles (the Vulgate of St. Jerome, the Sixtus-Clementine Vulgate propagated after the Council of Trent, the more recent Neovulgata), which have also always put the terms "Jesus" in the mouth of Jesus. "vobis" y "multis". It is therefore quite reasonable that this terminological agreement between the Eucharistic celebration and the biblical narrative should be maintained also when translating from Latin into modern languages, so that the words pronounced by the priest, when consecrating the chalice, correspond to what anyone can read in the best editions of the Bible, which translate almost univocally "vobis" with "you" y "multis" with "many".

Celebrating the Eucharist with the new formulation we read that the blood of the Covenant "it will be poured out for you and for many for the forgiveness of sins.". By bringing the biblical texts and the liturgical recitation back into synchrony, the formula is better adjusted to reality, because the Eucharistic celebration naturally refers back to the account of the gestures of Jesus in the Upper Room, and both actions, the historical and the celebratory, have the same content: the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross. Basically, the change of formulation testifies to the Church's veneration of the revealed Word and her faith that the Eucharistic celebration is the same as the celebration of the Eucharist. "memoria Christi"The sacramental presence of the paschal event narrated in the Gospels.

Context of the first translations

A few years after the Second Vatican Council, the new Missal was published. This was followed by translations of the Latin text into modern languages. The aim was to take into account the universal intention of Jesus in shedding his blood, and the open and indeterminate character of the expression "the blood of Jesus" was emphasized. "by many"which, as we have said, indicates the crowd.

The desire was to follow in the footsteps of the Council, which had strongly upheld the doctrine of the universal call to holiness. The Council's texts had emphasized God's closeness to mankind. His grace reaches everyone, because all were created to live in communion with him and Jesus gave his life for all. The criticisms that the enlightened and anti-clerical currents addressed to the Christian religion were also kept in mind, accusing it of being based on a particular event of the past, the story of Jesus, and as such, not fully attainable by many. From this it was concluded that salvation could not come from religion, unless it was admitted that God was a partial being who gave the means of salvation to some men and not to others. The aim was to give prominence to reason and to shake off the moral tutelage imposed by religious creeds.

The Council kept these objections in mind and, in a certain sense, tried to respond to them when it presented Jesus as the summit of human reality and affirmed the universal character of his redemption, which is offered to all. God works in people in an invisible way, the Council affirms, and his voice resounds in the most intimate part of the human conscience; for this reason there is no one who is alien to Christ. The redemptive sacrifice, which is the source of salvation for the baptized, does not limit its effects only to the body of the Church, to its members, but involves all men and women. "the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility that, in the form of God alone known, they may be associated with this paschal mystery." (Gaudium et Spes 22).

Moreover, and always within the modern period, the Church had had to fight against the rigorist tendencies, which had become strong with Jansenius and had left traces in the popular mentality, so that it was not infrequent to find conceptions of God in which the severity of the eternal Judge largely prevailed over the mercy of the caring and loving Father. In this context it was natural that the translation of the "pro multis" had a universalist slant: the blood of Jesus was shed for all men. To translate, following the Council, meant then to underline the universal scope of the call and action of God in Jesus Christ, a God who leaves no one abandoned.

Current context

It must be recognized, however, that the present context is, in some respects, profoundly different from that of Vatican II. After several decades of stressing the universality of the Christian message from Christocentric perspectives, and insisting on dialogue and on the Church's openness to the entire panorama of human realities, Christians do not doubt that God is a loving Father who leaves no one without abundant opportunities to receive his grace. The problem today is rather the opposite: that salvation is understood in many environments as something necessary, because God is so good and so Father that he cannot leave anyone without eternal happiness.

If we pay attention to the writings of the most prestigious theologians of the twentieth century, we will find a clear indication in this sense. They have often held positions which, even if they did not always affirm the thesis of universal human salvation, were quite close to it. The Orthodox philosophers and theologians Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov, the Lutheran Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Calvinist Karl Barth, the Catholic Hans Urs von Balthasar..., all of them, to varying degrees, have shared the hope of an ultimate and definitive salvation for all men.

A few words of the well-known Calvinist theologian that I have just mentioned can serve as an example of what I have said. Barth writes in his Theological Essays: "The truth is that there is no theological right by which we can put any limit to the philanthropy of God that appeared in Jesus Christ. Our theological duty is to see and understand it always greater than we have done so far.". These are just words, but they also run the risk of placing such a burden on the mercy of God, on his philanthropy, that the struggles and battles of men for or against the divine will become insignificant. Do we not have the impression today that man is such a relative and small being that no one can care about his miseries? And, therefore, does it not seem that the obligation of a good God cannot be other than to take pity on all, closing one or both eyes to what was the life of each one? But then, where is the tradition of the disciples of Christ, of the martyrs and saints who gave their lives for Jesus and illuminated their times by firmly incarnating the Gospel?

Perhaps today it will again be necessary to explain that God, certainly, addresses and seeks everyone, but also desires, as in times past, the intrepid and even heroic correspondence of men; that, in short, the old scholastic axiom is right when it affirms: "facienti quod in se est, Deus non denegat gratiam".He who, with the help of grace, freely disposes himself to receive God's will, will obtain from Him light and strength to carry it out. Ultimately, God's mercy, which surrounds man, also involves him and commits him to it. And this is what is also present in the change of the formula of consecration, that God takes man seriously and expects from each one correspondence to his infinite mercy.

In this sense, the passage of the "for all men" a "by many" contains a salutary admonition, and I believe it will be perceived as such, because there is no doubt that the new language is formally more restrictive than the preceding one.

What will have to be explained to the faithful people are two things: first, that this restriction is not due to any doctrinal change - because there was no doubt that Jesus died for all men, nor is there any doubt that He died for all men.-and second, that "the many", "the multitude", "the multitude" for whom Jesus gives himself, as distinguished from "all men," discreetly allude to the possibility that the blood offered may be rejected and may not exercise its full saving power on some. Keeping a certain distance from the two expressions, "for all men" and "for many men," the new translation "by many" The new translation, in its apparent indeterminacy, gathers together the two aspects of Christ's saving work: the objective and the subjective, the Lord's universal intention to establish a new covenant with all humanity, and the need for man to contribute, through his love and struggle, to the realization of God's plan in the world. In this way, the new translation is also a word that orients the Church today in her historical journey.

The authorAntonio Ducay

Latin America

A wall against reality

President Trump's intention to expand fences and walls on the Mexican border is complicated to implement and based on prejudice. Current ties, physical barriers, millions of Mexicans working in the U.S., cross-border cities and cost are some obstacles.

Omnes-March 6, 2017-Reading time: 5 minutes

On January 25 of this year, the President of the United States of America, Donald Trump, signed the executive order titled "Improvements in border security and immigration enforcement.". Its objective is "guarantee the security and territorial integrity of the United States and ensure that immigration laws are faithfully enforced".

The measures for its implementation include, among others, the planning, design and construction of a "barrier" on the southern border with Mexico, defined in the text as a "... barrier".physically impassable adjacent wall". The action plan also foresees the control and construction of additional detention centers for foreigners in addition to the existing ones; the increase in the detention of undocumented aliens and the hiring of 5,000 additional border agents.

The second point has begun to be implemented. In February, Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducted raids in several states, which resulted in the arrest of hundreds of undocumented aliens, or "undocumented aliens". paperlessfor their deportation. Several newspapers spoke of "panic". The actions took place in homes and workplaces in Atlanta, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, North Carolina and South Carolina.

In the middle of the month, Mexico's Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray reported that there had not yet been any mass deportations from the United States. On the other hand, on Sunday the 12th, protest marches against President Trump's immigration policies took place in different Mexican cities.

Mexico, a great unknown

Although the U.S.-Mexico bilateral relationship is one of the most important for both nations (united by their geography, history, communities and trade), for the average American, particularly for those who voted for the New York magnate, the neighbor to the south is the great unknown.

President Trump has decided to set aside the facts, the history of the relationship and its reality to rely on anti-Mexican and racial prejudices, many of them well rooted in the collective imagination of the common American. Within that imaginary, Mexico is neither a partner, nor a friend, nor a neighbor, but the place where there are poor and good people, but also many "bad hombres" (Trump dixit), who go to the U.S. to break laws, steal jobs from Americans, cross drugs across the border and commit crimes. Therefore, according to the president, the only solution is a "wall capable of stopping all the evils coming from the neighbor to the south".

With working life

The real fact is that throughout history there has never been a military or terrorist attack from Mexico (the only incursion was Pancho Villa's raid on Columbus, New Mexico, in 1917).

Another fact ignored by Trump is that a portion of the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States entered legally on tourist visas. And while they did indeed violate the terms and conditions of their stay in the country, wall or no wall, they would have entered.

And now they have joined the working life of the United States. They are people who with their work and taxes contribute to the greatness of the nation, which according to President Trump has vanished but he will be able to give it back to them. (Make America Great Again, "make America great again" was his campaign slogan).

In addition, of the millions of people who cross the border daily, only a small percentage do so without documents, but most are apprehended and repatriated to their countries of origin.

The construction of a wall is unthinkable in many parts of the southern border. A good part of the 3,140 kilometers of border already has some type of wired or concrete fence. In other areas, the physical barrier is nature itself: the Rio Grande, the desert or other natural areas, some of which are ecological reserves protected by federal law.

Another factor is that much of the land on which the fence would have to be built is privately owned, mostly in Texas. To build it, the federal government would have to buy thousands of miles or proceed to expropriate it, in which case it would face long and costly legal battles not only with the owners, but with entire counties and border cities. It would be a struggle of the executive branch against federal, state, municipal and private powers.

Cross-border cities

Another obstacle is the existence of dozens of regions on both sides of the border that are "borderless".cross-border cities"In other words, regions that are so economically and socially integrated that they function as if they were a single city. This is the case of Tijuana, Baja California and San Diego (California); Nogales, Sonora and Nogales (Arizona); Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua and El Paso (Texas); Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas and Laredo (Texas); Matamoros, Tamaulipas and Brownsville (Texas).

Mexico's border with the United States is the busiest in the world. Its cities are places where hundreds of Mexican workers work legally on one side but live on the other, and therefore cross it daily. Places where American citizens go to obtain medical services in Mexico, because they are up to 80 % cheaper, of high quality and without the inconvenience of the American government bureaucracy.

Integration in these cross-border cities is not only economic, but also social and cultural. In many regions, festivals are held every year to recognize their friendship and cooperation. These events highlight the traditions, art and culture of the two peoples. A typical case is the Friendship Festival, which is celebrated every year in the city of Del Rio (Texas), in which hundreds of people and floats from the neighboring city, Ciudad Acuña, in the State of Coahuila, participate.

Debate on cost

Perhaps the biggest hurdle Trump's wall will face will be the cost. To build it could require, according to some estimates, more than $20 billion. A cost that does not include all the items that President Trump mentions in his decree, such as the construction of more detention centers for undocumented immigrants, the escalation of deportations, and above all the hundreds of lawsuits he will have to face in the event of expropriation of land.

Who will pay for it? The reality is that the pockets of American citizens, even though Trump has repeatedly said that "the US will pay for it.Mexico will pay the full cost of the wall". The tycoon claims that this could be done by imposing a 20 % tax on all Mexican goods. Something that could not be done today because both countries are signatories to the North American Free Trade Agreement. In addition, both nations are members of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This practice of imposing tax tariffs against a single country would be a violation of the WTO statutes.

In the middle of the month, President Trump came out against the figures offered by Reuters, contained in an internal report of the US Department of Homeland Security. The cost would reach $21.6 billion, up from the $12 billion that Trump spoke of in the campaign. However, the president assured that, once "be involved"in its design, "the price will drop dramatically". "I'm reading that the big cross-border wall will cost more than the government thought, but I'm not yet involved in negotiations or the design. When it does, as happened with the F-35 fighter or the Air Force One program, the price will come down a lot.", wrote the president.

Experiences

Why get married? Christian marriage in the 21st century

The author proposes to young people to go into the depths of their conscience and ask themselves questions that will facilitate a valid, firm and lasting marriage. It is necessary to enter into their world and evangelize from there. This means spending hours, especially with other families, spouses and engaged couples committed to the same ideal of life.

Javier Láinez-March 6, 2017-Reading time: 11 minutes

 "Before, priests used to marry people because it was the most normal thing in the world. In less than two generations we have realized that it is not normal at all. Now the one who marries is a champion who swims against the current".. This phrase of a veteran parish priest in our country is a generalized perception.

Recently the press has published statistics showing that the drop in the number of weddings is abysmal. It is true that often cooked figures have been disseminated that falsify reality, mixing weddings with remarriages and other circumstances. But despite the bias with which some try to illustrate the loss of influence of the Church in society, the statistics confirm a reality that we all - in particular parish priests - perceive: many people have abandoned the dream of forming a Christian home and giving children to the Church, as the old catechisms used to say.

The prevailing disorientation and the trends imposed by relativism have pushed many people to alternative ways of life outside the family. To get a general idea, of all the couples who live together in the family "more uxorio" -that is, as spouses without being spouses- only one-third enter marriage, and of these, less than one-third do so in the Church. It has gone from 75 % of canonical weddings in the early 2000s to just over 22 % in 2016. These are figures that do not paint an enthusiastic picture.

Living together without getting married

St. John Paul II warned in Novo Millenio Ineunte (n. 47) "that there is a widespread and radical crisis of this fundamental institution. In the Christian vision of marriage, the relationship between a man and a woman - a reciprocal and total relationship, unique and indissoluble - responds to God's primitive plan, obfuscated in history by 'hardness of heart', but which Christ has come to restore to its original splendor, revealing what God has willed 'from the beginning'".

Now it has become fashionable to talk about post-truthThe cultural battle that has provoked the emergence of the new media, that is, the perception affected by the subjective emotions and feelings of a phenomenon of any kind. And the cultural battle that has brought about the emergence of the post-truth aims to replace all anthropology based on natural law with another based on the social consensus of facts not infrequently contrary to right reason. It is, they say, the victory of freedom.

In his book How the Western world really lost God (Rialp, 2014), Mary Eberstadt points out that. "From the beginning, Christianity regulated through doctrine and liturgy the fundamental issues of birth, death and procreation. Moreover, some would say that Christianity (like Judaism from which it drew) focuses its attention on these matters even more than other religions, which brings us to the important question of obedience. How often it is said that the Church is nothing but a flock of sinners. But are they sinners who do not comply with the norms in which they believe or people who do not feel bound by those norms?

There seems to be no doubt that public opinion has come to believe that there is no moral rule that prevents more or less free cohabitation before or instead of marriage. The civil laws of many countries with a Christian tradition have ended up equating any type of cohabitation based on a sexual or affective bond.

Marriage is no longer considered an institution of priority social interest and, as a result, parliaments have repealed the provisions that gave it legal protection. It is hardly legally relevant anymore whether or not one is married or not. Moreover, being married can often be unfavorable. Many people, young or old, who are facing a second marriage, are perceived to be disinterested in the marriage formula.

In particular, many young Catholics indulge in some kind of free union that is so often camouflaged by the euphemism "free union".living together". And families have ended up accepting that their children are emancipated in this way, most of them thinking that it will be a preliminary step to marriage and family stability. But this is not always the case.

The first characteristic of this type of life as a couple is the absence of commitment. There is no ground underfoot. In the internal engine of the relationship, everything is prepared for the breakup, which may or may not come, but is intended to be as atraumatic as possible. Moreover, as the only sustenance of the relationship is the affective bond, both are exposed to a fragile cohabitation that will depend in so many cases on factors external to the couple, which makes them very vulnerable to falling in love with third parties or to emotional ups and downs related to professional projection or business success. Secondly, there is usually no common project, no personal life plan involving the couple. Children are therefore frequently excluded (21 % of cases).

Pastoral care of marriage and family

The Church has always, but with a greater urgency in recent decades, sought ways to overcome this harmful desertification.

Paul VI, with the encyclical Humanae Vita,e and John Paul II with the Familiaris consortio, gave life to a network of institutions that have proliferated in the service of all the countries of the world, from Institutes for the Family to Pastoral Councils for the Family and Catholic Centers for Family Orientation in universities, dioceses and parishes.

In many places, the bishops have implemented itineraries and catechesis for young people to enter marriage and for married couples to strengthen their bond and heal their family life. The pastoral councils established in Italy, for example, have certainly contributed to making Italy one of the countries in the European Union with the lowest divorce rate. Many dioceses and parishes have worked seriously and with great care to prepare engaged couples to take the step towards marriage or have invited them to delay it when there was a lack of a real commitment that would make it viable.

This is the direction indicated once again by Pope Francis in the Amoris laetitia (2016): "Both the upcoming preparation and the more prolonged accompaniment should ensure that the bride and groom do not see marriage as the end of the road, but rather that they assume marriage as a vocation that launches them forward, with the firm and realistic decision to go through all the trials and difficult moments together.

   Pre-marital pastoral care and pastoral care of marriage should be above all a pastoral care of the bond, where elements are contributed that help both to mature love and to overcome difficult moments. These contributions are not only doctrinal convictions, nor can they be reduced to the precious spiritual resources that the Church always offers, but must also be practical ways, well-incarnated advice, tactics taken from experience, psychological orientations".

   "All of this" -adds the Pope-The pedagogy of love cannot ignore the current sensitivity of young people, in order to mobilize them interiorly. In turn, in the preparation of the engaged couple, it should be possible to indicate to them places and persons, consultancies or available families, where they can go for help when difficulties arise. But we must never forget the proposal of sacramental Reconciliation, which allows us to place the sins and errors of the past life, and of the relationship itself, under the influence of God's merciful forgiveness and his healing power". (AL, 211).

New ways of thinking and living

Amoris laetitia contains precious keys that many parish priests are also describing as prophetic. It has given so much light to so many souls and has broken the prejudices of those who look at the Church with suspicion. Pope Francis proposes a challenge of unprecedented dimensions: to understand this new mentality and to strive to evangelize it. It is well known that it is no longer easy to argue with reason, and that neither the exposition of the harmony of the natural law nor the argument of the authority of the Popes or of the Magisterium helps today to lead the bride and groom to the altar.

The Holy Father suggests a path that has proven to have a singular rate of success: "De are aware of the weight of extenuating circumstances - psychological, historical and even biological - and it follows that, 'without diminishing the value of the Gospel ideal, we must accompany with mercy and patience the possible stages of growth of persons who are being built up day by day', making room for 'the mercy of the Lord who stimulates us to do the possible good'. I understand those who prefer a more rigid pastoral care that does not give rise to any confusion. But I sincerely believe that Jesus Christ wants a Church attentive to the good that the Spirit pours out in the midst of fragility: a Mother who, while clearly expressing her objective teaching, 'does not renounce the possible good, even at the risk of being stained by the mud of the road' (cf. Mt. 5:15). (AL, 308).

In churches where many weddings are celebrated or where many pre-marriage courses are held - as in my case - it has been proven that the itinerary indicated by the Pope is the correct one. It is necessary to help young people to go into the depths of their conscience and ask themselves transcendental questions that will help them to take the right steps towards the desired goal of reaching a valid, firm and lasting marriage.

The task of the good shepherd

Getting married, as those who do it in the Church confess, is an impulse that comes from the heart. It is not a simple tradition, nor the result of overcoming the fear of commitment. It is something that "your body is asking for it", they say, "because you need stability". For those who have a little faith (often only one of the two), this interior demand brings them back to the Church, which in many cases they abandoned in adolescence. Here is where the role of the one who helps the shipwrecked who return home comes to the fore: how to welcome so many who aspire to marriage, but are disoriented, trapped by a frenetic life with wrong moral choices and ill-prepared to receive the sacraments?

The task of the shepherd who goes out to look not for one lost sheep but for ninety-nine and a half that have been scattered, requires today the creativity and enthusiasm of an artist. One must enter into their world - into their wandering - and evangelize from there.

Many young people are very shy of being judged for the way they live. Accepting no other norms than those imposed by the social environment, they often consider the Church as a kind of super-mother-in-law who sullenly reproaches them for their behavior.

How many engaged couples have breathed a sigh of relief when they realize that the priest not only does not frown when it is discovered that they have been living together for years, but also that the priest does not frown when it is discovered that the couple has been "amancebamiento"The Church encourages them to look forward to the step that will fill their lives with fullness through the sacrament of marriage.

Personal conversion

How then to face the conversion prior to the sacrament? A good percentage are ready to go to confession and rebuild their lives. But the passage from a life far from moral norms to a Christian way of life is thorny. It is such a radical change that it is frightening or even lazy. Many will long for the "pots of meat". of sexual liberality, just as the Israelites missed the quiet comfort of slavery.

It is true that, from a technical point of view, the mission of the parish priest is to ensure the validity of the marriage to be contracted. As soon as the psychological maturity, sincerity and correctness of intentThe absence of malice or impediments, and the absence of fraud or impediments, we have the wickerwork to weave the basket of a conjugal covenant based on fidelity for life and openness to the children that God may send.

The experience of the last decades confirms that a lot of time must be devoted to stimulating the firmness of the "return to faith"or the awakening of a Christian life that has remained hibernating.

The ideal would be to begin catechization at an early age. But when one does not have so much time, it is necessary to consider a pastoral ministry of marriage in the medium term, in reality very short. The objective is that the project contemplates an inclined plane capable of situating them in the true dimension of the step they are going to take.

The proclamation of the Gospel to those about to be married is often a kerygmatic proclamation. Like the hearers of St. Peter at Pentecost, the bride and groom ask "what are we to do?" (Acts 2:37). And as "the decision to marry and to create a family must be the fruit of vocational discernment". (AL, 72), the revelation of God's plan for marriage takes hours. Many hours of dealing with each other. Not only with the priest, but above all with other families, spouses, engaged couples and engaged couples committed to the same ideal of life. To succeed in creating a Christian family, a true domestic church, in a world that has turned its back on what is sometimes disparagingly called "family".traditional"needs support.

In many dioceses of the world, groups of couples and young couples are working very well, dedicating time not only to catechesis or family orientation courses, but also to pray and share experiences together. There are very positive examples of this in Italy and the United States.

Chastity before marriage

In the case of cohabiting couples or those who have frequent sexual relations without being married, there are profound questions to be asked.

It is simply a fact that for many Catholics sex has gone from being a forbidden garden to a jungle with no laws other than those of personal whim. Many engaged couples who attend premarital courses are struck by the discovery that Christian doctrine does not consider licit the exercise of sexuality between singles.

The reflection here is to help the bride and groom understand that marriage is fundamentally about communication. The only rule by which communication is sustained, whatever the environment in which it takes place, is truthfulness. Well, what truthfulness is to communication is chastity to sex.

Chastity, far from being simple carnal abstinence, is the requisite for endowing the sexual relationship with the authenticity that makes it real and holy. It is not only serious attacks against chastity that show the malice of lust. In pathologies such as pornography or prostitution, the inauthenticity of the relationship is such that it brutally manifests its lie. Moreover, we confessors know that the sin that really damages families in a merciless way is adultery. It is the supreme lie of sexuality between spouses.

The truthfulness of the relationship, chastity in the case of sex, is a continuum. If one did not want to be chaste when one was young, it is likely that the trap will close again in maturity. Chastity, which, according to the Catechism, "tolerates neither double life nor double talk". (n. 2338) is a virtue that, like all virtues, presupposes a process of learning and assimilation, especially in the sincerity of the relationship and before one's own conscience.

 Call to holiness

And what should we propose to engaged couples who are living together in the months before marriage: should they suspend their cohabitation so that the sacramental confession that will restore their peace with God and lead them to a holy married life may be totally sincere? Undoubtedly, it is necessary to arrive at this proposal.

The real art is to get the initiative from them. In addition to praying a lot - every journey of conversion demands it - it is necessary to understand the call to holiness that the marital vocation supposes. The carnal union of the spouses is an icon of God, as St. John Paul II explained in the Theology of the Body: "Sexual intercourse is the primary revelation in the created world of the eternal and invisible mystery of Christ." (hearing 29-IX-1982).

Among the hundreds of couples that I have accompanied in their process to marriage, there are a great number of cases. From resounding failures, to those who before the wedding return to their parents' house to, as they used to say in the old days, be led from there to the altar.

In unthinkable couples - he atheist, she poorly educated - I have witnessed the efforts of those who have been able to live "as brother and sister"The task of acting in God's face belongs to the conscience of the bride and groom, and the priest can help from the outside to form and enlighten them. The task of working towards God belongs to the conscience of the bride and groom, and the priest can help from the outside to form and enlighten them. This is certainly something to which pastors will have to devote energy and time in order to help Christian couples in the 21st century.

Openness to life

Those who decide to get married often look forward to becoming parents. But it is often difficult to help them understand that children are not a right of the couple, but a gift from God. The ideal is ambitious: "Large families are a joy for the Church. In them, love expresses its generous fruitfulness." (AL, 167).

If they are young, they sometimes consider spending a couple of years enjoying marriage without "load"What will they do during that time? For others, the responsibility of educating their offspring in Christianity is a world away if it goes beyond celebrations on the occasion of baptisms and first communions. They do not know what it means to educate in the faith.

If nature makes it difficult for them to conceive, not a few will resort without conscience to any fertility technique that will give them the desired child, whatever the distance between the end and the means.

Unfortunately, the anti-natalist mentality and the ease of contraceptive techniques have become so popular that dismantling prejudices and helping people to think in a Christian way is complicated. But there is no other way: "A serene look at the ultimate fulfillment of the human person will make parents even more aware of the precious gift that has been entrusted to them." (AL, 166).

For love and fertility, the challenge for spouses is holiness. That is nothing.

The authorJavier Láinez

Read more
The Vatican

Bishop Ocáriz: "Contact with poverty, with pain, helps to relativize problems".

On January 23, Spanish priest Fernando Ocáriz was elected and appointed by Pope Francis as the new Prelate of Opus Dei.number 2" of the Prelature. Word interviewed him in Rome.

Alfonso Riobó-March 6, 2017-Reading time: 15 minutes

The agreed objective was to dedicate a good part of the interview to bring the reader closer to the person of Bishop Fernando Ocáriz. The new Prelate of the Opus Dei He has fulfilled it faithfully, overcoming his notable reluctance to focus the conversation on himself. Reserve is part of his character, as is expressive sobriety, although he is not lacking in cordiality or openness. As far as the photo session is concerned, it was an unpleasant duty for him, but one that he took on with good humor.

The meeting took place at the headquarters of the Curia of the Prelature of Opus Dei, the building where St. Josemaría Escrivá, Blessed Álvaro del Portillo and Javier Echevarría lived and worked. Although Fernando Ocáriz came to the forefront of the Work's government in 1994, when he was appointed vicar general (since 2014 he was auxiliary vicar), he has lived here for 50 years, knows every detail of Opus Dei's activity and acts in full identification with his predecessors.

We thank the Prelate for this interview, the first of this breadth, just two weeks after his election and appointment on January 23, 2017.

FIRST YEARS

-You were born in Paris in 1944 to a Spanish family. Why were you born in France?

The civil war. My father was a soldier on the Republican side. He never wanted to tell details; but I understand that, because of his position as a commander, he had the opportunity to save people, and within the Republican army itself he ended up in a risky situation. As he was not a supporter of Franco, he thought it was convenient to go to France, and he took advantage of the proximity of the border of part of the army, and went there, through Catalonia. He was a military veterinarian, but he had devoted himself mainly to research in animal biology. He was not what could be considered a politician, but a military man and a scientist.

-Do you have any memories of that time?

What I know of that time is from hearing about it. When the family left for France I was not yet born, and neither was my seventh sister, the one before me (I did not get to know my two older sisters, who died at a very young age, long before I was born). The two youngest of us were born in Paris. I was born in October, just one month after the liberation by American and French troops under General Leclerc.

-Was politics discussed at home?

I have no memory of Paris. Already in Spain, little was said; rather loose and brief comments were made, not favorable, although not violent, to the Franco regime. In any case, it must be recognized that, from that time on, my father and the family led a peaceful life: my father was later readmitted to an official research center, under the Ministry of Agriculture, in Madrid, where he worked until his retirement.

-What about religion? Did you receive your faith in the family?

I received my faith mainly from my family, especially from my mother and my maternal grandmother, who lived with us. My father was a very good person, but at that time he was quite distant from religion. He would eventually return to religious practice, and became a supernumerary of Opus Dei. In the family home I learned the basics of the life of piety.

-From Paris, they returned to Spain.

I was three years old at the time, and I have only a vague memory, like an image engraved in my memory, of the train trip from Paris to Madrid.

-Where did you go to school?

In Areneros, the Jesuit school. I was there until the end of high school. It was a good school with quite serious discipline. Unlike what I have heard about other schools of the time, I never saw a Jesuit hit anyone in the eight years I was there. I am grateful for that. I remember quite a few teachers, especially those of the last years; for example, in the last year we had as mathematics teacher a layman and father of a family, surnamed Castillo Olivares, a truly valuable person, whom we admired very much.

MEETING WITH OPUS DEI

-You studied physics in Barcelona. What was the reason for your transfer?

Actually, I did my first year of university in Madrid. It was the "selective", which introduced all the engineering and science faculties. There were only five subjects, common to all these careers: mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and geology. We were a very large class; several groups, each with more than a hundred students.

That first year I had Francisco Botella as my mathematics teacher. [professor, priest and one of the first members of Opus Dei].. When he later found out that I was from the Work and that I was thinking of studying physics, he told me: "Why are you doing physics? Why don't you do mathematics? If you want to earn money, become an engineer, but if you are interested in science, why don't you study mathematics?

When I went to Barcelona I was already a member of Opus Dei. I lived in the Monterols Hall of Residence, where I combined my physics studies with the theological and spiritual formation that people who join the Work receive.

-When did you get to know Opus Dei?

From conversations between my older siblings and my parents, I had heard the expression "Opus Dei" when I was very young. Although I had no idea what it was, the word was familiar to me.

When I was in the fifth year of high school, I went to a center of the Work that was on Padilla Street number 1, on the corner of Serrano, and that is why it was called "Serrano"; it no longer exists. I went a few times. I liked the atmosphere and what was said, but at school we already had spiritual activities and maybe I didn't see the need. I also went some times to play soccer with the "Serrano" people.

Later, in the summer of 1961, after high school and before university, my older brother, who worked as a naval engineer in one of the shipyards in Cadiz, invited me to spend a few weeks there with his family. Very close to his house there was an Opus Dei center, and I started going there. The director was a sailor and naval weapons engineer who encouraged me to make the most of the time: he even gave me a chemistry book to study, something I had never done in the summer! There I prayed, studied, chatted and, between one thing and another, I assimilated the spirit of Opus Dei.

He ended up talking to me about the possibility of having a vocation to the Work. I reacted as many do, saying: "No. In any case, like my brother, who is a father of a family". I dragged my feet on the subject until I made up my mind. I remember the precise moment: I was listening to a Beethoven symphony. Naturally, it is not that I made up my mind because of the symphony, but that I happened to be listening to it when I made up my mind, after having thought and prayed a lot. A few days later I returned to Madrid.

-So, do you like music?

Yes.

-Who is your favorite musician?

Maybe Beethoven. Also others: Vivaldi, Mozart..., but if I had to choose one, I would choose Beethoven. The truth is that I have been listening to very little music for years. I don't follow a precise plan.

-Would you mind describing that decision to surrender to God?

There was no precise moment of "encounter" with God. It has been a natural, gradual thing, since I was a child and I was taught to pray. In a progressive way, I got closer to God at school, where we had the opportunity to receive communion daily, and I think that helped me to make the decision to join the Work relatively quickly. I applied for admission to the Work when I was a month shy of my 17th birthday, so I joined when I was 18.

-What can you tell us about the Barcelona years?

I was in Barcelona for five years, two as a resident in that study center and three as part of the direction of the Colegio Mayor. There I studied the other four years of my degree, and then I continued one more year teaching at the Faculty as an assistant. All the memories of Barcelona are wonderful: of friendship, study... A special memory is the visits we made to the poor and the sick, as is the tradition of the Work. Many of us university students who went there realized that contact with poverty, with pain, helps to relativize one's own problems.

-When did you meet St. Josemaría Escrivá and what impression did he make on you?

August 23, 1963. It was in Pamplona, in the Colegio Mayor Belagua, during a summer training activity. We had a very long discussion with him, at least an hour and a half. He made a wonderful impression on me. I remember that, afterwards, several of us commented that we should see Father -that is what we called the Founder- much more frequently.

His sympathy and his naturalness were striking: he was not a solemn person, but a natural person, with good humor, who often told anecdotes; and at the same time he said very profound things. It was an admirable synthesis: to say profound things with simplicity.

I saw him again soon after, I think the following month. I went to spend a few days in Madrid, and it coincided that Father was in Molinoviejo, so we went to see him from several places.

On none of those occasions did I get to speak with him personally. Later, here in Rome I did, of course: many times.

FIFTY YEARS IN ROME

-He moved to Rome in 1967...

I came for theological studies, and I also got a scholarship from the Italian government for research in Physics during the 1967-1968 academic year, at the University La Sapienza. In reality, I was able to do little in the way of research, only what was required by the scholarship. When I came here, I did not expressly have the prospect of pursuing an academic career in theology. Things just rolled on by themselves. I had no plans in that direction.

-His ordination to the priesthood was in 1971.

Yes, I was ordained on August 15, 1971, in the Basilica of St. Michael in Madrid. The ordaining bishop was Don Marcelo González Martín, still bishop of Barcelona, shortly before moving to Toledo.

They jokingly said that there were four of us Frenchmen in the class: two were "complete" Frenchmen, Franck Touzet and Jean-Paul Savignac; then there was Agustin Romero, a Spaniard who had been in France for many years; and finally me, who had been born in Paris and had lived there for three years.

I can't say that I always felt the call to the priesthood. When I came to Rome I expressed a disposition in principle, and then I said openly to St. Josemaría: "Father, I am ready to be ordained. He took me by the arm and said to me, among other things, more or less: "You give me great joy, my son, but when the time comes you have to do it in complete freedom. That conversation was in the Galleria della CampanaI think at the end of one of the get-togethers that we had with him very often at that time.

-Did you receive any pastoral assignment in Spain after ordination?

No. Three days after my ordination, I said my first solemn Mass in the Basilica of St. Michael and immediately returned to Rome. Here I had previously collaborated in youth apostolate activities at Orsini, which was then a center for university students, giving Christian formation classes and participating in other activities.

When I was already a priest in Rome, I worked for several years in the parish of Tiburtino (San Giovanni Battista in Collatino), and then in the Sant'EugenioI served as a priest in several centers of the Work, both for women and men; and I worked here in the offices of the central headquarters. In short, a normal trajectory.

-It is known that you like tennis. When did you become a tennis fan?

I started playing tennis relatively early, in Barcelona. I was taught a lot by an Italian, Giorgio Carimati, now a priest and already an old man, who played tennis very well at that time; in Italy he had been almost a professional. But there have been comings and goings with tennis, because I injured my right elbow and some times I devoted myself to cycling. Now I try to practice; I try to play every week. But it's not always possible, because of the weather, my work schedule, etc.

-Do you play games... "for real", to win?

Yes, of course. As for winning, it depends on who you play.

-Do you like to read?

Yes, but there's not much time... I don't have a favorite author. I have also read classics. Because of lack of time I have taken years to finish some big books; quite some time ago it took me a year to finish War and peace. I had to read a lot about theology, because I taught until 1994, and also because I had to study theological topics for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

-Theologically, you have studied central aspects of the spirit of Opus Dei, such as divine filiation. Do you consider it necessary to delve deeper into these reflections?

Much has already been done in this field. What needs to be done is to continue, and it will always have to be done. The spirit of Opus Dei is, as the philosopher and theologian Cornelius Faber used to say, "the Gospel". sine glossa". It is the Gospel, put into ordinary life; it is always necessary to go deeper.

In that sense, it is not that there is now a new era, because a great deal has already been done. It is enough to read, for example, Ernst Burkhart and Javier López's three "tomes" entitled Daily life and holiness.

-In an article in this magazine, speaking of Bishop Javier Echevarría, you used the expression "dynamic fidelity". With what meaning?

The expression "dynamic fidelity" is not an originality, far from it. It is about what St. Josemaría expressly affirmed: the ways of saying and doing change, while the nucleus, the spirit, remains untouchable. It is not a matter of now. One thing is the spirit, and another is the materiality of functioning in accidental things, which can change with the times.

Fidelity is not pure mechanical repetition; it is applying the same essence to different circumstances. Often it is also necessary to maintain what is accidental, and at other times to change it. Hence the importance of discernment, especially in order to know what is the limit between the accidental and the essential.

-What part did you play in the birth of the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross?

I had nothing to do with legal or institutional matters. I was simply one of the first professors. I had been a professor at the Roman College of the Holy Cross for quite a few years, in connection with the University of Navarre, and from 1980 to 1984 I taught at the Pontifical Urbaniana University; since I also had sufficient publications, the competent authority of the Holy See considered my qualifications adequate to enter directly as an ordinary professor. There were three of us who entered as ordinaries, under those conditions: Antonio Miralles, Miguel Angel Tabet and myself.

-Who have been your teachers, intellectually?

In Philosophy, Cornelio Fabro and Carlos Cardona. In Theology, I could not say a specific one. On the one hand, there is St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, and later Joseph Ratzinger. But above all I would point to St. Josemaría Escrivá: on a different level, logically, not academic, but because of his depth and originality. If I had to name one theologian, it would be him.

MEMORIES OF THREE POPES

-When did you meet St. John Paul II?

In one of the multitudinous meetings with the clergy in the Vatican, at the beginning of his pontificate. After that I saw him on many occasions, and accompanying Bishop Javier Echevarría I had lunch with him a few times, along with three or four other people.

I also had lunch with him two other times, because of my work at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

On the first occasion, we had a meeting in the pontifical apartment in which there were, besides the Pope, the Secretary of State, the Substitute, Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect, and three consultors. After a good while of meeting, the same people went to the dining room, and during the meal each one gave his opinion, in order, on the matter under discussion. In the meantime, this time and also the second time, the Pope was essentially listening. At the beginning he said a few words of thanks for our presence, then he asked Cardinal Ratzinger to lead the meeting, and at the end he made a synthetic summary and an overall evaluation of what he had heard.

I think it was on the second occasion when, after listening and thanking him for all that had been said, he put his hand to his chest and said: "But the responsibility is mine". It was clear that this was really weighing on him.

-And Benedict XVI, when did you meet him?

I met Cardinal Ratzinger when I was appointed consultor to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1986. After that, I met with him on a few occasions, in meetings with only a few people. Many other times I went to see him for various matters.

-Do you remember any anecdotes from those meetings?

One detail I always noticed in him: he listened a lot, and he was never the one to end the interviews.

I remember several anecdotes. For example, when the famous affair Lefebvre, I was at the talks with the French bishop, if I remember correctly, in 1988. A meeting was attended by Cardinal Prefect Ratzinger, the Secretary of the Congregation, Lefebvre himself with two counselors, and one or two other consultors from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Lefebvre had accepted, but then backed out. When I was alone with Ratzinger for a moment, he said with regret: "How can they not realize that without the Pope they are nothing!

As Pope, I was able to greet him several times, but not really have a conversation. After his resignation I saw him on two occasions, accompanying Bishop Echevarría to the place where he now lives: I noticed him very affectionate, old but with a fully lucid mind.

-Since you mentioned the problem of the Lefebvrians, do you see a way out of it?

I have had no contact since the last theological meetings with them a short time ago, but from the news it looks like it might be close to being settled.

-When did you meet Pope Francis?

I met him in Argentina, when he was Auxiliary Bishop of Buenos Aires. I was accompanying Bishop Javier Echevarría. I met him again in 2003, when he was already Cardinal Archbishop. He gave the impression of being a serious, kind person, close to the concerns of the people. Then his face changed: now we see him with that continuous smile.

As Pope I have seen him several times. Yesterday I received a letter from him. I had sent him a letter thanking him for his appointment, for the promptness with which he carried it out and for the gift of an image of Our Lady that he sent me that day. And he answered me with a very nice letter in which, among other things, he asked me to pray for him, as he always does.

PRIORITIES      

-On his first day as Prelate, he referred to three current priorities of Opus Dei: youth, family and people in need. Let's start with youth.

Opus Dei's work with young people shows how today's youth-at least a good part of them-respond generously to great ideals, for example when it comes to getting involved in activities of service to the most disadvantaged.

At the same time, a lack of hope is perceived in many, due to the absence of job offers, family problems, a consumerist mentality or various addictions that obscure those great ideals.

It is necessary to encourage young people to ask themselves profound questions that, in reality, can only find full answers in the Gospel. One challenge, therefore, is to bring them closer to the Gospel, to Jesus Christ, to help them discover his attractiveness. There they will find reasons to be proud to be Christians, to live their faith with joy and to serve others.

The challenge is to listen to them more, to understand them better. Parents, grandparents and educators play a major role in this. It is important to have time for young people, to be on their side. Give them affection, be patient, offer them company and know how to set them demanding challenges.

- In your opinion, what is the priority for the family?

To develop what Pope Francis has called "the heart" of Amoris LaetitiaThe apostolic exhortation, chapters 4 and 5 of the apostolic exhortation, on the foundations and growth in love.

In our days it is necessary to rediscover the value of commitment in marriage. It might seem more attractive to live apart from any kind of bond, but such an attitude often ends in loneliness or emptiness. Instead, to commit oneself is to use one's freedom in favor of a valuable and far-reaching endeavor.

Moreover, for Christians, the sacrament of marriage gives the necessary grace to make fruitful this commitment, which is not just a matter of two, because God is in the middle. Therefore, it is important to help rediscover the sacramentality of married love, especially in the period of preparation for marriage.

-During your pastoral trips with Bishop Echevarría, you have seen many initiatives in favor of disadvantaged people. Have you seen this need first hand?

Poverty in the world is impressive. There are countries that have, on the one hand, people of the highest level, scientists, etc., but also tremendous misery, which coexist together in large cities. In other places, you find a city that looks like Madrid or London and, a few kilometers away, with shantytowns of impressive material misery, which form a whole string of shantytowns around the city. The world is different from one place to another. But what impresses everywhere is the need to serve others, to make the Social Doctrine of the Church a reality.

- In what sense are people in need a priority for the Church and, as such, for Opus Dei?

They are a priority because they are at the heart of the Gospel and because they are loved in a special way by Jesus Christ.

In Opus Dei there is a first, more institutional aspect: the initiatives that people of the Prelature promote with other people to alleviate concrete needs of the time and place in which they live, and to which the Work provides spiritual assistance. Some concrete and recent cases are, for example, Lagoonin Madrid, a health initiative to assist people in need of care. palliative care; Los Pinosan educational center located in a marginalized area of Montevideo, which promotes the social development of young people; and the Iwollo Health Clinica medical dispensary that provides free care to hundreds of people in rural areas of Nigeria. These and many other similar works should continue and grow because the heart of Christ leads to that.

The other, more profound aspect is to help each member of the Prelature and each person who approaches its apostolates to discover that their Christian life is inseparable from helping those most in need. If we look around us, in our place of work, in the family, we will find so many occasions: the elderly living in solitude, families experiencing economic difficulties, the poor, the long-term unemployed, the sick in body and soul, refugees... St. Josemaría was committed to caring for the sick, because he saw in them the suffering flesh of Christ the Redeemer. That is why he used to refer to them as "a treasure. These are dramas that we encounter in ordinary life. As Mother Teresa of Calcutta, now a saint, used to say, "you don't have to go to India to care for and give love to others: you can do it in the very street where you live".

- In today's society, evangelization poses new challenges, and the Pope reminds us that the Church is always "going forth. How does Opus Dei participate in this invitation?

The Pope calls for a new evangelizing stage, characterized by the joy of those who, having encountered Jesus Christ, set out to share this gift among their peers.

Only those who have a personal experience of Jesus Christ can give true joy. If a Christian dedicates time to his personal contact with Jesus, he will be able to give witness of faith in the midst of ordinary activities, and help to discover there the joy of living the Christian message: the worker with the worker, the artist with the artist, the university student with the university student....

The people of Opus Dei-with all our defects-wish to contribute to the edification of the Church from our own workplace, in our own family... striving to sanctify ordinary life. Often these will be professional and social environments that have not yet experienced the joy of God's love and which, in this sense, are also peripheries which must be reached, one to one, person to person, as equals.

-A widespread concern in the Church is vocations. What advice would you give, based on the experience of Opus Dei?

In Opus Dei we experience the same difficulties as everyone in the Church, and we ask our Lord, who is the "Lord of the harvest," to send "workers into his harvest. Perhaps a special challenge is to encourage generosity among young people, helping them to understand that giving oneself to God is not just a renunciation but a gift, a gift that is received and that makes one happy.

What is the solution? What the founder of Opus Dei used to say comes to mind: "If we want to be more, let us be better. Vitality in the Church does not depend so much on organizational formulas, new or old, but on a total openness to the Gospel, which leads to a change of life. Both Benedict XVI and Pope Francis have reminded us that it is above all the saints who make the Church. Therefore, do we want more vocations for the whole Church? Let us strive more to correspond personally to the grace of God, who sanctifies.

-Since your election, you have frequently asked for prayers for the Church and for the Pope. How do you foster this unity with the Holy Father in the lives of ordinary people?

He asks me for advice. All those who have personally greeted Pope Francis, and since 2013 there must have been thousands, have heard this request: "Pray for me.". This is not a cliché. I hope that every day in the life of a Catholic there is always a small gesture for the Holy Father, who carries a lot of weight on his shoulders: reciting a simple prayer, making a small sacrifice, etc. It is not a matter of looking for difficult things, but something concrete, daily. I also encourage parents to invite their children, from an early age, to say a short prayer for the Pope.

Trump's decisions, a challenge

March 1, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

Responding effectively to President Donald Trump's decisions is proving challenging for the U.S. bishops. His daily tweets, executive orders, calls to foreign leaders, and the chaos of his own staff offer convulsion and change.

The past few weeks have seen an extraordinary series of statements from bishops heading committees in the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, as well as from its president, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston, and vice president, Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles.

The bishops have expressed support for positions of the Trump Administration that align with Catholic teaching, and have criticized those they consider incompatible.

For example, the bishops applauded Trump's Jan. 23 decision that the U.S. government will not fund organizations that promote or perform abortions overseas. It thus returns to the path of President Ronald Reagan, known as the "Mexico City policy".

The bishops have also urged progress on peace between Israelis and Palestinians and the establishment of conscientious objections for health care providers. They have also launched a campaign calling on U.S. Catholics to pressure politicians to support religious freedom. Many Catholic organizations are still embroiled in a legal battle over Obama-era government regulations that would force them to pay for contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.

Bishop Joe Vasquez has taken the lead in sharply criticizing Trump's decisions to build a longer wall between Mexico and the United States; his temporary refusal to admit more refugees; and the ban on citizens of seven predominantly Muslim nations from traveling to the country.

On refugees and the travel ban, the U.S. bishops have expressed solidarity with refugees from the Middle East: "The Church will not waver in her defense of our sisters and brothers of all faiths who suffer at the hands of ruthless persecutors." In addition, "welcoming the stranger and those on the run is Christianity itself.".

The U.S. bishops have later applauded court decisions that have temporarily suspended the refugee decisions and the travel ban.

The authorGreg Erlandson

Journalist, author and editor. Director of Catholic News Service (CNS)

Who takes care of the family?

The family must be recognized as a public good that we must take care of together: public administrations, companies, entities. The Church cannot be alone in this task. 

March 1, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

In July 2015, the Pope stated in Ecuador that. "the family is the closest hospital, the first school for children, the essential reference group for young people, the best asylum for the elderly".. The family takes care of everyone, but who takes care of the family? Who takes care of its real needs so that it can continue to perform its functions?

There are many challenges facing society with regard to the family: helping young people to create stable family bonds; helping parents who have been "exiled" from the home to resume the task of educating their children; supporting families in times of difficulty; restoring hope to broken families.

It is necessary to regain confidence in the devalued family institution. In order to face the current situation, it is necessary to undertake organic and organized action to support all families, especially those in difficulty.

The protection of family stability, the care and promotion of children, the visibility of the social contribution of the family and respect for the parental role are some of the key issues. Today, more than ever, the family needs to be itself and it is essential that the different agents -public administration, companies, entities and society as a whole- create the conditions that favor its mission of welcoming, caring for and educating the new generations. This is possibly one of the most urgent challenges at a time when no one doubts that the sustainability of our society relies to a large extent on the family.

The Church should not try to confront the problems of the family alone, but should use her moral authority to put the whole of society, beginning with the public authorities, to work in favor of the institution of the family. The family must be recognized as a public good to be cared for by all of us. No one is exempt from protecting the family from their own sphere of responsibility: the Church, the public administration, the business world, schools, universities, etc. Let us all take care of the family, too many things depend on it.

The authorMontserrat Gas Aixendri

Professor at the Faculty of Law of the International University of Catalonia and director of the Institute for Advanced Family Studies. She directs the Chair on Intergenerational Solidarity in the Family (IsFamily Santander Chair) and the Childcare and Family Policies Chair of the Joaquim Molins Figueras Foundation. She is also Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Law at UIC Barcelona.

Read more
Culture

Juan González de la Higuera. To be born again

Juan has lived twelve years of begging and knows what it is like to be "invisible" to society. His life has been full of obstacles, but he has managed to get by as best he could. Although he has been helped, his willpower has been the main reason he has been able to get out of the pit.

Jaime Sánchez Moreno-February 24, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

The eldest of eight children, in his childhood he had to take care of his siblings, exercising the responsibility of his parents, since his mother worked a lot and his father often ended up in the hospital and physically and psychologically abused his mother and children. He, who was a police lieutenant and had contacts in the military world, tried to find a way for Juan to work in the Army and live at home. However, Juan was fortunate that the Parachute Brigade was looking for a volunteer. That offer was the door to escape the hostile environment in which he was living. Finally, he was accepted and left home, which is what he wanted after the hardships he had endured there.

He shows me a picture of the coat of arms of the Parachute Brigade with the motto "triumph or die". In the picture, next to the shield, you can see a notebook where a story of his is written. Because writing and telling stories, something he was already doing at the age of 14, has always been his passion.

During his long career in the military, he traveled to places like Corsica, Djibouti, Kenya, Western Sahara and Brazil. When he returned to Spain, instead of going back to Madrid, he decided to go to Barcelona, because he did not want to see his family, nor did they want to see him. In Barcelona he rented an apartment and wandered around until he had little money left. Then he returned to the capital, where he worked as a waiter and met his wife. He says she was complicated, but also recognizes that he was impatient. They lived in constant tension. "One day, my son, at the age of 9, caught me wrong."says Juan. So he decided to leave home. He was so depressed that he was left out of the game. And, at first, he didn't know of any soup kitchens or other places where he could be taken in.

He says that his military experience helped him through the hell of begging for twelve years. The psychological training he received in the combat centers through which he passed prepared him for any adversity, as he "you have to keep in mind that on a day-to-day basis you are risking your life".he says. He adds that "there is no soldier in special forces who is aware that tomorrow he or she is still going to live". He also believes that the fact that he has not fallen into alcoholism or drug addiction is due to the training he received as a soldier and his lucidity.

During his life on the street, he was cared for by RAIS FoundationAmong other services, such as helping him with his minimum income, he was provided with psychologists and psychiatrists who were surprised by his good health, despite the fact that he was on the street. "When you fall to the bottom of the well, you stop suffering, because nothing that happens to you hurts you. You can't feel anymore. You know it's going to cost you a hundred times more to come up than it took you to go down. Once you get out of the pit you have to know how to support yourself. To your family and friends you've always been in the well. And in any argument you have with them, your controversies come up, reminding you of your past shortcomings."he explains.  "The 80 % of people who come out of the well do so because of the people who help them. I didn't want anything, I lived well as I lived. They gave me snacks and clothes, and I was content with that. I didn't want to face a normal life, because I had lost my family, everything. But, I saw the enthusiasm of the people who were by my side to help me get out, and I did it.". And he adds that "From there, I started to take several courses, such as computer science or radio announcing. Besides, I have a very good memory"..

A friend of his was receiving help from Bokatasan NGO that distributes sandwiches to beggars. He proposed to Juan to go to a Christmas dinner organized by this association. Juan accepted, and in this way he got to know Bokatas. When this NGO opened the Tandem CenterHe began to collaborate there. He feels a lot of satisfaction because he fights so that other people living on the street can get out of their difficult situation.

He often gives talks in schools to explain what homeless people are like and the problems they have. He shows me a photo in which all the children are looking at him as he speaks, none of them distracted. He admits that people who listen to him tell him that he has an excellent rhetoric and that he is a committed man when it comes to helping others.

The authorJaime Sánchez Moreno

Spain

Manos Unidas campaign: the problem of hunger, a scandalous paradox

Omnes-February 15, 2017-Reading time: 4 minutes

On February 9, the new Manos Unidas 2017 Campaign against hunger in the world will be launched throughout Spain under the slogan: "The world does not need more food. It needs more committed people".

Clara Pardo. President of Manos Unidas

FAO claims that enough food is produced to feed almost twice the world's population. However, some 800 million people still go hungry today and their fundamental right to safe, sufficient and nutritious food is not truly recognized. We are facing the "paradox of abundance," as St. John Paul II said: there is food for everyone, but not everyone has access to it. Pope Francis defines the situation as a "grave scandal". In fact, every year hunger kills more people than AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis combined.

That is why on Thursday, February 9, the Campaign against Hunger in the World 2017 promoted by Manos Unidas will be launched throughout Spain with the slogan: "The world doesn't need more food. It needs more committed people." and within the overall framework of the "Manos Unidas Triennial Campaign Against Hunger 2016-2018".. The following day, the Voluntary Fasting Day. And on Sunday, February 12, a collection will take place in all parishes for Manos Unidas, a non-governmental organization for development, of volunteers, Catholic and lay, and Association of the faithful of the Catholic Church in Spain to help disadvantaged peoples.

Throughout the rest of February in the 71 diocesan delegations there will be events, conferences and testimonies of missionaries, lay people and specialists to sensitize society to the scandal/paradox of hunger and the need for committed, generous and supportive people.

The Campaign Against Hunger has been celebrated for almost 60 years, when a group of Catholic Action women in Spain took up the declaration of "war against hunger in the world" and launched the first Campaign in tune with the manifesto of the World Organization of Catholic Women's Organizations (WUCWO). But despite the efforts made, hunger remains a complex and pressing problem. Manos Unidas approaches it from a concrete reflection and in the ethical-legal framework shared with relevant institutions such as FAO, because in reality hunger escapes a mere statistical reflection and becomes a call to universal awareness in the face of a human problem that should be a matter of urgency for everyone.

The geography of hunger points primarily to developing countries, where nearly 13% of the population is undernourished. Two-thirds of all hungry people are in Asia. However, sub-Saharan Africa is the region of the world with the highest percentage of hungry people: one in four people is undernourished and this is the cause of 45 % of deaths of children under five years of age - more than three million each year. One in four children in the world is stunted; this figure rises to one in three in developing countries. In these countries, 66 million children go to school hungry. These are unacceptable figures that cry out for a firm and decisive commitment.

The reduction of food to "commodities", a production system that privileges economic profit over people and their right to food, and the problem of food loss and waste are some of the fundamental causes of hunger. Causes that are linked to individualistic lifestyles, focused on consumption and inadequate commercial and distribution systems.

It is in the developed world and in households that the scandalous volume of waste is produced. In Spain, of the 8 million tons wasted annually, more than 60 % comes from the domestic sphere (63 kg per person per year!). Hunger is a real fact, an ethical-social problem that needs the commitment of all: States, Administrations and citizens, with solidarity, without selfishness.

Manos Unidas bases its action on the Gospel, the Social Doctrine of the Church and the directives of the Popes. And it bases its fight against hunger and the causes that provoke it, aware that they are multi-causal, from the analysis of the unsustainability of the current model, expressing the urgency of a global model of sustainable agricultural production and consumption, outside the networks of speculation, but open to fair trade. In addition, an agricultural production that respects the environment and guarantees local consumption. And an integrated use of agricultural production that minimizes food losses, especially in developing countries, particularly at harvest, storage and transport, and controls food waste, particularly in developed countries, by improving distribution, labeling and consumption patterns.

To combat the hunger that condemns the present and future lives of millions of people, in 2015, Manos Unidas materialized 595 new projects worth 38,903,487 euros which, when added to those initiated in previous years, give a total of total of 938 projects in progress at 58 countries in Africa, Asia and the Americasof which the following benefit more than two million people. The most supported sector was the educational with 219 projects, followed by social promotion (104), health (103), promotion of women (85) y agricultural (84).

And in order to continue this battle, Manos Unidas appeals, from these lines, to the commitment of Spanish society, because "The world does not need more food. It needs more committed people".

 

Cinema

Cinema: "Loving", love in marriage

Omnes-February 13, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

"Loving", love in marriage.
Director: Jeff Nichols
Script: Jeff Nichols
Year: 2016
Country: United States

Text - Jairo D. Velásquez

Against injustice, sow peace with love, especially if it is in marriage. A simple and to the point message that raises and maintains until the end this wonderful film. Loving is the latest film by Jeff Nichols (Mud), who tries to find a different way to explain the struggle for civil rights in the United States. It is far from the crudeness of Selma or Malcom X, it does not have the humor of Crossed Stories, nor the historical ambition of The Butler. It is a story that concentrates its strength in the simplicity and depth of the relationship of its two main characters. A gem.

The story takes us to the late 1950s. It begins unpretentiously with a conversation between Mildred (Ruth Negga), a mild-tempered African-American woman of unshakable convictions, and Richard (Joel Edgerton), a simple man whose only illusion is to make his beloved happy.

It seems like an ordinary love story. The changes come when the other space-time coordinate is added. These two wonderful characters fall in love, get married and live in the state of Virginia, USA. And that's the problem: there, at the time the film is set, it was illegal for two people of different races to marry; and if they had children, the authorities had no problem considering them bastards.

After the peace of the first meeting, the road is full of thorns. The spouses will overcome them with a single truth: the only thing that matters is to be together. With this maxim, they will build their family, overcome exile, endure the stress of persecution, confront the system and try to overcome it.

Not to say that everything is perfect, the story presents problems in its time jumps: there are events in the lives of the characters that remain unexplained. And there are characters that disappear without explanation. I still don't understand, for example, the importance given to the cars in the story. However, despite these minor shortcomings, the film that is set to get attention this awards season. It is sure to be a headliner at the next Oscars.

In an era of invasive and dictatorial cultural agendas, Loving has a clear intention. In the midst of celebrating the life and work of Martin Luther King and bidding farewell to the presidency of Barack Obama, it makes it clear that in the face of injustice and discrimination the answer is always in love. A piece that cannot be missing in your film library.

Dossier

Black history of medicine, José Alberto Palma

Omnes-February 13, 2017-Reading time: < 1 minute

Black history of medicine
José Alberto Palma
206 pages
Ciudadela Books. Madrid, 2016

Text - Antonio Jiménez

Dr. Palma introduces us to the great myths and dark, gruesome and erroneous legends of past medicine, such as drowning to make mental illnesses disappear or the bloodletting, enemas and trepanations that carried away, for example, René Descartes or George Washington.

This long list of erroneous therapeutic practices formed the basic medical manual of the pre-modern physician. Today we consider them, if not a crime, at least great follies. Several of these practices even reached the middle of the 20th century. Others, less known, can surprise us in an unimaginable way, such as the "suspension cure" or the "cure with magnets".

Historia negra de la medicina is, without a doubt, a surprising book in each of its pages, firstly because of the easy comprehension of what the author exposes; secondly because of the interest it awakens due to the concrete and real examples; and thirdly because of its mixture of divulgation and investigation. A work that should not be missing in the libraries of any person who is curious and eager to learn about history from the point of view of medicine and health.

Father S.O.S

Food and cancer

There is a close relationship between cancer and diet: it is estimated that around 35 % of tumors are related to dietary factors. They would be avoidable if a proper diet were followed.

Pilar Riobó-February 9, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

In general, vegetable products reduce the risk of cancer, since they contain substances with antioxidant effects that prevent carcinomas. It is not a matter of excluding all meat intake, but of making room for a greater quantity and variety of vegetable foods. Vegetables reduce the risk of cancers of the mouth and pharynx, esophagus, lung, stomach, colon and rectum, larynx, pancreas, liver, ovary and endometrium. Fruits, on the other hand, minimize the risk of mouth and pharynx, esophagus, lung and stomach cancers. Consequently, it is recommended to consume at least five servings of fruits and vegetables every day.

However, each type of carcinoma should be considered individually. 

First, we must mention colon and rectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of death from cancer in Spain and the first in the non-smoking population (among smokers, lung cancer is the leading cause). There are diseases that predispose to CRC, such as polyps, which can grow and become malignant, and inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Sometimes there are genetic roots: 25% of patients have an affected relative.

Foods with a high fiber content play a protective role against CRC: fiber accelerates the intestinal transit time and the exposure of the colonic mucosa to carcinogens, as well as contributing to a higher acidity in the colon. Although all vegetables are recommended, the efficacy of cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, cabbage or cauliflower stands out. Other foods with a protective effect are fish (containing omega 3), olive oil, milk (for its calcium), and those containing vitamin D, folates, flavonoids, antioxidant vitamins (A, C and E) and selenium. White meat (chicken, beef, turkey) have a neutral effect.

On the other hand, red meat (beef, veal, pork) or processed meat (cold cuts, sausages) is an increased risk. Their cooking at high temperatures leads to the formation of substances (fecapentanes, 3-ketosteroids) capable of producing mutations in the cells and, in the presence of a relative scarcity of protective substances and an adequate genetic basis, of favoring the malignant transformation of polyps. More generally, they are also associated with overall mortality of non-cancerous origin. Nitrites contained in smoked foods and processed and salted meat products are also implicated in CRC. 

Lifestyle conditions the appearance and development of the various carcinomas. There are three determining factors. Tobacco increases the risk of CRC, even with reduced consumption, and has a direct relationship with other cancers such as lung, larynx and bladder cancers. Alcohol (in any amount) is another risk factor. Finally, physical exercise represents an ideal preventive measure, as well as benefiting other aspects of health.

In relation to prostate cancer, it appears that prostate cancer cells are present in this organ in almost all men over 50 years of age. Fortunately, they only progress to clinical disease in some cases, possibly depending on environmental and dietary factors. Soy intake, omega-3 fat and tomatoes, thanks to their lycopene content, a powerful antioxidant, reduce the risk. On the other hand, calcium intake increases the risk (it is four times higher in men who consume 2,000 mg of calcium per day compared to those who consume only 500 mg per day, equivalent to two glasses of milk).

Pancreatic cancer has been associated with high glycemic index diets, that is, diets very rich in sugars or rapidly absorbed starches (excess potatoes, rice, bread). And breast cancer tends to respond more to genetic and hormonal factors, although it has a positive association with alcohol consumption, obesity and lack of physical exercise.

In summary, from a nutritional point of view, to prevent cancer, it is advisable to avoid excess calories and to reduce certain forms of cooking such as barbecue, smoked, salted foods, etc. On the other hand, fiber, vitamins and certain minerals and antioxidant substances have a protective effect against tumors.

The authorPilar Riobó

Medical specialist in Endocrinology and Nutrition.

TribuneMsgr. Brian Farrell

The meaning of Lund, five hundred years after the Reformation

The joint commemoration of the Reformation anniversary in Lund (October 2016) marks a point of arrival and departure in ecumenical relations of mutual trust and fraternity between Catholics and Lutherans.

February 8, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity focused on the 500th anniversary of the Reformation. It highlighted the theological and ecclesial heritage of the historical experience of the Reformation in its country of origin and, at the same time, the good relations between Catholics and Lutherans today, fifty years after the beginning of ecumenical dialogue. The most accredited expression of the new climate took place last October 31 in the city of Lund, Sweden, during the ecumenical meeting between Pope Francis and the President of the Lutheran World Federation, Bishop Younan.

How was it possible, after centuries of contention between Catholics and Protestants, that representatives of both Churches together gave thanks to God for "the spiritual and theological gifts received by the Reformation," deploring the fact that Lutherans and Catholics had wounded the visible unity of the Church? Perhaps the phrase that explains it best is found in the Joint Declaration: "While the past cannot be changed, memory and the way of remembering can be transformed". This is that indispensable process of ecumenical dialogue called "purification of memory" or the search for a new way of understanding the discord that caused the separation.

The Second Vatican Council, by recognizing that divisions have occurred "sometimes not without responsibility on both sides," and that "those who are now born and nourished by the faith of Jesus Christ within these communities cannot be held responsible for the sin of separation" (Unitatis Redintegratio, 3), inaugurated the path of this profound purification of memory. A dispassionate look at the disputes of the sixteenth century revealed the true intentions of the Reformers and their opponents. When Luther published his theses against indulgences, he was an Augustinian monk with an intense spiritual life, though scrupulous and even tormented, certainly scandalized by how the salvation of souls was almost subordinated to a kind of commerce administered by churchmen. It was to be expected that his criticism would arouse a strong reaction. What could not have been foreseen was the religious, social and political revolt that followed and the division of the Church itself.

More than four centuries of conflict and mistrust can only be overcome by a profound conversion that will enable the Churches to distance themselves from errors and exaggerations. St. John Paul II suggested: "Only by adopting, without reservation, an attitude of purification through truth, can we find a common interpretation of the past and reach a new starting point for today's dialogue" (Message to Cardinal Willebrands, October 31, 1983).

Consequently, the ecumenical path requires a better understanding of the historical truth of events, a shared interpretation of what is right and wrong in persons and events and, on this basis, the willingness to move in a new direction. Such has been the path followed by Catholic-Lutheran dialogue over the past five decades, the results of which are recorded in the document "From Conflict to Communion" (2013) by the International Commission for Catholic-Lutheran Dialogue.

The historiography of the last century has led to a less polemical judgment of the figure of Luther and has contributed to the creation of a new climate of mutual understanding. This revision of the figure and work of Luther has been echoed in pronouncements of recent Popes, beginning with Paul VI. For example, in an interview on June 26, 2016, Pope Francesco said, "I believe that Martin Luther's intentions were not wrong: he was a reformer... The Church of the time was not exactly a model to imitate; there was corruption, worldliness, attachment to money and power. That is why he protested.

The Lund event has brought the ecumenical world to a clear awareness that the way in which the past influences the present can be changed. "The key is not to tell a different story, but to tell that story differently" (From Conflict to Communion, 16). And ecumenism "lived", and not only thought and discussed, is bearing positive fruits, which are a promise and a solid hope for the road still to be traveled.

In harmony with the recent Year of Mercy, the common commemoration of the Reformation in Lund emphasized how, in a society dominated by economics and efficiency, there is an urgent need to make the transcendence of the question of God understood. And the meaning of Lund is also this: that Christians, although still divided, can no longer remain incommunicado or in conflict when it comes to witnessing to the faith. The Pope recently emphasized this to the Council for Promoting Christian Unity: "My recent visit to Lund reminded me of the timeliness of that ecumenical principle formulated there by the Ecumenical Council of Churches in 1952, which recommends that Christians 'do all things together, except in those cases where the profound difficulties of their convictions require them to act separately' ".

The authorMsgr. Brian Farrell

Secretary of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity

Spain

"The Pope asks us to live our religious vocation with depth and joy."

February 2 marks the celebration of the Day of Consecrated Life. Palabra talked about religious life with María del Rosario Ríos, the first woman president of the Spanish Confederation of Religious (CONFER).

Enrique Carlier-January 31, 2017-Reading time: 6 minutes

 María del Rosario Ríos, superior of the Company of Mary since 2010, was until recently the vice president of CONFER. In April last year she became interim president when the previous president, Luis Angel de las Heras, was appointed bishop of Mondoñedo-Ferrol. Then, in November, the General Assembly of CONFER elected her as president for the next four years.

Mariña (as she is familiarly known) was born in A Coruña in 1960. She has a degree in Psychology from the University of Santiago and a Bachelor's degree in Theology from the University of Comillas. She has worked among young people in colleges and university residences, as a teacher of novices and in various government services.

On his return from La Rioja and hours before catching the plane to Rome, he makes time to meet the readers of Palabra.

Maria del Rosario, how will you experience this year's World Day for Consecrated Life? 

I would emphasize the accent suggested by the chosen slogan:"Witnesses of hope and joy."which evokes the words of Pope Francis to the Church and to the Consecrated Life.

It evokes the Apostolic Letter Witnesses of joywhich the Pope addressed to us consecrated men and women during the Year of Consecrated Life. In that letter he encourages us to be witnesses of hope and to spread hope to all in the midst of the difficulties of our time and also of the difficulties in our own religious life.

I would also emphasize the same sense that the celebration of the Day has, not only for consecrated life, but for all the People of God. What is intended is to give thanks, to witness, to renew the religious charism and to deepen what it is. These days help the People of God to experience consecrated life as what it is: a gift in the Church.

How have the different ecclesial institutions, and also the institutes integrated in CONFER, received the fact that the president is a woman?

In CONFER it has been positively received, as something normal and as a service.

In religious institutions we already live the reality that men and women carry out services of government or formation at different levels: local, provincial, general. For this reason, it has been experienced as something normal, positive and as one of the various contributions of women to the Church.

Pope Francis invites women to contribute also from places where sometimes we have not contributed so much, because of the same trajectory of the Church or because, for various reasons, we have not dared to do so.

With regard to other areas of the Church, I have also felt positively welcomed.

I would add that there is a danger, when it is news, of insisting too much on the fact of being a woman. It is true that this is the first time that a woman president has been elected, but we have to enter into evangelical categories, even if we also have to fill positions.

These appointments can be an expressive sign of the contribution of women to the Church, but the contribution of women is not limited to that. We do not have to stop there, because in the end the important thing is to carry out a service to the Church, from the task of government and also from other tasks that are equally service.

Has anything surprised you during your time at the head of CONFER? How do you see the current situation of religious life in Spain?

The Spanish Confederation of Religious has a total of 408 religious congregations. Of these, 301 are female and 107 are male, with a total of some 42,000 members (with the same ratio of 3 to 1 between women and men as between the number of female and male congregations). And a total of more than 5,400 communities. Contemplative religious communities are generally not included.

The presidency of CONFER allows me to see the great richness of religious life in Spain and the plurality of its charisms. It is a very lively reality, very active, very creative, very busy and concerned about evangelization.

It has allowed me to discover many things that sometimes in day-to-day life can go unnoticed.

How do you deal with the aging of some religious institutes?

It is true that the average age of religious in Spain is higher than in other countries, as is also the case in Spanish society as a whole. But this does not detract from their vitality. We find in our religious institutes people who in civil society would be retired and in religious life are very active and committed people. God works wonders with these people. Perhaps they do not appear in the newspapers, but that is not what we want either, but to be faithful to Jesus.

There are several lines of action. One is to form and train ourselves to accompany this important stage of life and vocation in old age; also the local superiors and those responsible for communities.

It is true that life expectancy has increased. On the other hand, aging in some congregations-not in all of them, but it is true that the average age is higher than in other times-is leading us to look creatively at how to maintain service to the mission in another way.

Forty years ago a seventy-year-old religious was an old man. Today he is not. He may not be able to continue as a teacher in a religious school, but he can continue to be active as a reference in this apostolic work or continue to accompany young people.

I would say that we are facing it with realism and hope, because in the end - and here the Pope has made an important call to us - our trust is not in numbers, figures or youth, but in the Lord, who can do great things with what we are. If what is evangelical at times is the small and the weak, a high average age can also be evangelical.

We face it with a look, at the same time, believing and grateful. Because the elders have accumulated wisdom and experience and are a testimony of fidelity to the Lord.

Can reducing the workload by reducing the number of provinces of an Institute also be a line of action?

The grouping of provinces, which implies reducing operating structures, is not so much to reduce the mission, but just the opposite, to strengthen the mission.

I am thinking, for example, of my congregation, the Company of Mary. We did a reduction of provinces more than twelve years ago. We went from five provinces to one, but not so much to reduce the mission as to have more people active in the mission and less in the provincial structures. Many of these measures are taken to adjust the organization to reality and to be able to continue to strengthen the mission.

Another thing is that it is necessary to make discernment on certain presences, whether or not there is a reduction of provinces, because of the reality itself or because of the demands of reality. It is hard to say that today this work is either transformed or our health, educational or pastoral presence would have to be different in order to respond better to the reality.

What are the points on which Pope Francis insists the most for religious?

In the first place, we religious feel challenged by what the Pope says to the whole Church, not only to us. But, in addition, it is true that when he addresses the religious, some constants are observed, which seem to me to be in line with the idea that we should live our religious vocation with depth and joy. He calls us to be experts in communion and witnesses of hope, of joy and, in short, of the Lord. And to be part of that Church in going out, from our own vocation. It seems to me that this is the key to what the Pope is asking of us.

Another of his insistence is that we should not put ourselves at the center, not even our difficulties, but that the center should be the Lord and others.

I believe, moreover, that these calls are significant because the Pope speaks to us knowing religious life from the inside. His words are accurate, for example, when he insists on fraternity and communion, not only among religious. These are not theories, but the insistence of one who loves religious life well and knows it from the inside with all its riches and difficulties.

A few years ago there was talk of increasing the length of the novitiate for better vocational discernment. Is there any news about this?

In fact, some Congregations that had one year of novitiate have extended it to two. Other orders or institutes already had two years of novitiate. What is being done is to take great care of the pre-novitiate and discernment processes. Some Institutes, in addition, have extended the time of the postulancy, before the novitiate.

What is clear is that today formation and processes are much more personalized than they were thirty or forty years ago. The situation is different today, because society is different and the origins of vocations are different.

The idea is to ensure a good process of vocational discernment and formation that confirms the vocation to a religious institute.

The authorEnrique Carlier

Culture

Dorothy Day. The long loneliness

Last September 24 in his memorable address to the US Congress Pope Francis mentioned four times Dorothy Day (1897-1980), "daughter of this land" who "fought for justice and the cause of the oppressed with unceasing work", who "dreamed of social justice and the rights of people".

Jaime Nubiola-January 24, 2017-Reading time: 5 minutes

"In these times" -said the Pope on September 24. "in that social issues are so important, I cannot fail to name the Servant of God Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker movement. Her social activism, her passion for justice and the cause of the oppressed were inspired by the Gospel, her faith and the example of the saints."

These words of the Pope led me to read his 1952 autobiography, The long lonelinessthe magnificent biography of Jim Forest All is Grace: A Biography of Dorothy Day (Orbis, 2011), and several of his writings, among them the recent translation of My conversion. From Union Square to Rome, 1938. It seems to me that, in this age of secularization, Dorothy Day is a fascinating character because of her intimate union with God and her commitment to those most in need. Day's life reveals a deep mystical experience that led her to conversion, to the highest levels of spirituality, and to discover the face of Jesus Christ in those most in need.

He writes, for example, in a passage of The long loneliness: "If you lack time, sow time and you will reap time. Go to church and spend an hour in quiet prayer. You will have more time than ever and you will get your work done. Sow time with the poor. Sit and listen to them, waste your time with them. You will receive a hundredfold of that time. Sow kindness and you will reap kindness. Sow love and you will reap love. And, once again, he would say with St. John of the Cross: 'Where there is no love, put love and you will get love.'" (p. 268) What practical wisdom is contained in these brief lines!

A significant biography
Dorothy Day was born in 1897 in Brooklyn, New York, the daughter of a sports journalist. With her family she moved to San Francisco and then to Chicago; from her early years she worked taking care of her siblings and in multiple jobs outside the home. She studied on scholarship at the University of Illinois and after two years she dropped out. He moved to New York where he led a bohemian life and developed his social activism in contact with anarchist groups: "I oscillated between loyalty to socialism, syndicalism and anarchism. When I was reading Tolstoy I was an anarchist; Ferrer with his schools, Kropotkin with his agrarian communes, the men of Industrial Workers of the World with their solidarity and their unions: all of them attracted me." (p. 71). In his obituary published in the magazine Time in 1980, it was recalled that to her admirers, such as historian David J. O'Brien, Dorothy Day had been "the most significant, interesting and influential person in American Catholicism." And it was so, because in the movement of the Catholic Worker combined her zeal for reforming society as a whole with her practical concern for helping individual poor people. She was arrested a dozen times, the first as a suffragist in 1917, the last on the occasion of a demonstration in California in 1973, and took part in many, many labor and anti-war protests.

Benedict XVI said of her on February 13, 2013: "In her autobiography, she openly confesses to having fallen into the temptation to solve everything with politics, adhering to the Marxist proposal: 'I wanted to go with the demonstrators, go to prison, write, influence others and leave my dream to the world. How much ambition and how much search for myself there was in all this!'. The path to faith in such a secularized environment was particularly difficult, but Grace acts just the same, as she herself stressed: 'It is true that I felt more often the need to go to church, to kneel, to bow my head in prayer. A blind instinct, one might say, because I was not conscious of praying. But I would go, I would get into the atmosphere of prayer...'. God led her to a conscious adherence to the Church, to a life dedicated to the disinherited.".

Following the birth of her daughter, she converted to Catholicism in December 1927. She leaves her partner, the anarchist Forster Batterham, who did not want to marry, and concentrates on the child's education. She went to Mexico to get away from Forster, but when her daughter fell ill with malaria, she returned to New York. In 1933 she meets the radical Catholic Peter Maurin, with whom she founds the newspaper Catholic Worker which would henceforth be the dynamic axis of his life, together with the centers for the poor in cities and rural farms. The newspaper was widely distributed for decades. There are now more than 200 Catholic Worker in the United States and another 30 in various countries.

Newsroom
The Spanish reader is struck by Day's admiration for Ferrer Guardia, the anarchist founder of the Modern School, condemned and executed in 1909 for his alleged participation in the Tragic Week of Barcelona. It is surprising that Ferrer's pedagogical ideals had a notable impact in the United States, although some of his texts are crudely anti-religious. "Where were they?" -Dorothy Day writes in her autobiography (p. 162). "the priests who should have gone out in search of men like the Spanish anarchist Francesc Ferrer i Guardia, acting with them as the Good Shepherd had acted with the lost sheep, leaving the ninety-nine - the good parishioners - to go in search of the one that was lost, to heal the one that was wounded? No wonder that in my mind and in my heart there was a very acute conflict.". Also noteworthy is his active pacifism in the Catholic Worker during the Spanish Civil War in the face of the support of the American Church for the national side as a result of the martyrdom of so many priests and nuns and in the face of the support of the official authorities for the Republican side.

In this Year of Mercy, the figure and thought of Dorothy Day take on new relevance, even with some controversy: "Among the works of mercy are: teaching the unlearned, rebuking the sinner, comforting the afflicted, and patiently bearing with the unjust; to these we have always added: picketing and distributing propaganda."he writes, for example, in his autobiography (p. 235).

It is worthwhile to close this brief review of the book with a few beautiful lines from the epilogue: "The final word is love. [We cannot love God if we do not love one another, and to love we must know one another. We know Him in the act of breaking bread, and we know one another in the act of breaking bread and we are never alone. Heaven is a banquet and life is also a banquet, even with a crust of bread, where there is community. We have all known the long loneliness and we have all learned that the only solution is love and that love comes with community."  (p. 303).


 

To learn more

mar16-culture3

The long loneliness, Dorothy Day. 312 pages. Editorial Sal Terrae, 2000.

My conversionDorothy Day. 176 pages. Ediciones Rialp, 2014.

Dorothy Day: a journalist committed to the social equity  on the road to sainthoodRome Reports (2013).

Dorothy Day, a saint of our time, Ron Rolheiser. Round City. 7-IX-2015

The strength of an angel (movie) . Original title: Entertaining Angels: The Dorothy Day Story (1996).

Read more
Culture

Robert H. Benson: "Lord of the World".

At least twice Pope Francis has mentioned the futuristic novel by Robert Hugh Benson (1871-1914) in his preaching in recent years. Lord of the worldoriginally published in 1907. The author considers it, moreover, one of the keys to the encyclical Laudato si and as a work that "gives a lot to think about".

Jaime Nubiola-January 24, 2017-Reading time: 5 minutes

From the early daysSeveral authors have detected the presence of the thought and texts of Romano Guardini (1885-1968) in the preaching of Pope Francis and, in particular, in his recent encyclical Laudato si' May 2015. It is known that already in the novitiate the young Bergoglio was a reader of The Lord of Guardini and that in 1986 he spent a year in Germany working on a doctoral project on the dynamics of disagreement and encounter in Guardini.

In a certain sense, something of that project now surfaces in this luminous encyclical when the Pope reminds us that there is a tendency to believe that "that every increase of power constitutes without more a progress, an increase of security, of utility, of well-being, of vital energy, of fullness of values", although "modern man is not prepared to use power wisely." (n. 105). The words of The decline of the modern age are cited on at least eight occasions (notes 83, 84, 85, 87, 88, 92, 144 and 154): "Each epoch tends to develop little self-awareness of its own limits. This is why it is possible that humanity today does not realize the seriousness of the challenges it faces, and 'the possibility of man's misuse of power is constantly growing' when he is not 'subject to any norm regulating freedom, but only to the supposed imperatives of utility and security'" (n. 105). And a little further on he adds: "Technique has an inclination to seek to ensure that nothing remains outside its iron logic, and 'the man who possesses technique knows that, at bottom, this is aimed neither at utility nor at well-being, but at mastery; mastery, in the most extreme sense of the word'." (n. 108). It is worth a careful reading of The decline of the modern age (1950) because it sheds much light on how to interpret the encyclical and the present time.

However, it seems to me that there is a second key to the encyclical which refers to a very different source and which has been overlooked. I am referring to the futurist novel by Robert Hugh Benson (1871-1914) Lord of the world [The Lord of the Worldoriginally published in 1907 and mentioned at least twice by Pope Francis in his preaching in recent years. The figure of Julian Felsenburgh, who in the novel becomes the effective master of the world, seems to resonate in the background of the denunciation of the abuse of technocratic power that formulates the Laudato si': "It becomes indispensable to create a normative system that includes insurmountable limits and ensures the protection of ecosystems, before the new forms of power derived from the techno-economic paradigm end up sweeping away not only politics but also freedom and justice." (n. 53).

Robert H. Benson, the youngest son of Archbishop of Canterbury Edward W. Benson (1829-1896), had been educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge. He was ordained an Anglican priest in 1895 and, after a long process of reflection and prayer - of which he gives news in Memoirs of a convert-He was received into the Catholic Church in 1903 and ordained a priest the following year. Benson had excellent literary gifts. In addition to Lord of the world (1907), published in his short life - he died at the age of 43 - fourteen other successful novels, four plays and many other religious or apologetic books.

Lord of the world gives much food for thought, as so often happens with good works of science fiction. No doubt about it, "deserves a place" -wrote Joseph Pearce. "next to Brave New World (Huxley) and 1984 (Orwell) among the classics of dystopian fiction." It is the story of how, around the year 2000, the worst nightmare -a dystopia is an anti-utopia - has taken over the world and is preparing for the final elimination of religion.


To learn more:

january16-culture2

Confessions of a convertR. H. Benson. Ed. Rialp, 1998. Personal testimony in which Benson describes the arduous path that led him to the Catholic Church.

Converted writersJoseph Pearce. Ed. Palabra, 2006. Anglo-Saxon intellectuals and artists who manifest the creative force of Christianity.

Lord of the world, R. H. Benson. Ed. Palabra, 2015. A book that gives much food for thought, as so often happens with good works of science fiction.


As explained by Jesuit Cyril Martindale, Benson's biographer, the American Felsenburgh, the main character in Lord of the world who represents the Antichrist, is not so much an incarnation of Satan, but rather the quintessence of human perfection, the peacemaking politician on a world scale who embodies Man par excellence, the Spirit of the World. In contrast, the priest Percy Franklin who represents Christianity is a modest person who, when he is elected Pope after the fall of Rome at the hands of Felsenburgh, lives in poverty and anonymity in Nazareth awaiting the terrible end. For today's reader this behavior cannot but evoke the personal style of Pope Francis.

Two quotations suffice to demonstrate the timeliness of this book. One, the argumentation of Oliver Brand, an official of the new order, to his wife Mabel, who still retains traces of religiosity: "Deep in your heart you know that euthanasia administrators are the real priests.". And this one: "'Underneath every Catholic is a murderer,' said one of the articles featured in Pueblo Nuevo". When euthanasia is administered as if it were the Anointing of the Sick or when advocates of atheism such as Sam Harris argue that a religious person is a potential terrorist, it becomes quite clear that this work written more than a hundred years ago is very much up to date.

Benson himself warned of the sensationalist nature of his novel in an introductory note. With exquisite British phlegm he points out: "I am fully aware that this is a tremendously sensationalist book, open therefore to innumerable criticisms for that reason, as well as for many others. Yet I have had no other way of expressing the principles I wished to convey (and in whose truth I passionately believe) except by carrying the argument to a sensational extreme. I have, however, endeavored not to flare up in an improper manner.". It seems to me that the Pope in the Laudato si' does the same when it warns that "the earth, our home, seems to become more and more an immense deposit of filth." (n. 21) and that we are immersing ourselves in "a spiral of self-destruction" (n. 163). Truly, it seems to me, there is a deep harmony between Pope Francis and the Lord of the world by Robert Benson.

It is a good thing that Ediciones Palabra has published a new edition of the 1988 translation by Rafael Gómez López-Egea with a beautiful illustration on the cover. The master of the world was translated into Spanish very soon by the priest Juan Mateos de Diego and published in  first published in Spain in 1909 by the Gustavo Gili publishing house in Barcelona, and would see up to six successive editions in this publishing house throughout the last century. We do not know if the young Bergoglio would read this translation or the one made by the polemic Leonardo Castellani in Argentina (Itinerarium, 1958). In recent years other translations into Spanish have seen the light of day: that of Miguel Martínez-Lage (Homo Legens, 2006), and those of San Román (2011) and Stella Maris (2015). Castellani's has also been republished with a preface by Ralph McInerny and an introduction by C. John McCloskey, III (Cristiandad, 2013).

The Vatican

Card. Filoni: "There is a need for a Church open to all the peoples of the earth".

On January 22 was celebrated the Day of Missionary Childhood, a campaign of the Pontifical Mission Societies to involve children in the mission of the Church. Thanks to them, 2,795 projects to help children in mission territories are supported. Cardinal Filoni speaks in this interview about the vitality of the young Churches in mission territories.

Giovanni Tridente-January 23, 2017-Reading time: 10 minutes

Originally from Manduria, in Puglia, in southern Italy, Fernando Filoni was created a cardinal in February 2012. He has been Substitute for General Affairs of the Secretariat of State, Apostolic Nuncio to the Philippines and then to Jordan and Iraq. Precisely Pope Francis sent him to Iraq, as his representative, in 2014, after the serious situation created following the proclamation of the Islamic State. In 2015 he published the monograph The Church in Iraqpublished by the Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

He describes with great lucidity the situation in the Middle East from a historical perspective, but also from a hopeful vision of the future of those territories and of the minorities that populate them, today sadly tormented by war. He also speaks of the need for us to be more and more a "Church going out", something that Pope Francis has been embodying in his pontificate. Finally, he analyzes the role and competencies of the Congregation he directs, in the perspective of a full service to the evangelizing mission of the whole Church. The portrait that emerges, as he himself affirms, is that of a Church "open in all its richness to all peoples of all continents.".

Your Eminence, in the first months of your pontificate you often went to give "lessons" to the Pope - so it has been published - on the "missionary Church". How did you experience those moments?

-I continue to go, and I continue to have those meetings that my office leads me to have with the Holy Father. It was the Pope himself, with that endearing sense of humor of his, who said: "Here is the cardinal lecturing me." but I don't give lessons to anyone. The Pope rightly considered that it was necessary for him to begin to have more familiarity with the environments of Africa or Asia. And this is important because it shows how the Pope enters into this dialogue with the realities of his Congregation in order to give an adequate response to the needs of the Church. The element of esteem and relationship remains fundamental.

Young churches

What is the general situation of the Church in the mission lands?

-In general terms, it can be said that, especially in Africa and Asia, the Churches are almost always young. At the time of the Council, evangelization was in full swing and the local Churches were still led by our missionaries. Today, fifty years later, it can be affirmed that almost all the Churches in those lands are led by native clergy, with full responsibility for their local Churches.

The problems that have arisen are the typical difficulties of all growth: on the one hand we find great enthusiasm, but there are also problems of stability. Obviously, we are still in the phase of the first proclamation of the Gospel. As a Congregation, we take into consideration this rapid change, which involves not only the spiritual aspect, but also the integral development of these territories.

What particular message do you carry when you visit mission territories?

-There is no specific message from the Congregation. It depends very much on the reality we are going to visit. The announcement is of a real type, in the context of the great reality of the Church, of the Second Vatican Council and of the successive development through the great Popes we have had up to the present time.

It is a matter of making these particular Churches feel that they are part of the whole Church, calling them to co-responsibility in their own future and also as a participation in the great mission of the Church. It is important that a Church is always aware of itself and asks itself what kind of future it wants for the country in which it finds itself. What is important, in my opinion, is to encourage these Churches to play an active role in evangelization and in their own development. They are the ones who must evangelize, there are no longer missionaries coming from outside... This obviously leads to an assumption of responsibility, and we should all do it. We should ask ourselves the same question in Europe: which Church do we want, and why?

By the way, what is Europe to learn from these other experiences?

-I have always been struck by that expression used by Pope Benedict XVI during his trips, for example to Africa, and later adopted by Pope Francis: the joy of the faith of the people of these lands.

In spite of the level and tenor of their lives - certainly not at the level of Europeans - they manage to manifest their faith in a joyful way. Benedict XVI said that our faith often seems a bit sad, of resigned people..... On the other hand, in these other continents, especially in these young Churches, there is a great enthusiasm, a great liveliness. These are aspects that we have perhaps lost. So it is necessary to rediscover the meaning of a joyful faith, of a shared faith.

There is a lot of talk about refugees and refugees. What needs to be done in this area by the international community?

-I believe that the Pope has already indicated in many circumstances and in many ways what the fundamental deficiencies are. I don't think I can add anything different. What is lacking is the ability to understand, when it comes to refugees and refugees, what their real needs are. These are not numbers; they are people, and they have truly difficult situations behind them. When I look into the eyes of a refugee, who is a person and not a number, I cannot remain indifferent. We have to learn, therefore, to have an attitude that is not one of fear, of conditioning or commonplaces that in turn generate other difficulties, and to look more into the eyes of these people.

You have been the Holy Father's personal envoy in Iraq, where you have also been a nuncio. What is happening there?

-To simplify, I could say this: Iraq is an ancient land, rich in cultures, in history, in languages; but as a country it is relatively young, with little more than ninety years of life, with borders drawn by Westerners, who have divided up the zones of influence of a collapsed Ottoman Empire. Consequently, it is not the expression of one people, but of many peoples with very diverse cultures, who have found themselves in the situation of manifesting, within certain confines, a national vision that nevertheless had to be built. This construction has been very difficult, and has not been achieved. There are different groups, from Shiites, Sunnis, Christians and Kurds to other very ancient minorities, but numerically more limited, which have not amalgamated; a single sentiment has not emerged, and whoever had the power has predominated.

Do you see a solution?

-It is clear that democracy cannot be imposed. Besides, what kind of democracy? It is difficult, because cultures and ways of conceiving a community are different. The so-called numerical democracy is also risky, because it indicates that a majority can dominate a minority, even if it is relevant, and impose things that generate dissatisfaction, if it does not fight. In a complicated territory such as Iraq, one cannot think of standardizing everything in a simplistic way; one must give way to that necessary national entity that certainly must be helped to grow, but one must also respect the particular entities. It is a matter of overcoming approaches of domination of the other, and this requires a lot of help and a lot of good will.
In your latest book "The Church in Iraq" you speak of a "heroic Church"?

-It is the history of the Chaldean Church, of the Assyrian Church that shows it... From the moment of its birth, following the apostolic evangelization, it has always become a land of conflict: as the clashes for power have followed one after another, Christians have become the object of opposition and have been the ones who suffered the most.

From the first centuries, therefore, religion has been substantially an element of discrimination, and the same has happened in the following centuries with the various invasions. This Church of the East, which spread especially to Central Asia and the Far East - to the point of having 20 metropolitan sees and dozens of episcopal sees and reaching China and Peking - was then completely suppressed. These are stories of suffering, not to mention the most recent ones. It is this trail of suffering that led me to write this book.

Middle East

What other contribution can Christians offer with regard to conflicts and wars?

-Pope Francis has indicated it very well. The Christian, for example, does not think that the first thing to do when a State has wealth, which is part of the life of a people, is to buy arms. Another attitude is not to see relations between States only in terms of conflict; that conflict is, in fact, what leads to arming, and when one has a weapon one feels ready to use it.

A third aspect refers to the right. Whether one is a majority or a minority, it is not a question of competing to be the strongest. As members of a human, social and political reality, everyone has the right to live and profess what they believe in, which can be an ideal, a faith, a free profession, but also a way of coordinating or organizing. Until we enter into this perspective, we will always have conflict. After all, the Christian vision, on the level of healthy social thinking, is no different from that which is also held in the world. But with an additional burden, according to which respect for others, their value and importance is a profoundly Christian aspect, and it is the teaching that also comes to us from faith.

How do you see the future of the Middle East?

I do not have a crystal ball, but I would like to speak hopefully about the Middle East, which is a land made up of peoples, cultures and civilizations. Why should it not be possible to find a coexistence based on respect for the other, on the law and on the development of peoples? Why should elements of a religious nature, of intolerance towards the other people, towards the other group, always prevail? This mentality must be absolutely overcome, otherwise the conflict will remain latent. My wish is to move on to this new vision, involving not only the different countries present in these lands, but also those realities in which faith is lived, starting with Islam and Christianity.

Are mission lands also the scene of the martyrdom of Christians? What should we learn from these testimonies?

-With regard to martyrdom, the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples publishes statistics on this phenomenon every year through the Agency for the Evangelization of Peoples. Fides. For example, in 2015 at least 22 pastoral agents have been killed: priests, religious, laity and bishops; from 2000 to 2015 the martyrs in the world have been almost four hundred, including 5 bishops.

It is almost impossible that the proclamation of the faith does not sometimes require the sacrifice of one's own life. Jesus tells us this in the Gospel: "If they have persecuted me, they will persecute you also.". The proclamation of the Gospel is always uncomfortable, even beyond human life. Faith itself is sometimes the object of martyrdom, because of what it proclaims, because of the justice it demands, because of the defense of the poor....

Charity is proximity

One of the mottos of Pope Francis' pontificate is that of a "Church going forth". How can we live this dynamism?

-The Holy Father not only speaks of the Church going forth, but he himself shows what this means. We are coming from such an important year as the Jubilee of Mercy and, almost like a great parish priest of the whole Church, the Pope has shown us how he understands this dynamism. Then, each one of us is called to translate it, according to the task we carry out in the Church. As Prefect of this Congregation, I consider that we are on the way out when we become close to all those situations that we encounter in the various dioceses, and not only in the service of communion that we render to them and that they also offer to the universal Church.

How are "Rome" and the pontificate of Pope Francis perceived from distant lands?

-When I travel, I notice a great affection. In Latin America, for example, there is a growing awareness that what the Pope communicates and expresses is the fruit of a profound experience of life that comes from that same continent.

It is the same in Africa: people are deeply admired by the way the Pope interprets his pastoral vision as a priest, as a bishop, as a Pope, towards everyone and without frontiers. Even in continents that are culturally diverse, there is deep admiration. I am not saying this out of flattery, and perhaps those who do not appreciate these aspects see problems in them. Let us not forget that even in the face of what Christ did, for example a good work, there were those who admired him and those who despised him.

Service to evangelization

What is the "state of health" of your Congregation as an organism of the Roman Curia?

-It is obligatory to be always in full harmony. Our Congregation does not exist as an organism, but as an instrument of the Pope's solicitude for evangelization. This is the purpose by which we are guided and for which we exist: to be truly diakonia, service, in the hands of the Pope and of the territorial Churches for their growth.

Propaganda Fide is often perceived as a powerful entity that moves a lot of resources: how does it respond?

-I don't know if there is a myth surrounding this reality. We cannot deny that over the centuries the faithful have always seen the missionary work as something that belongs to them, and have wanted to participate in it in some way. Those who have not been able to do so personally have supported this work materially, leaving their goods. We have a task, and it is that of a good, healthy and transparent administration of these goods.

The question does not refer to the quantity but to the purpose that we have, and this is related to the development of the missionary Church in all its forms, from the human to the cultural, social, evangelical, or even those in which there is a need to provide a good building, a good school, a good dispensary and so many other things.

What is the status of relations with the Asian continent in general?

-I believe that Pope St. John Paul II, when he wanted an extraordinary Synod for Asia, outlined well the path to follow with regard to this enormous and varied continent, where Christians are a minority. He pointed out that the third millennium must look to Asia and to the proclamation of the Gospel in this continent. I think this is still profoundly valid and should inspire our service.

Evangelization, as Pope Francis says, must be carried out with two great hands: through the true proclamation of the Gospel, which is primary, and at the same time through witness, contact. In contact, in fact, we bear witness to what we are.

The Holy Year of Mercy has recently come to an end. What aspects of this Jubilee Year do you have special memories of?

-Two aspects. On the one hand, the fact that Pope Francis has once again placed mercy at the center and at the heart of the whole Church, as a central element of faith. The other element refers to how this mercy becomes close, and the way in which the Holy Father has interpreted it as a person and as a priest and bishop. This has made a great impression on the faithful.

Wherever I go, I notice an enormous development of this dimension: not of a social work to be done, but of a love that is merciful and takes care of others.

How do you see the Church today?

As far as I am concerned, I must say that, just as in the great plan of Providence there was a period in which the so-called Western Church played a pre-eminent role in all fields - cultural, theological, philosophical, human, social... that still remain, even in a numerically reduced way - today we find ourselves integrated in a very lively reality expressed by the African, Asian, Oceanian and Latin American Churches. Thank God, we now have a more global vision of the Church. I like to think of that beautiful image that shows Pope John XXIII with the world map, and to think that as he moves it, he looks in perspective at a Church transformed into a global reality, no longer still on a continent or in a particular place on earth. This is the Church I see today, open in all its richness to all peoples of all continents.

Debate

The priest and the Eucharist (and III)

As I announced at the beginning of these articles for PALABRA about "The priest and the Eucharist."I have referred successively to the Eucharist as the place where the priest offers himself to God and configures himself to Christ, and to sanctification as the purpose of the Eucharist. On this occasion, I will focus on the dispositions for participating in the Eucharist.

Cardinal Robert Sarah-January 20, 2017-Reading time: 6 minutes

How to celebrate the Eucharist fruitfully?
Concretely: with regard to the priest and the faithful, what are the priestly and spiritual dispositions required to celebrate and participate fruitfully in the Eucharist? The Epistle to the Philippians recalls the irreproachable and pure character that defines Christian identity. St. Paul exhorts the Philippians by saying to them: "Whatever things you do... so you will be blameless and simple, children of God without blemish, in the midst of a perverse and depraved generation, among whom you shine as luminaries of the world... And if my blood is to be shed, sprinkling the liturgical sacrifice which is your faith, I am glad and associate myself with your joy; on your part be glad and rejoice with me." (Phil 2:14-18). Paul does not ask the Philippian community to rejoice because of the sufferings they endure, nor because of the possibility of dying a violent death, as if for the Apostle this were something good; he asks them to rejoice insofar as their sufferings and all the trials of life are a sign of their real oblation in the Love of the Lord and for Love of him. The priest must accept with joy the sufferings and trials endured in the name of faith in Jesus, and he must be ready to go so far as to give his life for the flock, in union with Christ, who gave his life for our salvation.

Priestly grace in fact gives rise to the priest's pastoral charity. Certainly, the priest validly celebrates the Eucharist by virtue of Holy Orders, of the character he received on the day of his priestly ordination and which remains - because of Christ's unfailing fidelity to his Church - whatever his spiritual situation or the weight of his personal sins. But I repeat: the fruitfulness of his Eucharistic celebrations will be seriously hampered if his spiritual situation is bad. The scandal of the priest can greatly harm the People of God, and his personal sanctification and that of the faithful, which is his purpose, will be seriously hindered.

Sacrament of Orders and sanctity of life
But we cannot separate this sanctifying purpose and the sacrament of Holy Orders. The priest must ardently seek and strive to lead a holy life. He must strive with constancy to become Ipse Christusto know the will of God. And the will of God is our sanctification (cf. 1 Thess 4:3). He must have great veneration for the Sacrament of Holy Orders, and remember that the priesthood is a Sacrament: it communicates sanctifying grace to those who have the privilege of being ordained priests. As Pope Francis said forcefully to the priests and religious of Kenya, "The Church is not a company, it is not an NGO, the Church is a mystery, it is the mystery of the gaze of Jesus on each one, who says: 'Come'. It is clear, the one who calls is Jesus. You enter through the door, not through the window, and you follow the way of Jesus." (26-XI-2015).

In addition, the sacrament of Holy Orders increases baptismal grace by increasing the priest's love for God and pastoral charity, in imitation of Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd. St. John Paul II has developed this pastoral charity in a clear and admirable way in the post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation "Pastores Dabo Vobis", based on the first Letter of St. Peter: "Through sacramental consecration, the priest is configured to Jesus Christ, as Head and Pastor of the Church, and receives as a gift a 'spiritual power,' which is a participation in the authority with which Jesus Christ, through his Spirit, guides the Church.

Thanks to this consecration worked by the Holy Spirit in the sacramental effusion of Holy Orders, the spiritual life of the priest is characterized, shaped and defined by those attitudes and behaviors that are proper to Jesus Christ, Head and Shepherd of the Church and which are summed up in his pastoral charity... The spiritual life of the ministers of the New Testament must be characterized, therefore, by this essential attitude of service to the People of God (cf. Mt 20:24 ff; Mk 10:43-44), free from all presumption and every desire to 'tyrannize' the flock entrusted to them (cf. 1 Pet 5:2-3). A service carried out as God expects and in a good spirit. In this way the ministers, the 'elders' of the community, that is, the priests, will be able to be 'models' of the Lord's flock which, in turn, is called to assume before the whole world this priestly attitude of service to the fullness of man's life and his integral liberation" (Mk 10:43-44). (Pastores dabo vobis, 21).

Selflessness
As Good Shepherds, says Peter, the "elders" (presbyteroi) must maintain the cohesion and fraternal communion of the flock, as well as guaranteeing it security and the necessary nourishment. The difficulties of the task could lead to discouragement or discouragement. We must always return to the resolution to serve in a dedicated and disinterested way. "Everyone who let himself be chosen by Jesus is to serve, to serve the people of God, to serve the poorest, the most discarded, the humblest, to serve the children and the elderly, to serve also the people who are not aware of the pride and sin they carry within, to serve Jesus. To let oneself be chosen by Jesus is to let oneself be chosen to serve, not to be served". (Francis, 26-XI-2015).

Therefore, following the example of the "Supreme Shepherd," Christ himself, who washed the feet of his disciples (Jn 13:15-17), the "elders"-that is, the priests-must avoid every spirit of greed and domination (Mt 20:25-28) and place themselves with simplicity and dedication, instead, at the service of the community entrusted to them, "becoming models of the flock". (1 Pet 5:3). Thus they will receive the reward of him who is the One Shepherd of the Christian community. Therefore, we need to try to conform ourselves to Christ, the Supreme Shepherd. Our configuration to Christ will enable us to act sacramentally in the name of Christ, Head and Shepherd. "Peter calls Jesus the 'supreme Shepherd' (1 Pet 5:4), because his work and mission continue in the Church through the apostles (cf. Jn 21:15-17) and their successors (cf. 1 Pet 5:1ff), and through the presbyters. By virtue of their consecration, priests are configured to Jesus, the Good Shepherd, and are called to imitate and revive his same pastoral charity". (Pastores dabo vobis, 22).

Preparation for the celebration
In conclusion, I would like to share a conviction that seems essential to me: since the Eucharist is so vital for every Christian, and particularly for every priest, it is important that we prepare ourselves well before every Eucharistic celebration, in silence and adoration. In our preparation we must involve the whole Christian community.

And when the priest presides at the Eucharistic celebration, he must serve God and the people with dignity and humility, and he must make the faithful feel the living presence of Christ by his way of behaving and pronouncing the divine word. It must take the faithful by the hand and introduce them to the concrete experience of the rite; it must lead them to an encounter with Christ through gestures and prayers. We cannot forget that the liturgy, "being the action of Christ, it impels us from within to clothe ourselves with the same sentiments of Christ, and in this dynamism the whole of reality is transfigured." (Francis, 18-II-014). Hence the priest, exercising the task of mystagogue-for liturgical catechesis aims to introduce the faithful to the mystery of Christ and to initiate them into the riches that the sacraments signify and bring about in every Christian-does not speak in his own name, but echoes the words of Christ and of the Church.

Great astonishment and admiration "must always permeate the Church gathered in the celebration of the Eucharist. But in a special way it must accompany the minister of the Eucharist. Indeed, it is he who, thanks to the faculty granted by the Sacrament of Priestly Ordination, performs the consecration. With the power that comes to him from Christ in the Upper Room, he says: 'This is my body, which will be given for you... This is the cup of my blood, which will be poured out for you'. The priest pronounces these words, or rather, he puts his mouth and his voice at the disposal of the One who pronounced them in the Upper Room and willed that they should be repeated from generation to generation by all those who in the Church participate ministerially in his priesthood." (Ecclesia de Eucharistia, 5).

Let us take time to prepare ourselves, before and after each Eucharistic celebration, and allow ourselves a few precious moments to give thanks and adore. As Pope Francis reminded us to live the Holy Mass "it helps us, it introduces us, to be in adoration before the Eucharistic Lord in the tabernacle and to receive the sacrament of reconciliation." (30-V-2013). In reality, Eucharistic Adoration is the contemplation of the radiant Face of the Risen Christ, and through the Risen One we can contemplate the beauty of the Trinity and the divine sweetness present in our midst. Let there be a time of silence and intense prayer before and after each Eucharistic celebration, to converse with Christ. And by reclining on the breast of Jesus, like the disciple whom he loved, we will experience the depth of his heart (cf. Jn 13:25). Then we will sing with the psalmist: "Proclaim with me the greatness of the Lord, let us exalt his name together... Behold him and you will be radiant, your face will not be ashamed. Taste and see how good the Lord is, blessed is he who welcomes him." (Ps 34, 4.6.9).

The authorCardinal Robert Sarah

Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments from 2014 to 2021.

Read more
Twentieth Century Theology

The three explanations above all

The idea we have of the universe has been transformed by experimental sciences in the last century. This directly affects philosophical thought and is also of direct interest to theological thought.

Juan Luis Lorda-January 12, 2017-Reading time: 7 minutes

On the origin of man and the world, we used to have only the Genesis account and some ancient myths and fables. Since the mid-19th century, we have had another account of the origin of species and of man, the one initiated by Charles Darwin, which has been completed and refined as we have come to know genetics better. And, since the middle of the 20th century, we also have a new account of the origin of the world: the Big Bang, the big explosion. According to the evidence we have, the present universe came from the explosion of an enormously dense point, and it is still expanding.

Both scientific theories are more than hypotheses because they have accumulated evidence in their favor that seems sufficient to support that both processes shape the history of our universe.

A unified universe

With this, our idea of the universe is very different from what they might have had, for example, a hundred years ago. Today we can tell a "story of the universe" from an original moment to the present moment. Certainly, we cannot tell the details, and we do not know many transitions, but we can tell the general lines and we know that it is a single story: a story where everything that exists today has arisen: all the structures of matter and all living organisms. Everything has been made from an original point and everything is made from the same thing. It is possible that there was something before, but, apart from the fact that we have no indication of that, it does not affect the statement that the whole universe as we know it today has had a single history and is made up of the same thing.

We have never had such a unitary idea of reality. The people of other times lived in a world full of seemingly unconnected mysteries. There were many partial explanations and many unknown mysteries. Today we do not know everything, but we know that everything comes from the same process and that it is related. This is somewhat new in the history of thought and perhaps one of the most important facts in the history of thought. Some people with a mentality, so to speak only "of letters", tend to consider scientific statements as statements that are too circumstantial and, for that reason, dispensable. But the statements we have made are really universal, about the whole of visible reality and, for that very reason, they really have a philosophical and, to that same extent, theological rank.

A wonderful world

The story of the history of the present universe is much more wonderful than a fairy tale and could even be told as a fairy tale: "Once upon a time there was a very small but enormously dense point, and suddenly it burst forth radiating a fabulous amount of energy. And then...".

For a Christian, this story is an almost self-evident manifestation of God's power. On the other hand, for people who have a materialistic vision, it is a pure display of "chance and necessity", to quote the famous book by Monod, Nobel Prize winner in medicine and modern representative of biological materialism. Everything has happened without any sense and in an unforeseen way.

Three models to explain the universe

As our modern scientific image of the universe has become so unitary, the possible explanations have been greatly reduced: there are very few possible worldviews left, very few global worldviews. At the outset, there are three:

The world comes "from below": there is no God and the world is self-made.The evolution of the world, by the casual emergence of internal laws that have directed the growth. This is the materialistic thesis, which is defended by many people, including scientific experts, although, generally, without reaching its ultimate consequences.

The world comes "from above": it was made by an intelligent being, God.. Therefore, the explanation of its internal order, of the emergence of structures and of its own laws, is that it has been thought by an intelligent being. Galileo said that nature has a mathematical entrails, but that marvelous order deserves an explanation.

The world itself is God, or at least divine.. This is the third possibility. Although, at first sight, it may seem surprising because it is unusual, this position is quite widespread. It is defended by some ancient pantheisms and some important modern scientists, such as the Nobel Prize winner in physics Schrödinger or the great popularizer Karl Sagan. The characteristic of this position is to transmit to the universe the most important characteristic that we know in the universe, human consciousness. They give to the whole a certain consciousness or at least they consider it as the foundation of all consciousnesses. This "whole" can be called "God", although they do not generally think of a personal being. It is more something than someone.

Three different men's models

The three global explanations give rise to three models of human beings:

-If the world is a meaningless chance, the human being is also a meaningless chance. And he is not worth more than the rest. This has untenable practical consequences. Our Western culture and our democratic institutions are based on the idea that every man has a special dignity that must be respected. But if it is a bit of matter accumulated by chance we do not see why it should be specially respected.

-If the world was made by God, the human being can be, as the biblical message defends, "the image of God". He is a person in the image of the divine persons. An intelligent and free being, capable of good and love, and who fulfills himself by loving, in the image of the divine persons. The radical explanation of the uniqueness of human consciousness would come from God.

-If the world itself is God or a kind of divine whole, everything is part of the same. Everything is divine or emanation united to the divine. Then, the human being can only be a transitory spark of the whole, a part that has temporarily separated and that temporarily manifests a personal consciousness, but that is called to unite and merge in the Whole, as the oriental pantheisms defend (it is appreciated in the Buddhist or Hindu tradition). There cannot be a strong personal identity, but only a transitory one. For this reason, it is frequent to find in these positions the belief in reincarnation or transmigration of "souls".

 The "capitalization" problem

We are used to talking about great human dimensions, such as love, justice, freedom and beauty. They seem so important to us that we can write them in capital letters: Love, Justice, Freedom, Beauty.

But if the world is chance and necessity, these human dimensions cannot have much depth or much sense. What sense can love or justice have in a much arisen from elementary particles by chance? In physics, there is mass or charge, but there is no love or justice. If they are not dimensions of matter, and there is nothing but matter, they can only be illusions of the spirit. Love can be nothing but instinct and, at bottom, physics. And justice, a human convention without any foundation in physics, which only knows about attractions and repulsions, nor in biology, where the law of the jungle prevails.

Only if the world was made by God can these very human dimensions be reflections of a personal God. Only to the extent that the human being is the "image of God" can there be in human life something that is truly love and justice and freedom and beauty.

The practical problem of materialism

It is easy to make materialistic statements, but it is very difficult to live as a consistent materialist, because it contradicts the most elementary aspirations and uses of the human condition. Every materialist should seriously question whether it makes sense for him to love his children, his spouse, his parents or his friends. And the same applies to his aspirations or his claims to justice: why should one aspire to love or defend justice instead of accepting chance and necessity?

And if materialism, which seems so serious, turns out to be so inhuman, is there not an error in our approach? If, starting from our reductive idea of matter, we end up denying the human, is it not because we have the wrong method? Should we not start from the existence of these human dimensions, which are at least as real as those of matter, to show that the world is richer than the materialistic vision? Or is it that justice does not exist because we do not have a thermometer to measure it?

The problem of freedom

The theme of the "capital letter" of freedom is a special one. Liberty is a great human dimension, much extolled in the history of our modern world. Important statues to Liberty have even been erected in Paris and, above all, in New York (a gift from the French State).

But, if the world is only matter evolved by chance and necessity, there can be no real freedom. Chance means pure chance; and necessity means determination, absence of freedom. If matter is not free and the human being is only matter, he cannot have freedom, at least as it has been understood in the Western tradition. Then all modern culture, even all humanist culture, would have fallen into a fundamental error. It would continue to live in myth and not in science.

Materialistic paradoxes in the face of freedom

Of course, here too it is impossible to be consistent. If we think that freedom does not exist and that everything we do is dominated by chance and necessity, many things would have to change. But any attempt to take this assertion seriously leads to a paradox, even a joke. For if we think that chance and necessity is the explanation for everything, we must also accept that we think this very thing out of pure chance and necessity, and not because it is logical. In fact, it would leave us with no arguments.

Pope Benedict XVI developed this paradox very well: "In the end, this alternative presents itself: what is there at the origin? Either creative Reason, the creative Spirit that realizes everything and lets it develop, or Irrationality that, without thinking and without realizing it, produces a mathematically ordered cosmos, and also man with his reason. But then, human reason would be a chance of Evolution and, at bottom, irrational." (homily in Regensburg, 12.IX.2006).

Confusions about indeterminacy

But let us go to the heart of the matter. If the human being is only matter, dominated by chance and necessity, he cannot really be free. The only materialistic way out of this argument (attempted by many) is to take refuge in quantum mechanics. It turns out that all physics is deterministic, except the physics of subatomic particles, quantum physics, where we cannot determine exactly the position and velocity of elementary particles (electrons, photons) nor their behavior (as a wave or as a corpuscle). This is, in short, Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle. According to the current scientific view, matter is totally determined, except in this sphere. The solution would be, then, to try to relate human freedom to this sphere of indeterminacy. This is what Penrose did, for example (The mind of the emperor). And others follow.

But this is a misunderstanding. Indeterminacy means that we do not know where something is or how it will behave. But freedom is more than not being able to foresee what is going to happen. It is precisely deciding and creating what will happen. Seen from afar, the behavior of people can resemble that of subatomic particles because it is unpredictable. But free people think about what they are going to do and what happens next is guided by intelligence and not by indeterminacy. It can be said that the cathedral of Toledo was indeterminate before it was built, because there was no reason to suppose that there would be a cathedral on that land. But the cathedral of Toledo is not the fruit of indetermination, but of human intelligence and freedom: it is the fruit of projects and imagination and creative decisions. Therefore, it is full of thought, something that does not happen in the behavior of elementary particles or in any other sphere of matter.

Conclusion

We are free because we are intelligent. And intelligence is a mystery almost as great as freedom. It is the most evident proof that in the universe there is more than matter: there is intelligence. But also, in the human world, there is truth, justice, beauty and love. For a Christian, all these dimensions are reflections of the image of God. And they have no other possible explanation.

Read more
Spain

What educational pact is possible in Spain today?

A future new education law should be the result of a dialogue with the real educational agents and not just a minimum agreement between political groups.

Javier Hernández Varas / Enrique Carlier-January 10, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

On December 1, the Education Commission of the Congress of Deputies approved the proposal to create a sub-commission in charge of preparing, within six months, a diagnostic report on a great State pact for education. The document would serve as a basis for the government to promote a new education law that would bring stability to education policy. Meanwhile, the timetable for the implementation of all the aspects of the current Organic Law for the Improvement of the Quality of Education which have not yet come into force has been suspended.

For the preparation of the report, as many hearings as necessary will be held. The subcommission will call various organizations, institutions, persons of recognized prestige, social agents, educational platforms, trade unions, etcetera. And the Sectorial Conference, the State School Council and the Autonomous School Councils may issue specific reports.

The stability of the Pact, if it is achieved, will depend on the support of that parliamentary majority. But, as José Miguel García, director of the Secretariat of the Episcopal Commission for Teaching and Catechesis, rightly points out, this educational pact must be, above all, the result of a dialogue with the real educational subjects, not just a minimum agreement between political groups. The more teachers and parents are involved, the greater the possibility of reaching a lasting pact. And it will be difficult to subscribe a stable and definitive Pact if it does not guarantee several rights and freedoms. We are referring, of course, to the freedom of education and the right to teach Religion.

Furthermore, any Pact will be limited by the Constitution and its article 27, which recognizes the right to education, freedom of teaching and the fundamental right of parents to educate their children according to their convictions. And it will have to strengthen the complementarity of the networks of public and private-subsidized schools, without considering the subsidized school as a subsidiary of the public one, definitively guaranteeing its financing and stability.

The voice of the Church

On October 18, a representation of the Spanish bishops held a meeting with the Minister of Education, then in office, Iñigo Méndez de Vigo, to give their opinion on the advisability of the Education Pact and to request, in turn, to participate in it actively and with a single voice. This was confirmed by the Secretary General of the Episcopal ConferenceJosé María Gil Tamayo, who recalled the the Church's full support for the "education is a matter of state", and is not at the mercy of the "partisan alternations". In Spain, 11 education laws have been passed in 35 years, and this "There is no one who can resist it. stop making the school a political and ideological controversy board".said Gil Tamayo. And he also considered it necessary that the voice of the Church "to be taken into account when we start talking about an educational pact"."Given its remarkable presence in the field of education, with 2,600 centers specifically Catholic, that have 125,000 workers and nearly 1.5 million students; and considering that 3.5 million students freely choose the Religion and son 25,000 teachers of this subject.

In the meeting with the minister, which was attended by the president and secretary of the Education Commission - Bishop César Franco of Segovia and José Miguel García - as well as Gil Tamayo himself, it was insisted that the pact does not entail the elimination of Religion from the curriculum. By wanting this subject to be in the new educational framework, the Church does not intend to defend any privilege, but neither does it want to be marginalized. It is a constitutional right and a fundamental right of parents. And in the case of Catholic education, it is, in addition, a right protected by the Agreements between the State and the Holy See. The possibility of to be able to freely choose one's religion is an indicative of that "full insertion of the Church in constitutional Spain." to which King Felipe alluded during his recent visit to the Episcopal Conference.

For Gil Tamayo, the problem with the Religion subject lies in the fact that "there are people who still live with very old-fashioned approaches.who thinks that the public space must be aseptic of all religious convictions". and that the Catholic has to "hang on a hanger their religious convictions". when entering public places.

With the creation of the subcommission, an important and positive step has been taken, but there is still a long way to go. No one is unaware of the existence of ideological and political pitfalls, which is why it is time to show a clear vision, generosity and concern for the general interest, in the conviction that it is urgent to improve the educational system and give it the continuity and stability necessary for the good of the students.

The authorJavier Hernández Varas / Enrique Carlier

The World

Lebanon opens a page of stability with strong Syrian immigration

The experience of the civil war in the 80's has prompted to reach agreements that facilitate stability. Lebanon, which does not want to be dragged into the war in Syria, has a new president, the Christian Michel Aoun.

Ferran Canet-January 9, 2017-Reading time: 5 minutes

With the whirlwind of events that have transpired in the world in recent months, and particularly in the Middle East with Syria, the news that Lebanon has a new president, Michel Aoun, opens a page of cautious optimism and stability.

Michel Aoun was elected with the support of 83 out of 128 parliamentarians on October 31, thus closing more than two years in which the country was without a president. The serious situation in the Middle East could have led to fears that Lebanon would be directly immersed in the conflict, but so far it has managed to keep the problems inside the country very sporadic.

However, the tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the war in Syria, the conflict in Iraq, and even the problems in Yemen have influenced the Lebanese situation, if only because Hezbollah (a political party as well as a militia) supports Iran in the various conflicts in which it intervenes.

All in all, the fact that Lebanon is still at peace is astonishing. One cannot forget, moreover, that since the outbreak of the war in Syria, the Lebanese have seen more than 1.5 million Syrians seek refuge in Lebanon (with more than 1 million refugees officially registered since April 2014).

Discussion on settlements

If one takes into account that the local population of Lebanon is about 4.5 million inhabitants, there is a ratio of Syrian refugees of about 200 per thousand inhabitants (the highest in the world, three times that of Jordan, the second country in that sad ranking). To these should be added some 450,000 Palestinians.

Some experts have offered clues about Lebanon's reception capacity. For example, the country has a tradition of not locking refugees in camps, in part because of a long history of labor relations. Since the 1990s, many Syrians came to work in Lebanon, and this has facilitated some integration.

The policy of not housing people in refugee camps is due to security concerns, says Tamirace Fakhoury, a university professor of political science. The government fears the camps will become sanctuaries for terrorism, although it is a matter of debate. There are some informal settlements in the border area. Y UNHCR (the UN refugee agency), and some NGOs believe that camps run by them would provide better living conditions for Syrian refugees.

In reality, Lebanon does not have the capacity to fully integrate such a large number of refugees, and is really overstretched, so there are restrictions. On the other hand, municipalities often complain that there is no coherent national policy, and they formulate their own rules.

Experts also point out that a better coordinated response with Europe in analyzing legal avenues for these migration flows would be positive. A legal governance approach is needed to deal with a migration crisis such as the one caused by Syria.

Stability in Lebanon

If the data provided above were not enough to describe a potentially explosive situation, perhaps a historical reminder is. Until 2005, Syrian troops occupied Lebanon, having entered the country at the beginning of the Lebanese civil war (in 1976) under an Arab League mandate. For almost thirty years, many Lebanese saw the Syrian soldiers as invaders, and the Damascus government as responsible for all kinds of abuses and killings.

Nevertheless, the social situation is not as tense as one might imagine. Although it is true that part of the population does not welcome the presence of so many refugees. Mainly for fear that the situation will continue for years, which would disfigure the already rather unstable balance between the various social groups, shaped by membership of a particular religion.

Electoral law

For some years now, there has been talk of changing the electoral law to adapt it to a demographic situation different from the one that existed at the time the current law was made (1960). However, this reform looks slow and complicated, and it does not seem that the solution will be achieved in the coming months, before the next parliamentary elections (which should have been held in 2013, but have been delayed twice, and should now be in May 2017).

To understand why the country has not been dragged into the Syrian problem, one factor in particular must be taken into account. The experience of the civil war of the 1980s means that, in the face of a really tense situation, the country's leaders make an effort to reach agreements that prevent the fire from igniting and potentially engulfing everything. Another important element is that 40% of the Lebanese population is Christian, so that the Sunni-Shiite (Saudi Arabia-Iran) conflict finds a strong intermediary, absent in the other countries of the region.

Christians, essential for stability

Lebanon is an exception in the Middle East for several reasons, but one of the main ones is that Christians are not only not a small minority, nor are they simply tolerated or recognized, but they are an essential part of the social fabric and the political game.

At a time when we have witnessed the almost total reduction of the presence of Christians in Iraq, and now in Syria, Lebanon insists on its desire to be an example of coexistence (not perfect, true, but much better than one might think) for the whole region.

Benedict XVI's last trip before his resignation was precisely to Lebanon, and it was an opportunity for the Lebanese to brag of this ability to coexist and to welcome.

However, the current challenges may exceed Lebanon's capabilities alone. This is why criticism of the Western powers' handling of the situation is not uncommon, especially the indifference with which they have reacted to the rapid disappearance of Christians from the region (if not directly provoked).

The voice of the Patriarch Lebanon

Cardinal Bechara Raï, Patriarch of Antioch and Metropolitan of the Maronite Church, has been one of the voices that have not ceased to call for a responsible attitude on the part of politicians, to put aside personal interests, party and communityto be at the service of the entire country and all its citizens.

But their efforts, for now, have had little effect. Perhaps the most remarkable is the reconciliation between General Michel Aoun and Samir Geagea. They are two of the most important Christian leaders, who clashed during the last years of the civil war, writing one of the saddest pages of Lebanese history. But their reconciliation has been key to General Aoun's accession to the presidency.

However, beyond a few facts, there continues to be a feeling that important decisions in the country are made mainly considering the economic benefits that politicians can obtain, or the interests of the countries that support those politicians.

A new page has been opened, although the words, for now, are the same, and the narrative thread has not changed much either. The same surnames, the same families, dominate the political and economic world, and the citizen who is not aligned with any of these families, it is left, for the time being, to continue waiting.

The authorFerran Canet

Read more
Father S.O.S

The role of physical exercise

It has been said that "if physical exercise could be prescribed in pill form, it would be the most prescribed drug". Indeed, it is one of the most important aspects of health; and it has a clear effect on the prevention of certain diseases. 

Pilar Riobó-January 9, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

We use the term "physical exercise" to include both sports and leisure-time physical activity, as well as other forms of exercise performed in the context of daily, family and community activities. Recommending physical exercise does not imply that we are all expected to become elite athletes. 

Life in Western cities is not usually conducive to exercise: we use the car to go to work (and even use a button instead of a crank to roll down the window), we take the elevator to the upper floors, we sit for several hours in front of the television, we work at the office on the computer, and we carry out other occupations while sitting down.

Lack of activity is directly related to the appearance of certain diseases. In the first place, it favors obesity, whereas, on the contrary, exercise helps to lose weight. But if the effort to lose weight were based solely on exercise, its effectiveness would be very small. It helps to lose fat and hypertrophies muscle tissue; we could say that it exchanges fat tissue for lean tissue and, as the volume of the latter is smaller, it causes the obese to lose volume; those who observe a long-term diet manage to maintain their lost weight if they change their behavioral habits and become accustomed to exercise. Likewise, in the presence of obesity, physical exercise reduces the possibility of diabetes or improves insulin sensitivity; and it is beneficial for obese people with high cholesterol.

Physical exercise produces an increase in HDL cholesterol or "good" cholesterol. It has been shown that people who do some physical exercise have a lower incidence of diabetes; they maintain better bone health and prevent osteoporosis; they improve cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness. In addition, activity has positive psychological effects: it produces a sense of well-being, improves self-esteem and mood, helps to relax, controls anxiety and prevents depression.

Some behavioral habits that favor physical activity can be advised, taking into account the current circumstances of life.

Some behavioral habits that favor physical activity can be advised, taking into account the current circumstances of life. Let us first say that, whatever form of activity is chosen, it is advisable to start with the easiest and gradually increase it. Especially in obese people, excess weight itself is an obstacle which, together with the low level of training and possible associated osteo-articular problems, leads patients to abandon exercise, so that consistency and regularity are particularly important for them.

One idea is to make your commute on foot, avoiding the car whenever possible; you can walk the entire route or leave your car parked far from your destination. If your work is only a few minutes away from your home, or if you live in a small town, you can schedule a one-hour walk every day. It can be very useful to download a mobile application (some are free) that counts the steps and kilometers walked per day; many will be surprised at how little they move.

Walking down (and up) the stairs is helpful. It also helps to do household chores, family games, gardening, and even dancing. It is currently recommended to break the sedentary lifestyle during the working day every 30 minutes, with one minute of joint mobilization, and avoid accumulating many hours sitting.

Any moderate sport is good, with care not to get injured and caution not to want to achieve everything from the beginning; some uncomplicated ones are swimming, cycling or hiking. Many of these activities are, on the other hand, an opportunity for social interaction. Doing them with friends, enjoying them, favors continuity over time.

If we decide to join a gym, but we must be cautious and take advice about the exercises and equipment that suit us, some people also choose to have a gym equipment at home, such as an exercise bike. 

An elderly person, or one who has not had the possibility to take care of himself and be in shape, should not worry. There is always some possibility, and the most suitable is a good walk, about 1 hour a day, which can be done in 2 smaller walks of about 30 minutes.

The authorPilar Riobó

Medical specialist in Endocrinology and Nutrition.

ColumnistsXiskya Valladares

Faith as experience is the key

In the face of the difficulties posed by today's extremism, the education for dialogue suggested by Pope Francis is urgent and necessary, as well as following the criteria established by Jesus himself.

January 9, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

Pope Francis says that "Dialogue helps people to humanize relationships and overcome misunderstandings". We are very clear about it in our daily relationships, even if we admit that we do not always know how to do it. But are we equally clear when we refer to terrorists, suicide bombers, extremists? It gets more complicated. 

The recently published report on religious freedom in the world, commissioned by Aid to the Church in Need, concludes that extremist Islam is the main threat to religious freedom and the main cause of persecution. But it affects not only practicing Christians, but also Western societies with Christian roots, even if they are today atheist: one in five countries has suffered radical Islamist attacks. There are 38 out of 196 countries in the world where serious violations of religious freedom have been recorded. 

It is clear that extremism, in general, generates violence. Studies show that religion is a great factor of intra-group cohesion, something positive, but it can also increase inter-group aggressiveness towards those who do not belong to the group. Hence the urgency of deepening our faith in order to know how to give a reason for it, but above all, to base it on a strong personal relationship with Jesus. If we Christians reduce religion to an ideology or a social group, we run the risk of falling into fundamentalism. 

Not only is it possible, but education for dialogue, as Pope Francis says, is urgent and necessary. Other historical moments have shown us that Muslims, Jews and Christians can live together peacefully. Today, in the face of extremist Islam, we hear many questions about this possibility. Can we dialogue with terrorists? Should we respond with a welcoming response to the current drama of so many people displaced by war? What is clear is that not all Muslims are terrorists, and that it is in the face-to-face, from the story of the lives that coexist, when the encounter is created. It is also very clear that our criterion should be that of Jesus: what would He respond today in these situations? "Every time you did it to one of these, my younger brothers, you did it to me." (Mt 25:40).

Francisco: "Dialogue breaks down the walls of divisions and misunderstandings; it creates bridges of communication and does not allow anyone to isolate himself, shutting himself up in his own little world. To dialogue is to listen to what the other person says to me and to say with docility what I think".

The authorXiskya Valladares

Evangelizing on Twitter, Xiskya Valladares

January 5, 2017-Reading time: < 1 minute

Best practices to evangelize on twitter
Xiskya Valladares
117 pages
San Pablo. Madrid, 2016

Text - Jesús Ortiz López

Out of 7 billion people on the planet, 3 billion are active internet users. Most of them use social networks and twitter is the fifth most used. But the question is: how can one give Christian witness on twitter?

We believers are people who interact with our peers also in the digital streets, as was the wish of John Paul II: "If we have to go where the people are, we have to go to the Internet. And the Church knows it.

The author of this book, collaborator of Palabra and co-founder of iMision, invites us to use the Internet more, just as we should suggest to a priest to use the microphone so that he can be heard. She also explains how to make the Internet a place of communion, not just an impersonal cloud. In the second part of the book he adds thirty good practices for evangelizing on twitter and transmitting information, promoting initiatives and generating community.

The book is practical and the result of the author's long experience. It is well documented, well illustrated and easy to read. Above all, it opens up new horizons. At the end of reading it, it is easy to conclude: "I have to use networks more".

Cinema

Cinema: Silence, a film by Martin Scorsese

Omnes-January 2, 2017-Reading time: 2 minutes

Faith does not have two faces. At least that's what Martin Scorsese tries to show in his latest film, Silence. It is the fictionalized story of three Jesuit priests during the process of evangelization of Japan in the 17th century.

Silence

Director: Martin Scorsese

Screenplay: Jay Cocks, Martin Scorsese (based on the novel by Shusaku Endo)

Year: 2016

Country: United States

 

Faith does not have two faces. At least that's what Martin Scorsese tries to show in his latest film, Silence. It is the fictionalized story of three Jesuit priests during the process of evangelization of Japan in the 17th century.

It is a film that Scorsese began working on more than twenty years ago. The idea arose after the controversy caused by his movie The last temptation of Christ. It was then that he read the novel SilenceThe story was written by the Japanese writer Shusaku Endo (which presents some inconveniences for the believer). From that moment on, he began a process of research and study of the script to tell this story well. And it does not seem unreasonable to think that in the film, the director himself may let us glimpse his own questions about faith.

It tells the story of the journey to Japan of priests Sebastian Rodrigues (Andrew Garfield) and Francisco Garupe (Adam Driver). They go in search of their mentor, Cristobal Ferreira (Liam Neeson), who is assumed to have renounced the faith. On their journey, they encounter a society that, while rejecting Christian principles, leaves some room for the teachings of the two priests to bear some fruit.

However, problems arise when the inquisitor Inoue enters the scene, a calculating and Machiavellian character, who discovers in incoherence his main weapon to remove the souls of those who doubt. This character, masterfully played by Issei Ogata, takes advantage of the misinterpretation of the martyrdom of the early Christians to pressure the priests, especially Father Rodrigues, to abandon their task.

The pain, anguish and what the film presents as the silence of God, ends up generating an atmosphere of ambiguity that will lead the characters to see their religious foundations shaken, and to enter into a profound battle between what their faith demands and what the society in which they carry out their mission demands.

However, in the end, and ignoring some questionable decisions by the director, the film ends up going back to the beginning and opening a window to understand what God suggests with his silence.

In this classic film, the director does not shy away from any questions. His skill is evident both in what the camera shows and in the editing and montage. And because he focuses on the story he wants to tell, he ends up giving the viewer hardly any rest throughout its 160 minutes of footage.

-Jairo Darío Velásquez Espinosa

ColumnistsJohn Allen

Javier Echevarría's strong, discreet leadership

John Allen reviews the years that have passed in the life of Opus Dei since the death of the founder. He highlights the significance of Javier Echevarría's work, especially in terms of information management, and outlines the challenge that will fall to his successor.

January 2, 2017-Reading time: 4 minutes

With the loss of the person who has led it for more than twenty years, the bishop Javier Echevarría Rodríguezwho died on December 12 at the age of 84, Opus Dei, one of the most influential and notorious Catholic organizations in the world, is now facing a generational transition.

However, it does so from a base of strength, thanks in part to the two decades that Echevarría has been at its helm.

Echevarría assumed the task of prelate of Opus Dei in April 1994, following the death of Bishop Álvaro del Portillo. He will almost certainly be the last personal confidant of St. Josemaría Escrivá, who founded Opus Dei in Spain in 1928 and died in 1975, to lead the institution.

Javier Echevarría worked as Escrivá's personal secretary from 1955, and became secretary general of the organization in 1975. When in 1982 Opus Dei became a "personal prelature," that is, an entity incorporating both clergy and laity around a specific spirituality rather than on the basis of the geographical boundaries of a diocese, Echevarría was appointed its vicar general.

From the founder

As with virtually every new force in Catholic life, be it a religious order, a movement or something else, Opus Dei was faced with the challenge of proving its continued validity beyond the death of its charismatic founder.

For Opus Dei, in a certain sense this challenge has been delayed for almost 40 years, because both Alvaro del Portillo and Echevarría, Escrivá's personal collaborators, have been considered internally first and foremost as authoritative interpreters of his thought, so that it was almost as if the founder continued to hold the reins from beyond the grave.

Now the Opus Dei will have to stand on its own feet, with a leadership that does not necessarily come with the same personal seal of approval from St. Josemaría himself.

During its nearly 90 years, Opus Dei has been a powerful but controversial player in the Catholic Church, praised for its dedication to the formation of the laity and its good works, but also viewed with suspicion by critics who reproach it for a strict internal culture and deeply conservative political and theological objectives.

These impressions were perhaps most pronounced when Echevarría began his tenure in 1994, shortly after the beatification of Escrivá under the pontificate of John Paul II in 1992, an event that fueled almost endless controversy, and well before the founder's canonization in 2002 or the publication in 2003 of Dan Brown's infamous novelistic botch-up, the Da Vinci Code.

At that time, conspiracy theories and speculation about Opus Dei were very attractive, both in secular circles and in some circles of the Catholic Church itself.

There was lively debate about Opus Dei's alleged financial empire, its attitude toward women, its practices of bodily mortification, its alleged sectarianism and much else, all underpinned by the assumption that Escriva himself and other early members of Opus Dei had supported the right-wing fascist regime of Francisco Franco.

In this atmosphere, Opus Dei experts pointed out that there was a fundamental fissure in the organization between a policy of closure, in terms of adapting to the rules of the outside world, and transparency, in the sense of opening up and giving an account of the internal life and philosophy of the institution, in the conviction that any contact with reality was preferable to the mythology and the "black legend" that had been spread.

As prelate, Echevarría substantially settled the debate in favor of transparency, and the result has been a rapid "normalization" of Opus Dei's status within the Catholic Church and a corresponding drop in the level of controversy and animosity.

Information management by Javier Echevarría

When Echevarría began his tenure, there were still many Catholic bishops who looked askance at the idea of an Opus Dei-related initiative being established in their diocese, but in 2016 that fear has all but disappeared. Now, most bishops and other Church dignitaries look at Opus Dei as they would look at Caritas or the Salesian order, i.e., simply as another piece of furniture in the Catholic living room.

Under Echevarría's leadership, Opus Dei has gone from having what many considered to be the most dysfunctional news management in the Catholic Church - refusing on principle to even answer legitimate questions, and thus feeding negative images - to what is now rated as the best in Rome.

Today, the University of the Holy Cross, which runs Opus Dei in Rome, is promoting a training course for journalists from around the world on covering the Vatican and Catholicism, called "Church Up Close," and probably every Catholic decision-maker who needs help approaching their bad press problems should make their first phone call to someone from Opus Dei.

All this has been the result of a policy initiated and confirmed by Echevarría, which is that if we have nothing to hide, we have nothing to fear.

A dedicated shepherd

On the other hand, Echevarría was also a dedicated pastor who cared deeply for the people entrusted to his care. Friends say that he spent more time than anyone could ever count praying for Opus Dei members around the world who had lost loved ones, who were ill, who had lost their jobs or were otherwise suffering, and he was close to them on a personal level.

Whoever succeeds Echevarría at the head of Opus Dei will face a difficult challenge, but at the same time will inherit an organization poised to last a long time.

This is mainly due to the vision of the founder, but also to the firm and above all discreet leadership exercised by his two immediate successors, one of whom passed away two decades ago, and the other who left the world this year.

The authorJohn Allen

Newsroom

In memory of Bishop Javier Echevarría

A few days after the death of Bishop Javier Echevarría, the Auxiliary Vicar of the Prelature of Opus Dei has written these lines of remembrance for Palabra. In them he points out two outstanding characteristics of the Prelate's personality.

Fernando Ocáriz-January 2, 2017-Reading time: 3 minutes

Naturally, I have experienced and continue to experience great sorrow -as have all the faithful of the Work and many other people- at the unexpected death of the man who for 22 years as Prelate directed the Opus Dei and we used to call him, with all propriety, Father. At the same time, the Lord gives serenity, because thanks to faith we know that, with death, life is not lost but changed into a better one: into the blessed existence that Jesus Christ promised to those who love him. And the love of Bishop Javier Echevarría to Our Lord and, through Him, to all creatures, was great, sincere, full of practical consequences.

Dynamic fidelity

In these brief lines, I would like to emphasize only two fundamental traits. The first is his sense of fidelity: an unfailing loyalty to the Church, to the Pope, to Opus Dei, to the faithful of the Prelature, to his friends, which was a consequence or expression of his fidelity to Jesus Christ, our God and Lord. His whole life, from the time he asked for admission to Opus Dei in the distant year 1948, was marked by this human and supernatural virtue, which grew thanks to the close relationship he maintained, first with St. Josemaría, and then with Blessed Álvaro del Portillo, with whom he collaborated for many years in the government of the Prelature. As I said a few hours after his death, having lived for so many years at the side of these two saints left an indelible imprint on Bishop Echevarría's soul, which explains, at least in part, his deep sense of fidelity.

His was a dynamic fidelity that, while preserving intact the substance, the spirit, also sought the Will of God in the face of the changing needs of the times and people.

A few minutes before her death, she wanted to leave us this desire. As was stated by those who were assisting her most immediately at that moment, the intention of her prayer to the Lord was the fidelity of all of us.

Love for the Pope

A particular manifestation of fidelity concerns prayer for the Roman Pontiff. Following the exhortations of his predecessors, he constantly encouraged them to pray more and more for the Vicar of Christ on earth. In this way he also made the aspiration of the Founder of the Work a reality: to serve the Church as the Church desires to be served, within the characteristics that God himself communicated to St. Josemaría. A manifestation of this communion with the whole Mystical Body of Christ is the ordination of more than 600 priests during the years of his service as Prelate of Opus Dei.

In this context, I am pleased to note the generosity with which Bishop Echevarría welcomed requests from the bishops of many places for priests incardinated in the Prelature to collaborate directly in diocesan pastoral offices or assignments. And this despite the fact that the number of priests of the Prelature, although high, is not sufficient to meet the many needs of ordinary pastoral work.

Interest in each person

The second characteristic I wish to highlight is his generous dedication to each person who asked him for advice, guidance, a prayer; or simply addressed him a greeting or a comment when they met him in a hallway. He did not just listen; he was involved in what he heard, attentive, calm, never in a hurry, always with an interest whose authenticity was evident.

His zeal as a Pastor was not limited to caring for the small part of the People of God that is the Prelature. His heart had grown wider and wider. As a priest and as a bishop, he felt the weight of souls, especially those most in need: for the victims of natural calamities or terrorism; for refugees; for the sick; for peace in Syria, in Iraq, in Venezuela and in any country going through difficult times; for people without jobs or with family difficulties of any kind... Every week, in Rome, he received groups of people from all over the world, who asked him to pray for their spiritual and material needs. Everyone had a place in his heart, as he had learned from St. Josemaría and Blessed Alvaro del Portillo.

Charity

One more manifestation of his concern for others: the day before his death, Bishop Echevarría told me that he was sorry that so many people had to take care of him, attending to his needs. I answered him from within: No, Father, you are the one who supports us all. In this new period that is opening up before us, I would like to repeat these words to you and ask you, through your intercession, to sustain us and help us to be good children of the Church, with the help of St. Josemaría and Blessed Alvaro.

Bishop Echevarría brought all these intentions to Mass every day. The Sacrifice of the Altar is like the mold where the aspirations and works of men acquire their true meaning through their union with the sacrifice of the Cross. Now, I am consoled to think that, from Heaven, your Mass has become eternal: no longer under the veils of the sacrament, but in the face-to-face vision of divine glory, with her priestly intercession for all. Thus I ask the Lord through the maternal mediation of the Virgin, Mother of God and our Mother.

The authorFernando Ocáriz

Auxiliary and General Vicar of Opus Dei

Read more
Resources

The ethics of political institutions

The article underlines the specificity of political ethics with respect to personal ethics. For the former, the real problem is not the end to be achieved, but the means to be employed, with the resources available and taking into account the actual conditions.

Ángel Rodríguez Luño -December 30, 2016-Reading time: 10 minutes

Since I have been invited once again to write about the challenges facing moral theology today, I would like to propose some general considerations on political ethics, a branch of morality that is rather neglected.

Personal ethics and political ethics

In ordinary language, when we speak of ethics we usually think of a reflection that evaluates as good or bad the way of living of individual persons according to their conformity or opposition to the global good of human life. With this way of thinking we are really taking the part for the whole. The way of living of individuals is dealt with by personal ethics, but ethics also has other parts such as, for example, economic ethics, medical ethics, social ethics or political ethics.

Political ethics deals with the actions by which individuals gathered in a politically organized community (the State, the municipality, etc.) shape their life in common from the constitutional, legal, administrative, economic, educational, health, etc. point of view. These actions come from legislative or governmental bodies, or from individuals exercising a governmental function, but they are properly speaking actions of the political community, which, through its elected representatives, gives itself one form or another. Thus, for example, the laws that regulate university education, or the health system, or taxes, etc., are laws of the State, and not of the deputies John and Paul, although these have been their promoters.

The criterion by which political ethics values these actions of the community is their greater or lesser conformity with the end for which individuals wanted and still want to live together in an organized society. This end is called political common good (more simply, but much less accurately, it could also be called general welfare). In short, political ethics considers morally good those actions of the public apparatus (state, autonomous, municipal, etc.) that are in conformity with and promote the political common good, while it considers morally bad those that harm or oppose that good.

Naturally we now speak of political morality, which does not coincide exactly with the morality that personal ethics deals with, although it is related to it, sometimes very closely. Indeed, politically immoral actions sometimes stem from personal dishonesty... but not always. They can also be the consequence of simple incompetence, or of ideological categories, or of unsound economic conceptions that some people hold in good faith. For political ethics, the determining factor is not so much good (or bad) faith, but rather conformity and the promotion of the general welfare.

Some principles of distinction between personal ethics and political ethics can be deduced from the above. The most obvious one is that each of these branches of ethics is generally concerned with different kinds of actions: those of the individual and those of the politically organized community (legislative and governmental institutions). When one and the other seem to deal with the same type of actions, they actually consider two formally different dimensions of morality. Let us think, for example, that the deputies who vote for a law in parliament are sincerely convinced that the new law is in accordance with the general interest of their country. After a year and a half, experience shows with all evidence that the new law has been an evil. Can it be said that the approval of this law was a moral evil? Well, depends. From the point of view of the personal ethicsThose who, after having been informed, voted in good faith, lack personal guilt, and it cannot be said that they acted morally wrong. On the other hand, from the point of view of political ethics, an ethical evil has arisen: regardless of what happened in the conscience of those who voted in favor of that law, its contrary to the common good is a fact (and will continue to be so when, over the years, all the deputies who voted for it have passed away). The positive or negative moral quality of the form given to our life in common and to our collaboration - which is formally distinct from personal merit and moral guilt - is the specific object of political ethics.

The personal good and the political common good

The purpose of personal ethics is to teach people how to live well; or, in other words, to help each person to plan and live a good life. This immediately raises a few questions: by what authority can "ethics" enter into my existence to tell me how I should live; can an external body impose a way of living on me; can an external body impose a way of living on me?

In reality, ethics is not an external instance that wants to impose something on us, but it is within each one of us. Let us consider for a moment our own experience. We are constantly thinking about what we should do and what we should avoid; we draw up our plans; we plan our lives; we decide what profession we want to pursue, etc. Sometimes, a short or long time after having made a decision, one realizes that one has made a mistake, regrets it, and says to oneself that, if it were possible to go back, one would give one's life a quite different direction. The experience of regret makes us see the convenience of reflecting on the inner reasoning that precedes and prepares our decisions.

And that reflection is ethics. This, in fact, is nothing other than a reflection that seeks to objectify our inner deliberations, examining them as objectively as possible, critically controlling our inferences, evaluating past experiences and trying to foresee the consequences that a certain behavior can have for us and for those around us. Personal ethics is, therefore, a reflection that is born in a free conscience, and its findings are propose to other equally free consciences.

Returning to the question we are analyzing, this raises a difficult question for political ethics. If, as we have already said, its fundamental point of reference is the political common good, what is the relationship between this and the good life to which personal ethics looks? We will not stop now to review the various answers that have been given throughout history. We will only highlight a kind of antinomy that this relationship raises.

On the one hand, if the good life is the end that ethics proposes to freedom, and can only be realized insofar as it is freely willed, how could it also be the regulating principle of a set of instances, such as political institutions, which use coercion, and which have a monopoly on coercion? If the good life of citizens were also the aim of political institutions, would it not be the case that the State could consider obligatory all that is good, and forbidden all that is bad? And if among citizens there were different conceptions of the good life, would it be up to the State to determine which of them is true and therefore obligatory?

On the other hand, given that we live together to make possible through social collaboration our living and our living well, not certainly our living badly, can political institutions not consider at all what is good for us? If our good were to be disregarded, what other criteria could inspire the life of politically organized society? Moreover, the idea of an "ethically neutral" state does not seem realistic or accurate, simply because it is not possible. Indeed, the legal systems of civilized States prohibit murder, fraud, discrimination on the grounds of race, sex or religion, etc. They therefore have an ethical content. Another thing is that it is not considered lawful for political coercion to invade conscience and intimate convictions, but this is a substantial ethical requirement, linked to the freedom characteristic of the human condition, and not an absence of ethics. For this reason, a political environment from which all ethical considerations have been expelled in the name of freedom would turn against freedom itself, since the "ethical vacuum" would generate in citizens a set of anti-social and anti-solidarity habits that would end up making it impossible to respect the freedom of others and to abide by the rules of justice that make it possible to resolve in a civil manner the conflicts that inevitably arise between free persons. In the end, the strongest would prevail. Historical examples are not lacking.

How, then, is the relationship between the good life and the political common good to be understood? We do not have the space here to give a complete answer. But it is possible to propose two considerations. The first is that the political common good neither coincides completely with the good life, nor is it totally heterogeneous with respect to it. The second is that political institutions (the State) are at the service of social collaboration (society), and the latter exists so that people may freely attain their good (I am not saying that they actually attain it, but rather that can freely to achieve it). To live poorly and make ourselves miserable we would not seek the help of others.

Important consequences follow from these two considerations. In the first place, they make it possible to understand that some requirements of the personal good are absolutely binding for political ethics. Thus, for example, it would never be admissible, from a political point of view, a law that declares positively in accordance with the law an action considered by the majority of society as ethically negative (something quite different is "de facto tolerance" or "legal silence", which in certain circumstances may be convenient). Still less would a law be admissible that explicitly forbids a personal behavior that is commonly considered ethically obligatory, or that declares obligatory one that the generality of citizens think cannot be carried out without committing a moral fault.

At the same time, the fact that the good life and the political common good do not fully coincide means that, when one wants to argue that a certain act should be prohibited and punished by law, it is of little use to show that it constitutes a moral fault. Indeed, it is generally accepted that not everything that is morally wrong for the individual must be prohibited by the State. In short, not every sin is - nor should it be - a crime. Only those behaviors should be prohibited by the State that have a notable negative impact on the common good. This is what must be demonstrated if one wants to argue that this or that way of acting should be prohibited.

Third, good organization and the proper functioning of the public apparatus are necessary, but not sufficient. Good politics establishes instances and instruments of control, divides power among various bodies so that the exercise of power is always limited. However, these measures -which we could call structural- need the complement of personal virtue. It is not difficult to understand why: no matter how many systems of control and division of power are established, if corruption is introduced massively at all levels of a political structure, corruption prevails, and in such a case, as St. Augustine said, it would be impossible to distinguish the State from a gang of thieves.

The importance of the political point of view

Experience teaches that sometimes political problems are posed and attempted to be solved without having succeeded in framing them properly in what is the specific point of view of political ethics. Often one or another solution is proposed on the basis of reasoning that might be appropriate to personal ethics, but which does not even touch the political substance of the problem under study. Even more frequently, the need to achieve certain goals is insisted upon, which are presented as the banner of an ideological position, without realizing that there is no problem with them. And there is not, simply because we all agree on most of the goals that come up in public debates: we all want unemployment to disappear, we all want no citizen to lack quality health care, we all want economic growth, we all want the standard of living of the economically weak classes to improve, we all want the average level of education to improve, not to mention the desire for peace in the most conflictive regions of the world, for a solution to be found to the problem of migrants and refugees from war-torn countries, etc. What we do not agree on so much is the mode to achieve these goals.

In short, the real problem that the policy must solve is not that of the end to be achieved, but that of the media The company's strategy is based on concrete solutions to these sensitive issues, within the available resources, and taking into account the real conditions in which we find ourselves.

Therefore, as long as no reasonable concrete solutions to the media problem are proposed, both the decision-makers and the citizens who have to give or deny them their vote, will find themselves at the moment of truth without knowing what to do. It is as if the pilot of an airplane does not know where he has to take the passengers or, even worse, if the passengers do not even know where they have to go.

Political ethics and social processes

We have already said that political ethics deals with the activity of political institutions at various levels (state, community, municipal). These institutions have the typical characteristics of organizations: they have a hierarchical structure and are regulated by a set of precise rules according to the ends they pursue. However, the latter must be well defined, and it must not be lost sight of the fact that, in the final analysis, they consist of serving society and citizens. Otherwise, what was a means (the organization) will become something important in its own right. This is what happens when, instead of favoring social collaboration, political institutions give in to the temptation of the self-referentialityThe tendency to feed themselves and increase in size, to turn the useless into the necessary, and to bureaucratically hinder social processes.

Political processes and social processes are very different. In the former, there is a mind (it can also be a group of experts) that directs them according to the end sought: an order is conceived and coercion is used to enforce it. Social processes, on the other hand, are born of free collaboration among men and, moreover, generally do not respond to an intentional design. In contrast to the coercion and millimetric foresight typical of political processes, social processes are characterized by their spontaneity. Both the spheres and the instruments of these processes - such as the market, money and language itself - have arisen without responding to the order imposed by a directive mind. Likewise, the knowledge that regulates them is formed in the minds of millions of men as they interact. For this reason, it is a dispersed knowledge, difficult to formalize. In these processes, people who do not know each other, with different interests, but who at a given moment can reciprocally benefit from each other, interact.

From the point of view of political ethics, it is very important not only to know, but above all to respect this difference between political processes and social processes. It is not desirable to politically control the latter. And it is not desirable, above all, because it is not possible. No expert or group of experts can possess the necessary knowledge to do so. Attempts to social engineering end in complete failure, damage freedom, inhibit creativity and waste human and material resources. The idea of social order as spontaneous order, brilliantly proposed by F.A. Hayek, still seems to me to be fully valid, although it may require some slight refinement.

Even in the strictly political sphere, which we have already considered more akin to an organization, the idea of an engineering project raises doubts and fears. Wanting to alter secular institutions without due reflection, without preceding a calm, calm and profound social debate, without taking into account the sensitivity and convictions of a good part of the citizens, as well as the spontaneous dynamics of freedom, only because one has the parliamentary majority to do so, is a sign of the presumption that usually accompanies low intelligence and ideological blindness. Two phenomena that, unfortunately, almost always go together. Politics must respect and favor free social collaboration, without trying to corset it or adapt it to the intuitions of the "expert" in power. Submitting collective and secular knowledge to the ideas of a ruler or group of rulers will always mean, at the very least, a great impoverishment of social life and, many times, a disrespectful and unjust trampling, whatever the intention behind it. To run over and impoverish is precisely what good politics never does.

The authorÁngel Rodríguez Luño 

Professor of Fundamental Moral Theology
Pontifical University of the Holy Cross (Rome)

The World

Who are the persecuted Christians of the Middle East?

Omnes-December 30, 2016-Reading time: 11 minutes

Óscar Garrido Guijarro*.Professor of International Relations

Events in the Middle East are part of the news that surrounds our lives. In the midst of the painful and disturbing news that reach us from there, terms such as Copts, Chaldeans or Maronites appear that are familiar to us, but we may not know where to place them or where they come from. Óscar Garrido, author of Plucked from the Promised Land (St. Paul's, 2016), analyzes in these pages the delicate situation of Christians in the Arab world.

In this complex ethno-religious mosaic of the Middle East, many are unaware that there are countries that are not entirely Muslim, or that about 40 % of the Lebanese population is Christian, that Christians account for 10 % of the population in Egypt, or that they represented until recently 10 % in Syria and 5 % in Iraq.

In general, Arab Christians in the Middle East are second-class citizens in their own land - in terms of freedoms, equality and social and political rights - and have been and are subject to attacks, discrimination and persecution, although with varying intensity depending on the era and the country concerned. Christians have been clearly discriminated against, and this has been "legislated" throughout the history of Islam, and continues to be so in our contemporary era.

With regard to their influence on the West, Arab Christians, for example, have never played a significant role in the politics of the United States, the main proponent of Western values in the Middle East. And while they understand that Europe has at times shown sensitivity to their plight, they are nevertheless aware of Europe's limitations. Europe has become a post-Christian continent which, moreover, lacks the necessary military power. And the actions of European powers in defense of Christian Arabs throughout history have led to problems for these communities. Circumstances of danger have increased for Christian Arabs when they have been caught in the middle of conflicts between Muslims and Europeans, because Muslims have sometimes perceived Christian Arabs as collaborators with the enemy.

Present and future prospects

Recent events that have caused or are causing changes in the political and social developments in Iraq, Syria and Egypt undoubtedly affect the status of the Arab Christian communities in these countries. The rise of political Islamism - fundamentalist and moderate - which proposes a return to a political structure based on the Islamic legal tradition -sharia- is leading Arab Christian communities into a reverse gear in terms of freedoms and rights; and what is more serious: the most basic right, the right to life, is threatened for many Christians. The notion of citizenship and equal rights, as it is considered in Western political culture, is still unresolved in the Muslim cultural and political tradition, where this notion of citizenship still rests on religious affiliation and not on affiliation to the state.

In recent years, Iraq's secular dictatorship has been overthrown, Egypt's dictatorship has been threatened by the arrival of the Muslim Brothers to power and the Syrian one is in the death throes. As aptly described by M. A. Bastenier, "Saddam Hussein's tyrannical and bloodthirsty regime was the airtight lid that closed Pandora's box. Al Qaeda did not prosper in his territory because among the dictator's very serious shortcomings - like Assad in Damascus - religious fundamentalism did not figure, and his dictatorship did not allow competitors". Mariano Aguirre, director of the Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centrealso stressed that "the Arab Spring that would democratically transform the Middle East has turned out to be a period of violent uncertainties and unexpected geopolitical realignments. Optimistic democracy promotion strategists did not foresee that the fall of the dictators could generate a violent fragmentation of the region."

 Martyrs of the 21st century

Establishment of the Caliphate by the terrorist group Daesh in areas of Iraq and Syria in June 2014 has brought the violent persecution of Christians in the Middle East to the attention of world public opinion. The macabre photographs and videos of torture and crucifixions of Christians aired by the terrorists themselves to spread panic have been a wake-up call to the consciences of many political and social leaders on the planet. The shocking video of Islamic State terrorists beheading 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians with knives on a Libyan beach went around the world in February 2015. So did the images of Christians' houses marked with Arabic lettering. nun -The fact that the word "nasrani" ("Nazarenes") reminds us of the Nazi practices to stigmatize and terrorize the Jews, has made the whole world aware of this phenomenon of savage persecution against Christians, denounced on so many occasions, even before the emergence of Daesh.

At the time, the Somali-Dutch activist Aayan Hirsi Ali published an article in the American weekly magazine Newsweek titled The global war against Christians in the Muslim world. Aayan Hirsi Ali denounced that "Christians are being killed in the Islamic world because of their religion. It is a growing genocide that should provoke global alarm [...]. The conspiracy of silence surrounding this violent expression of religious intolerance must stop. Nothing less than the fate of Christianity - and ultimately of all religious minorities in the Muslim world - is at stake."

In another article, the executive secretary of the American Jewish CommitteeDavid Harris, highlighted the passivity and silence in the face of this phenomenon of intolerance and violence: "What there has been is silence. As a Jew I find this silence incomprehensible. We Jews know very well that the sin of silence is not a solution in the face of acts of oppression. [...] How many more attacks, how many more dead worshippers, how many more destroyed churches and how many more families will have to flee before the world finds its voice, expresses its moral outrage, demands more than fleeting official statements of distress and does not abandon Christian communities in distress?"

According to the organization Open DoorsCurrently, around one hundred million Christians suffer some form of persecution in more than sixty countries, and more than seven thousand Christians died in 2015 because of their faith. International Society for Human Rightsa German NGO, estimates that 80 % of the religious discrimination currently taking place in the world is directed against Christians.

On March 13, 2015, fifty countries signed a resolution at the UN Human Rights Council, which was meeting in Geneva, "in support of the human rights of Christians and other communities, especially in the Middle East." The resolution, whose prime movers were Russia, Lebanon and the Holy See, calls on countries to support the long-established historical presence of all ethnic and religious communities in the Middle East, and recalls that Christian communities in this region are in particular danger: "The Middle East is experiencing a situation of instability and conflict that has recently been exacerbated. The consequences are proving disastrous for the region. The existence of many religious communities is seriously threatened. Christians are now being particularly affected. These days even their survival is in question [...]. The situation of Christians in the Middle East, a land where they have been living for centuries and where they have a right to remain, is a matter of grave concern".

Three days after the adoption of the resolution, the Vatican's diplomatic representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Silvio Tomasi, said: "We have to stop this kind of genocide. Otherwise, in the future we will wonder why we did nothing, why we allowed such a terrible tragedy to happen." More recently, the Syrian bishop of Homs, Bishop Jean Abdou, has denounced the existence of a real genocide in Syria and denounced that "some countries don't care about Christians in the Middle East.".

Among the findings of the 2016 World Religious Freedom Report published by. Aid to the Church in Needthe Syrian Catholic priest Jacques Murad

-kidnapped in May 2015 by Daesh and that he managed to escape three months later, as he tells in the section People Who Count-stresses that "Our world teeters on the brink of complete catastrophe as extremism threatens to erase all traces of diversity in society. But if there is one thing religion teaches us, it is the value of the human person, the need to respect one another as a gift from God." And he explains how, back in his hometown of Al Qaryatayn, he was able to recover with the help of a Muslim friend. "The easiest thing for me would have been to fall into anger and hatred, but God showed me another way. Throughout my whole life as a monk in Syria I have sought points of encounter with Muslims."

            The report highlights "the emergence of a new phenomenon of religious violence that we could call Islamist 'hyper-extremism'." which is characterized by its "extremist creed and radical legal and governance system, its systematic attempt to annihilate or expel any group that does not share its views, its callous treatment of victims, its use of social networks to recruit its followers or intimidate the opposition, and the quest for global impact favored by associated extremist groups."

The perverse effects of this hyper-extremism for Arab Christians are patent: "In some areas of the Middle East, including Syria and Iraq, it is eliminating all forms of religious diversity.". Due to Islamist radicalism, according to the United Nations the number of refugees in the world has grown from 5.8 million in 2015 to 65.3 million in 2016.

 Egypt and the Copts

The term "Coptic" is used in different senses, not only in the usual religious sense. For most Copts the term is not simply a religious designation; they give it also a cultural and even ethnic sense. They stress that the term comes from the Greek "Aygyptos" and argue that Coptic identity is intrinsically linked to Egyptian identity, history and culture. They constitute the largest Arab Christian community in the Middle East.

Violence against Copts based on religious identity is a recent phenomenon. It first appeared in 1972 when Muslims in the city of Khankah burned an illegal church and destroyed Coptic property. The violence has continued ever since. Over the past few decades some 1,800 Copts have been killed and hundreds of acts of vandalism have been perpetrated against Christian property with almost no one being tried for it, let alone punished.

The bloodiest attack against Christians took place in Alexandria on January 1, 2011 when a suicide bomber targeted Copts participating in a church for New Year's religious services. Twenty-one Christians were killed and 97 were injured. In July 2013, following the protests that ended with the overthrow of Islamist President Mursi, days of intense violence erupted, pitting the army against supporters of the Muslim Brothers. The Copts were violently persecuted by Islamists, who accused them of being behind the coup against Mursi. During the summer of 2013, half a hundred churches and several hundred Christian properties were attacked or burned and dozens of Copts were killed. Jordi Batallá, coordinator of the work on North Africa at Amnesty InternationalThe government security forces' passivity was denounced at the time.

 Iraq: Assyrians and Chaldeans

The main Arab Christian communities in Iraq are the Chaldeans and Assyrians. In the last decades of the 20th century, Iraq's Christians, like their Muslim compatriots, suffered under the totalitarian regime of Saddam Hussein, which did not tolerate any form of collective organization or institution without direct control by the state. Despite constitutional recognition of religious freedom, religion and religious practice were heavily policed. After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Al Qaedafirst, and DaeshThe attacks, then, have unleashed the hunt for Christians. Between 2004 and 2009 alone, some 65 attacks on Christian churches in Iraq were recorded. In October 2010, a hundred Christians were kidnapped by a group of jihadists in an Assyrian Christian church in Baghdad. The result was the death of 58 hostages and 67 wounded. The hostage-takers entered with a clean shot during the mass on the eve of All Souls' Day. Christmas 2013, Daesh perpetrated a massacre of Christians in Baghdad. A car bomb exploded in front of a church while Midnight Mass was being celebrated. Thirty-eight people were killed and 70 injured.

June 9, 2014 Daesh took control of a considerable part of central and western Iraq and eastern Syria. On June 29, he released a recording announcing the establishment of the caliphate from Aleppo (Syria) to Diyala (Iraq). A few days later, Daesh was addressed in a written message to Christians in Mosul whom he threatened with death if they did not convert to Islam.

In September 2014, Chaldean Patriarch Louis Raphael Sako, in a meeting with U.S. Ambassador to the UN Keith Harper, called for the protection of Iraqi Christians. The patriarch warned that if Iraqi Christians could not return to their places of origin in the Nineveh Plain near Mosul, they would face the same fate as displaced Palestinians. He added: "Christians in Iraq will have a future if the international community helps us immediately. The population is disappointed by the little help that has been received so far. Some 120,000 Christians are currently displaced in Iraq. They need everything, because the Daesh terrorists have taken everything from them.

Syria: Melkites and Syriacs

In Syria, the two main Christian communities are the Melkites and the Syriacs. The Syrian state is set up as a republic under a military dictatorship presided over by Bashar Al Assad. Under this dictatorship, the Arab Christian communities in Syria are supervised by the regime, but the government gives them freedom to buy land and build churches. The churches run their internal affairs freely. The government is also responsible for providing the churches with electricity and water. Christians practice their faith freely and the liturgies of religious holidays are broadcast by the public media.

This situation has changed substantially over the past five years. Inspired by the popular uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, in March 2011 a multitude of Syrian protesters mobilized in the streets against the Syrian regime. Al Assad responded by using military force. Even today, after more than five years of civil war, the Syrian regime continues to crumble with no expectation that an external intervention or an armed rebellion can accelerate its fall and put an end to the repression, which has already caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, displaced persons and refugees.

With the entry into the Syrian conflict of the DaeshThe situation in the conflict has changed radically as the Syrian Christians experience it and as the United States and its Western allies perceive it, as they began to consider an armed intervention in Syria against the Assad regime in the summer of 2013. This is how Syrian Christians experience it, and this is also how it is perceived by the United States and Western allies, who went from considering an armed intervention in Syria against the Al Assad regime in the summer of 2013, to developing, from the end of September 2014 and until today, an intervention against Daeshin collaboration with Al Assad, on Syrian soil.

Between 2011 and 2013, a thousand Syrian Christians lost their lives and some 450,000 have been displaced, according to statements by the Patriarch of Antioch for the Catholic Melkites, Gregory III Laham. Within two years, the city of Aleppo, which previously had the largest Christian community in Syria, had lost most of its members. The exodus of Christians from Syria is a repeat of what has been happening in Iraq for the past ten years. In 2014, Daesh launched a persecution of Christians in the territory it controlled in northern Syria. According to the 2015 report of the organization Open DoorsSince the war began, 40 % of the Christian population has left the country: about 700,000 people. 

Lebanon and the Maronites

The Maronites are the main Arab Christian community in Lebanon, the only country in the Middle East where Christians - 40 % of the population - are not a minority. It is the only country in the region whose Head of State must be, according to the Constitution, a Christian. This fact makes Lebanon a unique country, although it must also be said that the recent election of Michel Aoun has required a year of intense negotiations.

Christians in Lebanon, as a free people, have had the capacity to lead the Arab cultural and intellectual renaissance of the first part of the 20th century, and have worked as agents of progress in Lebanon in all fields: education, media, commercial innovation, banking or entertainment industry. Beirut, despite almost three decades of civil war, is still the freest city in the Arab world, and continues to be the lung for many Christians who have emigrated from Turkey, Armenia, Syria or Iraq.

The revolutions and regime changes that have shaken the Middle East in recent years have not affected the country at the institutional level, although the consequences are noticeable given the wave of Syrian refugees that Lebanon is hosting, more than one million, in a country of only four million inhabitants.

Palestine and Israel

The Arab Christian communities living in Palestinian-Israeli territory are not numerically as important as those in Lebanon, Egypt, Syria or Iraq.

Some 161,000 Christians live in Israel, 80 % of Arab origin. The majority reside in the north. The cities with the most Christians are Nazareth (about 15,000), Haifa (15,000); Jerusalem (12,000) and Shjar'am (10,000).

In Palestinian territory (West Bank and Gaza) live some 52,000 Arab Christians, mostly Greek Orthodox Melkites. The rest are Syriacs, Roman Catholics, Greek Catholics, Armenians, Copts and Maronites.

 

TribuneCardinal Carlos Osoro Sierra

After the Year of Mercy let us design a new era

Recently elevated to the cardinal dignity, the Archbishop of Madrid takes stock of the Jubilee Year of Mercy and invites us to look to the future, calling us to be designers and protagonists of a new era of mercy.

December 30, 2016-Reading time: 3 minutes

Following in the footsteps of his predecessors, in the Year of Mercy, the Pope wanted to offer the Church a time of grace to take and assume a clear, attractive, radical path; what he himself told us in the Bull of Convocation: "Mercy is the main beam that supports the life of the Church." (Misericordiae vultus 10). Francis has constantly reminded us of this during these months and has succeeded in putting the Lord's desire in the hearts of men: "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." (Mt 5:7).

Already in the first moments of his pontificate, he told us in different ways that the first truth of the Church is the love of Christ. I recall that, when he celebrated his first Mass with the people of Rome in March 2013, he pointed out that. "the most forceful message from the Lord". Why? Do we realize the world we live in? Do we perceive the effects of drawing boundaries and always remaining in judgment of others?

Now that we have closed the Year of Mercy, I believe that Jesus Christ would say more or less the following: "Do not do that among yourselves or with those around you, bow down to each person you meet along the way. Have the audacity to begin the new epoch inaugurated by Me; the old has passed away, something new has begun.". The best response to grace this year is to imitate the God who became man to tell us who He is and who we are: He forgives not with decrees but with caresses, He caresses the wounds of our sins to heal them. If we have had the experience of allowing ourselves to be healed by God, let us go out to change this world with the grace and strength that He gives us.

As St. John XXIII affirmed at the opening of the Second Vatican Council, "the Bride of Christ prefers to use the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity.". And as Blessed Paul VI emphasized: "My misery, mercy of God. May I at least be able to honor Who Thou art, the God of infinite goodness, by invoking, accepting, celebrating Thy most sweet mercy." (Meditation of Paul VI in the face of death).

St. John Paul II, keeping St. Faustina Kowalska in mind, later intuited that our time is precisely the time of mercy. In his encyclical Dives in misericordiasaid that "the Church lives an authentic life, when she professes and proclaims mercy - the most stupendous attribute of the Creator and Redeemer." (n. 13). In the same vein, his successor, Pope Benedict XVI, emphasized that "mercy is in fact the central core of the Gospel message". (Divine Mercy Sunday, March 30, 2008).

Today it is Pope Francis who, with his numerous gestures - with refugees, the elderly, the homeless, etc. - and now in the apostolic letter Misericordia et miserareminds us once again that "this is the time of mercy". "Every day of our life is marked by the presence of God, who guides our steps with the power of the grace that the Spirit infuses in the heart to shape it and make it capable of love. It is the time of mercy for each and every one, so that no one may think that they are outside the closeness of God and the power of his tenderness, [...] so that the weak and defenseless, those who are far away and alone may feel the presence of brothers and sisters who support them in their needs, [...] so that every sinner may not fail to ask forgiveness and to feel the hand of the Father who always welcomes and embraces." (n. 21).

Let us have the audacity to allow ourselves to be led by the Lord, in this new epoch, in this new time, to design the world with mercy, and let us lend our lives to do so. Can you imagine all the people of the world in sincere and open communion and friendship with Our Lord Jesus Christ, giving to the world the medicine of God's mercy revealed in Him? I have always understood this medicine from God's faithfulness to all men: "If we are unfaithful, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself." (Tim 2:13). You and I can disown God, turn our backs on him and even sin against him, but God cannot disown himself. He remains faithful, always faithful, come what may. He does not grow weary, he waits, he encourages, he helps to get up, he never reproaches anything.

Humanity has deep wounds, the result of discarding, confrontations or so many new forms of slavery. Many believe that there are no solutions, that there is no possibility of rescue. Men and women of all ages and social situations need an embrace that saves them, that forgives them at the root and floods them with infinite love. This is the mercy that Jesus Christ offers you and that which puts you back on the path. Try it. It costs nothing. It is enough simply to let him embrace you and forgive you. It never bills you, for it makes you experience what the prodigal son saw and lived: "It was necessary to hold a feast and rejoice, because this brother of yours was dead and has come back to life; he was lost and we have found him." (Lk 15:32).

Let us dare to be designers and protagonists of the time of mercy, keeping in mind all that we have lived throughout this year.

The authorCardinal Carlos Osoro Sierra

Archbishop of Madrid

Experiences

Practical advice to Religion teachers

Omnes-December 30, 2016-Reading time: 6 minutes

Before the beginning of the school year, the prevailing political uncertainty is generating great educational instability. It is not known what will become of the LOMCE, but with it or without it, the academic placement of Religion is still not well resolved, and the teaching staff is suffering from the reduction of schedules due to ideological choices that do not respect the will of parents. And the teaching staff is suffering from the reduction of timetables due to ideological choices that do not respect the will of parents. What practical recommendations should be made?

- Dionisio Antolín Castrillo

Diocesan Delegate for Education of Palencia

As I start writing this article addressed to Religion teachers and before the beginning of the school year, which is just around the corner, it turns out that Spain has already gone through two general elections, and the results and the subsequent composition and distribution of seats in Parliament show a truly complex situation: a government in office and the popular mandate for political parties to dialogue, negotiate and agree and, from the pact, give a government to Spain.

The continuity in the application of the Organic Law for the Improvement of Educational Quality (LOMCE) will depend to a great extent on the government that is formed. The outlook is not good. And it is difficult to think that it will be maintained as it is.

There was a time when political parties seemed willing to build bridges and consensus in the educational field, thus responding to social demands. But that time has passed and attitudes vary greatly. If the Popular Party (PP) forms the government, its LOMCE is and must be the starting point, but it will have to rethink and delay its application in aspects that in some autonomies are not yet developed, in others they are being slowed down and, of course, they are being applied with many difficulties, even in those communities with PP government. If the Socialist Party (PSOE) forms a government, the LOMCE is the first thing it will repeal, as it has repeatedly announced, although it would have serious difficulties to bring forward a new law, also due to the absolute majority of the PP in the Senate,

Academic fit

I dislike hearing on television talk shows or reading in newspaper articles the sounding that it is necessary to eliminate the academic placement of the subject of Religion as a condition for improving the educational system. Paradoxically, from what I have read recently, the educational proposals go the other way: the countries that make up the OECD propose that the 2018 PISA test include, along with the already known tests of Mathematics, Reading and Science, a questionnaire that analyzes the attitude of 15-year-old students and evaluates the global competence of students to live in an inclusive world in which cultural and religious diversity is recognized and respected. Certainly, we must now agree on the need to equip students with the tools to manage a changing future in which scientific and technical solutions will not suffice and where clear ethical choices are required. Today, the presence of Religion in public schools makes more sense and is more necessary than ever. The school is the space in which the recognition of religious diversity must be articulated in the curriculum, in dialogue with the other subjects. It is necessary to continue claiming that it is not a better educational system the one that ignores the spiritual dimension or the one that has no academic space to welcome cultural and religious diversity.

Calendar of application of the LOMCE

On the other hand, the LOMCE is moving forward and fulfilling its timetable with the missing courses.

We already know the state and regional regulations for all levels of compulsory education and, therefore, the different teaching load for each of the courses. The very different treatment given to the subject in each of the Autonomous Communities has led teachers, professors, parents, diocesan delegates and bishops to a disheartening bewilderment. The appeals before the courts have been numerous; and the sentences have been favorable. But we must continue denouncing so that, from the Ministry, the law is complied with, demanding from the autonomous regions a worthy teaching load and that Religion is taught with the pedagogical quality required for the other subjects.

Teacher stability

Teacher-teachers who teach religion, workers in the public sector like the others with equal preparation and involvement., cannot become dispensable on the basis of unilateral ideological choices, not agreed upon with the community, and clearly not shared by so many parents who, as statistics show, choose the subject of religion for their children every year.

In the middle we are the diocesan delegates of Education, to whom the departments of human resources of each Autonomous Community communicate the educational needs for the schools of that diocese and ask them for their proposals for teachers. With real sleight of hand and great heartache, we look for ways to make the reduction of teaching hours in primary schools compatible with the number of teachers we have on staff. Sometimes, retirements have been the solution. But it has really been the solidarity among the teaching staff, losing everyone so that no one is left without work, which has paved the way. All this with the danger of having only part-time professionals.

Curriculum

We already have a Catholic Religion curriculum for all educational levels (Primary/Secondary/ Baccalaureate), which fits perfectly into the pedagogical framework of the LOMCE. A curriculum that underlines the legitimacy and foundation of Religion within the framework of integral education and its educational contribution (this perspective is more pedagogical and is not based so much on Church-State agreements and the right of families).

It is a curriculum that assumes the curricular framework of the LOMCE, by linking the contributions of the teaching of Religion to the School's own purpose, by presenting learning by competencies and by affirming that Religion assumes as a starting point the objectives set for each stage in the development of the various skills.

A curriculum that structures the contents in four blocks that gather the Christian anthropological knowledge accumulated throughout the centuries. It is explained that the four blocks include concepts, procedures and attitudes that are oriented to the achievement of the objectives of the stage.

By the way, in the ministerial resolution of February 13, 2015, which orders the publication of the new curriculum, it is stated that the students of Bachillerato who so request have the right to receive the teaching of Catholic Religion; that it is up to the hierarchy to indicate the contents of such teaching, as well as the determination of the curriculum and the evaluable learning standards that allow the verification of the achievement of the objectives and the acquisition of the competencies corresponding to the subject of Religion; that Catholic Religion will be included as an area or subject at the corresponding educational levels; that it will be obligatory for all centers and voluntary for students; that decisions on the use of textbooks and didactic materials and, as the case may be, the supervision and approval of the same is the responsibility of the religious authority.

The teacher's turn

The task now falls to the individual teacher. He or she is the last step on which the curriculum takes shape. On him and his dedication falls, to a great extent, what the subject represents in the educational centers. It is, therefore, necessary to make the pedagogical update that the moment demands. This is where the diocesan delegations of Education should be attentive. And I propose some possible tasks:

-I think it is necessary to know the new curricular framework of the LOMCE because of the consequences and significant impact on the didactic programs and on the way of teaching classes from now on. Specifically, Order ECD/65/2015, of January 21, 2015, on the relationship between the components of the curriculum, will help to understand the place of the subjects, Religion included, in the new pedagogical framework of the LOMCE, where all of them appear linked to the achievement of the stage objectives and key competencies.

-The new Religion curriculum for the three stages in which it has been renewed on the occasion of the LOMCE tries to justify the reasons for the teaching of Religion in the educational system. I think it is convenient to read or reread the 1979 Episcopal document on the school identity of the teaching of Religion. It is a key document, elaborated at a key moment.

-As is logical, a challenge that is always essential in the formation, both initial and ongoing, of teachers of Religion, is to keep in mind a good theological synthesis of the Christian message.. There are some very good materials; besides those of the Spanish Episcopal Conference, already known, there are others that open new perspectives of access. I think the one published by Verbo Divino is very good, A God who acts in history (there are three booklets: Old Testament; Jesus Christ; Church. It approaches the subject from the texts, in simple language, in the perspective of group work, etc.).

In short. I am convinced of it. Over and above political uncertainties, legislation, pedagogical neologisms with which reforms are justified, cutbacks, so many things... what the religion teacher finds are students, lives under construction that demand the best of them, and I know that most of them -if not all- do their best to give it. And they are convinced that education serves as a prelude, accompaniment and sowing, to be able to later reap a personal and mature response to transcendence or adherence to Jesus Christ.

Experiences

Religious handicrafts: the hands are at the heart of the matter

The recent restoration of the monumental monstrance of the Cathedral of Toledo, carried out by Talleres de Arte Granda with a multidisciplinary team composed of historians, silversmiths, gemologists, etc., brings to the present the irreplaceable contribution of goldsmiths and textile artisans to the development of the liturgy, to the proper richness of worship and to religious devotion itself. These pages describe the present and the future of these crafts.

Omnes-December 29, 2016-Reading time: 10 minutes

The goldsmith Enrique de Arfe made the Eucharistic monstrance of the cathedral of Toledo between 1515 and 1523. The recent restoration of this great piece of goldsmithing, in the flamboyant Gothic style, has required the dismantling of its 5,500 pieces, including a total of 260 statuettes. The restoration also coincides with the fact that the Madrid workshops in charge of this work - Talleres de Arte Granda, founded in 1891 by the Asturian priest Félix Granda - are celebrating 125 years of existence. PALABRA has talked to several of its artisans to bring our readers closer to the world of religious craftsmanship, without which the liturgy would lose its splendor and devotion would suffer. This is what Juan Carlos Martínez Moy, sculptor, suggested to us: "Religious images and objects of worship should not be seen as idols, but as windows to heaven."

Embroiderers and garment makers

One of the fundamental crafts is that of embroiderers and makers of chasubles, rain capes, albs, tablecloths, etcetera. In the workshop of Los Rosalesin Villaviciosa de Odón, dependent on Talleres de Arte Granda -explains designer Pilar Romero-, "We carry out three types of embroidery: appliqué embroidery; nuanced embroidery, which reproduces images with natural silk threads; and classic Spanish embroidery in gold thread, which is used to decorate the Virgin's mantles, so characteristic of Andalusia"..

The embroidery on tablecloths is usually done by machine, but it is handmade because the drawing is guided by hand. "Everything we do is handmade, as the hands occupy a fundamental place."Pilar emphasizes. She recognizes that machine embroidery is increasingly used, by computer, which transforms the digitized design into stitches. It is more economical, but the ideal of the craft is quality, beauty and that the product is liturgically appropriate.

The mentality has changed in recent years and the future is here, says Pilar, "I do not believe that hand embroidery and handmade tailoring will be lost, it is not even technically convenient. The good workshops, like ours, put a lot of effort into the quality of their craftsmanship".. A sign of this is, in his opinion, that the young seminarians continue to order good chasubles for their first Mass. Not long ago "a Spanish seminarian ordered a chasuble from the catalog, but quite rich, with hand embroidery. And since he had no money, he proposed to his family and parishioners that, instead of giving him other gifts, they should all participate in the purchase".

In almost all trades that serve the sacred, there is a great shortage of artisans and the average age of the embroiderers who know the trade is high. The workshop itself, says Pilar, "has become a training school over the past 58 years. Now, our quarry comes from vocational training schools with which we collaborate. Students of pattern making, dressmaking and fashion do their internships in the workshop".

Pilar is an art historian, but she is a "I always wanted to work in something manual, because since I was a child I have had a knack for it. The career has given me aesthetic training and helps me a lot when it comes to design, which is my main job.".

On another matter, he comments that "people of faith have a more complete view of that work." The work is similar to making a good civilian dress, but "Our destiny is the Mass, the worship, the liturgy. I don't think we will ever fully understand what this means".

At the end of our conversation he shows us the chasubles he has designed for the last three Popes. Showing me the photo of Pope Francis with the most recent one, sober and with machine embroidery, he concludes with pride and a broad smile: "Yes, the last three Popes have been my best customers."

Silversmiths

Juan Tardáguila is a silversmith and manufactures goldsmith pieces: chalices, monstrances, viriles, navetas, incense burners... He works with brass, silver, gold and steel for the stems of sacred vessels, all of them materials of a certain purity that do not oxidize. He explains that he got into the trade at the age of 15, more out of necessity than vocation, and that the apprenticeship has been a long one: "Managing it all is very difficult; it takes almost a lifetime. It also requires a great deal of creativity.

He is concerned about the future because it is difficult to train young people. There are schools, but the training they provide is insufficient and has to be completed in the workshop. There used to be more places to work, but now the market has shrunk. Andalusia is where there are more silversmiths.

For Juan, the quality of a piece, apart from the materials, is in its design. An exclusive piece, out of the catalog, is different from one that is reproduced in series. In the former, no molds are used and it is made to measure. It requires more dedication and is more expensive.

Juan is proud to have worked on the restoration of the Toledo monstrance: "I was impressed by how they were able to make it in the 16th century. Today technology helps us, but back then they had to make the same raw material in the workshop itself: sheet metal, thread, silver screws and nuts... That's where so many goldsmith procedures come from." He is motivated by doing his job well and having people appreciate it: "Sometimes we get compliments from customers, and it's a great satisfaction.".

Finally, he is skeptical about the mechanization of his trade: "In exclusive parts, machines can't go in too much. Almost everything has to be done by hand. In the repetition of pieces, yes, but there is a danger of displacing the artisans. This is what has happened with engravers: there are very few left and we depend almost entirely on machines, which, however, are not valid or profitable for some jobs, such as engraving a date. And by not combining men and machines, we end up losing the artisanal techniques.

Broncists

Juan Carriazo is a bronze artist specialized in making tabernacles. He explains that they are normally made of brass, but have parts covered with 24-karat gold or silver, and usually have two shells: an inner one, where the Blessed Sacrament will be placed, and the outer one. Then the decorative elements are added. The lock is also installed. "We are increasingly being asked for safe locks and steel reinforcement plates for security reasons."

A good tabernacle is good because of its exclusive and beautiful design, and because of the enrichment that is added to it: enamels, engravings, columns, jewels..., although these are usually provided by the client. And there is also the workmanship: "There are tabernacles that require more than three months of work: about 400 hours."Juan assures.

Juan comments with great satisfaction: "I have tabernacles made by me on five continents. I have a photograph of all of them. The best one was the one for the Alabama Cathedral, Gothic style, with silver interior brilliants and enamels: spectacular! It took us two years to complete the cathedral commission. And he explains that he works on this "By family tradition, I didn't learn it in school. My father worked here for fifty years, and an uncle of mine also worked here for fifty years. When I started working when I was 14 years old, I liked the trade, and I still do today"..

And to give me an idea of the challenge of each tabernacle, he tells me about the case of a customer who came with a peculiar tabernacle door -it had an opening mechanism-, and he asked for a tabernacle for that door.

Juan is retiring soon, but says the future of his work is secure with his two apprentices. But he warns that "Craftsmanship has to be liked a lot. If you don't, you end up leaving it. And you have to get involved. But it's a beautiful craft that I'm very proud of.".

Enamelists

"Enameling is a very ancient craft technique. Its origin is not very well known, but as the main elements of enamel are metal and glass, they require a significant degree of civilization."explains Montse Romero.

The first traces of enamels, he adds, appear in Mesopotamia, but it was the Egyptians who developed colored glass and initiated this technique to decorate with color metal. It was also done with precious stones, but the enamels give much versatility to the decorations. That is why enameling has always gone in parallel with religious goldsmithing, although enamels are also made for jewelry and decorative (with religious motifs or not), such as the picture of the Virgin that Montse points out to me in front of where we chat.

Nowadays, fewer enamels are made, because it is an expensive technique, especially because of the skilled labor required. Because of its great technical difficulty, there are very few people who know how to do them. A good artist must also be a good craftsman, because they are processes in which "You either master the materials or they master you. You have to master the fire, with furnaces over 800 degrees, glass and metal. And although metal and glass seem very different materials, have similar expansions and adhere by the action of heat without melting. I think that in time this craft will be valued more than it is now".

"What makes an enamel valuable is the skill of the craftsman and the expressiveness he achieves. The materials are not expensive: copper, silver and glass, which is silica with pigments. And keep in mind that we do not do anything standard: all enamels are handmade. I can be commissioned to make a chalice with enamels of the evangelists, but in the end each evangelist I make is different. There are no molds with which to reproduce the same enamels. It is something like painting by hand, but on copper and glass.

Montse recognizes that religious craftsmanship is an extra motivation. "I once painted a Virgin and was invited to the blessing of the image. I was very impressed when I saw a whole village lined up to kiss the image. I sat in a corner and was moved. I imagine that God will take into account a work that is for his service. Even those who do not have faith realize that there is something more, that they have to do the work very well because we have a very special client: the Church".

My endeavor, Monte observes, is to "to get each image to transmit something. And that, today, is not done by the machine". But the trade "Logically, it has to evolve. Machines can be introduced that take away the hard work, such as shaping the pieces, or sanding the metal, but the essence of craftsmanship will continue, I am convinced.".

The crisis has greatly affected the pool of enamelists and it is the workshops that function as a school for apprentices. Today, except in Catalonia, there are few people inclined towards the trade. Montse, who is an interior architect, learned it in the workshop, in these 18 years that she has been working as an enameler and polychromator in Granada.

 Polishers

José Chicharro explains his craft by indicating that, in the end, all goldsmith pieces must pass through his hands: "I give them life; without my work, no matter how well the goldsmith works, they would not look good.".

This craft is also learned in the workshop: "I started when I was 18 years old. I learned a lot in a family silversmith shop. In this trade you need a lot of strength, because you have to press and because of the weight of some pieces. And you have to know some tricks, especially for flat pieces.".

Warns that "The automatic machines are profitable when it comes to many of the same pieces, but religious goldsmithing is very different and the machines do not compensate. A tabernacle, for example, has about a hundred pieces and each piece has to be polished by hand. That is why it is expensive. But that's where the quality and the art lie".

He also comments on his satisfaction when he enters churches and sees things related to his trade. He recently saw in the cathedral of Granada a tabernacle that had come out of his workshop. He enjoyed boasting to those who were there that he had polished it. And above all, "I am very happy with the silver templete I polished for a monstrance in Vigo. When you see people seeing your work you feel a great satisfaction".

José is only a few years away from retirement. That's why he comments: "I think I have left a very important legacy to my apprentice. Young people are needed to keep the craft alive, as many of us artisans are nearing retirement."

Sculptors and carvers

The "imaginero" or carver, explains Juan Carlos Martínez Moy, is a type of sculptor dedicated to wood carving, polychrome and religious themes. Something very specific. He, however, considers himself a sculptor: "I have done some direct carving, but few in comparison to clay, which is what I work on the most. Almost everything I do is figurative and religious, because these are the commissions that come to the workshop the most". In his opinion, "The blank page of sculpture is clay. By dint of working with it, for me it has become the noblest material: it has an expressiveness that no other has. I start with a clay sketch and then I make the mold from which the piece is taken, or it is digitized and then reproduced in the size I want. The digital world facilitates a multitude of steps, although in the last ten years I have repeated very few things".

Notes that "The face of the figure is where I turn to the most, because it is what transmits the most, especially in sacred art. You can take a tree trunk without debarking, make a beautiful face and hand, and that's all it takes". It also stresses that "My greatest hope is that the Church will be the artistic vanguard, as it once was, and that the language of modern art will serve as an expression of the Gospel, which is what sacred art is. Joseph Ratzinger wrote that the icon is meant to stir the echo of the sacred that we all carry within us. And that is my goal: that a work of mine should move, because it is the window to heaven. That's why I try to take care of my spiritual life: I need it for my work. Many times I have had artistic ideas while praying".

Juan Carlos regrets the few sculptors who dedicate themselves to sacred art: "Some make inroads, but not always fortunate ones.". Where there is more imagery is in Andalusia, in Seville specifically. And there are not more artists because it is difficult to make a living from sculpture.

Polychromators

Begoña Espinos is dedicated to polychroming religious art objects: "This craft is very ancient. And already in the Romanesque and Gothic the technique of stewing appears, which is the queen of polychromy. It is a difficult technique that requires a great deal of skill and, above all, many hours. It is not only expensive because of the material, but also because it has to be done by hand. At the moment it is not possible to mechanize polychromy, because to give that touch that favors the expressiveness of an image, the artisan's hands are needed". Although he explains that now a more neutral polychrome is used. Even the images are left as they are.

There are good polychromators in England. They also abound in the south of Spain and in Madrid. She came to the trade out of a clear professional vocation and emphasizes that "When it comes to religious imagery, you do it with more affection, because you know that there is something sacred behind it, that you have to do it very well so that people will be devoted to it. I also pray a lot to the images I am working on".

Restorers

Dulce Piñeiro explains that "I have always liked art, but I didn't see myself as an artist, but rather as a doctor of works of art.". And the restoration, he adds, "It is a very necessary profession. It is important that people think about the conservation of their most valuable pieces. Many times they do not know their historical-artistic value and, rather than acquiring new ones, perhaps the best thing to do would be to restore them and return them to worship. We take care of assessing whether it is appropriate to repair or restore, and what would be the appropriate cleaning.

Explains that "there are many works of art that have been spoiled by ignorance".

And he points out that "A good restoration is one that respects the original, is documented, photographed, is reversible and gives clues to the restorers who come after it. This is the case of the restoration of the monstrance of the cathedral of Toledo: the indications of the previous restorers have been of great help to us. They worked very well and now the monstrance has been able to recover its splendor, which does not mean that it shines more. Polishing it again would have meant removing material. Yes, scratches, imperfections and dirt have been removed.".

Finally, Dulce insists that the main difficulty in her work is to make customers see that sometimes it is not convenient to make the piece look as if it were new.

Experiences

Migrants: walls are not the solution

First it was Lampedusa, then Lesbos; the Mediterranean turned into a cemetery; Syrians fleeing war; Central Africans seeking the Italian coasts from Libya... Migratory flows multiply, and meet walls. "Walls are not the solution. The problem remains with more hatred"Pope Francis affirms.

Rafael Miner-December 28, 2016-Reading time: 8 minutes

The process of dismantling the refugee camp in Calais (France), where thousands of immigrants wishing to reach the United Kingdom have been staying, has been in the news these days.

Many have been redistributed in reception centers scattered throughout France, although around two thousand, many of them minors, preferred to stay as long as possible to try to reach Great Britain, where they claim to have relatives they do not know if they will ever be able to see and embrace in their lifetime.

Most analysts consider that this is just another patch in the face of an issue of enormous magnitude, such as migration flows, which is truly multifaceted, but which involves hundreds of thousands of people - millions if the figures for years are added up - who are desperate to reach a better, more dignified future and escape from extreme poverty.

The numbers are stubborn. From January to early October of this year 2016, in just over nine months, more than three hundred thousand migrants have arrived in Europe via the Mediterranean; almost 170,000 via Greece, and 130,000 via Italy, and more than 3,500 people have drowned or gone missing. At the time of publication of this issue of WordThe figure may be as high as 4,000.

Just a few days ago, the Hellenic country, immersed in a major economic and financial crisis, has requested urgent assistance to care for 60,000 refugees who have been trapped in their country following the closure of the borders by the pact between the European Union and Turkey. "We need blankets now", says the Greek government.

Lampedusa

Since he was elected to take the helm of Peter's boat, Pope Francis has been closely following the drama of immigration.

He showed this in July 2013, when he arranged for his first official trip to the Sicilian island of Lampedusa, of barely five thousand inhabitants, known for the continuous disembarkation of immigrants, and for countless shipwrecks.

There, the Holy Father struck hearts and referred almost for the first time to a phenomenon that would make the world reflect: the "....globalization of indifference"."Who among us has wept for the death of these brothers and sisters, of all those who traveled on the boats, for the young mothers who carried their children, for these men who sought anything to support their families?". "We are a society that has forgotten the experience of weeping... The illusion of the insignificant, of the provisional, leads us to indifference towards others, leads us to the globalization of indifference.", said the Pope.

"Who is responsible for the blood of these brothers? No one. Today no one feels responsible, we have lost the sense of fraternal responsibility, we have fallen into hypocritical behavior.".

Children in human degradation

Three years later, on October 13, Pope Francis has made public the ".Message for the annual Migrant and Refugee Day 2017".in which he denounces that "migrant children end up at the bottom of human degradation". The specific title of your message is "Underage migrants, vulnerable and without voice". The text warns in particular of the serious risk for those who travel alone, and calls for their "right to play".

The Holy Father's speech took place on the very day that humanitarian associations and NGOs reported the disappearance of about ten thousand immigrant minors after arriving in Europe.

In Italy alone, 16,800 unaccompanied minors have arrived from Libya so far this year: they end up living on the streets, disappearing, as Francis cried out. Only the most fortunate, or the smallest, are taken in by families.

The Pope criticized that "instead of favoring the social integration of migrant children, or safe and assisted repatriation programs, the aim is only to prevent their entry, thus benefiting the use of illegal networks.".

The media reports that since the European Union signed the agreement with Turkey, the arrival of Syrians, and also of other migrants from other Middle Eastern countries, across the Aegean Sea has decreased.

But Libya has taken over. Migrants are arriving in waves from other African countries, fleeing hunger, thirst, poverty and war. And the natural departure is to Italy.

Controversial walls

The question now could focus on analyzing whether initiatives are beginning to emerge that support in some way, even if only partially, the Holy Father's appeals.

It is true that the European Union has begun to sign agreements with several African countries - Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Niger and Ethiopia - as we shall see shortly. However, the intense activity in the construction of fences and walls, or at least in their announcement, in order to avoid the "pull" effects, does not invite optimism.

On the other side of the Atlantic, Republican candidate Donald Trump, in the final stretch of the campaign, reiterated the promise that has upset the Hispanic world so much: "I'm not going to be the only one who can say, "I'm not going to be the only one who can say, "I'm not going to be the only one.I want to build the wall, we have to build the wall."(with Mexico). Although he no longer repeated what has outraged the Mexicans even more in recent months: that they would have to pay the bill for the more than three thousand kilometers.

On this side of the ocean, in parallel to the dismantling of the "the jungle"In September, France and the United Kingdom announced the construction of a four-meter high, one-kilometer wall in Calais to prevent the arrival of refugees and migrants in Britain, CNN reported.

"We have already built the fence. Now we will make a wall"British Immigration Minister Robert Goodwill announced. Despite current security measures - which include a fence - Goodwill said some people still risk traveling to the UK.

However, some protests and arguments against the Calais wall have already emerged. British truck drivers have criticized the construction of the wall as "poor use of taxpayers' money"In the words of Richard Burnett, leader of the Road Freight Association.

And in statements reported by the British newspaper The GuardianFrançois Guennoc, from the NGO Auberge des Migrants, which works in Calais, assures that "this wall will only make migrants have to go further to cross it". "When you put up walls anywhere in the world, people find ways to jump over them. It's a waste of money. It can make things more dangerous. It will increase the rates for human traffickers and people will end up taking more risks."Guennoc noted.

However, also in countries that have seen the Berlin Wall grow and fall, because they belonged to the former Soviet orbit, fences and walls have begun to be erected in order to stop migrants on their way to Germany.

Some of the states that have taken such initiatives are Bulgaria, on the Turkish border; Hungary, on its borders with Serbia and Croatia; Slovenia, with Croatia; Macedonia, with Greece; and Estonia, which has voted to build a wall on the border with Russia, in addition to Greece and the aforementioned United Kingdom and France.

As is well known, Spain has had high fences with Morocco in the autonomous cities of Ceuta and Melilla for years, of 8 and 12 kilometers respectively, in order to dissuade illegal entry of migrants through the Alawite country. And not to be forgotten is Israel's wall in the West Bank, more than 700 kilometers of barrier with the Palestinians.

In short, with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the globalized economy, many analysts thought that the walls would come down, but migratory flows and conflicts have set them in motion once again.

Alongside the lifting of these walls, mention must also be made of a recent initiative with positive overtones, although the nuances are not fully known: The European Union has begun to sign agreements with African countries. The motive is not to facilitate the reception of migrants, nor their integration in Europe, but it is reaching compromises. These are Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Niger and Ethiopia.

The Union's objective is migration control. EU agencies are accused of conditioning the development aid of the States. But Brussels denies this. Time will give or take away reasons, while Pope Francis calls on Europe to "recover the capacity to integrate that it has always had".

"All walls fall, today or tomorrow."

Returning from Philadelphia last year, a German journalist asked the Pope about the migration crisis, and about the decision of several countries to armor their borders with barbed wire. The Holy Father Francis was blunt. The word crisis hides behind it a long process, provoked in large part by "the exploitation of a continent against Africa"and wars. Regarding fences and wire fences, he said: "All walls fall, today, tomorrow, or a hundred years from now, but they all fall. It is not a solution. The wall is not a solution. The problem remains. And it remains with more hatred".

Later on, he reiterated the same idea in a Wednesday catechesis, already in Rome: "In some parts of the world there are walls and barriers. Sometimes it seems that the silent work of many men and women who, in many ways, offer to help and assist refugees and migrants, is overshadowed by the murmur of giving voice to an instinctive selfishness.".

The greatest solidarity: Italy

The Italian nation has recently become the host country par excellence. Not only does it rescue 160,000 migrants a year from drowning, but it seems to want to take in those that France and Germany will not admit.

Mario Marazitti, chairman of the Social Affairs Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, assures that Italy, unlike other European countries, has already taken a decision. In statements reported by El Paíssaid: "Europe is an old lady, almost without descendants, who has to decide whether she wants to continue to grow old alone, locked up in her beautiful house, surrounded by furniture, paintings and jewelry, or sharing the future with those who arrive. Migrations, instead of being a danger, are a great opportunity. A transfusion of future and solidarity for the old lady.".

Prefect Mario Morcone, head of the Immigration Department of the Ministry of the Interior, has stated: "There is no connection between immigration and criminality, just as there is no connection between immigration and terrorism. None. And this is not my opinion. The data says so. There is no connection whatsoever.

"Our country" -explains Morcone- "was until recently a place of passage for migrants, but now, having been rejected by France or Germany, they have no choice but to stay here. At present, we have almost 160,000 people in a reception situation, distributed throughout the territory, supported by families, associations and municipalities. Today, however, the focus is not so much on reception, but rather on inclusion and integration.".

To this end, the Italian State has begun to seek support from civil society. One example is the humanitarian corridors set up by the Community of Sant'Egidio and the Evangelical Church.

Figures and data on to migratory flows

-Three hundred thousand migrants this year alone. So far in 2016, more than three hundred thousand migrants have reached Europe through the Mediterranean; almost 170,000 through Greece, and 130,000 through Italy, and more than 3,500 people have drowned or disappeared. Greece has asked for help these days to take care of 60,000 refugees, trapped in their country after the closing of the borders by the agreement between the European Union and Turkey. "We need blankets now", says the Hellenic Executive.

-New wall announcements. In order to deter the arrival of migrants, some countries have announced or implemented border fences and walls, in addition to those existing in countries such as Israel or Spain. They are France and the United Kingdom in Calais, Bulgaria, on the Turkish border; Hungary, on its borders with Serbia and Croatia; Slovenia, with Croatia; Macedonia, with Greece; and Estonia on the border with Russia. In the United States, Trump has announced a wall on the border with Mexico if he wins the elections.

-Italy, an effort of solidarity. The Italian nation has become the world's largest migrant-receiving country. Not only does it rescue 160,000 migrants a year from drowning, but it seems to want to take in those that France and Germany reject. It now has more than 160,000 people housed throughout the country, and supported by families, associations and municipalities.

Culture

Hannah Arendt and the nostalgia for God

The appeal of Hannah Arendt's figure and thought grows greater with each passing day. She does not speak of God, but her readers can perhaps recognize the nostalgia for God in her courageous defense of human beings and their reason.

Carmen Camey and Jaime Nubiola-December 27, 2016-Reading time: 5 minutes

Hannah Arendt is a difficult woman to pigeonhole. Although of Jewish origin, she was not religious nor did she believe in God in the traditional way. She called herself an agnostic on several occasions, yet Hannah Arendt was a woman of faith. She spent most of her life trying to get her contemporaries to recover it: faith in reason, faith in humanity, faith in the world. There are two persistent elements throughout her life and work: trust and thought. They feed each other: Arendt trusted in thought, and the more she thought, the more her trust in it increased.

The person

Hannah Arendt was born in October 1906 in a village near Hannover. She studied in Marburg, where she met Martin Heidegger, moved to Freiburg to study with Husserl, and finally received her doctorate in Heidelberg in 1929 with a thesis on The concept of love in St. Augustine, directed by Karl Jaspers. She developed an extensive political activity in these years and, in view of the persecution of the Jews, she decided to emigrate to the United States, where she settled in 1941 with her second husband Heinrich Blücher. In the United States she worked as a journalist and as a professor of political science in several universities. She reflected a lot on her life experience in Germany and the United States. In 1951 she became a U.S. citizen after years of statelessness due to the withdrawal of her citizenship in Germany.

In 1961, she was sent as a reporter by The New Yorker to Jerusalem to give an account of the trial of Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi high commander arrested in Argentina and taken to Israel. The result of that experience was his book Eichmann in Jerusalem that was and still is so controversial. Arendt proposes a thesis to try to understand how apparently normal men and women could lend themselves to the atrocities committed during Nazi Germany. She argued that the evil of a man like Adolf Eichmann, an example of any man, was not a calculated, sadistic or ideological evil, but, on the contrary, it was a banal, superficial evil, the result not of an excess of thought, but precisely of its absence.

In Arendt's view, it was the personal inability to give a thoughtful response to a conflicting moral situation that led these people to become murderers and collaborators with evil. This attempt to shed light on what happened between 1940-1945 earned her harsh criticism for "defending a Nazi and betraying her own people." What many did not understand was that, during Eichmann's trial, the German philosopher did not attempt to defend a demon, but to defend humanity.

The reasons for the evil

The intellectual and general situation in which Hannah Arendt develops her thesis of the banality of evil was one of distrust of the world and of man himself. Men distrusted reason because they believed that it had led to such immense disasters: it was reason that had built the gas chambers and nuclear weapons. What Arendt achieves is precisely to refute this idea by affirming that evil has no depth, that evil - as a rule - does not come from calculation, but precisely from a lack of reflection, from superficiality.

Arendt recovers confidence in man as a being who can do evil without being pure evil; in her understanding of man there is room for redemption, for the hope that when man behaves as such, he does not become a demon. We are capable of evil, but it is not the thought that leads us to evil, it is not our most human qualities, but rather the failure to use them fully, that can lead us to commit horrible crimes.

Thinking leads us to ask ourselves the ultimate questions. These same principles are the ones we invoke when we have doubts in our actions, when we are at a moral crossroads and need guidance. The problem arises when these principles do not exist, when the renunciation to think has turned them into empty clichés that fall down at the slightest hint of pressure and do not allow us to be able to give a reasoned and personal response to problems.

Faith in man, faith in God

This desire for sacredness, for a greater faith in man and his capacities, is transparent in all of Hannah Arendt's works, in which all great human ideals are revered. Alfred Kazin explains that reading Arendt evokes for him a world to which we owe all our concepts of human greatness. Without God we do not know who we are, we do not know who man is. This is what Arendt's philosophy seems to hint at: her trust and gratitude for the gift of being. Her faith in justice, in truth, in all that makes man great and good made her a misunderstood person who turned away from the conventions of a world that reduced the greatness and mystery of man. Arendt is far from the nihilism and frustration to which many came after witnessing the events of the last century, because she does not lose hope and her search for truth evokes some cracks through which she opens herself to a transcendent reality, to an unfathomable mystery, to God.

Arendt shows a vision open to a transcendent reality because she does not have a blind faith in the human being; she is perfectly aware of what man is capable of doing, she does not close her eyes to human evil. However, this is not a reason for despair because his faith is not only in man himself, but in what makes man great. He is aware that when man believes only in himself he is frustrated, he is not capable of being man in fullness. This is embodied, for example, in the conversation Hannah Arendt had one evening with Golda Meir. She said to her: "Me being a socialist, naturally I don't believe in God. I believe in the Jewish people.". And Arendt will explain: "I was left without an answer... But I could have told him: the greatness of this people shone at a time when they believed in God and believed in Him in such a way that their love and trust towards Him were greater than their fear. And now this people only believe in themselves? What good can be derived from that?". Precisely, Arendt's vision is hopeful because she does not trust only in her own abilities, but in something that is beyond the human being, she leaves room for mystery, for unpredictability, for the unpredictability of the human being. (unpredictability) of which he is so fond of speaking. The real evil, for man, is to renounce being a man, is to become superfluous. as a human being and this happens when man trusts only in himself.

What Arendt does in her writings is to prepare the ground for God to fit in. In a world where man is evil and his reason is also evil, God cannot exist. God exists when the human being understands himself for what he is, when he knows himself to be the possessor of great capacities and at the same time capable of the greatest horrors, when he places confidence in himself and at the same time leaves room for the mystery that surpasses him. Thus, in Arendt's philosophy we can perceive that openness and that trust that are far from nothingness and very close to God.

The authorCarmen Camey and Jaime Nubiola

Culture

Aleš Primc. These are the children

Aleš Primc has promoted three pro-family referendums in Slovenia, and has won all of them. We take a closer look at these initiatives and their main promoter, talking to him in Ljubljana, the Slovenian capital.

Alfonso Riobó-December 21, 2016-Reading time: 4 minutes

The first occasion was in 2001, following the passage of a law on artificial insemination that allowed single mothers to be inseminated as well. With other friends and without partisan support, they succeeded in having it rejected by 72.4 % of the voters in June 2001.

Then came a second referendum. This time they formed their own organization, the Iniciativa Civil por la Familia y los Derechos de los Niños (Civil Initiative for the Family and Children's Rights)to make the effort more effective. From the time the platform was formed until the consultation was held in May 2012, "it was a real marathon"explains Aleš Primc himself. The aim was to stop a "family law" that allowed same-sex couples to adopt their partner's child (not joint adoption) and that therefore "ignored the right of the child to have a father and a mother, the significance of fatherhood and motherhood for his or her development and education.". After gathering more than 60,000 signatures of support, the referendum resulted in the vote of more than 52 % of the participants.

Primc underlines this key to the campaign: "We use our own language, we do not play the game of the terminology of homosexual activists. What they want is not to promote homosexual marriage, but to abolish marriage, the same marriage I contracted with my wife. There is a battle for language here. I am sorry to see that in some countries their terminology has already been taken over, and even with such prominent philosophers in those countries, the true meaning of the words cannot be revealed". For example, "we do not accept the word 'gender', which is an ideology. On this there is no discussion.". Otherwise, the reason for the victory is that "People understand that children need a father and a mother, and they don't agree that there are homosexual couples. Activists play with our children; and we approach things from that perspective: it's about understanding the child's relationship with his or her parents. We present and remember the basic natural relationships, and not ideological issues, which people don't understand.".

The third referendum, in December 2015, was directed against a law creating a homosexual "marriage" on an equal footing with the natural one, including adoption. To oppose was born the platform "It's all about the children."and the approach was well studied: "We may disagree with others on marriage; but we can agree on children. It's a realistic approach.". Result: 63.36 % of voters rejected the law: "It's a triumph for all our children."Primc said at the time. Slovenia was thus the first country to reverse such a law in a referendum.

Now the year is about to expire during which, according to the law, no new legislation on the same subject can be passed. But Primc explains to us that there will be no more referendums: they have created the "Movement for Children and Family".with which they will run in the elections for "mobilize all those who want to favor the family and religious freedom.". Emphasizes that "we will not go with a party mentality. We want to make a civil politics, gathering like-minded people around 38 points that summarize our program."and insists that "We are not driven by electoral calculations. We want to be clear, understandable, honest. We want to seek what is right, also with the help of prayer.".

We asked him about himself, who is Aleš Primc? He was born in Ljubljana, but his parents are from the south of the country; both are Catholics, but due to pressure during communism, "My parents' generation was no longer as religious as my grandparents', and my generation no longer even carries that Catholic tradition in its blood. I try to nourish my faith in various ways"..

He studied Philosophy of the State, social and political philosophy, and then Social Sciences; he immediately started working at the Ministry of Agriculture, until now. In fact, as we speak, he has just returned from a day spent in the vineyards, carrying out control tasks, and he is dressed in the informal way that this job requires. In 1992 he entered politics to channel his concern for social justice and promote family policies, and held various positions of responsibility in the Popular Party.

He is married and has three children (a 12-year-old boy and two girls, ages 8 and 6). His wife, a civil servant, is a great support and source of advice: "In an activity like this it is important to have the family behind me: to be able to organize trips and meetings, to take phone calls. My children understand it less, and they ask me: Dad, why do you have to go, what's more important than me?". He reads a lot, and publishes books. He specializes in the history of social movements, and specifically cooperatives. Other than that, "I don't have time for sports; my job is glued to the field. All the time I have left is for my family.".

Pro-family initiatives have not been a religious proposition, "although all three times the Church has openly supported us, and in 2015 the bishops have declared that gender ideology is atheistic, contrary to God's plan for man: it is their role in society, and people understand that they speak clearly".

Finally, he takes a look backWhen I think about these 15 years, I only regret that, as we are a small country, the world has not heard about what has happened here"..