Evangelization

The reliability of the New Testament in comparison with other ancient texts

The documentary evidence for the existence of Jesus is significantly stronger than that of many historical figures accepted without question. Comparison with classical texts shows that the New Testament has an exceptionally broad manuscript base that is exceptionally close to the events it narrates.

Javier García Herrería-February 23, 2025-Reading time: 2 minutes
Bible

Historical documents are very much in favor of the historicity of the existence of Jesus. Comparison with other classical texts shows that the New Testament has a significantly stronger documentary basis than many of the philosophical and historical works accepted without question.

According to the data collected, works by figures such as Plato, Aristotle and Julius Caesar have a small number of manuscript copies and a considerable time gap between their original writing and the oldest available copies. For example, Plato's writings, dated between 427 and 347 B.C., have their oldest copy in 900 A.D., with a gap of 1,200 years and only seven known copies. Aristotle, whose work was written between 384 and 322 B.C., has a gap of 1,400 years with respect to its oldest copy and only 49 copies.

In contrast, the New Testamentcomposed between 50 and 100 A.D., has manuscripts dating back to 130 A.D., with a margin of separation of only 30 to 60 years, an insignificant time in historical terms. In addition, it has 5,600 copies, a figure that far exceeds those of any other text of antiquity.

These data put into perspective the documentary reliability of the New Testament and question the double standard by which the historicity of Jesus is evaluated in comparison with other ancient figures. While figures such as Plato, Aristotle or Caesar are accepted without further debate, skepticism towards the Gospel accounts seems to respond more to ideological prejudices than to solid historiographical criteria.

AuthorDate of life / writingOlder copySeparation (years)Number of copies
Plato427-347 BC.900 A.D.~1,2007
Aristotle384-322 BC.1100 A.D.~1,40049
Herodotus480-425 BC.900 A.D.~1,3008
Demosthenes300 B.C.1100 A.D.~800200
Thucydides460-400 B.C.900 A.D.~1,3008
Euripides480-406 BC.1100 A.D.~1,3009
Julius Caesar100-44 BC.900 A.D.~1,00010
Homer900 B.C.400 A.D.~500643
New Testament50-100 A.D.130 A.D.~30-605600
  • The last column of the box refers to the number of ancient manuscript copies of each work that have survived to the present day. These copies include papyri, codices and scrolls transcribed by hand before the invention of the printing press.

A bias in historical disclosure?

The debate about the existence of Jesus is not only theological, but also historiographical. Despite the documentary evidence supporting the New Testament accounts, some schools of thought insist on denying their validity. However, the historical record shows that the figure of Jesus is better documented than many other figures whose existence is not in question.

This analysis invites further reflection on the way in which history is disseminated and the criteria applied to different figures of the past. Is it reasonable to doubt Jesus while accepting without qualms figures with less documentary support? The answer, no doubt, will continue to generate debate.

Read more
La Brújula Newsletter Leave us your email and receive every week the latest news curated with a catholic point of view.